Drugs & Aging

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 841–846 | Cite as

Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

A Retrospective Analysis in 139 Patients of the Influence of Age on the Response to Corticosteroids, Splenectomy and Danazol
  • Emmanuel Andrès
  • Jacques Zimmer
  • Esther Noel
  • Georges Kaltenbach
  • Argyro Koumarianou
  • Frédéric Maloisel
Original Research Article

Abstract

Objective

To review the influence of age on the response of patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) to corticosteroids, splenectomy and danazol.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 139 consecutively treated patients with ITP diagnosed between 1985 and 1994. In particular, we analysed the therapies used, their response rates, prognostic indicators of response and adverse effects. Furthermore, we compared the efficacy and tolerability of the various therapies between younger and older patients (<60 and ≥60 years old).

Results

Corticosteroids were used as first-line treatment in 118 patients with an initial response rate of 83%. Age did not affect the outcome of corticosteroid therapy, but all the patients aged ≥60 years reported adverse effects. A splenectomy was performed in 55 patients with an initial response rate of 87%. Older patients had significantly poorer outcomes from splenectomy with higher postoperative morbidity. Finally, danazol was given in 33 patients with a favourable response in 72% of cases. Compared with younger patients, older patients had a significantly better outcome with danazol.

Conclusions

Age may have significant effects on the response to and adverse effects of therapy in ITP, and this should be considered when choosing the treatment modality for the elderly.

Keywords

Corticosteroid Therapy Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Danazol Initial Response Rate Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Patient 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Conception and design: E. Andrès and F. Maloisel. Collection and assembly of data: J. Zimmer and F. Maloisel. Statistical analysis: J. Zimmer and F. Maloisel. Analysis and interpretation: E. Andrès, J. Zimmer and F. Maloisel. Drafting of the article: E. Andrès and F. Maloisel. Final approval of the manuscript: E. Andrès, J. Zimmer, E. Noel, G. Kaltenbach, A. Koumarianou and F. Maloisel. Provision of study materials or patients: E. Andrès, J. Zimmer, G. Kaltenbach, A. Koumarianou, F. Maloisel and the study group of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura of the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France. The authors have provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Cines DB, Blanchette VS. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 995–1008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Provan D, Newland A. Fifty years of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP): management of refractory ITP in adults. Br J Haematol 2002; 118: 933–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Semple JW. Immune pathophysiology of autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 9–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nugent DJ. Childhood immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 27–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    George JN, Woolf SH. Raskob GE, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a practice guideline developed by explicit methods for the American Society of Hematology. Blood 1996; 88: 3–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMillan R. Classical management of refractory adult immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 51–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berchtold P, McMillan R. Therapy of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults. Blood 1989; 74: 2309–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurata Y, Miyagawa S, Kosugi S, et al. High-titer antinuclear antibodies, anti-SSA/Ro antibodies and anti-nuclear RNP antibodies in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71: 184–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leung AY, Chim CS, Kwong YL, et al. Clinicopathologic and prognostic features of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adult Chinese patients: an analysis of 220 cases. Ann Hematol 2001; 80: 384–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pamuk GE, Pamuk ON, Baslar Z, et al. Overview of 321 patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: retrospective analysis of the clinical features and response to therapy. Ann Hematol 2002; 81: 436–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stasi R, Stipa E, Masi M, et al. Long-term observation of 208 adults with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Med 1995; 98: 436–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Difino SM, Lachant NA, Kirshner JJ, et al. Adult idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical findings and response to therapy. Am J Med 1980; 69: 430–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tobelem G, Chassang C, Asselain B, et al. Le purpura thrombopénique auto-immun: etude clinique et thérapeutique rétrospective de 544 observations. Nouv Presse Med 1981; 10: 2871–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    den Ottolander GJ, Gratama JW, de Koning J, et al. Long-term follow-up study of 168 patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Scand J Haematol 1984; 32: 101–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahn YS, Harrington WJ, Simon SR, et al. Danazol for the treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1396–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahn YS, Mylvaganam R, Garcia RO, et al. Low-dose danazol therapy in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107: 177–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahn YS, Rocha R, Mylvaganam R, et al. Long-term danazol therapy in autoimmune thrombocytopenia: unmaintained remission and age-dependent response in women. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111:723–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karpatkin S. Autoimmune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura. Lancet 1997; 349: 1531–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nalli G, Sajeva MR, Maffé GC, et al. Danazol therapy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Haematologica 1988; 73: 55–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mazzucconi MG, Francesconi M, Falcione E, et al. Danazol therapy in refractory chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Acta Haematol 1987; 77: 45–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McVerry BA, Auger M, Bellingham AJ. The use of danazol in the management of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol 1985; 61: 145–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shashaty GG, Rath CE. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in elderly. Am J Med Sci 1978; 276: 263–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taillan B, Hastier A, Ferrari E, et al. Purpura thrombopénique chronique chez le sujet. Nouv Presse Med 1991; 34: 1651–4Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Linares M, Cervero A, Colomina P, et al. Purpura thrombopénique chronique du sujet. Nouv Presse Med 1995; 93: 80–2Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cortelazzo S, Finazzi G, Buelli M, et al. High risk of severe bleeding in aged patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 1991; 77: 31–3PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel Andrès
    • 1
  • Jacques Zimmer
    • 2
    • 3
  • Esther Noel
    • 1
  • Georges Kaltenbach
    • 4
  • Argyro Koumarianou
    • 2
  • Frédéric Maloisel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineHôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.Department of Onco-HematologyHôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
  3. 3.Lausanne BranchLudwig Institute for Cancer ResearchEpalingesSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Internal Medicine and GeriatricsHôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations