Cost-effectiveness model of long-acting risperidone in schizophrenia in the US
- 124 Downloads
Background: Schizophrenia is a devastating and costly illness that affects 1% of the population in the US. Effective pharmacological therapies are available but suboptimal patient adherence to either acute or long-term therapeutic regimens reduces their effectiveness. The availability of a long-acting injection (LAI) formulation of risperidone may increase adherence and improve clinical and economic outcomes for people with schizophrenia.
Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of risperidone LAI compared with oral risperidone, oral olanzapine and haloperidol decanoate LAI over a 1-year time period in outpatients with schizophrenia who had previously suffered a relapse requiring hospitalisation.
Perspective: US healthcare system.
Methods: Published medical literature, unpublished data from clinical trials and a consumer health database, and a clinical expert panel were used to populate a decision-analysis model comparing the four treatment alternatives. The model captured: rates of patient compliance; rates, frequency and duration of relapse; incidence of adverse events (bodyweight gain and extrapyramidal effects); and healthcare resource utilisation and associated costs. Primary outcomes were: the proportion of patients with relapse; the frequency of relapse per patient; the number of relapse days per patient; and total direct medical cost per patient per year. Costs are in year 2002 US dollars.
Results: Based on model projections, the proportions of patients experiencing a relapse requiring hospitalisation after 1 year of treatment were 66% for haloperidol decanoate LAI, 41% for oral risperidone and oral olanzapine and 26% for risperidone LAI, while the proportion of patients with a relapse not requiring hospitalisation were 60%, 37%, 37% and 24%, respectively. The mean number of days of relapse requiring hospitalisation per patient per year was 28 for haloperidol decanoate LAI, 18 for oral risperidone and oral olanzapine and 11 for risperidone LAI, while the mean number of days of relapse not requiring hospitalisation was 8, 5, 5 and 3, respectively. This would translate into direct medical cost savings with risperidone LAI compared with oral risperidone, oral olanzapine and haloperidol decanoate LAI of $US397, $US1742, and $US8328, respectively. These findings were supported by sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: The use of risperidone LAI for treatment of outpatients with schizophrenia is predicted in this model to result in better clinical outcomes and lower total healthcare costs over 1 year than its comparators, oral risperidone, oral olanzapine and haloperidol decanoate LAI. Risperidone LAI may therefore be a cost saving therapeutic option for outpatients with schizophrenia in the US healthcare setting.
KeywordsSchizophrenia Risperidone Olanzapine Haloperidol Decanoate Oral Risperidone
The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship funding provided by Janssen Medical Affairs, L.L.C.
Julie C. Locklear contributed to the construction and review of this manuscript.
Marcia Rupnow is an employee of Janssen Medical Affairs, L.L.C. At the time of writing this study, Natalie Edwards, Chris Pashos and Marc Botteman were employees of Abt Associates Inc., a company that provides research and consulting services under contract to pharmaceutical companies. As Project Director, Natalie Edwards conceived and led the project. Chris Pashos, as Executive Director and Vice President at Abt Associates, reviewed all material and served as an expert resource. Marc Botteman served as a Project Advisor and contributed to the initial study design and reviewed all material. Marcia Rupnow was the primary project contact at Janssen Medical Affairs, L.L.C. and provided input to the model and manuscript. Dr Ronald Diamond served as the clinical expert and focused mainly on reviewing the model and its input parameters for clinical accuracy and validity. Dr Diamond also provided valuable input in the writing of the study and ensuring its relevance from a clinical perspective.
