Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 247–260 | Cite as

A Physiological Review of American Football

  • Danny M. Pincivero
  • Tudor O. Bompa
Review Article

Summary

American football has been one of the most popular sports in North America within the past century and has recently received support and increased participation from European nations. Two of the biggest concerns regarding participation in American football are the high incidence of injury and the physical demand for preparation. A basic understanding of the physiological systems utilised in the sport of football is necessary in order to develop optimal training programmes geared specifically for preparation as well as the requirements of individual field positions. Previously, it has been assumed that football relies primarily on an anaerobic source of energy for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) resynthesis with approximately 90% coming from the phosphocreatine (PCr) energy system. In lieu of research conducted specifically with football players, it appears that the energy contribution from the anaerobic glycolytic pathway in this sport has been underestimated. The elevated blood lactate levels observed in football players following game participation cast doubt on this hypothesis. Identifying position specific characteristics may also enhance the development of training programmes based on the requirements of the different positions. It appears that offensive and defensive linemen are generally larger, have higher levels of percent body fat and have greater absolute strength scores than all other positions. Offensive backs, defensive backs and wide receivers tend to display the lowest percentages of body fat, lower absolute strength scores, fastest times over 5, 10, 40 and 300m and the highest relative V̇O2max values. Linebackers appeared to represent a transition group mid way between the backs and linemen for size, body composition, strength, speed and endurance as well as positional duties. Findings within the literature suggest that a lack of cardiovascular development of university and professional football players may prove to be a hindrance to performance with specific regards to thermal regulation. Additional aerobic conditioning as well as the reduction of percent body fat would not only enhance performance, but might play a key role in preventing injuries and allowing a smoother transition into life after football.

