Sports Medicine

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 88–102 | Cite as

Biomechanical Factors Affecting Performance in Netball

Implications for Improving Performance and Injury Reduction
  • Julie R. Steele
Review Articles

Summary

Despite netball having one of the largest number of participants of any team game within the Commonwealth there has been limited research conducted which biomechanically analysed skills of the game. However, information presented from biomechanical analyses of skills can provide coaches with the necessary theoretical basis to teach netball fundamentals to junior players. Biomechanical information can also be used to refine the existing techniques of experienced netball players so they may achieve optimal technical performance of game skills while minimising the potential for injury.

Changes to footwork rules and to the material properties of court surfaces and footwear could reduce stress placed on the musculoskeletal system. However, the factor which influences musculoskeletal stress to the greatest extent is a player’s landing technique. Thus, the first concern for all netball coaches must be to teach all players to land correctly. The magnitude and rate of loading of the high vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces generated when players execute abrupt landings in netball are reduced more effectively by encouraging players to throw higher passes, requiring the receiver to jump upward to catch the ball. However, to maximise the reduction in stress placed on the musculoskeletal system on landing, players should be encouraged to land with the foot neutrally aligned (not abducted or adducted), ensure adequate hip and knee flexion, and reduce the foot-hip displacement by eliminating an exaggerated ‘striding out’ position often adopted by netball players.

Apart from landing techniques, the only netball skill that has been objectively analysed is goal shooting. To improve shooting accuracy players should demonstrate greater flexion of the knees and shooting elbow when preparing to shoot, sufficient but not excessive hyperextension of the hand to stabilise the ball, minimisation of trunk, arm and forearm movements during the shooting action in favour of increased hand motion, greater release height and greater release velocity.

If the potential for injury from poorly executed skills in netball is to be minimised, further research is required to identify the most efficient methods of performing all skills involved in the game, including pivoting, rebounding, defensive movement patterns, and attacking movement strategies.

Keywords

Ground Reaction Force Injury Incidence Vertical Ground Reaction Force Sport Shoe Coaching Manual 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. All Australia Netball Association. Netball official rules, All Australia Netball Association, Mosman, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. Allison B. A practical application of specificity in netball training. Sports Coach 2(2): 9–13, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechanics 13: 397–406, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanagh PR, Valiant GA, Misevich KW. Biological aspects of modeling shoe/foot interaction during running. In Frederick (Ed.) Sport shoes and playing surfaces, pp. 24–46, Human Kinetics, Champaign, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke TE, Frederick EC, Cooper LB. Biomechanical measurement of running shoe cushioning properties. In Nigg & Kerr (Eds) Biomechanical aspects of sport shoes and playing surfaces, pp. 25–33, University of Calgary, Calgary, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Cornwell G. The basic skills of netball. In Crouch (Ed.) The net-ball coaching manual, pp. 13–42, Adam and Charles Black, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Editorial. Netball. Sports Turf Bulletin 131: 11–12, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Elliott BC, Smith J. Fundamentals of netball goal shooting. Australian Journal of Sport Science 3(2): 21–27, 1983.aGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott B, Smith J. The relationship of selected biomechanic and anthropometric measures to accuracy in netball shooting. Journal of Human Movement Studies 9: 171–187, 1983.bGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott BC, Smith JR. Netball shooting: a statistical analysis. Sports Coach 7(1): 29–30, 35–37, 1983c.Google Scholar
  11. Frederick EC, Clarke TE, Hamill CL. The effect of running shoe design on shock attenuation. In Frederick (Ed.) Sport shoes and playing surfaces, pp. 190–198, Human Kinetics, Champaign, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Frederick EC, Hagy JL, Mann RA. The prediction of vertical impact force during running. Journal of Biomechanics 14: 498, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopper D. A survey of netball injuries and conditions related to these injuries. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 32(4): 231–239, 1986.Google Scholar
  14. Lees A. The application of biomechanics to netball skills. In Crouch (Ed.) The netball coaching manual, pp. 178–187, Adam and Charles Black, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Lees A, McCullagh PJ. A preliminary investigation into the shock absorbency of running shoes and shoe inserts. Journal of Human Movement Studies 10: 95–106, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. Martin T. Netball fundamentals, AH and AW Reed Pty Ltd., New South Wales, 1977.Google Scholar
  17. Miller DI. Biomechanics of running — what should the future hold? Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 3: 229–236, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. Nigg BM, Luethi S, Denoth J, Stacoff A. Methodological aspects of sport shoe and sport surface analysis. In Matsui & Kobayashi (Eds.) Biomechanics VIII-B, pp. 1041–1052, Human Kinetics, Champaign, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. O’Connor ST. Survey of injuries at the 1979 All-Australian National Netball Championships, Melbourne, Australia, May 19th–26th. Unpublished paper, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. Otago L. A game analysis of the activity patterns of netball players. Sports Coach 7(1): 24–28, 1983.Google Scholar
  21. Payne AH. A comparison of the ground reaction forces in race walking with those in normal walking and running. In Assmussen & Jorgensen (Eds) Biomechanics VI-A, pp. 293–302, University Press, Baltimore, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Purdam C. A survey of netball and basketball injuries. EXCEL 3(3): 8–11, 1987.Google Scholar
  23. Radin EL, Orr RB, Kelman JL, Paul IL, Rose RM. Effects of prolonged walking on concrete on the knees of sheep. Journal of Biomechanics 15: 487–492, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steele JR. An analysis of netball landing techniques: implications for injury prevention and shoe design. Court Action 1(2): 21–23, 1986.Google Scholar
  25. Steele JR. Netball: a weight training circuit without the weights. Sports Coach 10(4): 12–16, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. Steele JR. Injuries and the veteran netball player: minimizing the risks. Sport Science 4(2): 164–175, 1990.Google Scholar
  27. Steele JR, Lafortune MA. The relationship between technique and ground reaction forces at landing in netball. In Gregor et al. (Eds) Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Biomechanics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, June 26–30, 1989. Abstract no. 243, 1989a.Google Scholar
  28. Steele JR, Lafortune MA. A kinetic analysis of footfall patterns at landing in netball: a follow-up study. In Morrison (Ed.) VIIth International Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports, pp. 101–112, Footscray Institute of Technology, Footscray, 1989b.Google Scholar
  29. Steele JR, Milburn PD. A kinematic analysis of netball landing techniques. Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 19(2): 23–27, 1987.aGoogle Scholar
  30. Steele JR, Milburn PD. Ground reaction forces on landing in netball. Journal of Human Movement Studies 13: 399–410, 1987.bGoogle Scholar
  31. Steele JR, Milburn PD. The mechanics of landing in netball. New Zealand Journal of Sports Medicine 16(1): 7–13, 1988.aGoogle Scholar
  32. Steele JR, Milburn PD. Reducing the risk of injury in netball: changing rules or changing techniques? New Zealand Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation 21(1): 17–21, 1988b.Google Scholar
  33. Steele JR, Milburn PD. Effect of different synthetic sport surfaces on ground reaction forces at landing in netball. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 4: 130–145, 1988.cGoogle Scholar
  34. Steele JR, Milburn PD. A kinetic analysis of footfall patterns at landing in netball. Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 21(1): 10–13, 1989.Google Scholar
  35. Voloshin AS, Burger CP, Wosk J, Arcan M. An in vivo evaluation of the leg’s shock-absorbing capacity. In Winter et al. (Eds) Biomechanics IX-B, pp. 112–116, Human Kinetics, Champaign, 1985.Google Scholar
  36. Voloshin AS, Wosk J. An in vivo study of low back pain and shock absorption in the human locomotor system. Journal of Biomechanics 15: 21–27, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. White W. Netball — the relationship between distance and goal-scoring. Court Action 2(1): 16–18, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie R. Steele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Movement ScienceUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations