References
Holme I, Ekelund LG, Hjermann I, et al. Quality—adjusted meta—analysis of the hypertension/coronary dilemma. Am J Hypertens 1994; 7: 703–12
Kaplan NM. Measurement of the blood pressure. In: Kaplan NM, editor. Clinical hypertension. 6th ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1994: 23–45
Eisen SA, Miller DK, Woodward RS, et al. The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1881–4
Joint National Committee on Detection. Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection. Evaluation, and Treatmentof High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 154–83
Johannesson M. Economic evaluation of hypertension treatment Textbook of hypertension. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994: 1292–302
Hilleman DE, Mohiuddin SM, Lucas Jr BD, et al. Cost—minimization analysis of initial anti—hypertensive therapy in patientswith mild—to—moderate essential diastolic hypertension. Clin Ther 1994: 16: 88–102
Kaplan NM. Cost—effectiveness of anti—hypertensive drugs: fact or fancy? Am J Hypertens 1991; 4: 478–80
Selar DA, Tessier GC, Skaer TL, et al. Effect of pharmaceutical formulation of diltiazem on the utilization of medicaid andhealth maintenance organization services. Curr Ther Res 1994; 55: 1136–49
SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolatedsystolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertensionin the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, N.M. Cost Considerations in the Drug Treatment of Hypertension. Pharmacoeconomics 9, 283–285 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199609040-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199609040-00001