Athletic Injury Reporting
- 255 Downloads
There are numerous athletic injury reporting systems currently in place. In order for our understanding of athletic injury epidemiology to advance, we must be able to compare data from divergent sources. This paper provides a review of existing athletic injury reporting systems in North America. The epidemiological designs employed in these systems are outlined, along with a description of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to reporting. The differences between the case-series and cohort methods are delineated and the importance of injury definition, sources of error, denominator data and exposure estimation are discussed within this context.
Four recommendations are then offered to assist in moving toward more universal systems for athletic injury reporting. First, comparability of data between systems should be maximised through clear indication of the reporting system design and the methods of data collection. Secondly, an exact definition should be given as to what constitutes a reportable event (‘injury’). Thirdly, whenever possible, outcome information should be collected on each reported event so that an injury definition may be applied at the time of data analysis. Lastly, any limitations or sources of error should be acknowledged.
KeywordsAdis International Limited Sport Injury Cohort Design National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Data
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control. Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 1988; 37Suppl. 5: 1–18Google Scholar
- 6.Ellison LF, MacKenzie SG. Sports injuries in the database of the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program: an overview. Chron Dis Canada 1993; 14(3): 96–104Google Scholar
- 16.A national guide to injury reporting systems. National Youth Sports Foundation for the Prevention of Athletic Injuries, Inc., 1990Google Scholar
- 17.Sports medicine groups 1992: injury statistics groups. Physician Sports Med 1992; 20(1): 160–2Google Scholar
- 18.Last JM, editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988Google Scholar
- 23.Go B. Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1992Google Scholar
- 24.Clayton P. 3-year injury report system data review [report]. Calgary (Alberta): International Hockey Centre of Excellence, 1992Google Scholar
- 25.Sicard C, Daigle B. Economic costs of injuries and fatalities resulting form the practice of sports and recreational activities in Québec. Trois-Rivières: Régie de la Sécurité dans les Sports du Québec, 1990Google Scholar
- 26.Bicycle-related injuries: data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. JAMA 1987; 257(24): 3334–7Google Scholar
- 27.Duvall DP. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System: a description of its role in the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Division of Hazard and Injury Data Systems, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1990Google Scholar
- 28.Pelletier R. Canadian Athletic Injury/Illness Reporting System: CAIRS I recorder’s handbook. Ottawa: University of Ottawa, 1992Google Scholar
- 30.Dick R. 1991–92 Injury Surveillance System Report. Overland Park (KS): National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1992Google Scholar
- 31.Big Ten Sports Injury Reporting System. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 Suppl. l: S169–200Google Scholar
- 32.Yale Athletic Medicine Reporting System. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S167–8Google Scholar
- 33.Rice SG. Injury Data Analysis Fall 1979 — Spring 1992. Seattle: Athletic Health Care System, University of Washington, 1993Google Scholar
- 36.Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Clinical Epidemiology: the essentials. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1982: 190Google Scholar
- 39.Meeuwisse WH. Development, implementation and validation of the Canadian Intercollegiate Sport Injury Registry [dissertation]. The University of Calgary, 1994Google Scholar
- 40.Babbie E. The practice of social research. 5th ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1989Google Scholar