Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Onychomycosis

Health-Related Quality of Life Considerations

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The symptoms of onychomycosis and their impact on personal appearance are important determinants of patients’ perceptions of their own health. The effect of onychomycosis is greater on psychosocial than physical functioning and is directly related to the extent of nail involvement.

This review identified a number of disease-targeted questionnaires that have been developed to assess the impact of onychomycosis and its treatment on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). The instruments differ considerably in the extent to which they have been psychometrically tested. Most have been shown to provide both valid and reliable measurement of HR-QOL in patients with onychomycosis of the toes. However, not all have been tested in patients with fingernail disease. The generic and disease-targeted scales of most of the available questionnaires exhibit poor variability, which may limit their responsiveness to clinically important change.

Only one instrument, the Onychomycosis Disease-Specific Questionnaire, has been incorporated into a clinical trial. Thus, information relating to the impact of onychomycosis treatment on HR-QOL is limited. Future efforts should focus on the systematic evaluation of existing questionnaires in all populations for which they were developed. In addition, it is important that disease-targeted measures be included in future clinical trials so that a better understanding of the impact of onychomycosis treatment on patient HR-QOL may be gained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Midgley G, Moore MK, Cook JC, et al. Mycology of nail disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31 (3 Pt 2): S68–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arikian SR, Einarson TR, Kobelt-Nguyen G, et al. A multinational pharmacoeconomic analysis of oral therapies for onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol 1994; 130 Suppl. 43: 35–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Einarson TR, Gupta AK, Shear NH, et al. Clinical and economic factors in the treatment of onychomycosis. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9 (4): 307–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marchetti A, Piech CT, McGhan WF, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oral therapies for onychomycosis: a US model. Clin Ther 1996; 18 (4): 757–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scher RK. Onychomycosis is more than a cosmetic problem. Br J Dermatol 1994; 130 Suppl. 43: 15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lubeck DP, Patrick DL, McNulty P, et al. Quality of life persons with onychomycosis. Qual Life Res 1993; 341–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lubeck DP. Measuring health-related quality of life in onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38 (5 Pt 3): S64–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drake LA, Patrick DL, Fleckman P, et al. The impact of onychomycosis on quality of life: development of an international onychomycosis-specific questionnaire to measure patient quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41 (2 Pt 1): 189–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drake LA, Scher RK, Smith EB, et al. Effect of onychomycosis on quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38 (5 Pt 1): 702–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drake L. Quality of life issues for patients with fungal nail infections. AIDS Patient Care 1995; 9 Suppl 1: S15–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong JJ, Stiller MJ, Menn E, et al. A pilot study to determine the biopsychosocial effects of onychomycosis on a northeastern American subpopulation [abstract]. J Invest Dermatol 1995; 104: 668

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whittam LR, Hay RJ. The impact of onychomycosis on quality of life. Clin Exp Dermatol 1997; 22 (2): 87–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elewski BE. The effect of toenail onychomycosis on patient quality of life. Int J Dermatol 1997; 36 (10): 754–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haneke E. Achilles Foot-Screening Project: background, objectives and design (discussion S17). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1999; 12 Suppl. 1: S2–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roseeuw D. Achilles Foot-Screening Project: preliminary results of patients screened by dermatologists (discussion S17). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1999; 12 Suppl. 1: S6–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Opp K. Patients’ feelings and attitudes about their nail conditions. AIDS Patient Care 1995; 9 Suppl. 1: S18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schein JR, Gause D, Stier DM, et al. Onychomycosis: baseline results of an observational study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1997; 87 (11): 512–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lubeck DP, Gause D, Schein JR, et al. A health-related quality of life measure for use in patients with onychomycosis: a validation study. Qual Life Res 1999; 8 (1–2): 121–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lubeck DP, Schein JR, Gause D, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with toenail onychomycosis: data from a 9-month observational study. JCOM 1999; 6 (8): 37–42

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turner RR, Testa MA. Measuring the impact of onychomycosis on patient quality of life. Qual Life Res 2000; 9 (1): 39–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pollak R, Billstein SA. Efficacy of terbinafine for toenail onychomycosis: a multicenter trial of various treatment durations. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91 (3): 127–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Millikan LE, Powell DW, Drake LA. Quality of life for patients with onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 1999; 38 Suppl. 2: 13–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathes EW, Kahn A. Physical attractiveness, happiness, neuroticism, and self-esteem. J Psychol 1975; 90 (1st half): 27–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scher RK. Onychomycosis: a significant medical disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35 (3 Pt 2): S2–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, et al. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 17 (1): 13–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al. Evaluating quality of life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 1996; 18 (5): 979–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Testa MA. Quality-of-life assessment in diabetes research: interpreting the magnitude and meaning of treatment effects. Diabetes Spectrum 2000; 13 (1): 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86 (2): 420–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  32. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York (NY): Oxford Medical Publications, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: theMedical Outcomes Study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fleming JS, Courtney BE. The dimensionality of self-esteem. II: hierarchical facet models for revised measurement scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984; 46: 404–21

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34 (3): 220–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dupuy HJ. The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, et al., editors. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Le Jacq Publishing, 1984: 170–83

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nieworth M, Korting HC. Management of onychomycosis. Drugs 1999; 58 (2): 283–96

    Google Scholar 

  39. Roberts DT. Onychomycosis: current treatment and future challenges. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141 Suppl. 56: 1–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl. 3: S217–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Deyo RA, Patrick DL. Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl. 3: S254–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Murawski MM, Miederhoff PA. On the generalizability of statistical expressions of health related quality of life instrument responsiveness: a data synthesis. Qual Life Res 1998; 7 (1): 11–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118 (8): 622–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Epstein RS. Responsiveness in quality-of-life assessment: nomenclature, determinants, and clinical applications. Med Care 2000; 38 Suppl. II: II91–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bombardier C, Ware J, Russell IJ, et al. Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a multicenter trial. Am J Med 1986; 81 (4): 565–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Temkin NR, Dikmen S, Machamer J, et al. General versus disease-specific measures: further work on the Sickness Impact Profile for head injury. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl. 3: S44–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kennedy P. A guide to econometrics. 4th ed. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  48. Burke LB. US regulation of pharmaceutical outcomes research. Value Health 2001; 4 (1): 5–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors did not receive any payment for the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, PO Box 210207, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0207, USA

    James W. Shaw & Vijay N. Joish

Authors
  1. James W. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vijay N. Joish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen Joel Coons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Shaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, J.W., Joish, V.N. & Coons, S.J. Onychomycosis. Pharmacoeconomics 20, 23–36 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220010-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220010-00003

Keywords

Search

Navigation