New Developments in the Drug Treatment of Glaucoma
- 23 Downloads
This article reviews standard treatment modalities for patients with glaucoma and describes 3 classes of drugs which are undergoing development: apraclonidine (aplonidine, ALO 2145), an α2-adrenergic agonist which has been released for clinical use; topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, a modification of the systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors currently in use; and prostaglandins (PGs), a new class of drugs with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
Standard treatment modalities include parasympathomimetic agents such as pilocarpine, car-bachol, and phospholine iodide, which lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing aqueous outflow through the trabecular meshwork. A newer form of pilocarpine as a gel produces a longer action. Adrenergic agonist medications, such as epinephrine (adrenaline) and its prodrug dipivefrine (dipivalyl epinephrine), function by increasing uveoscleral outflow and trabecular outflow facility.
A decrease in aqueous formation by the ciliary processes is thought to be the mechanism of action of β-adrenoceptor antagonists, but the physiological basis for this action has not been clearly demonstrated. A newer β-blocker, betaxolol, has relatively selective β2-blocking activity.
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are nonbacteriostatic sulphonamide derivatives which decrease aqueous formation by the ciliary body. Almost 50% of patients taking these medications are unable to tolerate them because of their adverse effects, and there is thus much interest in the development of a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor with the potential for fewer adverse effects. MK 507 is the most recent and most potent compound in the series of topically active carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
Apraclonidine hydrochloride is a derivative of clonidine hydrochloride, an α2-adrenergic agonist. Clonidine has previously been shown to lower IOP significantly, but has the potential to produce marked lowering of both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Its major ocular effect appears to be a decrease in aqueous production. The structural modification to apraclonidine decreases corneal absorption and the drug’s ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, minimising the risk of centrally mediated cardiovascular side effects.
Apraclonidine may also influence secondary avenues of aqueous outflow, such as uveoscleral outflow, and may also affect conjunctival and episcleral vascular flow. It produces a mean decrease in IOP of 25% for as long as 12 hours. Adverse effects include blanching of the conjunctiva, minimal mydriasis and eyelid retraction. This drug has been approved in the US for use in prevention of elevated IOP after argon laser trabeculoplasty and iridotomy, and has potential uses in preventing an IOP rise after YAG laser posterior capsulotomy and cataract surgery in patients already on other antiglaucomatous medications.
Lower doses of certain prostaglandins, especially PGF2α, have produced a dramatic IOP lowering effect. A 10 to 25% decrease in IOP can occur in humans at doses which are probably submaximal, with little or no evidence of intraocular inflammation. There is no effect on pupillary diameter or visual acuity; however, conjunctival hyperaemia, ocular irritation and a foreign body sensation have been noted. It is hoped that new drug analogues will eliminate these adverse effects. The primary mechanism of the ocular hypotensive action of prostaglandins is thought to be an increase in uveoscleral outflow.
Twice-daily doses of the isopropylester derivative of PGF2α (PGF2α-IE) for several days have the ability to consistently reduce IOP by 50 to 60%, to pressures of less than 10mm Hg in cynomolgus monkeys. Prostaglandins are thus the most powerful topical ocular hypotensive agents yet tested in subhuman primates. It remains to be seen whether maximal doses in humans will produce as dramatic an effect. If so, prostaglandin treatment could provide an alternative to surgery for very difficult patients in whom high-risk procedures are necessary in an attempt to achieve these very low IOPs.
KeywordsGlaucoma Timolol Pilocarpine Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Investigative Ophthalmology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abraham SV. Miotics in glaucoma. Glaucoma 7(5): 246–248, 1985Google Scholar
- American Academy of Ophthalmology, Quality of Care Committee, Glaucoma Panel. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern. Epidemiology and magnitude, p.2, February 25, 1989Google Scholar
- Barany EH, Rohen JW. Localized contraction and relaxation within the ciliary muscle of the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus ethiops). In Rohen JW (Ed.) The structure of the eye, second symposium, pp. 287–311, Schattauer-Verlag, Stuttgart, 1965Google Scholar
- Bill A. Formation and drainage of aqueous humor in cats. Experimental Eye Research 5: 185–190, 1966aGoogle Scholar
- Bill A. Blood circulation and fluid dynamics in the eye. Pharmacological Reviews 55: 383–417, 1975Google Scholar
- Bill A, Heilmann K. Ocular effects of clonidine in cats and monkeys (Macaca irus). Experimental Eye Research 21: 481–488, 1978Google Scholar
- Blanchard DL. Adrenergic-associated symblepharon. Glaucoma 9: 18–20, 1987Google Scholar
- Bovino JA, Marcus DF. The mechanism of transient myopia induced by sulfonamide therapy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 78: 327, 1974Google Scholar
- Chandler PA, Grant WM. Diaǵnosis and treatment of glaucomas in adults. In Epstein DL (Ed.) Glaucoma, 3rd ed., 5, pp. 129–180, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1986Google Scholar
- Coleman AL, Robin AL, Pollack IP. Apraclonidine hydrochloride. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America 2: 97–108, 1989aGoogle Scholar
- Coleman AL, Robin AL, Rudikoff MT, Pollack IP. A comparison of the cardiovascular effects and intraocular pressure lowering of apraclonidine and timolol. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 29 (Suppl.): 22, 1989bGoogle Scholar
- Crawford K, Kaufman PL, Majors LJ. Dose-response relationships between PGF2α-IE and IOP, refraction and pupil diameter in cynomolgus monkeys. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 30 (Suppl.): 24, 1989Google Scholar
- Cyrlin JS, Beckman H. Low-dose oral glycerin for the prevention of post-laser IOP elevation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 28 (Suppl.): 272, 1987Google Scholar
- DeRoetth Jr A. Lens opacities in patients on phospholine iodide therapy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 62: 619–628, 1966Google Scholar
- George JL, Sirbat D, Lesure P, Lippa E, Royer J, et al. MK-417 vs MK-927: multiple-dose efficacy comparison of two topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 30 (Suppl.): 98, 1989Google Scholar
- Giufrè G. The effects of prostaglandin F2α in the human eye. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 222: 139–141, 1985Google Scholar
- Grant WM. Antiglaucoma drugs: problems with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. In Leopold IM (Ed.) Symposium on ocular therapy 6, pp. 19–38, Mosby, St. Louis, 1972Google Scholar
- Hayashi MT, Yablonski ME, Bito LZ, Miranda OC. The effects of ocular hypotensive doses of prostaglandins (PGs) and their esters on aqueous humor dynamics of cat eyes. Proceedings of the International Society for Eye Research 4: 14, 1986Google Scholar
- Heilman K, Richardson KT (Eds). Glaucoma and glaucoma suspects. In Glaucoma: conceptions of a disease, pp. 2-6, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Georg Thieme Publishers, Stuttgart, 1978Google Scholar
- Higginbotham EJ. Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. In Zimmerman TJ & Kooner KS (Eds) Ophthalmology clinics of North America pp. 113–130, Saunders, Philadelphia, March 1989Google Scholar
- Higginbotham E, Kao SF, Kass M, Weinreb R, Lippa E, et al. Once-daily and twice-daily treatment with the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor MK-927. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 30 (Suppl.): 23, 1989Google Scholar
- Hoskins HD Jr, Kass M. Becker-Shaffer’s diagnosis and therapy of the glaucomas, 6th ed., pp. 2–9, C.V. Mosby, St Louis, MO, 1989Google Scholar
- Innemee HC, Hermans AJM, van Zweiten PA. The influence of clonidine on intraocular pressure after topical application to the eyes of anesthetized cats. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 212: 19–27, 1979Google Scholar
- Innemee HC, van Zweiten PA. The central ocular hypotensive effect of clonidine. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 210: 93–102, 1979Google Scholar
- Kass M, Korey M, Gordon M, Becker B. Timolol and acetazolamide: a study of concurrent administration. Archives of Ophthalmology 100: 921–942, 1982Google Scholar
- Kaufman PL. Aqueous humor outflow. In Zadunaisky& Davson (Eds) Current topics in eye research, Vol. 4, pp. 97–138, Academic Press, New York, 1984Google Scholar
- Kaufman PL. Aqueous humor dynamics. In Duane TD (Ed.) Clinical ophthalmology, Vol. 3, pp. 1–24, Harper & Row, Philadelphia, 1985Google Scholar
- Kaufman PL. Recent advances in the physiology and pharmacology of the ciliary muscle in relation to aqueous humor outflow. Proceedings of the International Society for Eye Research 5: 73, 1988Google Scholar
- Kinsey VE. Ion movement in ciliary processes. In Bittar EE (Ed.) Membranes and ion transport, Vol. 3, pp. 185–209, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971Google Scholar
- Lewis RA. Medical therapy of glaucoma. In Duane TD & Jaeger EA (Eds) Clinical ophthalmology, Vol. 3, pp. 1–24, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1988Google Scholar
- Maren TH. Teratology and carbonic anhydrase inhibition. Archives of Ophthalmology 78: 327, 1974Google Scholar
- Maren TH. The development of ideas concerning the role of carbonic anhydrase in the secretion of aqueous humor relation to the treatment of glaucoma. In Drance SM & Neufeld AH (Eds) Glaucoma: applied pharmacology in medical treatment, pp. 325–355, Grune and Stratton, Orlando, Florida, 1984Google Scholar
- Rehany U, Rose L, Mazor Z, Ticho U. Visual effects of echothiophate (phospholine) iodide and pilocarpine hydrochloride in young adults. Glaucoma 2: 456–460, 1980Google Scholar
- Ritch R, Lowe RF, Reyes A. Therapeutic overview of angle-closure glaucoma. In Ritch et al. (Eds) The Glaucomas, Vol. 2, Section 48, pp. 855–864, C.V. Mosby Co., Baltimore, 1989Google Scholar
- Robin AL. The role of apraclonidine hydrochloride in laser therapy for glaucoma. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 97: 729–761, 1989Google Scholar
- Robin AL, Novack GD. Alpha 2 agonist in the therapy of glaucoma. In Drance et al. (Eds) Glaucoma: applied pharmacology in medical treatment, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, in press, 1991Google Scholar
- Schottensteinai EM. Intraocular pressure. In Ritch et al. (Eds) The Glaucomas, Vol. 1, Section 15, pp. 301–317, C.V. Mosby Co., Baltimore, 1989Google Scholar
- Schwartz JS, Weinstock SM. Side effects of topical epinephrine therapy. Glaucoma 5: 21–23, 1983Google Scholar
- Serdahl C, Galustian J, Lewis RA. Effects of apraclonidine on conjunctival oxygen tension. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 30 (Suppl.): 22, 1989Google Scholar
- Stewart RH, Kimbrough RL, Smith JP, Ward RL. Long acting pilocarpine gel: a dose-response in ocular hypertensive subjects. Glaucoma 6: 182–185, 1984Google Scholar
- Stitzel RE, Irish III JM. Water, electrolyte metabolism and diuretic agents. In Craig CR & Stitzel RE (Eds) Modern pharmacology, pp. 328–329, Little Brown, Boston, 1982Google Scholar
- Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee. Acetazolamide: pancytopenia. Bulletin SADRAC No. 46, 1985Google Scholar
- Tamm E, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Rittig M, Rohen JW. Connective tissue changes in the uveoscleral pathways of primate eyes after treatment with prostaglandin F2α. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 30 (Suppl.): 99, 1989Google Scholar
- Terry AC, Stark WJ, Maumenee AE, et al. Neodymium:YAG laser for posterior capsulotomy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 86: 716–720, 1983Google Scholar
- VanBuskirk EM, Weinreb RN, Berry DP, Lustgarten JS, Podos SM, et al. Betaxolol in patients with glaucoma and asthma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 101: 531–534, 1986Google Scholar
- Weinreb RN, Kass MA, Lippa EA, et al. MS-507 vs MK-417: comparative efficacy of two topically active carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Ophthalmology 97 (Suppl. 1): 124, 1990Google Scholar
- Zimmerman TJ. Acetazolamide and methazolamide. Annals of Ophthalmology 10: 509–510, 1978Google Scholar
- Zimmerman TJ. Mechanism of action of topical epinephrine. Editorial. Annals of Ophthalmology 16: 307–308, 1984Google Scholar
- Zimmerman TJ, Baumann JD, Hetherington J. Side effects of timolol. Survey of Ophthalmology 2: 243–249, 1983Google Scholar