Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of Items and Avoidance of Bias in Quality of Life Scales

  • Review Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 August 1992

Summary

The total score of a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire reflects the items that make up the questionnaire. Although different questionnaires have strikingly similar items, the balance between types of items can affect research outcomes. Four general quality of life (QOL) scales and one specific scale may be compared to show how the balance of items can bias the results to: (a) increase or decrease the chance of obtaining a significant result in a clinical trial; (b) make one treatment appear better or worse compared with that of a competitor; (c) make the QOL of one disease category appear better or worse than that of another disease category. Healthcare decision-making should be based on relatively unaggregated measures of health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastasi A. Psychological testing, 6th ed., Macmillan, New York, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A. Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna S. Measuring health status. Croom Helm, London, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care 19: 787–805, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freund DA, Dittus RS. Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy. PharmacoEconomics 1: 20–29, 1992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, UK, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland ME, Finnis S, Irvine SH. A scale for assessing quality of life in adult asthma sufferers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 35: 99–110, 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Cook D. Quality of life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs. PharmacoEconomics 1: 84–94, 1992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychology 1: 61–80, 1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The general health policy model: an integrative approach. In Spilker B (Ed.) Quality of life assessment in clinical trials, pp. 131–149, ((publisher to come)), 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilker B. Standardisation of quality of life trials: an industry perspective. PharmacoEconomics 1: 73–75, 1992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS short-short form general health survey. Medical Care 26: 724–735, 1988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03260127.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyland, M.E. Selection of Items and Avoidance of Bias in Quality of Life Scales. Pharmacoeconomics 1, 182–190 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199201030-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199201030-00005

Keywords

Navigation