Advertisement

Drugs & Aging

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 121–132 | Cite as

Potential Applications of Gene Therapy in the Patient with Cancer

  • Piotr W. Szlosarek
  • Angus G. Dalgleish
Review Article

Abstract

The elderly population has much to gain from the advances of molecular medicine, although at present genetic pharmacology remains mostly at the conceptual level. Cancer, in particular, is an increasing health burden and the majority (over 70%) of gene therapy trials are aimed at tackling this problem. Available strategies employ both viral and synthetic vectors with the selective delivery and expression of therapeutic genes a pivotal requirement. Clinical trials are now in progress with a view to modulating disease at many different levels, including the direct replacement of abnormal genes, suicide-gene formulations, and the delivery of ‘gain of function’ genes, which seek to alter the malignant phenotype by indirect means, such as, immunopotentiation and stromal reorganisation. Early data from these studies is tantalising and we must remain optimistic that gene therapy will benefit the patient with cancer by both reducing morbidity and extending life.

Keywords

Gene Therapy Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Cytosine Deaminase Gene Therapy Trial Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Promoter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S. Todryk for critical review of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosenberg SA, Aebersold P, Cornetta K, et al. Gene transfer into humans: immunotherapy of patients with advanced melanoma using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes modified by retroviral gene transduction. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 570–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blaese RM, Culver KW, Miller AD, et al. T-lymphocyte-directed gene therapy for ADA-SCID: initial trial results after 4 years. Science 1995; 270: 475–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eliasson MJL, Sampei K, Mandir AS, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene disruption renders mice resistant to cerebral ischaemia. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1089–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stenbit AE, Tsu-Shuen T, Li J, et al. GLUT4 heterozygous knockout mice develop muscle insulin resistance and diabetes. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1096–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carroll JL, Bell MC, Gameau LJ, et al. Analysis of a bystander effect in vivo following adenovirus-based p53 gene therapy [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1999; 40: 3280Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caruso M, Panis Y, Gagandeep S, et al. Regression of established macroscopic liver metastases after in situ transduction of a suicide gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 7024–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wei MX, Tamiya T, Rhee RJ, et al. Diffusible cytotoxic metabolites contribute to the in vitro bystander effect associated with the cyclophosphamide/cytochrome P450 2B1 cancer gene therapy paradigm. Clin Cancer Res 1995; 1: 1171–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elshami AA, Saavendra A, Zhang H, et al. Gap junctions play a role in the ‘bystander effect’ of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir system in vitro. GeneTher 1996; 3: 85–92Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vile RG, Castledon S, Marshall J, et al. Generation of an anti-tumour response in a non-immunogenic tumour: HSVtk killing in vivo stimulates a mononuclear cell infiltrate and a Th1-like profile of intratumoral cytokine expression. Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 267–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nishizaki M, Fujiwara T, Tanida T, et al. Recombinant adenovirus expressing wild-type p53 is antiangiogenic: a proposed mechanism for bystander effect. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1015–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel PI. Identification of disease genes and somatic gene therapy: an overview and prospects for the aged. J Gerontology 1993; 48: B80–5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blaese M, Blankenstein T, Brenner M, et al. Vectors in cancer therapy: how will they deliver? Cancer Gene Ther 1995; 2: 291–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nabel GJ. Development of optimized vectors for gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 324–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roth JA, Cristiano RJ. Gene therapy for cancer: what have we done and where are we going? J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 21–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dranoff G. Cancer gene therapy: connecting basic research with clinical inquiry. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2548–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson WF. Human gene therapy. Nature 1998; 392 Suppl.: 25–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patterson A, Harris AL. Molecular chemotherapy for breast cancer. Drugs Aging 1999; 14: 75–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clayman GL, El-Naggar AK, Lippman SM, et al. Adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in patients with advanced recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2221–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirn D, Hermiston T, McCormick F. ONYX-015: clinical data are encouraging. Nat Med 1998; 4: 1341–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fujiwara T, Grimm EA, Mukhopadhyay T, et al. Induction of chemosensitivity in human lung cancer cells in vivo by adenovirus-mediated transfer of the wild-type p53 gene. