Ranolazine is a compound that is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of chronic angina pectoris in combination with amlodipine, β-adrenoceptor antagonists or nitrates, in patients who have not achieved an adequate response with other anti-anginals. The anti-anginal effect of ranolazine does not depend on changes in heart rate or blood pressure. It acts through different pharmacological mechanisms where inhibition of the late inward sodium current (reducing calcium overload and thereby left ventricular diastolic tension) is one plausible mechanism of reduced oxygen consumption. Initial studies used an oral solution or an immediate-release (IR) capsule, but subsequently an extended-release (ER) formulation was developed to allow for twice-daily administration with maintained efficacy.
Following administration of an oral solution or IR capsule, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) are observed within 1 hour. After administration of radio-labelled ranolazine, 73% of the dose was excreted in urine, and unchanged ranolazine accounted for <5% of radioactivity in both urine and faeces. The absolute bioavailability ranges from 35% to 50%. Food has no effect on rate or extent of absorption from the ER formulation. Ranolazine protein binding is about 61–64% over the therapeutic concentration range. Volume of distribution at steady state ranges from 85 to 180L.
Ranolazine is extensively metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes and, to a lesser extent, by CYP2D6, with approximately 5% excreted renally unchanged. Elimination half-life of ranolazine is 1.4–1.9 hours but is apparently prolonged, on average, to 7 hours for the ER formulation as a result of extended absorption (flip-flop kinetics). Elimination occurs through parallel linear and saturable elimination pathways, where the saturable pathway is related to CYP2D6, which is partly inhibited by ranolazine. Oral plasma clearance diminishes with dose from, on average, 45 L/h at 500mg twice daily to 33 L/h at 1000mg twice daily. The departure from dose proportionality for this dose range is modest, with increases in steady-state Cmax and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 12 hours of 2.5- and 2.7-fold, respectively. Ranolazine pharmacokinetics are unaffected by sex, congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus. AUC increases up to 2-fold with advancing degree of renal impairment.
Ranolazine is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A, and increases AUC and Cmax for simvastatin, its metabolites and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor activity <2-fold. Digoxin AUC is increased 40–60% by ranolazine through P-glycoprotein inhibition. Ranolazine AUC is increased by C YP3 A inhibitors ranging from 1.5-fold for diltiazem 180mg once daily to 3.9-fold for ketoconazole 200mg twice daily. Verapamil increases ranolazine exposure approximately 2-fold. CYP2D6 inhibition has a negligible effect on ranolazine exposure.
Digoxin Simvastatin Diltiazem Mean Residence Time Ranolazine
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Funding to assist in the preparation of this review was provided by CV Therapeutics, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA
Dr Jerling was an employee of CV Therapeutics at the time of studies conduct and reporting, and is currently a consultant to CV Therapeutics.
Cocco G, Rousseau MF, Bouvy T, et al. Effects of a new metabolic modulator, ranolazine, on exercise tolerance in angina pectoris patients treated with beta-blocker or diltiazem. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992; 20(1): 131–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chaitman BR, Pepine CJ, Parker JO, et al. Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(3): 309–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaitman BR, Skettino SL, Parker JO, et al. Anti-ischemic effects and long-term survival during ranolazine monotherapy in patients with chronic severe angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43(8): 1375–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau MF, Pouleur H, Cocco G, et al. Comparative efficacy of ranolazine versus atenolol for chronic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95(3): 311–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antzelevitch C, Belardinelli L, Zygmunt AC, et al. Electrophysiological effects of ranolazine, a novel antianginal agent with antiarrhythmic properties. Circulation 2004; 110: 904–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song Y, Shryock JC, Wu L, et al. Antagonism by ranolazine of the pro-arrhythmic effects of increasing late INa in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2004; 44(2): 192–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C, Fraser H. Inhibition of late (sustained/persistent) sodium current: a potential drug target to reduce intracellular sodium-dependent calcium overload and its detrimental effects on cardiomyocyte function. Eur Heart J Suppl I 2004; 6: 113–17Google Scholar
Meyer M, Keweloh B, Guth K, et al. Frequency-dependence of myocardial energetics in failing human myocardium as quantified by a new method for the measurement of oxygen consumption in muscle strip preparations. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1998; 30(8): 1459–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashida W, van Eyll C, Rousseau MF, et al. Effects of ranolazine on left ventricular regional diastolic function in patients with ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1994; 8(5): 741–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal SL, Sheiner LB. NONMEM users guide. Part I: users basic guide. USCF, San Francisco (CA): NONMEM Project Group, 1989Google Scholar
Cockroft D, Gault M. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16: 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerling M, Huan B-L, Leung K, et al. Studies to investigate the pharmacokinetic interactions between ranolazine and ketoconazole, diltiazem, or simvastatin during combined administration in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45(4): 422–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerling M, Farrell C. Population pharmacokinetics of ranolazine [abstract]. J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45: 29Google Scholar
Prueksaritanont T, Gorham LM, Ma B, et al. In vitro metabolism of simvastatin in humans [SBT]identification of metabolizing enzymes and effect of the drug on hepatic P450s. Drug Metab Dispos 1997; 25(10): 1191–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
Prueksaritanont T, Ma B, Yu N. The human hepatic metabolism of simvastatin hydroxy acid is mediated primarily by CYP3A, and not CYP2D6. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 56(1): 120–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilja JJ, Kivisto KT, Neuvonen PJ. Grapefruit juice-simvastatin interaction: effect on serum concentrations of simvastatin, simvastatin acid, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 64(5): 477–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuvonen PJ, Kantola T, Rivisto KT. Simvastatin but not pravastatin is very susceptible to interaction with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 63(3): 332–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
CVT technical report CVT303.010-N: the P170-glycoprotein transporter as a potential site of the ranolazine/digoxin drug interaction. 2002 Aug 20Google Scholar
Tiberghien F, Loor F. Ranking of P-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors by a calcein-AM fluorometry screening assay. Anticancer Drugs 1996; 7(5): 568–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo KR, Yeo WW. Inhibitory effects of verapamil and diltiazem on simvastatin metabolism in human liver microsomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 51(5): 461–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koren G, Woodland C, Ito S. Toxic digoxin-drug interactions: the major role of renal P-glycoprotein. Vet Hum Toxicol 1998; 40(1): 45–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wakasugi H, Yano I, Ito T, et al. Effect of clarithromycin on renal excretion of digoxin: interaction with P-glycoprotein. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 64(1): 123–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal K, Weinbrenner A, Giessmann T, et al. Oral bioavailability of digoxin is enhanced by talinolol: evidence for involvement of intestinal P-glycoprotein. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 68(1): 6–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckenridge A, Orme M, Wesseling H, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the enantiomers of warfarin in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1974; 15(4): 424–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rettie AE, Korzekwa KR, Kunze KL, et al. Hydroxylation of warfarin by human cDNA-expressed cytochrome P-450: a role for P-4502C9 in the etiology of (S)-warfarin-drug interactions. Chem Res Toxicol 1992; 5(1): 54–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotreau MM, von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ. The influence of age and sex on the clearance of cytochrome P450 3A substrates. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(1): 33–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleisher D, Li C, Zhou Y, et al. Drug, meal and formulation interactions influencing drug absorption after oral administration: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 36: 233–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerling M, Abdallah H. Effect of renal impairment on multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of extended-release ranolazine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005; 78(3): 288–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreisbach AW, Lertora JJ. The effect of chronic renal failure on hepatic drug metabolism and drug disposition. Semin Dial 2003; 16(1): 45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdallah H, Jerling M. Effect of hepatic impairment on the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ranolazine sustained-release tablets. J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45(7): 802–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60(8): 646–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leithe M, Margorien R, Hermiller J, et al. Relationship between central hemodynamics and regional blood flow in normal subjects and in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1984; 69(1): 57–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matzke G, Frye R, Early J, et al. Evaluation of the influence of diabetes mellitus on antipyrine metabolism and CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 activity. Pharmacotherapy 2000; 20: 182–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar