Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 164–168 | Cite as

Sports Injury Surveillance Systems

‘One Size Fits All?’
  • Willem van Mechelen
Injury Surveillance Leading Article

Summary

Sport is beneficial to health, but may also cause injuries. Therefore there is a need for sports injury prevention. Sports injury prevention should be based on the outcome of scientific research and should be part of the ‘sequence of prevention’. In applying the ‘sequence of prevention’, first the incidence and severity of the sports injury problem need to be established. Secondly the aetiology and the mechanism of sports injuries need to be identified. Only based on this information can preventative measures be introduced, which must subsequently be evaluated for effectiveness. The principle of the ‘sequence of prevention’ cannot be applied without proper sports injury surveillance. This paper addresses the question of whether one uniform sports injury surveillance system can be used to cover all aspects of sports injury research at all stages of the ‘sequence of prevention’. It is argued that a general sports injury surveillance system is useful for answering questions about the incidence and severity of the sports injury problem in various subsets of a population. It can also be used for time trend studies. If the purpose of injury surveillance is to identify the aetiology or the effectiveness of preventative measures, then sports injury surveillance should be tailored to the specific sports situation. Sports injury surveillance systems are not useful in identifying the mechanism of injury.

Keywords

Sport Participation Sport Injury Aetiological Factor Sport Injury Prevention Lance System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Vulpen A. Sport for all: sport injuries and their prevention. Papendal, The Netherlands: Council of Europe, NISGZ, 1989Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HCG. How can sports injuries be prevented? NISGZ publication no. 25E, ISBN 90-71001-12-1. Papendal, The Netherlands: NISGZ, 1987Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HCG. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries. Sports Med 1992; 14(2): 82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wade CE. What is the question? In: Noyes FR, Albright JP, editors. Sports injury research. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S38–S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunter RE, Levy IM Vignettes. In: Noyes FR, Albright JP, editors. Sports injury research. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S25–S37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noyes FR, Lindenfeld TN, Marshall MT. What determines an athletic injury (definition)? Who determines an injury (occurrence)? In: Noyes FR, Albright JP, editors. Sports injury research. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S65–S68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Mechelen W, Twisk JWR, Molendijk A et al. Subject-related risk factors for sports injuries: a 1 year prospective study in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28(9): 1171–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Mechelen W, Kemper HCG, Snel J, et al. Are physical fitness, physiological and psychosocial indices related to sports injuries? In: Kemper HCG, editor. The Amsterdam Growth Study: a longitudinal analysis of health, fitness and lifestyle. ISSN 0894-4229, HK Sport Science Monograph Series Vol. 6. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1995: 189–203Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rudicel SR. How to choose a study design. In: Noyes FR, Albright JP, editors. Sports injury research. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S43–S47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klesges RC, Eck LH, Mellon MW et al. The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1990; 22(5): 690–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Galen WChC, Diederiks JPM. Sportblessures breed uitgemeten. Haarlem, The Netherlands: De Vrieseborch, 1990Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmikli SL, Backx FJG, Bol E. Sportblesures nader uitgediept. Houten/Diegem, The Netherlands: Bohn, Stafleu, Van Lochem, 1995Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Loës M. Epidemiology of sports injuries in the Swiss organization ‘Youth and Sports’ 1987–1989. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16: 134–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bouter L, Van Dongen M. Probleemanalyse. In: Damoiseaux V, van der Molen HT, Kok GJ, editors. Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering. Assen, The Netherlands,: Van Gorcum, 1993Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindenfeld TN, Noyes FR, Marshall MT. Components of injury reporting systems. In: Noyes FR, Albright JP, editors. Sports injury research. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16Suppl. 1: S69–S80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marti B. Health effects of recreational running in women: some epidemiological and preventive aspects. Sports Med 1991; 11(1): 20–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Zijlstra W,P et al. Is range of motion of the hip and ankle joint related to running injuries? A case control study. Int J Sports Med 1992; 13(8): 605–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine and Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of MedicineVrije Universiteit AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations