Prolonged-Release Nicotinic Acid
- 93 Downloads
Prolonged-release (PR) nicotinic acid (niacin) [Niaspan®] is an oral, once-daily formulation of the lipid-modifying drug designed to produce less vasodilatory flushing than crystalline immediate-release (IR) nicotinic acid and less hepatotoxicity than previous sustained-release formulations of nicotinic acid.
PR nicotinic acid appears to retain the same level of efficacy as crystalline IR nicotinic acid and be better tolerated than older nicotinic acid formulations. Nicotinic acid has beneficial effects on all traditional blood lipid and lipoprotein fractions and is the most effective agent for increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (HDL-C) and reducing lipoprotein(a). The effects of PR nicotinic acid are often additive when used in combination with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), making it a useful addition when lipid goals are not achieved with the usual statin monotherapy or when additional correction of a specific lipid abnormality is required. PR nicotinic acid also slows atherosclerotic progression and even appears to produce regression of atherosclerosis in patients on stable statin therapy. PR nicotinic acid is a logical drug choice for treating atherogenic dyslipidaemia commonly associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome, and has been shown to be effective in patients with diabetes without adversely affecting glycaemic control in the majority of patients. The incidence of vasodilatory flushing with PR nicotinic acid is lower than with IR nicotinic acid and it decreases substantially over time as tolerance develops. To date, there has been no clinically significant hepatotoxicity observed with PR nicotinic acid. Therefore, once-daily PR nicotinic acid appears to maximise the potential benefits of nicotinic acid, while minimising any historical tolerability or safety concerns.
PR nicotinic acid appears to increase HDL-C levels by selectively blocking hepatic catabolic uptake of HDL particles containing apolipoprotein A-I and thereby augmenting reverse cholesterol transport. It selectively increases the proportion of larger HDL particles resulting in an overall increase in HDL particle size. The increase in HDL-C in patients with coronary artery disease was shown to correlate with improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation. PR nicotinic acid also reduces triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles by decreasing the mobilisation of free fatty acids from peripheral adipose tissue to the liver. PR nicotinic acid decreases the number of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles and increases the mean LDL particle size.
Oral PR nicotinic acid is rapidly absorbed and undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism. The time to peak plasma concentration was 4–5 hours. Approximately 60–76% of the dose was recovered in the urine as unchanged nicotinic acid or metabolites. The ratio of non-conjugative to conjugative metabolites decreased with increasing dosage of PR nicotinic acid between 1000 (7.2) and 3000 (1.4) mg/day.
PR nicotinic acid beneficially altered all serum lipid components relative to placebo in patients with primary dyslipidaemia. The response was dose-proportional in the range 500–2000 mg/day. In two studies, PR nicotinic acid 2000 mg/ day increased HDL-C by 23% and 26% from baseline and decreased triglycerides by 29% and 35%, lipoprotein(a) by 24% and 27%, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) by 14% and 17%, apolipoprotein B by 16% and total cholesterol by 10% and 12%, respectively.
PR nicotinic acid maintained full efficacy for at least 2 years in open-label extension studies.
In a head-to-head comparison in patients with hyperlipidaemia, the efficacy of PR nicotinic acid was similar to that of IR nicotinic acid when administered at the same daily dosage (1500 mg/day). PR nicotinic acid 1500–2000 mg/day increased HDL-C and reduced lipoprotein(a) to a greater extent than did gemfibrozil 1200 mg/day in patients with low HDL-C, while gemfibrozil reduced triglycerides to a greater extent than did PR nicotinic acid. PR nicotinic acid tended to increase HDL-C more than lovastatin and to reduce lipoprotein(a) more than lovastatin or rosuvastatin in patients with hyperlipidaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. Lovastatin and rosuvastatin each tended to reduce total cholesterol and LDL-C to a greater extent than PR nicotinic acid.
The combinations of PR nicotinic acid/lovastatin 1500mg/20mg and 2000mg/ 40mg produced generally additive responses. Combinations of PR nicotinic acid and rosuvastatin were generally superior to rosuvastatin alone only with respect to improvements in HDL-C, lipoprotein(a) or apolipoprotein A-I.
PR nicotinic acid in combination with a statin reduced the progression of carotid intima-media thickness compared with placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Atherosclerotic progression at 12 months in placebo recipients was statistically significant, while progression in recipients of PR nicotinic acid was not significant. Preliminary results from an open-label, 12-month extension study suggest that PR nicotinic acid added to a statin produces significant regression of atherosclerosis over 12–24 months.
PR nicotinic acid 1500 mg/day effectively increased HDL-C and decreased triglycerides and LDL-C in patients with dyslipidaemia and type 2 diabetes.
PR nicotinic acid is generally well tolerated with most adverse events being mild-to-moderate in intensity and transient in nature. Flushing was the most frequent adverse event, followed by gastrointestinal symptoms and other cutaneous reactions. PR nicotinic acid-induced flushing decreased over time and was associated with a low incidence of treatment discontinuation. The incidence of flushing with PR nicotinic acid was initially significantly lower than that with IR nicotinic acid.
PR nicotinic acid produced small, reversible elevations in liver transaminases, but there was no clinically significant hepatotoxicity. Similarly, elevated uric acid levels associated with recommended dosages of PR nicotinic acid did not result in any instances of clinical gout. PR nicotinic acid therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia was associated with a small, but statistically significant, increase in glycosylated haemoglobin levels. However, fasting blood glucose levels were well controlled over the course of the 16-week study in most patients.
The incidence of adverse events and treatment discontinuation was higher with PR nicotinic acid than with lovastatin or rosuvastatin, predominantly as a result of flushing with PR nicotinic acid, while the overall tolerability of PR nicotinic acid was similar to that of gemfibrozil. No instances of myopathy or new adverse events occurred when PR nicotinic acid was given in combination with statins.
KeywordsNicotinic Acid Lovastatin Rosuvastatin Gemfibrozil Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate
At the request of the journal, Merck KGaA provided a non-binding review of this article.
- 12.National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002 Dec 17; 106(25): 3143–421Google Scholar
- 24.Morgan JM, Capuzzi DM, de la Llera-Moya M, et al. The effects of crystalline and extended-release niacin, Niaspan, on HDL lipoprotein-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux as compared to placebo [abstract no. 1075-78]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 Feb; 33 Suppl. A: 245AGoogle Scholar
- 26.Cefali EA, Adams MH. Extended-release niacin pharmacokinetics following multiple-dose administration [abstract no. 125]. Pharmacotherapy 2003 Mar; 23(3): 410Google Scholar
- 27.Kos Pharmaceuticals Inc. Niaspan® (niacin extended-release tablets): US prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.niaspan.com [Accessed 2005 Feb 11]
- 28.Merck KGaA. Niaspan (prolonged release tablets): summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://emc.medicines.org.uk [Accessed 2005 Feb 2]
- 33.Taylor AJ, Sullenberger LE, Lee HJ, et al. Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol (ARBITER) 2: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of extended-release niacin on atherosclerosis progression in secondary prevention patients treated with statins. Circulation 2004 Dec 7; 110(23): 3512–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Grundy SM, Vega GL, McGovern ME, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily niacin for the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with type 2 diabetes: results of the Assessment of Diabetes Control and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Niaspan Trial. Diabetes Multicenter Research Group. Arch Intern Med 2002 Jul 22; 162: 1568–76Google Scholar
- 48.Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CNB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Circulation 2004 Jul 13; 110(2): 227–39Google Scholar
- 53.Sacks FM, Pasternak RC, Gibson CM, et al. Effect on coronary atherosclerosis of decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations in normocholesterolaemic patients. Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project (HARP) Group. Lancet 1994 Oct 29; 344(8931): 1182–6Google Scholar
- 54.Kos Pharmaceuticals Inc. Kos Pharmaceuticals announces commencement of landmark long-term coronary heart disease outcomes study: AIM-HIGH study will evaluate whether combination therapy with Niaspan® and simvastatin is superior to simvastatin alone in preventing cardiovascular events [media release]. 2005 Jul 6Google Scholar
- 55.Mosca L, Appel LJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. American Heart Association. Circulation 2004 Feb 10; 109(5): 672–93Google Scholar