- 2.Wyatt RJ, Henter J, Leary MC, et al. An economic evaluation of schizophrenia... 1991. Soc Psychiatry Pyschiatr Epidemiol 1995; 30 Suppl. 5: 196–205Google Scholar
- 5.Duncan JC, Rogers R. Medication compliance in patients with chronic schizophrenia: implications for the community management of mentally disordered offenders. J Forensic Sci 1998 Nov; 46 (3): 1133–7Google Scholar
- 6.Scottish Schizophrenia Research Group. The Scottish First Episode Schizophrenia Study, II: treatment: pimozide versus flupenthixol. Br J Psychiatry 1987 Mar; 150: 334–8Google Scholar
- 7.Young JL, Zonana HV, Shepler L. Medication noncompliance in schizophrenia: codification and update. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law 1986; 14 5(2): 105–22Google Scholar
- 9.Kissling W. Compliance, quality assurance and standards for relapse prevention in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997; 89 Suppl. 382: 16–24Google Scholar
- 11.Davis JM, Kane JM, Marder SR, et al.J Dose response of prophylactic antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 1993 Mar; Suppl. 54: 24–30Google Scholar
- 14.Weiden PJ, Dixon L, Frances A, et al. Neuroleptic noncompliance in schizophrenia. In: Tamming CA, Schulz SC, editors. Advances in neuropsychiatry and psychopharmacology:schiz ophrenia research. Vol. 1. New York: Raven Press, 1991: 285–96Google Scholar
- 16.Yousef HA. A five-year follow-up study of chronic schizophrenics and other psychotics treated in the community: depot haloperidol decanoate versus other neuroleptics. Adv Ther 1989; 67: 186–95Google Scholar
- 19.Hogarty GE, Anderson CM, Reiss DJ, et al. Family psychoeducation, social skills training, and maintenance chemotherapy in the aftercare treatment of schizophrenia: II. Two-year effects of a controlled study on relapse and adjustment. Environmental-Personal Indicators in the Course of Schizophrenia (EPICS) Research Group. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991 Apr; 48 (4): 340–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.American Psychiatric Association. Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1997 Apr; 154 Suppl. 4: 1–63Google Scholar
- 26.Consumer Health Sciences (CHS) database [online]. Available from URL: http://www.chsinternational.com/diseases/ 05 Schiz_prod_Description 012401.asp [Accessed 2003 Jul 1]Google Scholar
- 29.Weiden P, Rapkin B, Zygmunt A, et al. Postdischarge medication compliance of inpatients converted from an oral to a depot neuroleptic regimen. Psychiatr Serv 1995 Oct; 46 (10): 104954Google Scholar
- 41.Beasley CM. Safety of olanzapine. J Clin Psychiatry Monograph 1997; 15 (2): 16–21Google Scholar
- 42.Vrijens B, Gross R, Goetghebeur E, et al. Dose timing information improves clinical explanatory power of data on patient compliance with antiretroviral drug regimens [abstract]. Society for Risk Analysis Annual Meeting; 2002 Dec 8–11; New OrleansGoogle Scholar
- 44.Weiden PJ, Mott T, Curico N. Recognition and management of neuroleptic non-compliance. In: Shiriqui C, Nasrallah H, editors. Contemporary issues in the treatment of schizophrenia. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1995Google Scholar
- 45.NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Centre for Health Economics, University of York. A rapid and systematic review of atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia [online]. Available from URL: http://www.NICE.org [Accessed 2001 Sep 21]
- 49.Duggan L, Fenton M, Dardennes RM, et al. Olanzapine for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (2): AB001359Google Scholar
- 50.US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Medical Care Services Consumer Price Indices from 1993 to 2002 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.bls.gov/ppi/ppinaics.htm [Accessed 2003 Jul 1]
- 52.Data on file, Janssen Medical Affairs, L.L.C., 2002Google Scholar
- 53.Palmer CS, Revicki DA, Genduso LA, et al. A cost-effectiveness clinical decision analysis model for schizophrenia. Am J Managed Care 1998 Mar; 4 (3): 345–55Google Scholar
- 54.Spielman AB, Kanders B, Kienholz M, et al. The cost of losing: an analysis of commercial weight-loss programs in a metropolitan area. J Am College Nutr 1992 Feb; 11 (1): 36–41Google Scholar
- 55.Data on file, Janssen Medical Affairs, L.L.C., 2002 (Medi-Cal study)Google Scholar
- 56.Data on file, Janssen Medical Affairs, L.L.C., 2002 (Lash Group Study, CPT code 90782)Google Scholar
- 57.First DataBank price probe [online]. Available from URL: http://www.firstdatabank.com/reference-products/price-probe/ [Accessed 2003 Nov 1]
- 58.IMS Health National Disease and Therapeutic Index database [online]. Available from URL: http://www.imshealth.com [Accessed 2003 Sep 1]
- 59.Guest IF, Hart WM, Cookson RF, et al. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of long-term treatment with risperidone for patients with chronic schizophrenia. Br J Med Econ 1996; 10: 59–67Google Scholar