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 2287–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pirollo KF, Hao Z, Rait A, et al. p53-mediated sensitization of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck to radiotherapy. Oncogene 1997; 14: 1735–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Donahue RE, Kessler SW, Bodine D, et al. Helper virus induced T cell lymphoma in nonhuman primates after retroviral mediated gene transfer. J Exp Med 1992; 176: 1125–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang Q, Finer MH. Second-generation adenovirus vectors. Nat Med 1996; 2: 714–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nevins JR. Mechanism of activation of early viral transcription by the adenovirus E1A gene product. Cell 1981; 26: 213–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halbert DN, Cutt JR, Shenk T. Adenovirus early region 4 encodes functions required for efficient DNA replication, late gene expression, and host cell shutoff. J Virol 1985; 56: 250–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gorziglia MI, Lapacevich C, Roy S, et al. Generation of an adenovirus vector lacking E1, e2a, E3, and all of E4 except open reading frame 3. J Virol 1999; 73: 6048–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muruve DA, Barnes MJ, Stillman IE, et al. Adenoviral gene therapy leads to rapid induction of multiple chemokines and acute neutrophil-dependent hepatic injury in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 965–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dewey RA, Morrissey G, Cowsill CM, et al. Chronic brain inflammation and persistent herpes simplex virus 1 thymidine kinase expression in survivors of syngeneic glioma treated by adenovirus-mediated gene therapy: implications for clinical trials. Nature Med 1999; 5: 1256–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gene therapy: a loss of innocence [editorial]. Nat Med 2000; 6: 1Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim CJ, Cormier J, Roden M, et al. Use of recombinant poxviruses to stimulate anti-melanoma T cell reactivity. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5: 64–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bischoff JR, Kirn DH, Williams A, et al. An adenovirus mutant that replicates in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science 1996; 274: 373–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall AR, Dix BR, O’Carroll SJ, et al. p53-dependent cell death/apoptosis is required for a productive adenovirus infection. Nat Med 1998; 4: 1068–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kirn D, Nemunaitis J, Ganly I, et al. A phase II trial with an EIB-deleted adenovirus, ONYX-015, in patients with recurrent refractory head and neck cancer [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998; 17: 1509Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heise C, Sampson-Johannes A, Williams A, et al. ONYX-015, an E1B gene-attenuated adenovirus, causes tumor-specific cytolysis and antitumoral efficacy that can be augmented by standard chemotherapeutic agents. Nat Med 1997; 3: 639–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Freytag SO, Rogulski KR, Paielli DL, et al. A novel three-pronged approachto kill cancer cells selectively: concomitant viral, double suicide gene, and radiotherapy. Hum Gene Ther 1998; 9: 1323–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rampling R, Cruickshank G, Papanastassiou V, et al. Toxicity evaluation of relication-competent herpes simplex virus (ICP 34.5 null mutant 1716) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Gene Ther 200; 7: 859–66Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Markert JM, Medlock MD, Rabkin SD. Conditinally relicating herpes simples virus mutant, G207 for the treatment of malignant glioma: results of a phase I trial. Gene Ther 200; 7: 867–74Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nalbantoglu J, Pari G, Karpati G, et al. Expression of the primary coxsackie and adenovirus receptor is downregulated during skeletal muscle maturation and limits the efficacy of adenovirus-mediated gene delivery to muscle cells. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 1009–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li Y, Rey-Chen P, Bergelson JM, et al. Loss of adenoviral receptor expression in human bladder cancer cells: a potential impact on the efficacy of gene therapy. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 325–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gropp R, Michaela F, Wagner TOF, et al. Epithelial defensins impair adenoviral infection: implication for adenovirus-mediated gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 957–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bosse R, Singhofer-Wowra M, Rosenthal F, et al. Good manufacturing practice production of human stem cells for somatic cell and gene therapy. Stem Cells 1997; 15 Suppl. 1: 275–80Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Linden RM, Woo SLC. Avant-garde gene therapy. Nat Med 1999; 5: 21–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Coffey MC, Strong JE, Forsyth PA, et al. Reovirus therapy of tumors with activated Ras pathway. Science 1998; 282: 1332–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zufferey R, Dull T, Mandel RJ, et al. Self-inactivating lentivirus vector for safe and efficient in vivo gene delivery. J Virol 1998; 72: 9873–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Poeschla EM, Wong-Staal F, Looney DJ. Efficient transduction of nondividing human cells by feline immunodeficiency virus lentiviral vectors. Nat Med 1998; 4: 354–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Langer R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 1998; 392 Suppl.: 5–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tang WH, Xu L, Pirollo KF, et al. A ligand-directed, tumor-targeting systemic gene delivery system [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1999; 40: 4167Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Murray JL, Yoo GH, Lopez-Berestein G, et al. Phase I trial of intratumoral liposomal-E1A gene therapy in patients with recurrent/refractory breast cancer (BC) and head and neck (H&N) cancer [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998: 17; 1662Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nabel GJ, Gordon D, Bishop DK, et al. Immune response in human melanoma after transfer of an allogeneic class I major histocompatibility complex gene with DNA-liposome complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 15388–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roth JA, Nguyen D, Lawrence DD, et al. Retrovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer to tumors of patients with lung cancer. Nat Med 1996; 2: 985–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hang Y, Mukhopadhyay T, Donehower LA, et al. Retroviral vector-mediated transduction of K-ras antisense RNA into human lung cancer cells inhibits expression of the malignant phenotype. Hum Gene Ther 1993; 4: 451–60Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Monia BP, Johnston JF, Geiger T, et al. Antitumor activity of a phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeted against C-raf kinase. Nat Med 1996; 2: 668–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Webb A, Cunningham D, Cotter F, et al. BCL-2 antisense therapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet 1997; 349: 1137–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ho PT, Parkinson DR. Antisense oligonucleotides as therapeutics for malignant diseases. Semin Oncol 1997; 24: 187–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Akhtar S, Agrawal S. In vivo studies with antisense oligonucleotides. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1997; 18: 12–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tortora G, Caputo R, Pomatico G, et al. Cooperative inhibitory effect of novel mixed backbone oligonucleotide targeting protein kinase A in combination woth docetaxel and anti-epidermal growth factor-receptor antibody on human breast cancer cell growth. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 875–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yamamoto T, Yamamoto S, Kataoka T, et al. Ability of oligonucleotides with certain palindromes to induce interferon production and augment natural killer cell activity is associated with their base length. Antisense Res Dev 1994; 4: 119–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Roman M, Martin-Orozco E, Goodman JS, et al. Immunostimulatory DNA sequences function as T helper-1 promoting adjuvants. Nat Med 1997; 3: 849–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chong H, Vile R. Gene therapy for cancer. Drugs Future 1997; 22: 857–74Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Perry MA, Todryk S, Dalgleish AG. The role of HSVtk in the treatment of solid tumours. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 1999; 8: 777–85Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hamel W, Magnelli L, Chirarugi V, et al. Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir-mediated apoptotic death of bystander cells. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 2697–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Craperi D, Vicat JM, Nissou MF, et al. Increased Bax expression is associated with cell death induced by ganciclovir in a herpes thymidine kinase gene-expressing glioma cell line. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 679–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Barba D, Hardin J, Sadelain M, et al. Development of antitumor immunity following thymidine kinase-mediated killing of experimental brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 4348–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Izquierdo ML. An overview of gene therapy approaches to neurological malignancies. BioDrugs 1998; 9: 337–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ram Z, Culver KW, Oshiro ME, et al. Therapy of malignant brain tumors by intratumoral implantation of retroviral vector-producer cells. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1354–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Klatzmann D, Cherin P, Bensimon G, et al. Aphase I/II dose-escalation study of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase ‘suicide’ gene therapy for metastatic melanoma. Study Group on Gene Therapy of Metastatic Melanoma. Hum Gene Ther 1998; 9: 2585–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ido A, Nakata K, Kato Y, et al. Gene therapy for hepatoma cells using a retrovirus vector carrying herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene under the control of human alpha-fetoprotein gene promoter. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 3105–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chen L, Chen D, Manome Y, et al. Breast cancer selective gene expression and therapy mediated by recombinant adenoviruses containing the DF3/MUC1 promoter. J Clin Invest 1995; 96: 2775–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vandier D, Rixe O, Brenner M, et al. Selective killing of glioma cell lines using an astrocyte-specific expression of the herpes sinplex virus-thymidine kinase gene. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 4577–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mullen C, Kilstrup M, Blaese R. Transfer of the bacterial gene for cytosine deaminase to mammalian cells confers lethal sensitivity to 5-fluorocytosine: a negative selection system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 33–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Mullen CA, Coale MM, Lowe R, et al. Tumors expressing the cytosine deaminase suicide gene can be eliminated in vivo with 5-fluorocytosine and induce protective immunity to wild-type tumor. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 1503–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Huber BE, Austin EA, Richards CA, et al. Metabolism of 5-fluorocytosine to 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal tumor cells transduced with the cytosine deaminase gene: significant antitumor effects when only a small percentage of tumor cells express cytosine deaminase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91: 8302–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cao G, Kuriyama S, Gao J, et al. Effective and safe gene therapy for colorectal carcinoma using the cytosine deaminase gene directed by the carcinoembryonic antigen promoter. Gene Ther 1999; 6: 83–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bordignon C, Bonini C, Verzeletti S, et al. Transfer of the HSV-tk gene into donor peripheral blood lymphocytes for in vivo modulation of donor anti-tumor immunity after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Hum Gene Ther 1995; 6: 813–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bonini C, Ferrari G, Verzeletti S, et al. HSV-TK gene transfer into donor lymphocytes for control of allogeneic graft-versus-leukemia. Science 1997; 276: 1719–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Verzeletti S, Bonini C, Marktel S, et al. Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene transfer for controlled graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia: clinical follow-up and improved new vectors. Hum Gene Ther 1998; 9: 2243–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Dalgleish AG, Browning MJ, editors. Tumour immunology: immunotherapy and cancer vaccines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Human gene marker/therapy clinical protocols. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 1043–92Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Asher AL, Mule JJ, Kasid A, et al. Murine tumor cells transduced with the gene for tumor necrosis factor-alpha: evidence for paracrine immune effects of tumour necrosis factor-alpha against tumors. J Immunol 1991; 146: 3227–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Fearon ER, Pardoll DM, Itaya T, et al. Interleukin-2 production by tumor cells bypasses T helper function in the generation of an antitumor response. Cell 1990; 60: 397–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Gansbacher B, Zier K, Daniels B, et al. Interleukin-2 gene transfer into tumor cells abrogates tumorigenicity and induces protective immunity. J Exp Med 1990; 172: 1217–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hock H, Dorsch M, Diamantstein, et al. Interleukin 7 induces CD4+ T cell-dependent tumor rejection. J Exp Med 1991; 174: 1291–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Dranoff G, Jaffee E, Lazenby A, et al. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 3539–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lim M, Simons JW. Emerging concepts in GM-CSF gene-transduced tumor vaccines for human prostate cancer. Curr Opin Mol Ther 1999; 1: 64–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Dilloo D, Bacon K, Holden W, et al. Combined chemokine and cytokine gene transfer enhances antitumor immunity. Nat Med 1996; 2: 1090–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Paillard F. Cytokine and chemokine: a stimulating couple. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 695–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Wallich R, Bulbuc N, Hammerling GH, et al. Abrogation of metastatic properties of tumour cells by de novo expression of H-2K antigens following H-2 gene transfection. Nature 1985; 315: 301–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Plaskin D, Gelber C, Feldman M, et al. Reversal of the metastatic phenotype in Lewis lung carcinoma cells after transfection with syngeneic H-2Kb gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85: 4463–7Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Townsend SE, Allison JP. Tumor rejection after direct costimulation of CD8+ T cells by B7-transfected melanoma cells. Science 1993; 259: 368–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Putzer BM, Hitt M, Mueller Wl, et al. Interleukin-12 and B7-I costimulatory molecule expressed by an adenoviral vector act synergistically to facilitate tumor regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94: 10889–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Dalgleish AG. The case for therapeutic vaccines. Melanoma Res 1996; 6: 5–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Dalgleish AG. The development of therapeutic vaccines of the management of malignant melanoma. Cancer Surv 1996; 26: 289–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hrouda D, Dalgleish AG. Gene therapy for prostate cancer. Gene Ther 1996; 3: 845–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Todryk SM, Chong H, Vile RG, et al. Can immunotherapy by gene transfer tip the balance against colorectal cancer? Gut 1998; 43: 445–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Abdel-Wahab Z, Weltz C, Hester D, et al. A phase I clinical trial of immunotherapy with interferon-γ gene-modified autologous melanoma cells. Cancer 1997; 80: 401–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Schreiber S, Kämpgen E, Wagner E, et al. Immunotherapy of metastatic malignant melanoma by a vaccine consisting of autologous interleukin 2-transfected cancer cells: outcome of a phase 1 study. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 983–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Soiffer R, Lynch T, Mihm M, et al. Vaccination with irradiated autologous melanoma cells engineered to secrete human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor generates potent antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 13141–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Hennemann B, Andreesen R. Monocyte/macrophage activation by immunostimulators. Clin Immunother 1996; 5: 294–308Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 1998; 392: 245–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gilboa E, Nair SK, Lyerly HK. Immunotherapy of cancer with dendritic-cell-based vaccines. Cancer Immunol Immunother 1998; 46: 82–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Zhong L, Granelli-Piperno A, Choi Y, et al. Recombinant adenovirus is an efficient and non-perturbing genetic vector for human dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 1999; 29: 964–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Diebold S, Lehrmann H, Kursa M, et al. Efficient gene delivery into human dendritic cells by adenovirus polyethylenimine and mannose polyethylenimine transfection. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 775–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Condon C, Watkins SC, Celluzzi CM, et al. DNA-based immunization by in vivo transfection of dendritic cells. Nat Med 1996; 2: 1122–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Nestle FO, Alijagic S, Gilliet M, et al. Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide- or tumour lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Nat Med 1998; 4: 328–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Okada H, Tahara H, Shurin MR, et al. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with a tumor-specific peptide elicit effective anti-tumor immunity against intracranial neoplasms. Int J Cancer 1998; 78: 196–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Reeves M, Royal R, Lam J, et al. Retroviral transduction of human dendritic cells with a tumor-associated antigen gene. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 5672–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Pérez-Díez A, Butterfield LH, Li L, et al. Generation of CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell response to dendritic cells genetically engineered to express the MART-1/Melan-A gene. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 5305–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Uyttenhove C, Maryanski J, Boon T. Escape of mouse mastocytoma P815 after nearly complete rejection is due to antigen-loss variants rather than immunosuppression. J Exp Med 1983; 157: 1040–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Topalian SL, Kasid A, Rosenberg SA. Immunoselection of a human melanoma resistant to specific lysis by autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Immunol 1990; 144: 4487–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Jäger E, Ringhoffer M, Altmannsberger M, et al. Immunoselection in vivo: independent loss of MHC class I and melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in metastatic melanoma. Int J Can 1997; 71: 142–7Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Miller PW, Sharma, S, Stolina M, et al. Intratumoral administration of cytokine gene-modified dendritic cells augments antigen presentation and processing in non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1999; 40: 572Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Cao X, Zhang W, He L, et al. Lymphotactin gene-modified bone marrow dendritic cells act as more potent adjuvants for peptide delivery to induce specific antitumor immunity. J Immunol 1998; 161: 6238–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Hwu P, Yang JC, Cowherd R, et al. In vivo antitumor activity of T cells redirected with chimeric antibody/T cell receptor genes. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 3369–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Wang G, Chopra RK, Royal RE, et al. A T cell-independent antitumor response in mice with bone marrow cells retrovirally transduced with an antibody/Fc-gamma chain gene recognising a human ovarian cancer antigen. Nature Med 1998; 4: 168–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Altenschmidt U, Moritz D, Croner B. Specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in gene therapy. J Mol Med 1997; 75: 259–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Paillard F. Immunotherapy with T cells bearing chimeric antitumor receptors. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 151–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Shiraki K, Tsuji N, Shioda T, et al. Expression of Fas ligand in liver metastases of human colonic adenocarcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 94: 6420–5Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    McGuiness RP, Ge Y, Patel SD, et al. Anti-tumor activity of human T cells expressing the CC49-zeta chimeric immune receptor. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 165–73Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Tahara H, Zeh Hl, Storkus WJ, et al. Fibroblasts genetically engineered to secrete interleukin-12 can suppress tumor growth and induce antitumor immunity to a murine melanoma in vivo. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 182–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Syrengelas AD, Chen TT, Levy R. DNA immunization induces protective immunity against B-cell lymphoma. Nat Med 1996; 2: 1038–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Horton HM, Anderson D, Hernandez P, et al. A gene therapy for cancer using intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA encoding interferon α. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 1553–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Kong HL, Crystal RG. Gene therapy strategies for tumor anti-angiogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 273–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Tanaka T, Manome Y, Wen P, et al. Viral vector-mediated transduction of a modified platelet factor 4 cDNA inhibits angio-genesis and tumor growth. Nat Med 1997; 3: 437–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Valente P, Fassina G, Melchiori A, et al. TIMP-2 over-expression reduces invasion and angiogenesis and protects B16F10 melanoma cells from apoptosis. Int J Cancer 1998; 75: 246–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Baker AH, George SJ, Zaltsman AB, et al. Inhibition of invasion and induction of apoptotic cell death of cancer cell lines by overexpression of TIMP-3. Br J Cancer 1999; 79: 1347–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Rigg AS, Waxman J, Lemoine NR. Gene therapy with TIMP1 or TIMP2 prolongs the survival and reduces the burden of disease for mice harboring intraperitoneal human pancreatic carcinomas [abstract]. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1999; 40: 4169Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Oku T, Tjuvajec JG, Miyagawa T, et al. Tumor growth modulation by sense and antisense vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression: effects on angiogenesis, vascular permeability, blood volume, blood flow, fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, and proliferation of human melanoma intracerebral xenografts. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 4185–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Im SA, Gomez-Manzano C, Fueyo J, et al. Antiangiogenesis treatment for gliomas: transfer of antisense-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 895–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Goldman CK, Kendall RL, Cabrera G, et al. Paracrine expression of a native soluble vascular endothelial growth factor recptor inhibits tumor growth, metastasis, and mortality rate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 8795–800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Machein MR, Risau W, Plate KH. Antiangiogenic gene therapy in a rat glioma model using a dominant-negative vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 1117–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Gabrilovich DI, Ishida T, Nadaf S, et al. Antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by improving endogenous dendritic cell function. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 2963–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Cao Y, O’Reilly MS, Marshall B, et al. Expression of angiostatin cDNA in a murine fibrosarcoma suppresses primary tumor growth and produces long-term dormancy of metastases. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 1055–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Tanaka T, Cao Y, Folkman J, et al. Viral vector-targeted anti-angiogenic gene therapy utilizing an angiostatin complementary DNA. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 3362–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Chen QR, Kumar D, Stass SA, et al. Liposomes complexed to plasmids encoding angiostatin and endostatin inhibit breast cancer in nude mice. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 3308–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Liu Y, Thor A, Shtivelman E, et al. Systemic gene delivery expands the repertoire of effective antiangiogenic agents. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 13338–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Gottesman M. How cancer cells evade chemotherapy: sixteenth Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Foundation Award Lecture. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 747–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Podda S, Ward M, Himelstein A, et al. Transfer and expression of the human multiple drug resistance gene into live mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 9676–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Sorrentino BP, Brandt SJ, Bodine D, et al. Selection of drug-resistant bone marrow cells in vivo after retroviral transfer of human MDR1. Science 1992; 257: 99–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Rafferty JA, Hickson I, Chinnasamy N, et al. Chemoprotection of normal tissues by transfer of drug resistance genes. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1996; 15: 365–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Hesdorffer C, Ayello J, Ward M, et al. Phase I trial of retroviral-mediated transfer of the human MDR1 gene as marrow chemoprotection in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 165–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Merrouche Y, Negrier S, Bain C, et al. Clinical application of retroviral gene transfer in oncology: results of a French study with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes transduced with the gene of resistance to neomycin. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 410–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Brenner MK, Rill DR, Moen RC, et al. Gene marking to trace origin of relapse after autologous bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet 1993; 341: 85–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Deisseroth AB, Zu Z, Claxton D, et al. Genetic marking shows that Ph+ cells present in autologous transplants of chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) contribute to relapse after autologous bone marrow transplantation in CML. Blood 1994; 83: 3068–76PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Guy HouseGuy’s HospitalLondonEngland
  2. 2.Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Cellular and Molecular SciencesSt George’s Hospital Medical SchoolLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations