Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 1–6 | Cite as

Using Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships to Predict the Effect of Poor Compliance

Leading Article

Abstract

Since it is difficult to improve patient compliance to drug prescriptions, an alternative is to select a drug with less consequences for poor compliance, that is, a drug that has the capacity of ‘forgiveness’. Forgiveness is the property of a drug which, when compared with another medicine with different pharmacokinetics and/or concentration-effect relationships, blunts the consequences of missing one or two doses in a row, or has a greater variability in the timing of intake. Simulations show that drugs with a concentration-effect relationship modelled with an effect compartment, for example a delayed response, have more forgiveness. A marker of forgiveness would be of some help for doctors deciding which drug to prescribe to patients who are poor compilers.

Keywords

Poor Compliance Peripheral Compartment Effect Compartment Improve Patient Compliance Drug Holiday 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by APRET (Agence Pour la Recherche et l’Evaluation Thérapeutique), the Luennec Medical School and Lyon Teaching Hospital.

References

  1. 1.
    Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, editors. Compliance in health care. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979: 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peyrieux JC, Boissel JP, Leizorovicz A. Relationship between plasma mexiletine levels at steady-state. Presence of ventricular arrhythmias and side effects. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1987; 1: 45–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boissel JP, Collet JP, Moleur P, et al. Surrogate endpoints: a basis for a rational approach. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 43: 235–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Urquhart J. Role of patient compliance in clinical pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 1994; 27(3): 202–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levy G. A pharmacokinetic perspective on medicament noncompliance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 242–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nony P, Cucherat M, Boissel JP. Revisiting the effect compartment through timing errors in drug administration. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1998; 19: 49–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Segre G. Kinetics of interaction between drugs and biological systems. Farmaco (Sci) 1968; 23: 907–18Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holford NHG, Sheiner LB. Kinetics of pharmacologie response. Pharmacol Ther 1982; 6: 143–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical PharmacologyClaude Bernard University and Teaching HospitalLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations