Sports Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 244–256 | Cite as

Physiological Effects of Exercising with Handweights

  • T. E. Auble
  • L. Schwartz
Review Article

Summary

Research demonstrates a positive and graded relationship between handweighted exercise energy costs, the distance through which handweights are swung and the weight used. The energy costs of handweighted exercise when swinging 0.45 to 1.36kg handweights have been shown to be 3 to 155% greater than costs of unweighted exercise at any pace. The upper limit of such increases is unknown. Moreover, the use of handweighted arm swings can convert walking, benchstepping or running from leg dominated endurance training modalities to exercises that simultaneously challenge muscles of both the upper and lower body.

The use of handweights may induce a pressor response characterised by elevated heart rate and blood pressure responses at a given exercise intensity. However, such elevations have not been consistently reproduced and when they occurred, were on average small and of little physiological concern. Individual blood pressure responses may vary more widely between hand-weighted and unweighted walking, with some exhibiting higher and others lower blood pressures when using handweights. Taken together, research suggests that the prescription of handweighted exercise is safe for most individuals. However, it should be prescribed using precautions similar to those used when implementing new exercise regimens, particularly among those with cardiovascular complications. Potential strength and endurance training adaptations to handweighted exercise that incorporates large arm and leg range of motion movement patterns have yet to be determined.

Keywords

Mean Arterial Pressure Rate Pressure Product Aerobic Dance Circuit Weight Training Hand Grip Force 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadie BR. Physiological responses to grade walking with wrist and hand-held weights. Research Quarterly 61: 93–95, 1990Google Scholar
  2. American College of Sports Medicine. Resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, Lea & Febiger, pp. 126, 128, Philadelphia, 1988Google Scholar
  3. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for graded exercise testing and prescription, 3rd ed., pp. 20, 33–36, 40–42, 171, Philadelphia, 1986Google Scholar
  4. Åstrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of physiology — physiological bases of exercise, 2nd ed., pp. 306, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1977Google Scholar
  5. Auble TE, Schwartz L. Speed and frequency effects on hand-weighted walk energy costs. Presented at the American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting, 1988Google Scholar
  6. Auble TE, Schwartz L, Robertson RJ. Aerobic requirements for moving handweights through various ranges of motion while walking. Physician and Sportsmedicine 15: 133–140, 1987Google Scholar
  7. Bergh U, Kanstrup I-L, Ekblom B. Maximal oxygen uptake during exercise with various combinations of arm and leg work. Journal of Applied Physiology 41: 191–196, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bevegard S, Freyschuss U, Strandell T. Circulatory adaptation to arm and leg exercise in supine and sitting position. Journal of Applied Physiology 21: 37–46, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blessing DL, Wilson GD, Puckett JR, Ford HT. The physiologic effects of eight weeks of aerobic dance with and without handheld weights. American Journal of Sports Medicine 15: 508–510, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Claremont AD, Hall SJ. Effects of extremity loading upon energy expenditure and running mechanics. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20: 167–171, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeBusk R, Valdez R, Houston N, Haskeil W. Cardiovascular responses to dynamic static effort soon after myocardial infarction: application to occupational work assessment. Circulation 58: 368–375, 1978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ewing A, Vandeputte H, Francis K. Effects of exercise with light hand weights on strength. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 8: 533–536, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis K, Hoobler T. Changes in oxygen consumption associated with treadmill walking and running with light hand-carried weights. Ergonomics 29: 999–1004, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin BA. Aerobic exercise training programs for the upper body. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 21: S141–S148, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Spina RJ, Auble TE, Cassinelli DA, et al. Are treadmill-based exercise prescriptions generalizable to combined arm and leg exercise? Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 7: 551–555, 1987Google Scholar
  16. Graves JE, Martin AD, Miltenberger JL, Pollock ML. Physiological responses to walking with hand weights, wrist weights, and ankle weights. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20: 265–271, 1988bPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graves JE, Pollock ML, Montain SJ, Jackson AS, O’Keefe JM. The effect of hand-held weights on the physiological responses to walking exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 19: 260–275, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Graves JE, Sagiv M, Pollock ML, Miltenberger LA. Effect of handheld weights and wrist weights on the metabolic and hemo-dynamic responses to submaximal exercise in hypertensive responders. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 8: 134–140, 1988aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutin B, Ang KE, Torrey K. Cardiorespiratory and subjective responses to incremental and constant load ergometry with arms and legs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69: 510–513, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hung J, McKillip J, Savin W, Magder S, Kraus R, et al. Comparison of cardiovascular response to combined static-dynamic effort, postprandial dynamic effort and dynamic effort alone in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. Circulation 65: 1411–1419, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelemen MH, Stewart KJ, Gillilan RE, Ewart CK, Valenti SA, et al. Circuit weight training in cardiac patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 7: 38–42, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerber RE, Miller RA, Najjar SM. Myocardial ischemic effects of isometric, dynamic and combined exercise in coronary artery disease. Chest 67: 388–394, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiblom A, Persson J. Cardiovascular response to combined dynamic and static exercise. Clinical Research (Suppl. I) 38: 93–97, 1981Google Scholar
  24. Lind AR. Cardiovascular adjustments to isometric contractions: static effort. In Handbook of physiology: the cardiovascular system, peripheral circulation and organ blood flow. sec. 2, vol III, pp. 957–960, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, 1983Google Scholar
  25. Lind AR, McNicol GW. Circulatory response to sustained handgrip contractions performed during other exercise, both rhythmic and static. Journal of Physiology 192: 595–607, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Makalous SL, Araujo J, Thomas TR. Energy expenditure during walking with hand weights. Physician and Sportsmedicine 16: 139–148, 1988Google Scholar
  27. Maud PJ, Stokes GD, Stokes LR. Stride frequency, perceived exertion and oxygen cost response to walking with variations in arm swing and hand-held weight. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 10: 294–299, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller JF, Stamford BA. Intensity and energy cost of weighted walking vs running for men and women. Journal of Applied Physiology 62: 1497–1451, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell JH, Schibye B, Payne FC, Saltin B. Response of arterial blood pressure to static exercise in relation to muscle mass, force development, and electromyographic activity. Circulation Research (Suppl. I) 48: 70–75, 1981Google Scholar
  30. Nagle FJ, Richie JP, Giese MD. V̇2max responses in separate and combined arm and leg air-braked ergometer exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports Exercise 16: 563–566, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niederberger M, Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Whitkanack S. Disparities in ventilatory and circulatory responses to bicycle and treadmill exercise. British Heart Journal 36: 377–382, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson RR, Gobel FL, Jorgensen CR, Wang K, Taylor HL. Hemodynamic predictors of myocardial oxygen consumption during static and dynamic exercise. Circulation 50: 1179–1188, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz L. Heavyhands: the ultimate exercise, Warner Books Inc, New York, 1982Google Scholar
  34. Schwartz L. The heavyhands walking book, Panaerobics Press Inc., Pittsburgh, 1989Google Scholar
  35. Shedahl LM, Wilke NA, Tristani FE, Kalbfleisch JH. Response of patients after myocardial infarction to carrying a graded set of weightloads. American Journal of Cardiology 52: 698–703, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stenberg J, Åstrand PO, Ekblom B. Haemodynamic response to work with different muscle groups, sitting or supine. Journal of Applied Physiology 22: 61–70, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stewart KJ, Mason JM, Kelemen MH. Three-year participation in circuit weight training improves muscular strength and self-efficacy in cardiac patients. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 8: 292–296, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toner MM, Sawka MN, Levine L, Pandolf KB. Cardiorespiratory responses to exercise distributed between the upper and lower body. Journal of Applied Physiology 54: 1403–1408, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Von Hofen D, Auble TE, Schwartz L. Aerobic requirements for pumping versus carrying.91kg handweights while running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise (Suppl. 2) 21: S7, 1989Google Scholar
  40. Zarandona JE, Nelson AG, Conlee RK, Fisher AG. Physiological responses to hand-carried weights. Physician Sportsmedicine 14: 113–120, 1987Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. E. Auble
    • 1
  • L. Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Energy Research LaboratoryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations