, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 5–14 | Cite as

The New Zealand Preferred Medicines Concept

A National Scheme for Audit and Quality Assurance of Prescribing
  • Timothy J. B. Maiing
Leading Article


Pharmaceutical Expenditure Regional Health Authority Core Service Medicine Information Individual Prescriber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Muthumala D, McKendry C. Health expenditure trends in New Zealand 1980–1991. Special report. Wellington: Department of Health, 1992Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradley PC. Decision making and prescribing patterns — a literature review, Fam Pract 1991; 8: 276–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maling T, Ward C. First repoct of the National Preferred Medicines Centre. NZ Med J 1993; 106: 364–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferguson R, Maling T. The Nelson General Practice Prescribing Project. Part II: prescribing reports fOr self audit. NZ Med J 1990: 103: 560–62Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Summary of Evalualions, National Preferred Medicines Centre. Wellington: Wellington School of Medicine, 1993Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferguson R, Maling T. The Nelson General Practice Prescribing Project: Project Report. Report to the Nelson General Practice Project Steering Committee, Nelson, New Zealand, 1990Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avorn J, Soumerai M. Improving drug—therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academic detailing. New Engl J Med 1983: 308: 1457–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwartz R, Soumerai S, Avorn J. Physician motivations for non—scientific drug prescribing. Social Sci Med 1989; 28: 577–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patterns of care and professional decision making in a New Zealand general practice sample. NZ Med J 1990; 103: 309–12Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serum drug concentrations in clinical perspective. In Richens A, Marks V, editors. Therapeutic drug monitoring. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1981, 1–23Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maling TJB. The prescribing process and options for modification. NZ Med J 1989; 102: 43–5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferguson R, Maling T. The Nelson General Practice Prescribing Project. Part I: a pilot audit of the regional prescribing profile. NZ Med J 1990: 103: 558–60Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soumerai S, Avorn J. Efficacy and cost containment in hospital pharmacotherapy: state of the art and future directions. Milbank Q 1984: 62: 447–73Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green J. The formulary system and thc emperor’s new clothes. Am J Hosp Pharm 1986: 43: 2830–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wright S. The change of general practitioners’ prescribing habits [thesis]. Auckland: Auckland University, 1990Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy J. B. Maiing
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineWellington School of MedicineNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations