Advertisement

Clinical Pharmacokinetics

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 395–403 | Cite as

Pharmacokinetic Software for the Health Sciences

Choosing the Right Package for Teaching Purposes
Leading Article

Abstract

Computer assisted learning has an important role in the teaching of pharmacokinetics to health sciences students because it transfers the emphasis from the purely mathematical domain to an ‘experiential’ domain in which graphical and symbolic representations of actions and their consequences form the major focus for learning. Basic pharmacokinetic concepts can be taught by experimenting with the interplay between dose and dosage interval with drug absorption (e.g. absorption rate, bioavailability), drug distribution (e.g. volume of distribution, protein binding) and drug elimination (e.g. clearance) on drug concentrations using library (‘canned’) pharmacokinetic models.

Such ‘what if’ approaches are found in calculator-simulators such as PharmaCalc, Practical Pharmacokinetics and PK Solutions. Others such as SAAM II, ModelMaker, and Stella represent the ‘systems dynamics’ genre, which requires the user to conceptualise a problem and formulate the model on-screen using symbols, icons, and directional arrows.

The choice of software should be determined by the aims of the subject/course, the experience and background of the students in pharmacokinetics, and institutional factors including price and networking capabilities of the package(s). Enhanced learning may result if the computer teaching of pharmacokinetics is supported by tutorials, especially where the techniques are applied to solving problems in which the link with healthcare practices is clearly established.

Keywords

Intermittent Infusion Absorption Rate Constant Serum Drug Concentration Computer Assisted Learning Library Drug 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bourne DWA, Triggs EJ, Eadie MJ. Pharmacokinetics for the non-mathematical. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1986Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lesh R, Post T, Behr M. Dienes revisited: multiple embodiments in computer environments. In: Wirzup I, Streit R, editors. Development in school mathematics around the world. Reston (VA): National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1987: 647–80Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaput JJ. Technology and mathematics education. In: Grouws DA, editor. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: a project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Macmillan, 1992Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danek A, Poczatek J. A simple electronic circuit for simulation of pharmacokinetic processes. Arzneimettel Forschung (Drug Res) 1976; 26: 321–4Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson F, Wilson CG. A microprocessor-based simulator for teaching pharmacokinetics [proceedings]. Br J Pharmacol 1979; 67: 502P–3PPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aarons L, Foster RW, Hollingsworth M, et al. Computer-assisted learning lessons in drug disposition and pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacol Methods 1988; 20: 109–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Navarro JDS, Alvarez JAT, Ortega FP, et al. A DYNAMO application of microcomputer-based simulation in health sciences teaching. Int J Nurs Stud 1993; 30: 425–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feldman RD, Schoenwald R, Kane J. Development of a computer-based instructional system in pharmacokinetics: efficacy in clinical pharmacology teaching for senior medical students. J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 29: 158–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garfield JM, Paskin S, Philip JH. An evaluation of the effectiveness of a computer simulation of anaesthetic uptake and distribution as a teaching tool. Med Educ 1989; 23: 457–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jean Y, De Traversay J, Lemieux P. Teaching cancer chemotherapy by means of a computer simulation. Int J Biomed Comput 1994; 36: 273–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Normand Y, Drugeon HB, Potel G, et al. Teaching individualized antibiotic dosage regimens by means of two computer-assisted learning programs. Int J Biomed Comput 1994; 36: 117–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacFadyen JC, Brown JE, Schoenwald R, et al. The effectiveness of teaching clinical pharmacokinetics by computer. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 617–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buffington DE, Lampasona V, Chandler MH. Computers in pharmacokinetics: choosing software for clinical decision making. Clin Pharmacokinet 1993; 25: 205–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neef C, Proost JH, Meijer DKF. Therapeutic drug monitoring with MW/PHARM. Int J Biomed Comput 1994; 36: 151–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PharmacyThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.The Australian Centre for Paediatric PharmacokineticsThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations