Operational Aspects of Quality-of-Life Assessment
- 6 Downloads
In assessing quality of life, the most important goal is to develop a strategy that produces useable and useful information for decision making. Assessment design is complex, and whether an assessment is developed from scratch, or 1 or more portions of existing instruments are adapted, the focus must be on the quality of the theoretical and operational elements of the particular line of inquiry and its environment.
The necessary and most often discussed focus on the theoretical dimensions of validity, reliability and responsiveness is not sufficient to insure that the data are of the requisite high quality. There is also a need, almost universally given little attention in the literature, to look at operational aspects, such as design, format, flow, appearance, and response-stimulus, of each assessment instrument. Searching for guidance in the quality-of-life (QOL) literature remains a challenge even with computers, modems, keywords, static guidebooks and bibliographic systems.
The On-Line Guide to Quality-of-Life Assessments (OLGA) is presented as a personal computer-based system that is updated 3 times a year to provide QOL researchers and assessment developers with 2 databases: assessments providing full descriptions and contact information; and references providing fully keyed citations to the assessment use literature. These databases are made more useful by decision-logical programs that identify relevant assessments and supporting research literature.
OLGA can thus save time and other resources by helping investigators concentrate on the most relevant elements of the existing literature. This focus will assist them in avoiding the problems of ending up with the right answers to the wrong questions.
KeywordsAdis International Limited Assessment Strategy Assessment Design Quality Oflife Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Garrett JW, Drossman DA, Patrick DL. InfIammatory bowel disease. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life assessments inclinical trials. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 367–79Google Scholar
- 3.Wennberg JE. On the status of the prostate disease assessment team. Health Serv Res 1990; 25 (5): 727–31Google Scholar
- 4.Pashos CL, Mcneil BJ. Consequences ofvariation in treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Health Serv Res 1990; 25 (5): 718–22Google Scholar
- 6.Erickson P. Bibliography on health indexes. HyattsvilIe, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1973–1993Google Scholar
- 8.WHO. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Basic Documents. Geneva: WHO, 1948Google Scholar
- 11.Bergner M. Quality of life, health status, and clinical research. Med Care 1989; 27 (3 Suppl.): S148–56Google Scholar
- 12.Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar
- 13.Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGrawHill, 1993Google Scholar
- 21.Payne SL. The art of asking questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1951Google Scholar
- 22.Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978Google Scholar
- 23.Warwick DP, Lininger CA. The sample survey: theory and practice. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1975: 126–71Google Scholar
- 26.Health Outcomes Institute. Type Specification. Bloomington, MN: Health Outcomes Institute, 1993Google Scholar
- 27.Mcoowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993Google Scholar
- 28.Frank-Stromborg M, editor. Instruments for clinical nursing research. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1988Google Scholar
- 29.Bech P. Health—related quality of life. Ann Med 1993; 25: 103-4Google Scholar
- 31.Ware JE. Methodological considerations in the selection of health status assessment procedures. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CO, et al., editors. Assessment of quality of lifein clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Lelacq Publishing, 1984: 87–117Google Scholar
- 32.Erickson P, Patrick OL. Guidelines for selecting quality of life assessment: methodological and practical considerations. Drug Ther Res 1988; 13 (5): 159–63Google Scholar
- 33.Barofsky I, Cohen SJ, Sugarbaker PH. Selecting a quality oflife assessment: standardized tests, clinical assessments, or custom–designed instruments. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, et al., editors. Assessment of quality of life inclinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Le lacqPublishing, 1984: 239–49Google Scholar