Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 403–416 | Cite as

Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Roflumilast and Roflumilast N-Oxide in Patients with Mild and Moderate Liver Cirrhosis

  • Robert Hermann
  • Nassr Nassr
  • Gezim Lahu
  • Éva Péterfai
  • Dietrich Knoerzer
  • Rolf Herzog
  • Karl Zech
  • Christian de Mey
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

Roflumilast and its primary N-oxide metabolite are targeted Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors with similar in vivo potency. Roflumilast is being developed for the treatment of inflammatory airway diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

Objective

To investigate the effects of mild and moderate liver cirrhosis on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide.

Methods

Patients with mild (n = 8, Child-Pugh A) and moderate (n = 8, Child-Pugh B) liver cirrhosis and healthy subjects (n = 8) matched with patients with cirrhosis with regard to sex, age and bodyweight received oral roflumilast 25Cμg once daily for 14 days. Blood samples were collected for 24 hours after the last dose on day 14. Steady-state plasma concentrations of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assay. The pharmacokinetics were compared between groups using ANOVA.

Results

In patients with liver cirrhosis, the average total exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours [AUC24]) of roflumilast was ≈51% (Child-Pugh A) and 92% (Child-Pugh B) higher than in healthy subjects. In contrast, roflumilast maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was unaltered in Child-Pugh A patients and was increased by 27% in Child-Pugh B patients. Changes in the AUC24 of roflumilast N-oxide were less distinct, with 24% and 41% increases and corresponding Cmax increases of 26% and 40% in Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. Overall, changes in average potency-corrected exposure to the sum of the free fractions of both compounds were estimated to result in ≈26% and 46% increases in total PDE4 inhibitory capacity (tPDE4i) in Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively, relative to healthy subjects. Roflumilast was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Mild and moderate liver cirrhosis resulted in distinct alterations of exposure to roflumilast but only in modest alterations of exposure to roflumlast N-oxide. The integrated exposure-weighted assessment of the observed pharmacokinetic changes of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide (tPDE4i) indicates modest average exposure increases to the sum of both compounds. These findings and the favourable tolerability profile suggest that roflumilast can be safely used in patients with mild and moderate liver cirrhosis without special precautions or dose adjustment.

Keywords

Liver Cirrhosis Roflumilast Trimetazidine Hepatic Function Impairment Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by ALTANA Pharma AG (Konstanz, Germany). The authors thank the clinical team at the Drug Research Center in Balatonfüred, Hungary, for technical assistance in the conduct of the study and Mrs Sabine Berger, Exploratory Medicine, ALTANA Pharma AG (Konstanz, Germany) for clinical monitoring of the study. The authors thank pharm-analyt Labor GmbH (Baden, Austria) for performing the bioanalytical assays of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide, and Medical Laboratory Bremen GmbH (Bremen, Germany) for analysing monoethylglycinexylidide and lidocaine. The authors acknowledge Dr Angela Schilling and Dr Kathy B. Thomas (Medical Writing, ALTANA Pharma AG, Konstanz, Germany) for helpful suggestions during the preparation of the article.

The authors Dr Robert Hermann, Dr Nassr Nassr, Gezim Lahu, Dr Dietrich Knoerzer, Rolf Herzog and Dr Karl Zech are employees of ALTANA Pharma AG (Konstanz, Germany). Dr Christian de Mey and Dr Éva Péterfai have assumed the roles of the principal investigator and the clinical investigator, respectively, as representatives of contract research organisations for the present study. As such, they have relationships involving commercial interests with the sponsor of this study. Beyond the scope of the present study, Dr Christian de Mey also serves as a consultant for ALTANA Pharma AG.

References

  1. 1.
    Lipworth BJ. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 2005; 365(9454): 167–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reid P. Roflumilast ALTANA Pharma. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2002; 3(8): 1165–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bousquet J, Aubier M, Sastre J, et al. Comparison of roflumilast, an oral anti-inflammatory, with beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of persistent asthma. Allergy 2006; 61(1): 72–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rabe KF, Bateman ED, O’Donnell D, et al. Roflumilast: an oral anti-inflammatory treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366(9485): 563–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Schalkwyk E, Strydom K, Williams Z, et al. Roflumilast, an oral, once-daily Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, attenuates allergen-induced asthmatic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 116(2): 292–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    David M, Zech K, Seiberling M, et al. Roflumilast, a novel, oral, selective PDE4 inhibitor, shows high absolute bioavailability [abstract]. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113 (2 Suppl. 1): S220–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hiinnemeyer A, Hauns B, David M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of roflumilast, a once-daily, oral, selective PDE4 inhibitor, and its active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide in healthy subjects [abstract]. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113 (2 Suppl. 1): S222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bundschuh DS, Eltze M, Barsig J, et al. In vivo efficacy in airway disease models of roflumilast, a novel orally active PDE4 inhibitor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 297(1): 280–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hatzelmann A, Schudt C. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential of the novel PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 297(1): 267–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schudt C, Winder S, Forderkunz S, et al. Influence of selective Phosphodiesterase inhibitors on human neutrophil functions and levels of cAMP and Cai. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1991; 344(6): 682–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermann R, Lahu G, Hauns B, et al. Total PDE4 inhibitory activity: a concept for evaluating pharmacokinetic alterations of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in special populations and drug-drug interactions [abstract]. Eur Respir J 2006; 28 Suppl. 50: 436sGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lahu G, Hünnemeyer A, Reutter F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide with concomitant ketoconazole [abstract]. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3: A850Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lahu G, Hiinnemeyer A, Herzog R, et al. Effect of erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide [abstract]. Proc Am Thor Soc 2006; 3: A850Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iwao T, Toyonaga A, Oho K, et al. Value of Doppler ultrasound parameters of portal vein and hepatic artery in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92(6): 1012–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of Creatinine clearance from serum Creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16(1): 31–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60(8): 646–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arrigoni A, Gindro T, Aimo G, et al. Monoethylglicinexylidide test: a prognostic indicator of survival in cirrhosis. Hepatology 1994; 20(2): 383–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kupcova V, Turecky L, Szantova M, et al. Monoethylglycinexylidide, a metabolite of lidocaine, as an index of liver function in chronic hepatic parenchymal diseases. Bratisl Lek Listy 1999; 100(1): 12–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cawello W (editor), Brett M, Weimann H-J, et al. Parameters for compartment-free pharmacokinetics: standardisation of study design, data analysis and reporting. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 1999Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Streit F, Niedmann PD, Shipkova M, et al. Rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of monoethylglycinexylidide. Clin Chem 2001; 47(10): 1853–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bethke TD, Giessmann T, Westphal K, et al. Roflumilast, a once-daily oral Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor lacks relevant pharmacokinetic interactions with inhaled salbutamol when co-administered in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006; 44(11): 572–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bethke TD, Böhmer GM, Hermann R, et al. Dose-proportional intraindividual single- and repeated-dose pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, an oral, once-daily Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 47(1): 26–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nassr N, Lahu G, Hiinnemeyer A, et al. Magnesium hydroxide/ aluminium hydroxide-containing antacid does not affect the pharmacokinetics of the targeted Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast. J Clin Pharmacol. Epub 2007 Mar 20Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chalon SA, Desager JP, Desante KA, et al. Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 73(3): 178–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tygstrup N. Assessment of liver function: principles and practice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1990; 5(4): 468–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janssen U, Walker S, Maier K, et al. Flumazenil disposition and elimination in cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 46(3): 317–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klotz U, Avant GR, Hoyumpa A, et al. The effects of age and liver disease on the disposition and elimination of diazepam in adult man. J Clin Invest 1975; 55(2): 347–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klotz U, Fischer C, Muller-Seydlitz P, et al. Alterations in the disposition of differently cleared drugs in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 26(2): 221–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Elbekai RH, Korashy HM, El Kadi AO. The effect of liver cirrhosis on the regulation and expression of drug metabolizing enzymes. Curr Drug Metab 2004; 5(2): 157–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    George J, Liddle C, Murray M, et al. Pre-translational regulation of cytochrome P450 genes is responsible for disease-specific changes of individual P450 enzymes among patients with cirrhosis. Biochem Pharmacol 1995; 49(7): 873–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parkinson A, Mudra DR, Johnson C, et al. The effects of gender, age, ethnicity, and liver cirrhosis on cytochrome P450 enzyme activity in human liver microsomes and inducibility in cultured human hepatocytes. Toxicol Appi Pharmacol 2004; 199(3): 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morgan DJ, McLean AJ. Therapeutic implications of impaired hepatic oxygen diffusion in chronic liver disease. Hepatology 1991; 14(6): 1280–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frye RF, Zgheib NK, Matzke GR, et al. Liver disease selectively modulates cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006; 80(3): 235–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Hermann
    • 1
  • Nassr Nassr
    • 1
  • Gezim Lahu
    • 2
  • Éva Péterfai
    • 3
  • Dietrich Knoerzer
    • 2
  • Rolf Herzog
    • 4
  • Karl Zech
    • 5
  • Christian de Mey
    • 6
  1. 1.Exploratory MedicineALTANA Pharma AGKonstanzGermany
  2. 2.Pharmacometrics and PharmacokineticsALTANA Pharma AGKonstanzGermany
  3. 3.DRC — Drug Research CenterBalatonfüredHungary
  4. 4.BioanalyticsALTANA Pharma AGKonstanzGermany
  5. 5.Preclinical ResearchALTANA Pharma AGKonstanzGermany
  6. 6.ACPS — Applied Clinical Pharmacology ServicesMainz-KastelGermany

Personalised recommendations