Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the AccuSwayPLUS System in Measuring the Effect of Lorazepam on Body Sway in Healthy Volunteers

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim: To assess the AccuSwayPLUS system, which aims to quantify deficiency in human balance, using the measurement of the effect of lorazepam on body sway in healthy volunteers.

Methods: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 12 healthy male and female volunteers. Participants received a single oral dose of lorazepam 2mg and placebo, 1 week apart. Body sway was assessed using the AccuSwayPLUS system, by measuring the length of the path of the centre-of-pressure (COP), and the area of the 95% confidence ellipse enclosing the COP (A95). Body sway was assessed at baseline and at 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after administration, in two positions: with the participants’ eyes open and feet apart at hip’s width (EOFA), and with their eyes shut and feet together (ESFT).

Results: Statistically significant differences in body sway between lorazepam and placebo were detected for up to 18 hours after administration. The largest change in body sway was 2 hours post-dose, in the EOFA position; the mean (95% confidence interval) difference between lorazepam and placebo in fold change of A95 was 7.67 (3.88, 15.17), and in length of COP was 1.61 (1.23, 2.10).

Conclusion: The findings confirm that the AccuSwayPLUS system is a useful tool for detecting changes in body sway induced by centrally acting drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitzgerald JE, Murray A, Elliott C, et al. Comparison of balance assessment by sway magnetometry and force platforms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119: 41–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dick RB, Bhattacharya A, Shukla R. Use of a computerised postural sway measurement system for neurobehavioral toxicology. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1990; 12: 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitzgerald JE, Murray A, Elliott C, et al. Comparison of body sway analysis techniques. Acta Otolaryngol 1994; 114: 115–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogind H, Simonsen H, Era P, et al. Comparison of Kistler 9861A force platform and Chattecx Balance System for measurement of postural sway: correlation and test-retest reliability. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2003; 13: 106–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorazepam: datasheet compendium. London: Association of the British Pharmaceutial Industry, 1999

  6. Patat A, Foulhoux P. Effect on postural sway of various benzodiazepine tranquillisers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 20: 9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patat A, Perault MC, Vandel B, et al. Lack of interaction between a new antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam on psychomotor performance and memory in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 39: 31–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Noachtar S, von Maydell B, Fuhry L, et al. Gabapentin and carbamazepine affect eye movements and posture control differently: a placebo-controlled investigation of acute CNS side effects in healthy volunteers. Epilepsy Res 1998; 31: 47–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wesnes KA, Garratt C, Wickens M, et al. Effect of sibutramine alone and with alcohol on cognitive function in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49: 110–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattila MJ, Vanakoski J, Kalska H, et al. Effect of alcohol, zolpidem, and some other sedatives and hypnotics on performance and memory. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1998; 59: 917–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Letz R, Gerr F, Harris-Abbott D. Heterogeneity of effects of ethanol ingestion on postural stability as measured by two devices. Neurotoxicology 1994; 15: 603–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berlin I, Warot D, Hergueta T, et al. Comparison of the effects of zolpidem and triazolam on memory functions, psychomotor performances, and postural sway in healthy subjects. J Clin Pyschopharmacol 1993; 13: 100–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Allain H, Bentue-Ferrer D, Tarral A, et al. Effects on postural oscillation and memory functions of a single dose of zolpidem 5mg, zopiclone 3.75mg and lormetazepam 1mg in elderly healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 59: 179–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tada K, Sato Y, Sakai T, et al. Effect of zopiclone, triazolam, and nitrazepam on standing steadiness. Neuropsychobiology 1994; 29: 17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ledin T, Gupta A, Larsen LE, et al. Randomised perturbed posturography: methodology and effects of midazolam sedation. Acta Otolaryngol 1993; 113: 245–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mattila MJ, Mattila ME, Olkkola KT, et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on human performance and mood. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 41: 217–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Steveninck AL, Gieschke R, Schoemaker RC, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of bretazenil and diazepam with alcohol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 41: 565–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patat A, Klein MJ, Hucher M, et al. Acute effects of amitriptryline on human performance and interactions with diazepam. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 35: 585–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McClelland G, Cooper S, Pilgrim A. A comparison of the central nervous system effects of haloperidol, chlorpromazine and sulpiride in normal volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: 795–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu YJ, Stagni G, Walden JG, et al. Thioridazine dose-related effects on biomechanical force platform measures of sway in young and old men. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 431–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kollegger H, Wober C, Baumgartner C, et al. Stabilising and destabilizing effects of vision and foot position on body sway of healthy young subjects: a posturagraphic study. Eur Neurol 1989; 29: 241–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perneger T. What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments? BMJ 1998; 316: 1236–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothman K. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990; 1: 43–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd supplied the lorazepam and placebo used in this study.

Dr Nicole Calder is a direct employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd in England. The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Warrington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norris, V., Baisley, K.J., Calder, N. et al. Assessment of the AccuSwayPLUS System in Measuring the Effect of Lorazepam on Body Sway in Healthy Volunteers. Int J Pharm Med 19, 233–238 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00124363-200519040-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00124363-200519040-00005

Keywords

Navigation