Consumer Preference for Dinoprostone Vaginal Gel Using Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modelling
- 38 Downloads
Objective: To assess consumer preference for two methods of induction of labour using stated preference discrete choice modelling. The methods of induction were artificial rupture of the membranes (ARM) plus oxytocin and dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) vaginal gel, followed by oxytocin if necessary.
Methods: Consumer preference was measured in terms of willingness to pay for each of the attributes. These attributes were the method of administration, place of care, length of time from induction to delivery, need for epidural anaesthetic, type of delivery and cost. Levels were assigned to each of the attributes. Pregnant women attending a public hospital antenatal clinic were asked to read a description of the two methods and then to choose between them in 18 different scenarios in which the levels of the attributes were varied.
Results: Women were willing to pay 11 Australian dollars ($A) for a 1% reduction in the chance of needing oxytocin as well as the gel and $A55 for every 1 hour reduction in the length of time from induction to delivery. For a 1% reduction in the chance of needing an epidural anaesthetic or Caesarean section, women expressed a willingness to pay of $A20 and $A90, respectively. All estimates were obtained in 1998 and expressed in Australian dollars ($A1 = $US0.63).
Conclusion: Women valued the less invasive method of administration of the gel and the associated greater freedom of movement during labour. However, they valued the shorter time from induction to delivery associated with ARM plus oxytocin more highly. A policy which allows women access to the gel for up to two doses would accommodate this consumer preference.
KeywordsCaesarean Section Oxytocin Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Consumer Preference
We are very grateful to Dr Andrew Child, the Director of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at King George V Hospital, Sydney for his support for this project. In addition, we would like to thank Mai Lee, the Nursing Unit Manager of the Outpatient Clinics, and her staff for their co-operation during the data collection period in the clinics. Finally we would like to thank the Pharmacy Board of NSW for their financial assistance.
This study was supported financially by the Pharmacy Board of NSW. However, there were and are no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this manuscript.
- 10.Upjohn. Prostin E2 vaginal gel: as close to “natural” as labour induction can be. Sydney, Australia: Upjohn, 1991Google Scholar
- 12.Hahn GJ, Shapiro SS. A catalogue and computer programme for the design and analysis of orthogonal symmetric and asymmetric fractional factorial experiments. Schenectady (NY): General Electric Research and Development Center, 1964Google Scholar
- 13.Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995Google Scholar
- 14.McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Berkley (CA): University of California, 1973Google Scholar
- 15.Greene WH. LIMDEP version 7, user’s manual. Plainview (NY): Econometric Software Inc, 1998Google Scholar
- 17.Domencich TA, McFadden D. Urban travel demand: a behavioral analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1975Google Scholar
- 18.Scott A. Giving things up to have more of others: the implications of limited suitability for eliciting preferences in health and health care [discussion paper 01/98]. Aberdeen: Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 1998Google Scholar
- 28.Cramer IS. The logit model: an introduction for economists. New York: Edward Arnold, 1991Google Scholar