Keywords

Football Player Bench Press National Football League American Football National Collegiate Athletic Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Soviet Lecture Series 3. Strength and conditioning considerations in American football. Natl Strength Conditioning Assn J 1988; 10(2): 70–1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gleim, GW. The profiling of professional football players. Clin Sports Med 1984; 3(1): 185–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith DP, Byrd RJ. Body composition, pulmonary function and maximal oxygen consumption of college football players. J Sports Med 1976; 16: 301–8Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vermeil AL, Chu D. Theoretical approach to planning a football season. Natl Strength Conditioning J Jan 1983; 33–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    White J, Mayhew JL, Piper FC. Prediction of body composition in college football players. J Sports Med 1980; 20: 317–24Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wickkiser JD, Kelly JM. The body composition of a college football team. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1975; 7(3): 199–202Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilmore JH, Haskeil WL. Body composition and endurance capacity of professional football players. J Appl Physiol 1972; 33(5): 564–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilmore JH, Parr RB, Haskell WL, et al. Football pros strengths and CV weakness — charted. Phys Sports Med 1976; Oct: 45–54Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powers SK, Howley ET. Exercise physiology: theory and application to exercise and performance. Dubuque: WC Brown Publishers, 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Houston ME. Biochemistry primer for exercise science. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition, and human performance. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1991Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fox EL, Matthews D. Interval training: conditioning for sports and general fitness. Orlando: Saunders College/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spriet LL. Anaerobic metabolism during high-intensity exercise. In: Hargreaves M, editor. Exercise metabolism. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1995: 1–40Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brooks GA, Fahey TD. Exercise physiology: human bioenergetics and its applications. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1985Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hultman E, Sjoholm H. Energy metabolism and contraction force of human skeletal muscle in situ during electrical stimulation. J Physiol (Lond) 1983; 345: 525–32Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hultman E, Sjoholm H. Substrate availability. In: Knuttgen HG, Vogel JA, Poortmans J, editors. Biochemistry of exercise. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1983: 63–75Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bompa T. Theory and methodology of training. 3rd ed. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., 1994: 6–7Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gleim GW, Witman PA, Nicholas JA. Indirect assessment of cardiovascular ‘demands’ using telemetry on professional football players. Am J Sports Med 1981; 9(3): 178–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Craig Jr AB. Exposure time to injury in professional football. Res Quart 1968; 39: 789–91Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zapiec C, Taylor AW. Muscle fiber composition and energy utilization in CFL football players. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1979; 4(2): 140–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith ME, Jackson CGR. Lactate response of college football players to practices and a game [abstract]. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1991; 5: 163Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takahashi H, Inaki M, Fujimoto K, et al. Control of the rate of phosphocreatine resynthesis after exercise in trained and untrained human quadriceps muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 71: 396–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hultman E, Bergstrom J, McLennan Anderson N. Breakdown and resynthesis of phosphorylcreatine and adenosine triphosphate in connection with muscular work in man. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1967; 19: 56–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burke EJ, Winslow E, Strube WV. Measures of body composition and performance in major college football players. J Sports Med 1980; 20: 173–80Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Crews TR, Meadors WJ. Analysis of reaction time, speed, and body composition of college football players. J Sports Med 1978; 18: 169–74Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Marty L, et al. Isokinetic leg flexion and extension strength of university football players. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1988; 9(11): 365–9Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seiler S, Taylor M, Diana R, et al. Assessing anaerobic power in collegiate football players. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1990; 4(1): 9–15Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olson JR, Hunter GR. A comparison of 1974 and 1984 player sized and maximal strength and speed efforts for division I NCAA universities. Nat Strength Cond Assoc J 1985; Jan: 26–8Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fahey TD, Akka L, Ralph R. Body composition and V̇O2max of exceptional weight trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 1975; 39: 559–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mayhew JL, Levy B, McCormick T, et al. Strength norms for NCAA division II college football players. Nat Strength Cond Assoc J 1987; 9(3): 67–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fry AC, Kraemer WJ. Physical performance characteristics of American collegiate football players. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1991; 5(3): 126–38Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barker M, Wyatt TJ, Johnson RL, et al. Performance factors, psychological assessment, physical characteristics, and football playing ability. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7(4): 224–33Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Black W, Roundy E. Comparisons of size, strength, speed and power in NCAA division 1-A football players. J Strength Cond Res 1994; 8(2): 80–5Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Edgerton VR, Apor P, Roy RR. Specific tension of human elbow flexion muscles. Acta Physiol (Hung) 1990; 75: 205–16Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanda K, Hashizume K. Factors causing difference in force output among motor units in the rat medial gastrocnemius muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 1992; 448: 677–95Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    McDonough MJN, Davies CTM. Adaptive response of mammalian skeletal muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 1984; 52: 139–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nygaard E, Houston ME, Suzuki Y, et al. Morphology of the brachial biceps muscle and elbow flexion in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1983; 117: 287–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Skeletal muscle architecture and performance. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers 1992: 115–29Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Perrin DH. Isokinetic exercise and assessment. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1993Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Enoka RM. Neuromechanical basis of kinesiology. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1994Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mayhew JL, Piper FC, Schwegler TM, et al. Contributions of speed, agility and body composition to anaerobic power measurements in college football players. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1989; 3(4): 101–6Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yessis M. Strength and power training program for football linemen. Nat Strength Cond Assoc J 1983; 5(1): 30–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Elam RP, Barth BI. The relationship between tibial nerve conduction velocity and selected strength and power variables in college football linemen. J Sports Med 1986; 26: 398–405Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gauthier MM. Oversized athletes: fit or just fat? Phys Sports Med 1988; 16(12): 20–2Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kelly JM, Wickkiser JO. For ‘ideal’ football weight assess fat, not poundage. Phys Sport Med 1975; 3(12): 38–42Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Blomquist CG, Saltin B. Cardiovascular adaptations of physical training. Annual Rev Physiol 1983; 45: 169–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    National Football League 1974 Injury Study. Menlo Park (CA): Stanford Research Institute, 1974Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hoette CA, Clark BA, Wolff GA. Cardiac function and physical response of 146 professional football players to graded treadmill exercise stress. J Sports Med 1986; 26: 34–42Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Raskoff WJ, Goldman S, Cohn K. The ‘athletic heart’: prevalence and physiologic significance of left ventricular enlargement in distance runners. JAMA 1976; 126: 158–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Astrand P, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danny M. Pincivero
    • 1
  • Tudor O. Bompa
    • 2
  1. 1.Sports MedicineUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations