Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Prescription Drug Use by Older Adults

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

Although older adults are frequent consumers of prescription drugs and increasingly the intended audience of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) marketing efforts, little is known about the effect of DTCA on older adults’ prescription drug-seeking behaviour. In response, the objective of this study is to examine factors associated with requesting a prescription drug from a physician following exposure to DTCA among older adults, and whether the drug or other medical treatment was prescribed during the encounter.

Methods

A secondary data analysis of the “Public Health Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs”, a data set publicly available through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR 3687), was conducted. For the purposes of this study, only those respondents who indicated that they had been exposed to DTCA (n = 2601) were included in the study sample. Using a two-step weighted logistic regression approach, separate models were estimated to examine first, whether a request for the advertised drug was made following exposure to DTCA and secondly, the outcomes of any patient-physician encounters that occurred following exposure to DTCA.

Results

Descriptive analysis of the outcome variables revealed that, among respondents exposed to DTCA, 31% (n = 801) requested a prescription drug from their physician. Approximately 5% of those who made a request were ≥75 years of age. Among respondents requesting a prescription drug, 69% (n = 556) received a prescription in response to their request, of whom, approximately 5% were ≥75 years of age. Multivariate findings suggest that although adults ≥75 years of age are less likely to request a prescription drug following exposure to DTCA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58; p = 0.032), when they do approach their physicians, they are more likely to receive recommendations for further treatment, with ORs indicating a 250% (OR = 3.507; p = 0.002) increase in the odds of further referral among adults ≥75 years of age.

Conclusion

Overall, results from the study suggest that DTCA influences the patient-doctor relationship and prescription drug acquisition behaviour of patients; however, the nature of the effect of DTCA on older adults is complex. Because future cohorts of older adults may be more comfortable about requesting prescription drugs and the consumer-driven approach to obtaining medical care, understanding the impact of DTCA on older consumers represents an important area for further inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Rosenthal MB, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, et al. Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(7): 498–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heffler S, Levit K, Smith S, et al. Health spending growth up in 1999: faster growth expected in the future. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20(2): 193–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. IMS Health. Integrated promotional services TM and CMR, 6/2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.im-shealth.com/ims/portal/front/articleC/0,2777,6599_44304752_44889690,00.html [Accessed 2005 Sep 15]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson AR, Hohmann KB, Rifkin JI, et al. Direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising: physician and public opinion and potential effects on the physician patient relationship. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 427–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lipsky MS, Taylor CA. The opinions and experiences of family physicians regarding direct to consumer advertising. J Fam Pract 1997; 45(6): 495–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weissman JS, Blumenthal D, Silk AJ, et al. Physician’s report on patient encounters involving direct to consumer advertising. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives (Jan–Jun): W4219–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kravitz RL, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, et al. Influence of patients’ requests for direct-to-consumer advertised an-tidepressants: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 293(16): 1995–2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weissman JS, Blumenthal D, Silk AJ, et al. Consumers’ report on the health effects of direct to consumer drug advertising. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; Suppl Web Exclusives (Jan–Jun): W382–95

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aikin KJ, Swasy JL, Braman AC. Patient and physician attitudes and behaviors associated with DTC promotion of prescription drugs: summary of FDA survey research results. Rockville (MD). Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA. US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2004 Nov 19

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slaughter E, Schumacher M. Prevention’s international survey on Wellness and consumer reactions to DTCA of Rx drugs. Emmaus (PA): Prevention Magazine, Kodak Inc., 2000/2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser Family Foundation. Understanding the effects of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Menlo Park (CA): The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. Direct to consumer advertising: public perceptions of its effects on health behaviors: healthcare and the doctor patient relationship. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17(1): 6–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doucette WR, Schommer JC. Consumer preferences for drug information after direct to consumer advertising. Drug Inf J 1998; 32: 1081–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salom IL, Davis K. Prescribing for older patients: how to avoid toxic drug reactions. Geriatrics 1995; 50(10): 37–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beijer HJM, de Blaey CJ. Hospitalizations caused by adverse drug reactions (ADR): a meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharm World Sci 2002; 24(2): 46–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Spencer MM, Teleki SR, Cheetham TC, et al. Direct-to-con-sumer advertising of cox-2 inhibitors: effect on appropriateness of prescribing. Med Care Res Rev 2005; 62(5): 544–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Corney RH. Sex differences in general practice attendance and help seeking for minor illness. J Psychosom Res 1990; 34(5): 525–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibjsers van Wijk CM, van Vliet KP, Kolk AM. Gender perspectives and quality of care: towards appropriate and adequate health care for women. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43(5): 707–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi L. Sociodemographic characteristics and individual health behaviors. South Med J 1998; 91(10): 933–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Briesacher B, Limcangco R, Gaskin D. Racial and ethnic disparities in prescription coverage and medication use. Health Care Financ Rev 2003; 25(2): 63–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS, Schneider EC, et al. Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. JAMA 2000; 284: 2061–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonul FF, Carter F, Wind J. What kind of patients and physicians value direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Health Care Manag Sci 2000; 3(3): 215–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Allison PD. Event history analysis: regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  24. StataCorp. Statistical Software: release 9.0. College Station (TX): StataCorp., 2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Tremmel J, et al. Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs: what are Americans being sold? Lancet 2001; 358(9288): 1141–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hwang W, Weller W, Ireys H, et al. Out-of-pocket medical spending for care of chronic conditions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001; 20(6): 267–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

The authors are grateful for public access to the study data through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and for the helpful comments provided by the three anonymous rewiewers. The views presented here belong to the authors, who alone are responsible for any errors or omissions, and who accept all responsibility for the presentation and content. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 57th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, November 2004, Washington, DC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary W. Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Datti, B., Carter, M.W. The Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Prescription Drug Use by Older Adults. Drugs Aging 23, 71–81 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200623010-00007

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200623010-00007

Keywords

Navigation