Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 65–75 | Cite as

Scintigraphic Uptake of 99mTc at Non-Painful Sites in Athletes with Stress Fractures

The Concept of Bone Strain
  • G. O. Matheson
  • D. B. Clement
  • D. C. McKenzie
  • J. E. Taunton
  • D. R. Lloyd-Smith
  • J. G. Macintyre
Injury Clinic

Summary

Stress fractures are commonly found in athletes attending sports medicine clinics for diagnosis of lower limb pain. Plain radiographs are less reliable than the 99mTc bone scan for diagnosing stress fractures because of their low sensitivity. While the heightened sensitivity of the bone scan is advantageous as a diagnostic aid, the uptake of99mTc at non-painful sites occurs frequently in the athlete. Although the clinical significance has not been determined, asymptomatic uptake may indicate bone remodelling as part of a continuum of adaptation to physical stress. It is not known whether athletes who have uptake of99mTc in asymptomatic areas represent a separate population from those who do not. This study retrospectively reviewed the medical charts and bone scan reports of 320 athletes diagnosed as having stress fractures, to determine the frequency of asymptomatic focal uptake at sites other than the site of pain. This group was compared with the group who had no asymptomatic uptake on a number of demographic variables and physical findings. Asymptomatic focal uptake was found in 37.5% of athletes with the average number of sites being 1.8 per person. No significant differences between groups with focal asymptomatic uptake and groups with no asymptomatic uptake were found when compared4 for age, height, weight, mileage in runners, times to diagnosis and recovery, frequency of tenderness, swelling, trauma history, varus alignment, and x-ray abnormalities. It is concluded that asymptomatic uptake of99mTc occurs frequently in athletes with stress fractures and there are no significant clinical differences between the group with asymptomatic uptake and the group without. It is suggested that symptomatic uptake of99mTc represents the remodelling response of bone to physical stress.

Keywords

Stress Fracture Endurance Limit Overuse Injury Focal Uptake Varus Alignment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belkin SC. Stress fractures in athletes. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 11: 735–742, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brill DR. Sports nuclear medicine: bone imaging for lower extremity pain in athletes. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 8: 101–106, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler JE, Brown SL, McConnell BG. Subtrochanteric stress fractures in runners. American Journal of Sports Medicine 10: 228–232, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamay A, Tschantz P. Mechanical influences in bone remodeling: experimental research on Wolffs Law. Journal of Biomechanics 5: 173–180, 1972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clement DB. Tibial stress syndrome in athletes. Journal of Sports Medicine 2: 81:85, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clement DB, Taunton JE, Smart GW, McNicol KL. A survey of overuse running injuries. Physician and Sports Medicine 9: 47–58, 1981Google Scholar
  7. Curry J. The mechanical properties of bones. In the mechanical adaptation of bones, pp. 38–87, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Daffher RH, Martinez S, Gehweiler JA, Harrelson JM. Stress fractures of the proximal tibia in runners. Radiology 142: 63–65, 1982Google Scholar
  9. Davis MA, Jones AG. Comparison of 99mTc-labeled phosphate and phosphonate agents for skeletal imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 6: 19–31, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devas MB. Stress fractures, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1975Google Scholar
  11. Devereaux MD, Parr GR, Lachman SM, Page-Thomas P, Hazleman BL. The diagnosis of stress fractures in athletes. Journal of the American Medical Association 252: 531–533, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugan RC, D’Ambrosia R. Fibular stress fractures in runners. Journal of Family Practice 17: 415–418, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Genant HK, Bautovich GJ, Singh M, Lathrop KA, Harper PV. Bone-seeking radionuclides: an in vivo study of factors affecting skeletal uptake. Radiology 113: 373–382, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Geslien GE, Thrall JH, Espinosa JL, Older RA. Early detection of stress fractures using 99mTc-polyphosphate. Radiology 121: 683:687, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Giladi M, Ziv Y, Aharonson Z, Nili E, Danon YL. Comparison between radiography, bone scan, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of stress fractures. Military Medicine 149: 459–461, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Giladi M, Alcalay J. Stress fractures of the calcaneus — still an enigma in the Israeli army. Journal of the American Medical Association 252: 3128–3129, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greaney RB, Gerber FH, Laughlin RL, Kmet JP, Metz CD, et al. Distribution and natural history of stress fractures in U.S. Marine recruits. Radiology 146: 339–346, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Holder L, Michael RH. The specific scintigraphic pattern of’shin splints in the lower leg’. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 25: 865–869, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. James SL, Bates BT, Ostemig LR. Injuries to runners. American Journal of Sports Medicine 6: 40–50, 1981Google Scholar
  20. Johnson LC, Stradford HT, Geis RW, Dineen JR, Kerley E. Histogenesis of stress fractures. Abstract. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 45-A: 1542, 1963Google Scholar
  21. Jones AG, Francis MD, Davis MA. Bone scanning: radionuclide reaction mechanisms. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 6: 3–18, 1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT. Functional adaptation in skeletal structures. In Hildebrand et al. (Eds) Functional vertebrate morphology, pp. 1–25, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1985Google Scholar
  23. Li G, Zhang S, Chen G, Chen H, Wang A. Radiographic and histologic analyses of stress fracture in rabbit tibias. American Journal of Sports Medicine 13: 285–294, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lombardo SJ, Benson DW. Stress fractures of the femur in runners. American Journal of Sports Medicine 10: 219–227, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macintyre JG, Clement DB, Lloyd-Smith DR, McKenzie DC, Taunton JE, et al. Injuries in aerobic dance: patterns and mechanisms. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, submitted, 1986Google Scholar
  26. Matheson GO, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Taunton JE, Lloyd-Smith DR, et al. Stress fractures in athletes: a study of 320 cases. American Journal of Sports Medicine, in press, 1986Google Scholar
  27. Meurman KOA, Elfving S. Stress fracture of the cuneiform bones. British Journal of Radiology 53: 157–160, 1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orava S, Hulkko A. Stress fractures of the mid-tibial shaft. Acta Orthopedica Scandinavica 55: 35–37, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pendergrass HP, Potsaid MS, Castronovo FP. The clinical use of 99mTc-diphosphonate(HEDSPA). Radiology 107: 557–562, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Prather JL, Nusynitz ML, Snowdy HA, Hughes AD, McCartney WH, et al. Scintigraphic findings in stress fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 59A: 869–874, 1977Google Scholar
  31. Renstrom P, Johnson RJ. Overuse injuries in sports: a review. Sports Medicine 2 (5): 316–333, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenthall L, Hill RO, Chuang S. Observation on the use of 99mTc-phosphate imaging in peripheral bone trauma. Radiology 119: 637–641, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosen PR, Micheli LJ, Treves S. Early scintigraphic diagnosis of bone stress and fractures in athletic adolescents. Pediatrics 70: 11–15, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Roub LW, Gumerman LW, Hanley EN, Clark MW, Goodman M, et al. Bone stress: a radionuclide imaging perspective. Radiology 132: 431–438, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rupani HD, Holder LW, Espinola DA, Engin SI. Three-phase radionuclide bone imaging in sports medicine. Radiology 156: 187–196, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Saunders AJS, Elsayed TF, Hilson AJW, Maisey MN, Grahame R. Stress lesions of the lower leg and foot. Clinical Radiology 30: 649–651, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savoca CJ. Stress fractures: a classification of the earliest radiographic signs. Radiology 100: 519–524, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Siddiqui AR. Bone scans for the early detection of stress fractures. Correspondence. New England Journal of Medicine 298 (13): 1033, 1979Google Scholar
  39. Somer K, Meurman ROA. Computer tomography of stress fractures. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 6: 109–115, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stanish WD. Overuse injuries in athletes: a perspective. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 16(1): 1–7, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Subramanian G, McAfee J. A new complex of 99mTc for skeletal imaging. Radiology 99: 192–196, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Taunton JE, Clement DB, Webber D. Lower extremity stress fractures in athletes. Physician and Sports Medicine 9: 77–86, 1981Google Scholar
  43. Williams J. Recalcitrant stress fracture — a case managed by drilling. British Journal of Sports Medicine 13: 84–85, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Press Limited 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. O. Matheson
    • 1
  • D. B. Clement
    • 1
  • D. C. McKenzie
    • 1
  • J. E. Taunton
    • 1
  • D. R. Lloyd-Smith
    • 1
  • J. G. Macintyre
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Family Practice and the British Columbia Sports Medicine ClinicUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations