Sports Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 55–72 | Cite as

Exercise Programmes in the Treatment of Children with Learning Disabilities

  • Mary H. Bluechardt
  • J. Wiener
  • Roy J. Shephard
Review Article


Learning disability is characterised by a discrepancy between achievement and assessed intellectual ability. Children with this problem commonly (but not invariably) show impaired motor proficiency, as assessed by such instruments as the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of motor proficiency. It has been hypothesised that poor motor performance and/or poor social skills lead to exclusion from games, creating a vicious cycle of decreasing participation, decreasing competence, a deterioration of self-worth and increasing social maladjustment.

Attempts to break the vicious cycle with programmes designed to enhance motor proficiency have been uniformly unsuccessful. There is limited experimental evidence to support the view that structured physical activity programmes with an embedded social skills training component can be an effective method of enhancing both actual motor ability and self-perception of physical and academic competence. However, a controlled comparison with small-group, academic instruction has shown that, from the educational perspective, a physical activity-based intervention is no more effective than other forms of special attention. The main argument for delivering social skills training through a physical activity programme lies not in a unique impact upon learning disability, but rather in terms of the other well-established long term health benefits of exercise.


Social Skill Learning Disability Disable Child Learning Disabil Learn Disability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Swanson HL. Toward a meta-theory of learning disabilities. J Learning Disabil 1988; 21: 196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mercer CD, Hughes C, Mercer AR. Learning disabilities definitions used by State education departments. Learning Disabil Q 1985; 8: 45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McKinney JD. The search for subtypes of specific learning disabilities. J Learning Disabil 1984; 17: 43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozols EJ, Rourke BP Dimensions of social sensitivity in two types of learning disabled children. In: Rourke BP, editor. Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: essentials of subtype analysis. New York: Guilford, 1985: 281–301Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rourke BP, Strang JD. Subtypes of reading and arithmetic disabilities: a neuropsychological analysis. In: Rutter M, editor. Developmental neuropsychiatry. New York: Guilford, 1983: 473–88Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siegel LS, Heaven RK. Categorization of learning disabilities. In: Ceci S, editor. Handbook of cognitive, social and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities. New York: Academic Press, 1986: 95–122Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiener J, Harris PJ. Evaluation of an individualized, context based social skills training program for children with learning disabilities. J Learning Disabil Res Pract. In pressGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson DJ. Nonverbal learning disabilities. Pediatr Ann 1987; 16: 133–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rourke BP. Nonverbal learning disabilities: the syndrome and the model. New York: Guilford, 1989Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weller C, Strawser S. Adaptive behavior of subtypes of learning disabled individuals. J Special Educ 1987; 21: 101–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Douglas VL, Peters KG. Toward a clearer definition of the attentional deficit of hyperactive children. In: Hale G, Lewis M, editors. Attention and the development of cognitive style. New York: Plenum, 1979Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flicek M. Social status of boys with both academic problems and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1992; 20: 353–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flicek M, Landau S. Social status problems of learning disabled and hyperactive/learning disabled boys. J Clin Child Psychol 1985; 14: 340–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landau S, Moore LA. Social skill deficits in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychol Rev 1991; 20: 235–51Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Education Act (Ontario) 1984, subsect. 1(1)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bruno R. Interpretation of pictorially presented social situations by learning disabled and normal children. J Learning Disabil 1981; 14: 350–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carlson CI. Social interaction goals and strategies of children with learning disabilities. J Learning Disabil 1987; 20: 306–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oliva AH, LaGreca AM. Children with learning disabilities: social goals and strategies. J Learning Disabil 1988; 21: 301–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wiener J, Harris PJ, Shirer C. Achievement and social-behavioural correlates of peer status in learning disabled children. Learning Disabil Q 1990; 13: 114–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brandon JE, Eason RL, Smith TL. Behavioral relaxation training and motor performance of learning disabled children with hyperactive behaviors. Adapted Phys Activity Q 1986; 3: 67–79Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherrill C, Pyfer JL. Learning disabled students in physical education. Adapted Phys Activ Q 1985; 2: 283–91Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eichstaedt CB, Kalakian LH. Learning disabilities. In: Eichstaedt CB, Kalakian LH, editors. Developmental/adapted physical education: making ability count. New York: Mac-Millan, 1987: 228–42Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Geddes D. Future directions: physical activity for LD children. Acad Ther 1980; 16(1): 5–9Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williams J. Dyslexia. Orbit 1978; 9(1): 24–6Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barlow B. Perceptual-motor activities in the treatment of severe reading disability. Reading Teacher 1971; 24(6): 513–25Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hallahan DP, Cruickshank WM. The efficacy of perceptual-motor training. In: Hallahan DP, Cruickshank WM. Psycho-educational foundations of learning disabilities. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973: 176–216Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hammill DD, Goodman L, Weiderholt JL. Visual-motor processes: can we train them? Reading Teacher 1974; 27: 469–78Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kavale KA, Mattson PD. One jumped off the balance beam: meta-analysis of perceptual motor training. J Learning Disabil 1983; 16: 165–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Myers PI, Hammill DD. Developing perceptual motor correlates. In: Myers PI, Hamill DD, editors. Learning disabilities: basic concepts, assessment practices, and instructional strategies. Austin: Wiley, 1982: 343–417Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Poplin MS. The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: replicating the past by reducing the present. J Learning Disabil 1988; 21: 389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vellutino FR, Steger BM, Moyer SC, et al. Has the perceptual deficit hypothesis led us astray? J Learning Disabil 1977; 10: 54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency: examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, Mn.: American Guidance Service, 1978Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hamill J. The physically challenged child. Pediatric Exercise Science 1992; 4: 197–248Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ulrich BD. Standardized motor assessment tests used by adapted physical education teachers. Unpublished manuscript, available from the author, Dept of Kinesiology, Indiana University, 1985Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Winnick JP, Short FX. Physical fitness testing of the disabled: Project Unique. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1985Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Miles BH, Nierengarten ME, Nearing RJ. A review of the eleven most often-cited assessment instruments used in adapted physical education. Clin Kinesiol 1988; 42: 33–41Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sabatino DA. Review of Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. In: Mitchell JV, editor. The ninth mental measurements yearbook, vol. 1. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1985: 235–6Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bialer I, Doll L, Winsberg G. A modified Lincoln-Oseretsky motor development scale: provisional standardization. Percept Motor Skills 1974; 38: 599–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bruininks VL, Bruininks RL. Motor proficiency of learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Percept Motor Skills 1977; 44: 1131–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Beitel PA, Mead BJ. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of motor proficiency: a viable measure for 3- to 5-year-old children. Percept Motor Skills 1982; 51: 919–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Broadhead GD, Church GE. Discriminant analysis of gross and fine motor proficiency data. Percept Motor Skills 1982; 55: 547–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    King HA, Aufsesser PM. A decision-theoretic examination of the usefulness of two motor performance tests in identifying children for assignment to special education. Sacramento: California State Department of Education, Division of Special Education, 1984Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pyfer JL, Carlson BR. Characteristic motor development of children with learning disabilities. Percept Motor Skills 1972; 35: 291–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Doll-Tepper GM. Effects of physical education on children with learning disabilities. In: Berridge ME, Ward GR, editors. International perspectives on adapted physical activity. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1987: 19–24Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schilling F, Kiphard E. The body coordination test. J Phys Educ Recreation 1976; 47: 37Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kendrick KA, Hanten WR. Assessment and evaluation in adapted physical education. Atlanta: Georgia State University, 1980. (ED 210 879)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    American Association of Health and Physical Education. Testing for impaired, disabled and handicapped individuals. Washington, DC: AAHPER, 1975Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Akers LC. Comparison of motor proficiency in learning disabled and normal children [doctoral thesis]. Birmingham, Ala: Univ. of Alabama, 1983Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Haubenstricker JL. Motor development in children with learning disabilities. J Phys Educ Recreation Dance 1982; 53: 41–3Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maeland AF. Identification of children with motor coordination problems. Adapted Phys Activity Q 1992; 9: 330–42Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wall AE. Physically awkward children: a motor development perspective. In: Das JP, Mulcahy R, Wall AE, editors. Theory and research in learning disabilities. New York: Plenum, 1982: 254Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Arnheim DD, Sinclair WA. The clumsy child: a program of motor therapy. St Louis: Mosby, 1975Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Maloy CF, Sattler JM. Motor and cognitive proficiency of learning disabled and normal children. J School Psychol 1979; 17: 213–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Johnson RE, Rubinson RM. Physical functioning levels of learning disabled and normal children. Am Corrective Ther J 1983; 37: 56–60Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bluechardt M, Shephard RJ. Responses of learning disabled students to extracurricular activity with a social skills component. J Learning Disabil. In pressGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mirwald RL, Bailey DA. Maximal aerobic power: a longitudinal analysis. London, Ont.: Sports Dynamics, 1986Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Clark JE, Ewing M. A meta-analysis of gender differences and similarities in the gross motor skills of prepubescent children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Gulf Park, Mass., May 1985Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Harris ID, Jones MA. The motor performance status of elementary school children in Georgia. Marietta, Ga.: Georgia Association of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1982Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Thomas JR, French KE. Gender differences across age in motor performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1985; 98: 260–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Berry K, Buktenica N. Developmental test of visual-motor integration. Chicago: Follett, 1967Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Culbertson F, Gunn R. Comparison of the Bender Gestalt Test and Frostig Test in several clinical groups of children. J Clin Psychol 1966; 22: 439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Keogh B, Smith C. Changes in copying ability of young children. Percept Motor Skills 1968; 26: 773–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Koppitz E. The Bender Gestalt Test for young children, vol. II. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1975Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Maccoby E, Jacklin C. The psychology of sex differences. New York: Praeger, 1974Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Vogel SA. Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: a review of the literature. J Learning Disabil 1990; 23: 44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Anastasi A. Sex differences: historical perspectives and methodological implications. Dev Rev 1981; 1: 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Malina RM. Anthropometric correlates of strength and motor performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1975; 3: 249–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1962Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Branta C, Painter M, Kiger J. Gender differences in play patterns and sport participation of North American youth. In: Gould D, Weiss MR, editors. Advances in pediatric sport sciences, vol. 2: behavioral issues. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1987: 25–42Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Coakley JJ. Children and the sport socialization process. In: Gould D, Weiss MR, editors. Advances in pediatric sport sciences, vol. 2: behavioral issues. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1987: 43–60Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lever J. Sex differences in the games children play. Soc Prob 1976; 23: 478–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Greendorfer SL, Brundage CL. Gender differences in children’s sport skills. In: Adrian MJ, editor. Sports women. Basel: Karger, 1987: 125–37Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ackerman PT, Dykman RA, Oglesby DM. Sex and group differences in reading and attention disordered children with and without hyperkinesia. J Learn Disord 1983; 16: 407–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    D’Amato RC, Dean RS, Rattan G, et al. A study of psychological referrals for learning disabled children. J Psychoeduc Assess 1988; 6: 118–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    DeFries JC. Gender ratios in children with reading disability and their affected relatives: a commentary. J Learning Disabil 1989; 22: 544–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Finucci JM, Childs B. Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In: Ansara A, Geschwind N, Galaburda A, et al., editors. Sex differences in dyslexia. Baltimore: Orton Dyslexia Society, 1981: 1–10Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Fletcher JM, et al. Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. JAMA 1990; 264: 998–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mirkin P. Direct and repeated measurement of academic skills: an alternative to traditional screening: referral and identification of learning disabled students. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, 1982. Report no.: IRLD-RR-75Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Berry C, Shaywitz S, Shaywitz B. Girls with attention deficit disorder: a silent minority? A report on behavioral and cognitive characteristics. Pediatrics 1985; 76: 801–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Epstein MH, Cullinan D, Rosemier R. Behaviour problem patterns among the learning disabled: boys aged 6–11. Learning Disabil Q 1983; 6: 305–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Geschwind N. A reaction of conference. In: Ansara A, Geschwind N, Galaburda A, et al., editors. Sex differences in dyslexia. Baltimore: Orton Dyslexia Society, 1981: 13–8Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Denno D. Sex differences in cognition: a review and critique of the longitudinal evidence. Adolescence 1982; 17: 779–88Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Mayes AG, Roberts AR. A study of WISC-R sub-test scores of learning disabled students, 1985. (ED 262 545)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ryckman D. Sex differences in a sample of learning disabled children. Learning Disabil Q 1981; 4: 48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Vance H, Singer M, Engin A. WISC-R sub-test differences for male and female children and youth. J Clin Psychol 1980; 36: 953–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Vogel SOA, Walsh P. Gender differences in cognitive abilities in learning disabled females and males. Ann Dyslexia 1987; 37: 142–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Coopersmith S. The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: WH Freeman, 1967Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Martinek T, Zaichkowsky LD. Manual and scale for the Martinek-Zaichowsky Self-concept Scale for Children. Jacksonville, Ill.: Psychologists and Educators, 1977Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Piers EV. Manual for the Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale. Nashville: Counsellor Recordings and Tests, 1969Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Harter S. The perceived competence scale for children. Child Dev 1982; 53: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Harter S. The determinants and mediational role of global self-worth in children. In: Eisenberg N, editor. Contemporary topics in developmental psychology. Toronto: Wiley, 1985: 219–41Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bryan TH, Donahue M, Pearl R. Learning disabled children’s peer interactions during a small group problem solving task. Learning Disabil Q 1981; 4: 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Renick M, Harter S. Manual for the self-perception profile for learning disabled students. Denver: University of Denver Press, 1988Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Battle J, Blowers T, Yeudall L. An exploratory study of self-esteem and brain dysfunction in elementary school children. Psychol Rep 1980; 46: 149–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Griffin NS, Keogh JF. A model for movement confidence. In: Kelso JAS, Clark JE, editors. The development of movement control and coordination. Chichester: Wiley, 1982: 213–36Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Harter S. The development of competence motivation in the mastery of cognitive and physical skills: is there still a play for joy? In: Roberts GC, Landers DM, editors. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1981: 3–29Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Messner YJ. Athletic perceived competence of learning disabled préadolescent males and the learning of a motor skill with augmented feedback. Advocate: Natl Consort Phys Educ Recreation Handicapped 1987; 16(1): 3Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ulrich BD. Perceptions of physical competence, motor competence, and participation in organized sport: their interrelationships in young children. Res Q 1987; 58: 57–67Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory for behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Godin G, Shephard RJ. Use of attitude-behaviour models in exercise promotion. Sports Med 1990; 10: 103–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    White R. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol Rev 1959; 66: 297–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Harter S, Connell JP. A model of children’s achievement and related self-perceptions of competence, control and activational orientation. In: Nicholls J, editor. Advances in motivation and achievement. Ill: the development of achievement motivation. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984: 153–97Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Weiss MR, Bredemeier BJ, Shewchuck RM. The dynamics of perceived competence, perceived control and motivational orientation in youth sport. In: Weiss M, Gould D, editors. Sport for children and youth. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1986Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Harter S. Pleasure derived from cognitive challenge and mastery. Child Dev 1974; 45: 661–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Harter S. Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In: Leahy R, editor. The development of the self. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 55–121Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Johnson DS. Naturally acquired learned helplessness: the relationship of school failure to achievement behaviour attributions, and self-concept. J Educ Psychol 1981; 73: 174–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Black WF. Self-concept as related to achievement and age in learning disabled children. Child Dev 1974; 45: 1137–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Sheare J. The impact of resource programs upon the self-concept and peer acceptance of learning disabled children. Psychol Schools 1978; 15: 406–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Margalit M, Zak I. Anxiety and self-concept of learning disabled children. J Learning Disabil 1984; 17: 537–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Rogers H, Saklofske D. Self-concepts, locus of control and performance expectations of learning disabled children. J Learning Disabil 1985; 18: 273–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kistner JA, Haskett M, White K, et al. Perceived competence and self-worth of learning disabled and normally achieving students. Learning Disabil Q 1987; 10: 37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kistner JA, Osborne M. A longitudinal study of learning disabled children’s self-evaluation. Learning Disabil Q 1987; 10: 258–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Grolnick WS, Ryan RM. Self-perceptions, motivation and adjustment in children with learning disabilities: a multiple group comparison study. J Learning Disabil 1990; 23: 177–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Bryan TH, Pearl R. Self-concepts and locus of control of learning disabled children. J Clin Child Psychol 1979; 8: 223–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Harter S. Effectance motivation reconsidered: toward a developmental model. Hum Dev 21: 34–64Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Harter S, Pike R. The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Dev 1984; 55: 1969–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Horn TS, Weiss MR. A developmental analysis of children’s self-ability judgments in the physical domain. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1991; 3: 310–26Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Boling R P. Differences between actual motor ability and physical self-concept (perceived motor performance/body image) of fifth grade boys [doctoral dissertation]. Jackson, Miss.: Mississippi State University, 1983 (ED.229 372)Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Feltz D, Brown E. Perceived competence in soccer skills among young soccer players. J Sport Psychol 1984; 6: 385–94Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Guyot GW, Fairchild L, Hill M. Physical fitness, sport participation, body build, and self-concept of elementary school children. Int J Sport Psychol 1981; 12: 105–16Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Roberts GC, Kleiber DA, Duba JL. An analysis of motivation in children’s sport: the role of perceived competence in participation. J Sport Psychol 1981; 3: 206–16Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Feltz D, Petlichkoff L. Perceived competence among interscholastic sport participants and dropouts. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1983; 8: 231–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Martinek TJ, Cheffers JT, Zaichowsky LD. Physical activity, motor development and self concept: race and age differences. Percept Motor Skills 1978; 46: 147–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Martinek T, Karper W. Entry-level motor performance and self-concepts of handicapped and non-handicapped children in mainstreamed physical education classes: a preliminary study. Percept Motor Skills 1982; 55: 1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Van Rossum JHA, Vermeer A. Perceived competence: a validation study in the field of motoria remedial teaching. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 1990; 37: 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Zimmer R. Motorik und Persoenlichkeitsentwicklunq bei Kindern im Vorschulalter. Schorndorf: Karl Hofmann Verlag, 1981Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Harter S. The self-perception profile for children: manual. Denver: University of Denver Press, 1985Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Goldman R, Hardin VE. The social perception of learning disabled and non-learning disabled children. Exceptional Child 1982; 29(1): 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Pearl R, Cosden M. Sizing up a situation: learning disabled children’s understanding of social situations. Learning Disabil Q 1982; 5: 371–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    LaGreca A. Social behavior and social perception in learning disabled children: a review with implications for social skills training. J Pediatr Psychol 1981; 6: 395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Stone WL, LaGreca AM. The social status of children with learning disabilities: a re-examination. J Learning Disabil 1990; 23: 32–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 135.
    Hartup WW. Peer relations. In: Heatherington EM, editor. Handbook of child psychology: socialization, personality and social development, vol. 4. New York: Wiley, 1983: 103–96Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ladd GW. Documenting the effects of social skill training with children: process and outcome assessment. In: Schneider B, Rubin K, Ledingham J, editors. Children’s peer relations: issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag, 1985: 243–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    French DC, Waas GE. Behaviors problems of peer rejected and neglected elementary age children: teacher and parent perspectives. Child Dev 1985; 56: 246–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Kneedler RD. The use of cognitive training to change social behavior. Exceptional Educ Q 1980; 1: 65–73Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    McHale SM, Olley JG. Using play to facilitate the social development of handicapped children. Teaching Exceptional Children Spec Educ 1982; 2: 76–86Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Smoll FL. Motor impairment and social development. Am J Corrective Ther 1974; 28: 4–6Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Gottlieb BW, Gottlieb J, Berkell D, et al. Sociometric status and solitary play of LD boys and girls. J Learning Disabil 1986; 19: 619–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Silver LB. Psychological and family problems associated with learning disabilities: assessment and intervention. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989; 28: 319–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Siperstein G, Bopp M, Bak J. Social status of learning disabled children. J Learning Disabil 1978; 11: 49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    McGinnis E, Goldstein AP, Sprafkin RP, et al. Skill-streaming the elementary school child: a guide for teaching prosocial skills. Champaign, Ill.: Research Press, 1984: 18Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Spivak G, Piatt JJ, Shure MB. The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Weissberg RP, Gesten EL, Rapkin BD, et al. Evaluation of a social-problem-solving training program for suburban and inner-city third grade children. J Consult Clin Psychol 1981; 49: 251–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Vaughn S, McIntosh R, Hogan A. Why social skills training doesn’t work: an alternative model. In: Scruggs TE, Wong BYL, editors. Intervention research in learning disabilities. New York: Springer Verlag, 1990: 279–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Reid G (1982). Physical education for the learning disabled student: an update. Learning Disabil Q 1982; 5: 190–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Elstein A. Effects of physical education on the physical fitness, social adjustment, and self-concept of learning disabled students [doctoral dissertation]. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1976. Dissert Abstracts Int; 38 (01): 200Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Martino L, Johnson D. Cooperative and individualistic experiences among disabled and normal children. J School Psychol 1979; 107: 177–83Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Allan J. Jogging can modify disruptive behaviors. Teaching Exceptional Children 1980; 12: 66–70Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Mender J, Kerr R, Orlick T. A cooperative games program for learning disabled children. Int J Sports Psychol 1982; 13: 222–33Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Kerr R. Impact of a special physical activity program on learning disabled children. In: Partington JT, Orlick T, Salmela RH, editors. Sport in perspective. Ottawa: University of Ottawa, 1982: 206–7Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    MacMahon JR, Gross RT. Physical and psychological effects of aerobic exercise in boys with learning disabilities. Dev Behav Pediatr 8: 274–7Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Norris D, Boucher J. Observing children through their formative years. Toronto: Board of Education for the City of Toronto, 1980Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Wessel JA, Kelly L. Achievement-based curriculum development in physical education. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1986: 62–5Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T. Physical activity: fitness and health. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary H. Bluechardt
    • 1
  • J. Wiener
    • 2
  • Roy J. Shephard
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical Activity StudiesUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationTorontoCanada
  3. 3.School of Physical and Health EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Health Studies ProgramBrock UniversitySt Catherine’sCanada

Personalised recommendations