Sports Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 73–84 | Cite as

Strength Training

Single Versus Multiple Sets
Review Article

Abstract

Perhaps the most controversial element of any strength training programme is the number of sets required to increase muscular strength and hypertrophy. There is a prevalent belief that at least 3 sets of each exercise are required to elicit optimal increases in strength and hypertrophy. However, most of the studies that reported the results of training with single versus multiple sets do not substantiate this tenet. In fact, the preponderance of evidence suggests that for training durations of 4 to 25 weeks there is no significant difference in the increase in strength or hypertrophy as a result of training with single versus multiple sets. Because of the design limitations of these studies, conclusions concerning the efficacy of multiple sets should be tentative. However, there is little scientific evidence, and no theoretical physiological basis, to suggest that a greater volume of exercise elicits greater increases in strength or hypertrophy. This information may represent an important practical application of time-efficient, low-volume exercise.

Keywords

Adis International Limited Strength Training Muscular Strength Muscle Thickness Bench Press 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atha J. Strengthening muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1981; 9: 1–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behm DG. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9 (4): 264–74Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke DH. Adaptations in strength and muscular endurance resulting from exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1973; 1: 73–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Resistance training: basic principles (part 1 of 4). Physician Sportsmed 1988; 16 (3): 160–71Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraemer WJ, Fleck SJ. Resistance training: exercise prescription (part 4 of 4). Physician Sportsmed 1988; 16 (6): 69–81Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraemer WJ, Fleck SJ, Deschenes M. A review: factors in exercise prescription of resistance training. Natl Strength Conditioning Assoc J 1988; 10 (5): 36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lillegard WA, Terrio JD. Appropriate strength training. Med Clin North Am 1994; 78 (2): 457–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McDonagh MN, Davies CM. Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 1984; 52: 139–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger RA. Applied exercise physiology. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger, 1982: 1–46Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enoka RM. Chronic adaptations. In: Neuromechanical basis of kinesiology. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988: 303–49Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance training programs. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1987: 57–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Periodization breakthrough! Ronkonkoma (NY): Advanced Research Press, Inc., 1996: 36–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fox EL, Bowers RW, Foss ML. Development of muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility. In. The physiological basis for exercise and sport. 5th ed. Madison (WI): Brown & Benchmark Publishers, 1993: 158–92Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training. In: Physiology of sport and exercise. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1994; 66–89Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Muscular strength: training muscles to become stronger. In: Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition, and human performance. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1996: 417–55Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berger RA. Effect of varied weight training programs on strength. Res Q 1962; 33 (2): 168–81Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berger RA. Comparative effects of three weight training programs. Res Q 1963; 34 (3): 396–8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kramer JB, Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, et al. Effects of single vs multiple sets of weight training: impact of volume, intensity, and variation. J Strength Conditioning Res 1997; 11 (3): 143–7Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kraemer WJ, Newton RV, Bush J, et al. Varied multiple set resistance training programs produce greater gains than single set program [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 7 (5): S195Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coleman AE. Nautilus vs Universal Gym strength training in adult males. Am Corr Ther J 1977; 31 (4): 103–7Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Graves JE, Holmes BL, Leggett SH, et al. Single versus multiple set dynamic and isometric lumbar extension training. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy; 1991 Jul 28-Aug 2; 1340–2Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hurley BF, Redmond RA, Pratley RE, et al. Effects of strength training on muscle hypertrophy and muscle cell distribution in older men. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16 (6): 378–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ryan AS, Pratley RE, Elahi D, et al. Resistive training increases fat-free mass and maintains RMR despite weight loss in postmenopausal women. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79 (3): 818–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Treuth MS, Ryan AS, Pratley RE, et al. Effects of strength training on total and regional body composition in older men. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77 (2): 614–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ryan AS, Treuth MS, Rubin MA, et al. Effects of strength training on bone mineral density: hormonal and bone turnover relationships. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77 (4): 1678–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller JP, Pratley RE, Goldberg AP, et al. Strength training increases insulin action in healthy 50- to 65-yr-old men. J Appl Physiol 1194; 77 (3): 1122–7Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Koffler KH, Menkes A, Redmond RA, et al. Strength training accelerates gastrointestinal transit in middle-aged and older men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24 (2): 415–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rubin MA, Miller JP, Ryan AS, et al. Acute and chronic resistive exercise increase urinary chromium excretion in men as measured with an enriched chromium stable isotope. J Nutr 1998; 128: 73–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nicklas BJ, Ryan AJ, Treuth M, et al. Testosterone, growth hormone and IGF-1 responses to acute and chronic resistive exercise in men aged 55-70 years. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16 (7): 445–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pollock MH, Graves JE, Bamman MM, et al. Frequency and volume of resistance training: effect on cervical extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 1080–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Westcott WL. 4 key factors in building a strength program. Scholastic Coach 1986; 55: 104–5, 123Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Capen EK. Study of four programs of heavy resistance exercise for development of muscular strength. Res Q 1956; 27 (2): 132–42Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Starkey DB, Pollock ML, Ishida Y, et al. Effect of resistance training volume on strength and muscle thickness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28 (10): 1311–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Terbizan DJ, Bartels RL. The effect of set-repetition combinations on strength gain in females age 18-35 [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17 (2 Suppl.): 267Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Silvester LJ, Stiggins C, McGown C, et al. The effect of variable resistance and free-weight training programs on strength and vertical jump. Natl Strength Conditioning Assoc J 1982; 3 (6): 30–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reid CM, Yeater RA, Ullrich IH. Weight training and strength, cardiorespiratory functioning and body composition. Br J Sports Med 1987; 21 (1): 40–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stowers T, McMillan J, Scala D, et al. The short-term effects of three different strength power training methods. Natl Strength Conditioning Assoc J 1983; 5 (3): 24–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Messier SP, Dill ME. Alterations in strength and maximal oxygen uptake consequent to Nautilus circuit weight training. Res Q Exerc Sport 1985; 56 (4): 345–51Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jacobson BH. A comparison of two progressive weight training techniques on knee extensor strength. Athletic Training 1986; 21 (4): 315–8, 390Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    De Hoyos DV, Herring D, Garzarella L, et al. Effect of strength training volume on the development of strength and power in adolescent tennis players [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29 (5 Suppl.): S164Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Westcott WL, Greenberger K, Milius D. Strength training research: sets and repetitions. Scholastic Coach 1989; 58: 98–100Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Welsch MA, Brechue WF, Pollock ML, et al. Effect of reduced training volume on bilateral isometric knee/extension torque [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26 (5 Suppl.): S189Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Leighton JR, Holmes D, Benson J, et al. A study on the effectiveness of ten different methods of progressive resistance exercise on the development of strength, flexibility, girth, and bodyweight. J Assoc Phys Mental Rehabil 1967; 21 (3): 78–81Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stadler Jr LV, Stubbs NB, Vokovich MD. A comparison of a 2-day and 3-day per week resistance training program on strength gains in older adults [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 20 (5 Suppl.): S254Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    De Hoyos D, Abe T, Garzarella L, et al. Effects of 6 months of high- or low-volume resistance training on muscular strength and endurance [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (5 Suppl.): S165Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pollock ML, Abe T, De Hoyos DV, et al. Muscular hypertrophy responses to 6 months of high- or low-volume resistance training [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (5 Suppl.): S116Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vincent K, De Hoyos D, Garzarella L, et al. Relationship between indices of knee extension strength before and after training [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (5 Suppl.): S163Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ostrowski KJ, Wilson GJ, Weatherby R, et al. The effect of weight training volume on hormonal output and muscular size and function. J Strength Conditioning Res 1997; 11 (3): 148–54Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hass CJ, Garzarella L, De Hoyos DV, et al. Effects of training volume on strength and endurance in experienced resistance trained adults [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 (5 Suppl.): S115Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Withers RT. Effect of varied weight-training loads on the strength of university freshmen. Res Q 1970; 41 (1): 110–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ciriello VM, Holden WL, Evans WJ. The effects of two isokinetic training regimens on muscle strength and fiber composition. In. Knuttgen HG, Vogel JA, Poortmans J, editors. Biochemistry of exercise. Vol. 13. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1982: 787–93Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Liederman E. Quality of muscle the basis of strength. In: Secrets of strength. New York (NY): Earle Liederman, 1925: 116–30Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jones A. Flexibility as a result of exercise. In. Peterson JA, editor. Total fitness: the Nautilus way. West Point (NY): Leisure Press, 1978: 134–41Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Darden E. Strength training principles. In. Peterson JA, editor. Total fitness: the Nautilus way. West Point (NY): Leisure Press, 1978: 157–74Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Riley DP. How to organize a strength training program. In: Strength training by the experts. 2nd ed. West Point (NY): Leisure Press, 1977: 97–107Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fleck SJ, Kraemer WJ. Designing resistance training programs. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1997: 131–63Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EF, Ryan ND, et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med 1994; 330 (25): 1769–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Feigenbaum MS, Pollock ML. Strength training: rationale for current guidelines for adult fitness programs. Physician Sportsmed 1997; 25 (2): 44–64Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    McCartney N, McKelvie RS, Martin J, et al. Weight-training induced attenuation of the circulatory response to weightlifting in older men. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 1056–60PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited. All rights reserved 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Performance LaboratoryAdelphi UniversityGarden CityUSA

Personalised recommendations