Clinical Use of Cocaine
- 11 Downloads
Following the isolation of cocaine from the extract of coca leaves in the late 1700s by Albert Neiman, the local anaesthetic properties of the drug have been evaluated. The anaesthetic effect of cocaine is believed to be the result of reversible blockade of nervous impulse conduction by the prevention of sodium ion movement within the cell membrane. The many undesired effects, however, are the result of adrenergic stimulation by means of prevention of noradrenaline (norepinephrine) uptake. The clinical use of cocaine in the modern era is associated primarily with surgical procedures involving the manipulation of mucous membranes, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract. Recently, based on problems with the potential for illicit use and adverse effects, alternative regimens have been investigated. In some settings these have been superior to cocaine. Further studies comparing various anaesthetic regimens are warranted.
KeywordsCocaine Lidocaine Phenylephrine Nasotracheal Intubation Serum Choline Esterase
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Berman AR, Johns ME, Price JC, Pillsbury RC, Henderson RL. Metabolism of intranasally applied cocaine. Annals of Otolaryngology 86: 342–347, 1977Google Scholar
- Gomes PJ, Teale C, Muers MF, Pearson SB. Bronchoscopic local anaesthesia: intratracheal cocaine and lignocaine appear equally effective. Thorax 45: 333P, 1990Google Scholar
- Johns ME, Henderson RL. Cocaine use by the otolaryngologist — a survey of the Trans American Academy of Ophthalmology. Otolaryngology 84: 969, 1977Google Scholar
- Kirkpatrick MB, Middleton RM. Topical anesthesia and conscious sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: a survey of bron-choscopists experiences. Clinical Research 39: 875A, 1991Google Scholar
- Moore GF, Emanuel JM, Ogren FP, Yonkers AJ. Cocaine: Current clinical use and potential abuse. Nebraska Medical Journal 71C9: 317–321, 1986Google Scholar
- Tutlow P. Cocaine and succinylcholine sensitivity — a new caution. Anesthesiology and Analgesia 58: 235, 1979Google Scholar