Sports Medicine

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 171–178 | Cite as

The Effect of Ankle Bracing on Athletic Performance

Review Article


Ankle braces in sports are used for prevention of ankle sprains. Besides restricting inversion and eversion, it is possible that an ankle brace also reduces the functional range of motion of the ankle joint. Consequently, their use could also impair athletic performance. It is unlikely that prophylactic ankle bracing will gain wide acceptance if bracing hinders athletic performance. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on the effect of ankle bracing on vertical jump height, running speed, agility and broad jump performance.

In 2 studies, 2 ankle braces negatively affected vertical jump height. Other studies did not find a significant effect on vertical jump performance when wearing an ankle brace. One study found a negative effect on running speed and broad jump performance when wearing a lace-on brace. In other studies, no effects on running speed and broad jump were found. In 1 study, agility was negatively affected when wearing an ankle brace, although agility was not significantly affected in other studies. The effect of prolonged use of an ankle brace is unknown, but could possibly influence ankle musculature and ligament function. Further research is necessary to study the effect of prolonged ankle bracing on performance.


Plantar Flexion Ankle Sprain Athletic Performance Vertical Jump Athletic Train 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273 (5): 402–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Backx FJG, Beijer HJM, Bol E, et al. Injuries in high-risk sports; a longitudinal study of 1818 school children. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (2): 124–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fintelman LFJ, Hildebrandt VH. Meerjarig onderzoek naar blessures bij jeugdhockey: het eerste onderzoeksjaar: een tussenrapportage. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor Praeventieve Gezondheidszorg TNO, 1994Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Geffen Y, Backx FJG, van Mechelen W, et al. Zaalkorfbalblessures bij 30-plussers. Geneeskunde en Sport 1990; 23 (4): 137–45Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inklaar H, Bol E, Schmikli SL, et al. Injuries in male soccer players: team risk analysis. Int J Sports Med 1996; 17 (3): 229–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schafle MD, Requa RK, Patton WL, et al. Injuries in the 1987 national amateur volleyball tournament. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (6): 624–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1977; 5 (6): 241–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greene TA, Hillman SK. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (5): 498–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryan AJ, Cox JS, Inniss B, et al. Ankle sprains: a round table. Physician Sports Med 1986; 14 (2): 101–7, 113–5, 118Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith R, Reischl S. Treatment of ankle sprains in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14: 465–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ekstrand J, Gilquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15 (3): 267–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tropp H, Askling C, Gillquist J. Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13 (4): 259–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whiteside JA, Fleagle SB, Kalenak A, et al. Manpower loss in football: a 12 year study at the Pennsylvania State University. Physician Sports Med 1985; 13 (1): 102–9, 112–4Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes LY, Stetts DM. A comparison of ankle taping and a semirigid support. Physician Sports Med 1983; 11 (4): 99–103Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fumich RM, Ellison AE, Guerin GJ, et al. The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1981; 9: 165–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin N, Harter RA. Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise. J Athletic Train 1993; 28 (4): 324–9Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Myburgh KH, Vaughan CL, Isaacs SK. The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during and after a squash match. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12: 441–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bunch RP, Bednarski K, Holland D, et al. Ankle joint support: a comparison of reusable lace-on braces with taping and wrapping. Physican Sports Med 1985; 13 (5): 59–62Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karlsson J, Faxen E. Chronic ankle injuries. In: Renstrom PAFH, editor. Clinical practice of sports injury prevention and care. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994: 228–45Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rovere GD, Clarke TJ, Yates CS, et al. Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (3): 228–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gross MT, Lapp AK, Davis JM. Comparison of Swede-OUniversal ankle support and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses and ankle tape in restricting eversion-inversion before and after exercise. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1991; 13 (10): 11–9Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lyle TD, Corbin CB. Restriction of ankle inversion: taping versus an ankle brace. Phys Educat 1992; 49 (2): 88–94Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paris DL, Vardaxis V, Kokkaliaris J. Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced. J Athletic Train 1995; 30 (3): 223–8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gross MT, Bradshaw MK, Ventry LC, et al. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1987; 9 (1): 33–9Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alves JW, Alday RV, Ketcham DL, et al. A comparison of the passive support provided by various ankle braces. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1992; 15 (1): 10–8Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johnson RE, Veale JR, McCarthy JJ. Comparative study of ankle support devices. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1994; 84 (3): 107–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greene TA, Wight CR. A comparative support evaluation of three ankle orthoses before, during and after exercise. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1990; 11 (10): 453–66Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gross MT, Ballard CL, Mears HC, et al. Comparison of DonJoy Ankle Ligament Protector and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses in restricting foot and ankle motion before and after exercise. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1992; 16 (2): 60–7Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tweedy R, Carson T, Vicenzino B. Leuko and Nessa ankle braces: effectiveness before and after exercise. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1994; 26 (3–4): 62–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Feuerbach JW, Grabiner MD, Koh TJ, et al. Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (2): 223–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Firer P. Effectiveness of taping for the prevention of ankle ligament sprains. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24 (1): 47–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glick JM, Gordon RB, Nishimoto D. The prevention and treatment of ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 1976; 4 (4): 136–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heit EJ, Lephart SM, Rozzi SL. The effect of ankle bracing and taping on joint position sense in the stable ankle. J Sport Rehabil 1996; 5: 206–13Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jerosch J, Hoffstetter I, Bork H, et al. The influence of orthoses on the proprioception of the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995; 3 (1): 39–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karlsson J, Andreasson GO. The effect of external ankle support in chronic lateral ankle joint instability. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20 (3): 257–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Surve I, Schwellnus MP, Moakes T, et al. A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in soccer players using the Sport Stirrup orthosis. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (5): 601–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sitler M, Ryan J, Wheeler B, et al. The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball; a randomized clinical study at West Point. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (4): 454–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Robbins S, Waked E. Factors associated with ankle injuries: preventive measures. Sports Med 1998; 25 (1): 63–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wright IA, Stefanyshyn DJ, Nigg BM. Prevention of ankle sprains. Sports Med 1998; 26 (1): 59–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bocchinfuso C, Sitler MR, Kimura IF. Effects of tow semirigid prophylactic ankle stabilizers on speed, agility, and vertical jump. J Sport Rehabil 1994; 3: 125–34Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gross MT, Everts JR, Roberson SE, et al. Effect of DonJoy Ankle Ligament Protector and Aircast Sport Stirrup orthoses on functional performance. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1994; 19 (3): 150–6Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Macpherson K, Sitler M, Kimura I, et al. Effects of a semirigid softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on selected performance tests among high school footbal players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995; 21 (3): 147–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Paris DL. The effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid ankle braces and adhesive taping on speed, balance, agility, and vertical jump. J Athletic Train 1992; 27 (3): 253–6Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pienkowski D, Mcmorrow M, Shapiro R, et al. The effect of ankle stabilizers on athletic performance; a randomized prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (6): 757–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Verbrugge JD. The effects of semirigid Air-Stirrup bracing versus adhesive ankle taping on motor performance. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1996; 23 (5): 320–5Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mackean LC, Bell G, Burnham RS. Prohylactic ankle bracing vs taping: effects on functional performance in female basketball players. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1995; 22 (2): 77–81Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burks RT, Bean BG, Marcus R, et al. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (2): 104–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Beriau MR, Cox WB, Manning J. Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes. J Athletic Train 1994; 29 (3): 224–6, 228, 230Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gehlsen GM, Pearson D, Bahamonde R. Ankle joint strength, total work, and ROM: comparison between prophylactic devices. J Athletic Train 1991; 26: 62–5Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lindley TR, Kernozek TW. Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion. J Athletic Train 1995; 30 (2): 109–12Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Abdenour TE, Saville WA, White RC, et al. The effect of ankle taping upon torque and range of motion. J Athletic Train 1979; 14: 227–8Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stuessie E, Tiegermann V, Gerber H, et al. A biomechanical study of the stabilization effect of the Aircast Ankle Brace. In: Johnsson B, editor. Biomechanics X-A. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1987Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Greene TA, Roland GC. A comparative isokinetic evalution of a functional ankle orthosis on talocalcaneal function. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1989; 11 (6): 245–52Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Paris DL, Sullivan SJ. Isometric strength of rearfoot inversion and eversion in nonsupported, taped, and braced ankles assessed by a hand-held dynamometer. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1992; 15 (5): 229–35Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Science, Faculty of Human Movement SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine and Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of MedicineVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations