- 27 Downloads
The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has shown antitumour activity against a variety of tumour types in vitro and in vivo. Topotecan in combination with drugs that induce DNA damage generally results in synergistic killing of tumour cells in vitro. As the activity of topotecan is related to exposure time, the drug is administered by intravenous infusion either continuously or once daily over a 30-minute period for several consecutive days.
A 30-minute infusion of topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks produced response rates of up to ≈20% in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had failed to respond to platinum-based regimens or relapsed after initial response to such regimens. No significant differences in efficacy were apparent between topotecan and paclitaxel in a phase III study in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, although a trend in favour of topotecan was evident for all major efficacy parameters.
Non-cumulative myelosuppression, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia, is the dose-limiting toxicity associated with topotecan. Myelosuppression was significantly more common with topotecan than with paclitaxel in a single comparative study. Non-haematological adverse events in topotecan recipients are generally mild and include alopecia, nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal problems.
Thus, topotecan has modest efficacy in the treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, with clinical activity similar to that of paclitaxel in a large randomised phase III study in this setting. Combinations of paclitaxel and a platinum compound are being used increasingly for first-line therapy, although relapse rates remain significant. Topotecan is therefore a suitable second-line option, providing antitumour response for some patients whose disease has relapsed after, or is refractory to, platinum-based therapy. Its wider potential when used either alone or in combination regimens should become clearer from ongoing studies.
Topotecan is a water soluble semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin which exerts an antineoplastic effect by inhibiting the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I.
The cytotoxicity of topotecan in vitro is related to exposure time and is significantly greater with continuous exposure to low concentrations of the drug than brief exposure to higher concentrations. Topotecan exhibited some selectivity for human ovarian tumour cells in vitro.
Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan 10 mg/kg once every 4 days increased median survival time in mice with an intraperitoneal human ovarian cancer xenograft and was more effective than doxorubicin 5 mg/kg, cisplatin 4 or 6 mg/kg and carboplatin 60 mg/kg.
The degree of enhancement of cytotoxicity with combinations of topotecan and a variety of other antineoplastic drugs depended on tumour type, duration of exposure, drug concentrations, calculation methods and drug sequence. The addition of drugs that induce DNA damage, such as cisplatin, carmustine or melphalan, to topotecan generally resulted in synergistic killing of hamster V79 cells and a variety of human cancer cell lines.
Classical multidrug-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing a high level of P-glycoprotein were modestly cross-resistant to topotecan and other camptothecin derivatives. Topotecan exhibited similar activity against susceptible and multidrug-resistant murine leukaemia in vivo.
Topotecan, like other camptothecin derivatives, is present in plasma as an active closed-ring lactone and an inactive open-ring form (carboxylate). After intravenous infusion of topotecan 0.5 to 22.5 mg/m2 /day over a 30-minute period, there was a linear relationship between dose and mean peak plasma concentrations and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for the lactone. During 24-hour infusion steady-state concentrations of the carboxylated form were 1.5 to 1.9 times those of the lactone in adults.
Protein binding of topotecan is low (6.6 to 31.3%) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd) has varied between 15 and 86.1 L/m.
Reported mean total plasma clearance (CL) rates were between 17.2 and 69.5 L/h/m2 for the lactone and between 6.5 and 30 L/h/m2 for total topotecan. 24-hour urinary recovery rates were between 20.4 and 41.6%. Mean elimination half-lives were between 1.78 and 4.7 hours.
In patients with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance <3.6 L/h) values for CL and Vd were about half those in patients with normal renal function. Pharmacokinetic parameters are not influenced by hepatic impairment.
A 30-minute infusion of topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks produced response rates of 13.8 to 20.5% in the 3 largest phase II/III studies in women with advanced ovarian cancer who had either failed to respond to or had relapsed after an initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 92 to 139). Continuous 21-day infusion of topotecan 0.3 to 0.5 mg/m2 has shown efficacy in 2 small phase II studies.
There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between topotecan (1.5 mg/m /day for 5 consecutive days every 21 days) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m /day given over 3 hours every 21 days) in a randomised phase III study in women with advanced ovarian cancer that had failed to respond to or had relapsed after platinum-based therapy. However, a trend in favour of topotecan was evident for response rate (20.5 vs 14.0%) as well as for response duration, time to disease progression and survival duration.
In 3 large clinical trials, response to topotecan was higher in patients who were platinum sensitive (19.2 to 29%) than in those whose disease was platinum resistant or refractory (11.3 to 13.3%) [not statistically significant in 1 study, statistical analysis not reported in the other 2 trials].
Myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia, is the dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan. It is reversible, dose-related and non-cumulative. In 2 large studies, topotecan produced grade 4 neutropenia in 78 and 79% of patients and in 40 and 37% of all treatment courses (febrile neutropenia occurred during 3% of 552 courses in 1 study). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 18 and 25% of patients and in 6 and 10% of all courses, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was significantly more common in patients receiving topotecan than in those receiving paclitaxel (79 vs 23%), as was grade 4 thrombocytopenia (25 vs 2%), in a single randomised clinical trial.
Non-haematological adverse events during topotecan therapy were mostly mild, did not necessitate dose reduction, and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, other gastrointestinal effects, stomatitis, dyspnoea and asthenia. Patients receiving topotecan experienced more nausea and vomiting, fatigue, constipation and fever than paclitaxel recipients in a single randomised trial (paclitaxel recipients were pretreated with dexamethasone and histamine H1 receptor antagonists for hypersensitivity reactions, which may have contributed to the lower incidence of nausea and vomiting). Paclitaxel recipients had a higher incidence of alopecia, abdominal pain, arthralgia, myalgia and neuropathy than topotecan recipients (statistical analysis of between-group differences was not provided).
Dosage and Administration
The recommended dosage regimen of topotecan for the treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer is 1.5 mg/m2 /day by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes for 5 consecutive days starting on day 1 of a 21-day course. A minimum of 4 courses is recommended because median time to response has been 9 to 12 weeks.
Before starting treatment with topotecan, patients must have a baseline neutrophil count of >1500 cells/μl and a platelet count of >100 000/μl.
Dosage should be reduced to 0.75 mg/m2 /day in patients with moderate renal impairment [creatinine clearance <40 ml/min (2.4 L/h)].
KeywordsOvarian Cancer Paclitaxel Adis International Limited Lactone Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Blay J, Poon A, Skillings JR, et al. Cytotoxicity of topotecan with cisplatin or etoposide on lung, breast and colon carcinoma cells in vitro [abstract]. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72 Suppl. 1: 198Google Scholar
- 10.Nagourney RA, Risbud A, Blitzer J, et al. Activity spectrum of topotecan in primary cultures of human neoplasms [abstract]. 31st Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1995 May 20–23; Los Angeles, 493Google Scholar
- 17.Kozelsky TK, Bonner JA. Sequence dependent interaction of etoposide and topotecan [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Cancer Res 1995 Mar; 36: 293Google Scholar
- 26.Kuhn J, Irvin R, Kane B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of topotecan following a 30 min infusion or 3 day continuous infusion [abstract]. Pharmacotherapy 1992; 12(3): 247Google Scholar
- 32.Stewart CF, Baker SD, Crom WR, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of topotecan in children with cancer [abstract 2354]. Proc Am Soc Cancer Res 1993; 34 (Mar): 395Google Scholar
- 35.Loos WJ, Stoter G, Verweij J, et al. Sensitive high-performance liquid Chromatographic fluorescence assay for the quantitation of topotecan (SKF 104864-A) and its lactone ring-opened product (hydroxy acid) in human plasma and urine. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 1996 Apr 12; 678: 309–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Gerrits C, Schellens J, Burris H, et al. Prolonged exposure to oral topotecan (TPT), correlates between pharmcokinetics and toxicity [abstract no. *788]. 33rd Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1997 May 17–20; Denver, 224aGoogle Scholar
- 41.Kuhn J, Rizzo J, Eckardt J, et al. Phase I bioavailability study of oral topotecan [abstract]. 31st Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1995 May 20–23; Los Angeles (CA), 474Google Scholar
- 45.Slichenmeyer W, Chen T-L, Donehower R, et al. Clinical pharmacology of topotecan in cancer patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction [abstract]. 30th Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1994 May 14–17; Dallas (TX), 142Google Scholar
- 46.Grochow LB, Slichenmyer W, Rowinsky E, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction [abstract]. Ann Oncol 1994; 5 Suppl. 5: 191Google Scholar
- 49.Armstrong D, Rowinsky E, Donehower R, et al. A phase II trial of topotecan as salvage therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer [abstract]. 31 st Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1995 May 20–23; Los Angeles (CA), 275Google Scholar
- 53.Gordon A, Bookman M, Malmström H, et al. Efficacy of topotecan in advanced cancer after failure of platinum and paclitaxel. International topotecan study group trial [abstract 763]. 32nd Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1996 May 18–21; Philadelphia (PA), 282Google Scholar
- 54.World Health Organization. WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. WHO Offset Publication, No. 48. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1979Google Scholar
- 57.Bookman MA, Malmström H, Bolis G, et al. Topotecan for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an open-label phase II study in patients treated after prior chemotherapy containing cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol. In pressGoogle Scholar
- 59.Gordon A, Carmichael J, Malfetano J, et al. Final analysis of a phase III, randomized study of topotecan (T) vs paclitaxel (P) in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (OC): International Topotecan Study Group [abstract no. *1374]. 34th Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1998 May 16–19; Los Angeles (CA), 356aGoogle Scholar
- 60.Hochster H, Speyer J, Wadler S, et al. Phase II study of topotecan 21-day infusion in platinum-treated ovarian cancer: a highly active regimen (a NYGOG Study) [abstract 775]. 32nd Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1996 May 18–21; Philadelphia (PA), 285Google Scholar
- 62.Rowinsky E, Grochow L, Kaufmann S, et al. Sequence-dependent effects of topotecan and cisplatin in a phase I and pharmacological study [abstract]. Ann Oncol 1994; 5 Suppl. 5: 192Google Scholar
- 69.National Cancer Institute. In: Clinical cancer information for physicians, WWW CancerNet [online]. National Cancer Institute; Jan 1998. Available from: URL: http://www.ncc.go.jp/cnet.html [Accessed 1998 Aug 7]
- 71.Lorigan PC, Crosby T, Coleman RE. Drug treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Paediatr Obst Gynaecol 1996 Sep/Oct: 25–9Google Scholar
- 72.Clarke-Pearson DL, Van Le T, Whitney CW, et al. A phase II study of oral topotecan as a single agent, second-line therapy, administered for five days in patients with advanced ovarian cancer [abstract no. 1403]. 34th Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1998 May 16–19; Los Angeles (CA), 363aGoogle Scholar
- 73.Gore M, Rustin G, Calvert H, et al. A multicentre, randomised, phase III study of topotecan (T) administered intravenously or orally for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma [abstract no. *1346]. 34th Annual Meeting, American Society of Clinical Oncology; 1998 May 16–19; Los Angeles (CA), 349aGoogle Scholar