Cost Effectiveness of a Pharmacy-Based Coaching Programme to Improve Adherence to Antidepressants
- 278 Downloads
The efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of depression has been convincingly demonstrated in randomised trials. However, non-adherence to antidepressant treatment is common.
To evaluate, from a societal perspective, the cost effectiveness of a pharmacy-based intervention to improve adherence to antidepressant therapy in adult patients receiving treatment in primary care.
An economic evaluation was performed alongside a 6-month randomised controlled trial in The Netherlands.
Patients who came to 19 pharmacies with a new prescription for a non-tricyclic antidepressant, i.e. those who had not received any prescription for an antidepressant in the past 6 months, were invited to participate. They were then randomly allocated to education and coaching by the pharmacist or to usual care. The coaching programme consisted of three contacts with the pharmacist, with a mean duration of between 13 and 20 minutes, and a take-home video reviewing important facts on depression and antidepressant treatment.
The clinical outcome measures were adherence to antidepressant treatment measured using an electronic pill container (eDEM) and improvement in depressive symptoms measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL). Resource use was measured by means of questionnaires. The uncertainty around differences in costs and cost effectiveness between the treatment groups was evaluated using bootstrapping.
Seventy patients were randomised to the intervention group and 81 to the usual care group; of these, 40 in the intervention group and 48 in the control group completed all of the follow-up questionnaires.
There were no significant differences in adherence, improvements in the SCL depression mean item score and costs over 6 months between the two treatment groups. Mean total costs (2002 values) were €3275 in the intervention group and €2961 in the control group (mean difference €315; 95% CI —1922, 2416). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with the pharmacist intervention was €149 per 1% improvement in adherence and €2550 per point improvement in the SCL depression mean item score. Cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves indicated that the pharmacist intervention was not likely to be cost effective compared with usual care.
In patients starting treatment with antidepressants, there were no significant differences in adherence, severity of depression, costs and cost effectiveness between patients receiving coaching by a pharmacist and patients receiving usual care after 6 months. Considering the resources needed to implement an intervention like this in clinical practice, based on these results, the continuation of usual care is recommended.
KeywordsUsual Care Antidepressant Treatment Community Pharmacist Usual Care Group Human Capital Approach
The Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (DHCIB) financed this trial (grant number OG 01–146). The funding source had no involvement in the production of this manuscript; the views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and are not attributable to the DHCIB. The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this study.
The study was designed by Hein van Hout, Oscar Brook and Hugo Nieuwenhuyse. The data were collected by Oscar Brook and Hein van Hout. Judith Bosmans and Martine de Bruijne analysed the cost-effectiveness data. The data were interpreted by Judith Bosmans, Oscar Brook, Hein van Hout and Martine de Bruijne. All authors contributed to the drafting and preparation of the paper.
- 18.van Marwijk HWJ, Grundmeijer HGLM, Brueren MM, et al. Guidelines on depression of the Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG-Standaard Depressie). Huisarts Wet 1994; 37: 482–490Google Scholar
- 23.Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Van Rutten FFH. Handbook for cost studies, methods and guidelines for economic evaluation in health care [in Dutch]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Health Care Insurance Council, 2000Google Scholar
- 25.Z-index. G-Standaard. The Hague, The Netherlands: Z-Index, 2002Google Scholar
- 26.Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek). Statline [online]. Available from URL: http://statline.cbs.nl/ [Accessed 2006 Oct 1]Google Scholar
- 28.Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hal, 1993Google Scholar
- 34.Von Korff M, Katon W, Bush T, et al. Treatment costs, cost offset, and cost-effectiveness of collaborative management of depression. Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 143–149Google Scholar