Sports Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 54–64 | Cite as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Rehabilitation in Athletes

Biomechanical Considerations
  • Bruce D. BeynnonEmail author
  • Robert J. Johnson
Injury Clinic


Postoperative rehabilitation is a major factor in the success of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedure. Clinical investigations of patients after ACL reconstruction have shown that immobilisation of the knee, or restricted motion without muscle contraction, leads to undesired outcomes for the articular, ligamentous, and musculature structures that surround the knee.

Early joint motion is beneficial for; reducing pain, capsular contractions, articular cartilage, and for minimising scar formation that limit joint motion. These findings, combined with graft materials that have biomechanical properties similar to the normal ACL, and adequate fixation strength, have led many to recommend aggressive rehabilitation programmes that involve contraction of the dominant quadriceps muscles.

Recently, a prospective, randomised study of rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction has presented evidence that a closed kinetic chain exercise programme (foot fixed against a resistance) results in anterior-posterior knee laxity values that are similar to the contralateral normal knee. Also, open kinetic chain exercises (foot not fixed against a resistance) result in increased anterior-posterior knee laxity compared with the normal knee. Criteria must be observed because the relationship between rehabilitation exercises and the healing response of an ACL graft is unknown at present.

Biomechanical studies of healing ACL grafts performed in animals have shown that the graft requires a long time to revascularise and heal, and that the biomechanical behaviour of the graft never returns to normal. Functional knee braces provide a protective strain-shielding effect on the ACL when anterior shear loads and internal torques are applied to the knee in the non-weight-bearing condition. However, the strain shielding effect of functional braces decrease as the magnitude of anterior shear and internal torque applied to the knee increase. Future studies should strive to determine the actual loads transmitted across the knee and ACL graft strain during various rehabilitation exercises and relate these to the healing response of the knee and graft.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Knee Laxity Knee Flexion Angle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Buckwalter JA. Activity vs rest in the treatment of bone, soft tissue and joint injuries. Iowa Orthop J 1995; 15: 29–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paulos L, Noyes FR, Grood ES, et al. Knee rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and repair. Am J Sports Med 1981; 9: 140–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steadman JR. Rehabilitation of acute injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 1983; 172: 129–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akeson WH, Amiel D, Woo SL-Y. Immobility effects on synovial joints. The pathomechanics of joint contracture. Biorheology 1980; 17: 95–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haggmark T, Erickson E. Cylinder or mobile cast brace after knee ligament surgery: a clinical analysis and morphological and enzymatic study of changes in quadriceps muscle. Am J Sports Med 1979; 7: 48–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jozsa L, Jarvinen M, Kannus P, et al. Fine structural changes in the articular cartilage of the rat’s knee following short-term immobilization in various positions: a scanning electron microscopical study. Int Orthop 1987; 11: 129–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jozsa L, Reffy A, Jarvinen M, et al. Cortical and trabecular osteopenia after immobilization — a quantitative histological study in rats. Int Orthop 1988; 12: 169–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jozsa L, Thöring J, Jarvinen M, et al. Quantitative alterations in intramuscular connective tissue following immobilization: an experimental study in rat calf muscle. Exp Mol Pathol 1988; 49: 267–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy JC. Symposium: current concepts in the management of knee instability. Contemp Orthop 1982; 5: 59–78Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noyes FR. Functional properties of knee ligaments and alterations induced by immobilization. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1977; 123: 210–42Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noyes FR, Mangine RE, Barber S. Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1987; 15: 149–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shelbourne KD, Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18: 292–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacDonald PB, Hedden D, Pacin O, et al. Effects of accelerated rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with combined semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and a ligament augmentation device. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 588–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shelbourne DK, Klootwyk TE, Wilckens JH, et al. Ligament stability two to six years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft and participation in accelerated rehabilitation program. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 575–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beynnon BD, Fleming BC, Johnson RJ, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament strain behavior during rehabilitation exercises in-vivo. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 24–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Draganich LF, Vahey JW. An in-vitro study of anterior cruciate ligament strain induced by quadriceps and hamstrings forces. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henning CE, Lynch MA, Glick KR. An in-vivo strain gage study of elongation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13: 22–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jurist KA, Otis JC. Anteroposterior tibiofemoral displacements during isometric extension efforts. The role of external load and knee flexion angle. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13: 254–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lutz GE, Palmitier RA, An KN, et al. Comparison of tibiofemoral forces during open-kinetic chain and closed-kinetic chain exercises. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 732–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shoemaker SC, Markolf KL. Effects of joint load on the stiffness and laxity of ligament deficient knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 136–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yack HJ, Collins CE, Whieldon TJ. Comparison of closed and open kinetic chain exercises in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bell C. On the nervous circle which connects the voluntary muscles with the brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1826; 116: 163–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sherrington CS. The integrative action of the nervous system. London: Constable, 1906Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barrett DS. Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate econstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 833–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrack RL, Skinner HB, Buckley SL. Proprioception in the anterior cruicate deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17: 1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Good L, Beynnon BD, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Joint position sense is not changed after ACL disruption [abstract]. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1995; 20(1): 95Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Corrigan JP, Cashman WF, Brady MP. Proprioception in the cruciate deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 247–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klein BP, Blaha JD, Simons W. Anterior cruciate deficient knees do not have altered proprioception [abstract]. Orthop Trans 1992; 16: 539Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beard DJ, Kyberd PJ, Fergusson CM, et al. Proprioception after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. An object indication for the need for surgery? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 311–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jennings AG, Seedholm BB. Proprioception in the knee and reflex hamstrings contraction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 491–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beynnon BD, Gottlieb D, Elmqvist L-G, et al. The latency of reflex muscle contraction in normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient subjects. Orthop Trans 1994; 8(2): 450–1Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wojtys EM, Huston LJ. Neuromuscular performance in normal and anterior cruciate ligament deficient lower extremities. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 89–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Newton PO, Horibe S, Woo SL-Y. Experimental studies of anterior cruciate ligament autografts and allografts. In: Daniel DM, Akeson WH, O’Conner JJ, editors. Knee ligaments: structure, function, injury and repair. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 389–9Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, et al. The measurement of elongation of anterior cruciate grafts in-vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 520–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Beynnon BD, Pope MH, Wertheimer CM, et al. The effect of functional knee-braces on strain on the anterior cruciate ligament in-vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 1298–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arms SW, Donnermeyer D, Renström P, et al. The effect of knee braces on anterior cruciate ligament strain [abstract]. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1987; 12: 245Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR, et al. Mechanical properties of primate vascularized vs nonvascularized patellar tendon grafts: changes over time. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 68–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bailock RT, Woo SL-Y, Lyon RM, et al. Use of patellar tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the rabbit: a long term histological and biomecanical study. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 474–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jackson DW, Grood ES, Cohn BT, et al. The effect of in-situ freezing of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 201–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Tohyama H, et al. The relationship between anterior-posterior knee laxity and the structural properties of the patellar tendon graft. A study in canines. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 812–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Glasgow SG, Gabriel JP, Sapega AA, et al. The effect of early versus late return to vigorous activities on the outcome of anterior cruciate reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 243–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. The effect of rehabilitation and return to activity on anterior-posterior knee displacements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21: 264–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rosen MA, Jackson DW, Atwell EA. The efficacy of continuous passive motion in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20: 122–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Richmond JC, Gladstone J, MacGillivray J. Continuous passive motion after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of short-versus long-term use. J Arthroscop Rel Res 1991; 7: 39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bynum EB, Barrack RL, Alexander AH. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23: 401–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, McClure Musculoskeletal Research CenterUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations