Molecular Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 43–53 | Cite as

Peptide Mimetic of the S100A4 Protein Modulates Peripheral Nerve Regeneration and Attenuates the Progression of Neuropathy in Myelin Protein P0 Null Mice

  • Mihai Moldovan
  • Volodymyr Pinchenko
  • Oksana Dmytriyeva
  • Stanislava Pankratova
  • Kåre Fugleholm
  • Jorg Klingelhofer
  • Elisabeth Bock
  • Vladimir Berezin
  • Christian Krarup
  • Darya Kiryushko
Research Article


We recently found that S100A4, a member of the multifunctional S100 protein family, protects neurons in the injured brain and identified two sequence motifs in S100A4 mediating its neurotrophic effect. Synthetic peptides encompassing these motifs stimulated neuritogenesis and survival in vitro and mimicked the S100A4-induced neuroprotection in brain trauma. Here, we investigated a possible function of S100A4 and its mimetics in the pathologies of the peripheral nervous system (PNS). We found that S100A4 was expressed in the injured PNS and that its peptide mimetic (H3) affected the regeneration and survival of myelinated axons. H3 accelerated electrophysiological, behavioral and morphological recovery after sciatic nerve crush while transiently delaying regeneration after sciatic nerve transection and repair. On the basis of the finding that both S100A4 and H3 increased neurite branching in vitro, these effects were attributed to the modulatory effect of H3 on initial axonal sprouting. In contrast to the modest effect of H3 on the time course of regeneration, H3 had a long-term neuroprotective effect in the myelin protein P0 nul mice, a model of dysmyelinating neuropathy (Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 disease), where the peptide attenuated the deterioration of nerve conduction, demyelination and axonal loss. From these results, S100A4 mimetics emerge as a possible means to enhance axonal sprouting and survival, especially in the context of demyelinating neuropathies with secondary axonal loss, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 disease. Moreover, our data suggest that S100A4 is a neuroprotectant in PNS and that other S10C proteins, sharing high homology in the H3 motif, may have important functions in PNS pathologies.



The project was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Danish Medical Research Council, Ludvig and Sara Elsass Foundation, Foundation for Research in Neurology and the Jytte and Kaj Dahlboms Foundation. We would like to thank Irina Korshunova for help with genotyping the P0 mice and Lis Hansen for expert technical assistance with the histological preparations.


  1. 1.
    Donato R. (2003) Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins. Microsc. Res. Tech. 60:540–551.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salama I, Malone PS, Mihaimeed F, Jones JL. (2008) A review of the S100 proteins in cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 34:357–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goyette J, Geczy CL. (2011) Inflammation-associated S100 proteins: new mechanisms that regulate function. Amino Acids. 41:821–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimmer DB, Chaplin J, Baldwin A, Rast M. (2005) S100-mediated signal transduction in the nervous system and neurological diseases. Cell Mol. Biol. (Noisy-le-grand). 51:201–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shepherd CE, et al. (2006) Inflammatory S100A9 and S100A12 proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 27:1554–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lisachev PD, et al. (2010) A comparison of the dynamics of S100B, S100A1, and S100A6 mRNA expression in hippocampal CA1 area of rats during long-term potentiation and after low-frequency stimulation. Cardiovasc. Psychiatry Neurol. 2010:720958.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garrett SC, Varney KM, Weber DJ, Bresnick AR. (2006) S100A4, a mediator of metastasis. J. Biol. Chem. 281:677–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boye K, Maelandsmo GM. (2010) S100A4 and metastasis: a small actor playing many roles. Am. J. Pathol. 176:528–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kozlova EN, Lukanidin E. (2002) Mts1 protein expression in the central nervous system after injury. Glia. 37:337–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dmytriyeva O, et al. (2012) The metastasis-promoting S100A4 protein confers neuroprotection in brain injury. Nat. Commun. 3:1197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang KH, Han S, Lu PH, Xu XM. (2004) Upregulation of S100A4 after spinal cord transection in adult rats. Acta. Pharmacol. Sin. 25:1007–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stary M, Schneider M, Sheikh SP, Weitzer G. (2006) Parietal endoderm secreted S100A4 promotes early cardiomyogenesis in embryoid bodies. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 343:555–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yammani RR, Long D, Loeser RF. (2009) Interleukin-7 stimulates secretion of S100A4 by activating the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in human articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 60:792–800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novitskaya V, et al. (2000) Oligomeric forms of the metastasis-related Mts1 (S100A4) protein stimulate neuronal differentiation in cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. J Biol. Chem. 275:41278–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pedersen MV, et al.(2004) The Mts1/S100A4 protein is a neuroprotectant. J. Neurosci. Res. 77:777–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiryushko D, et al. (2006) Molecular mechanisms of Ca(2+) signaling in neurons induced by the S100A4 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:3625–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kozlova EN, Lukanidin E. (1999) Metastasis-associated mts1 (S100A4) protein is selectively expressed in white matter astrocytes and is up-regulated after peripheral nerve or dorsal root injury. Glia. 27:249–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sandelin M, Zabihi S, Liu L, Wicher G, Kozlova EN. (2004) Metastasis-associated S100A4 (Mts1) protein is expressed in subpopulations of sensory and autonomic neurons and in Schwann cells of the adult rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 473:233–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fang Z, Forslund N, Takenaga K, Lukanidin E, Kozlova EN. (2006) Sensory neurite outgrowth on white matter astrocytes is influenced by intra-cellular and extracellular S100A4 protein. J. Neurosci. Res. 83:619–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haglid KG, et al. (1997) S-100beta stimulates neurite outgrowth in the rat sciatic nerve grafted with acellular muscle transplants. Brain Res. 753:196–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolthers M, Moldovan M, Binderup T, Schmalbruch H, Krarup C. (2005) Comparative electrophysiological, functional, and histological studies of nerve lesions in rats. Microsurgery. 25:508–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giese KP, Martini R, Lemke G, Soriano P, Schachner M. (1992) Mouse P0 gene disruption leads to hypomyelination, abnormal expression of recognition molecules, and degeneration of myelin and axons. Cell. 71:565–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martini R, Zielasek J, Toyka KV, Giese KP, Schachner M. (1995) Protein zero (P0)-deficient mice show myelin degeneration in peripheral nerves characteristic of inherited human neuropathies. Nat. Genet. 11:281–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moldovan M, et al. (2011) Na(v)1.8 channelopathy in mutant mice deficient for myelin protein zero is detrimental to motor axons. Brain. 134:585–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nave KA, Sereda MW, Ehrenreich H. (2007) Mechanisms of disease: inherited demyelinating neuropathies: from basic to clinical research. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 453–64.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmid CD, et al. (2000) Immune deficiency in mouse models for inherited peripheral neuropathies leads to improved myelin maintenance. J. Neurosci. 20:729–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    OECD principles of Good Laboratory Practice: (as revised in 1997). 1998. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], Environment Directorate; [cited 2013 Mar 25]. Available from: OECD Environment Directorate, Environmental Health and Safety Division, Paris, France;
  28. 28.
    European Parliament; Council of the EU. (2010) Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Off. J. European Union. 53:L 276/33–79.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies. (2011) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th edition. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; [cited 2013 Mar 25]. Available from: Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moldovan M, Alvarez S, Krarup C. (2009) Motor axon excitability during Wallerian degeneration. Brain. 132:511–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA. (1989) Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 83:129–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    de Medinaceli L, Freed WJ, Wyatt RJ. (1982) An index of the functional condition of rat sciatic nerve based on measurements made from walking tracks. Exp. Neurol. 77:634–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Alagappan D, et al. (2009) Brain injury expands the numbers of neural stem cells and progenitors in the SVZ by enhancing their responsiveness to EGF. ASN Neuro. 1:e00009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soroka V, et al. (2002) Induction of neuronal differentiation by a peptide corresponding to the homophilic binding site of the second Ig module of the neural cell adhesion molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 277:24676–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Haastert K, et al. (2005) Rat embryonic motoneurons in long-term co-culture with Schwann cells: a system to investigate motoneuron diseases on a cellular level in vitro. J. Neurosci. Methods. 142:275–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pankratova S, et al. (2012) A new agonist of the erythropoietin receptor, Epobis, induces neurite outgrowth and promotes neuronal survival. J. Neurochem. 121:915–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fugleholm K, Schmalbruch H, Krarup C. (1994) Early peripheral nerve regeneration after crushing, sectioning, and freeze studied by implanted electrodes in the cat. J. Neurosci. 14:2659–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sorensen J, Fugleholm K, Moldovan M, Schmalbruch H, Krarup C. (2001) Axonal elongation through long acellular nerve segments depends on recruitment of phagocytic cells from the near-nerve environment: electrophysiological and morphological studies in the cat. Brain Res. 903:185–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ey B, Kobsar I, Blazyca H, Kroner A, Martini R. (2007) Visualization of degenerating axons in a dysmyelinating mouse mutant with axonal loss. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 35:153–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Frei R, et al. (1999) Loss of distal axons and sensory Merkel cells and features indicative of muscle denervation in hindlimbs of P0-deficient mice. J. Neurosci. 19:6058–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Samsam M, et al. (2003) The Wlds mutation delays robust loss of motor and sensory axons in a genetic model for myelin-related axonopathy. J. Neurosci. 23:2833–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hofmann MA, et al. (1999) RAGE mediates a novel proinflammatory axis: a central cell surface receptor for S100/calgranulin polypeptides. Cell. 97:889–901.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Huttunen HJ, et al. (2000) Coregulation of neurite outgrowth and cell survival by amphoterin and S100 proteins through receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) activation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:40096–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rong LL, et al. (2004) RAGE modulates peripheral nerve regeneration via recruitment of both inflammatory and axonal outgrowth pathways. FASEB J. 18:1818–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krarup C, Archibald SJ, Madison RD. (2002) Factors that influence peripheral nerve regeneration: an electrophysiological study of the monkey median nerve. Ann. Neurol. 51:69–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Skouras E, Ozsoy U, Sarikcioglu L, Angelov DN. (2011) Intrinsic and therapeutic factors determining the recovery of motor function after peripheral nerve transection. Ann. Anat. 193:286–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brushart TM. (1988) Preferential reinnervation of motor nerves by regenerating motor axons. J. Neurosci. 8:1026–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Uschold T, Robinson GA, Madison RD. (2007) Motor neuron regeneration accuracy: balancing trophic influences between pathways and endorgans. Exp. Neurol. 205:250–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Meehan CF, MacDermid VE, Montague SJ, Neuber-Hess M, Rose PK. (2011) Dendrite-derived supernumerary axons on adult axotomized motor neurons possess proteins that are essential for the initiation and propagation of action potentials and synaptic vesicle release. J. Neurosci. 31:6732–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Terenghi G, Hart A, Wiberg M. (2011) The nerve injury and the dying neurons: diagnosis and prevention. J. Hand Surg. 36:730–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weimer LH, Podwall D. (2006) Medication-induced exacerbation of neuropathy in Charcot Marie Tooth disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 242:47–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ip CW, Kroner A, Kohl B, Wessig C, Martini R. (2009) Tacrolimus (FK506) causes disease aggravation in models for inherited peripheral myelinopathies. Neurobiol. Dis. 33:207–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    d’Ydewalle C, Benoy V, Van Den Bosch L. (2012) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: emerging mechanisms and therapies. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 44:1299–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    ten Asbroek AL, et al. (2005) Expression profiling of sciatic nerve in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1a mouse model. J. Neurosci. Res. 79:825–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Perrone L, Peluso G, Melone MA. (2008) RAGE recycles at the plasma membrane in S100B secretory vesicles and promotes Schwann cells morphological changes. J. Cell. Physiol. 217:60–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit (

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihai Moldovan
    • 1
  • Volodymyr Pinchenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • Oksana Dmytriyeva
    • 2
  • Stanislava Pankratova
    • 2
  • Kåre Fugleholm
    • 3
  • Jorg Klingelhofer
    • 2
  • Elisabeth Bock
    • 2
  • Vladimir Berezin
    • 2
  • Christian Krarup
    • 1
    • 4
  • Darya Kiryushko
    • 2
  1. 1.Nerve Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Panum InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Protein Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and PharmacologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryRigshospitalet, CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Clinical NeurophysiologyRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations