Molecular Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 123–137 | Cite as

Multiple Mechanisms of Immune Suppression by B Lymphocytes

  • Matthew W. Klinker
  • Steven K. LundyEmail author
Open Access
Invited Review Article


Suppression of the immune system after the resolution of infection or inflammation is an important process that limits immune-mediated pathogenesis and autoimmunity. Several mechanisms of immune suppression have received a great deal of attention in the past three decades. These include mechanisms related to suppressive cytokines, interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, produced by regulatory cells, and mechanisms related to apoptosis mediated by death ligands, Fas ligand (FasL) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), expressed by killer or cytotoxic cells. Despite many lines of evidence supporting an important role for B lymphocytes as both regulatory and killer cells in many inflammatory settings, relatively little attention has been given to understanding the biology of these cells, their relative importance or their usefulness as therapeutic targets. This review is intended to give an overview of the major mechanisms of immunosuppression used by B lymphocytes during both normal and inflammatory contexts. The more recent discoveries of expression of granzyme B, programmed death 1 ligand 2 (PD-L2) and regulatory antibody production by B cells as well as the interactions of regulatory and killer B cells with regulatory T cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells and other cell populations are discussed. In addition, new evidence on the basis of independent characterizations of regulatory and killer CD5+ B cells point toward the concept of a multipotent suppressor B cell with seemingly high therapeutic potential.


The immune system contains a vast array of cell types and effector molecules specialized to detect and destroy pathogenic microorganisms and the cells and tissues that harbor them. With this highly toxic protective function comes the need for tight regulation so that once the danger of infection has passed, the system can return to relative calm and further damage can be avoided. This regulation is mediated by subsets of cells and immunosuppressive molecules that are specialized to actively suppress the immune response (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Ideally, immune suppression balances the destructive forces of inflammation while allowing clearance of pathogenic infectious agents (Figure 1A) (8). Failures of immune suppression may manifest themselves clinically in the form of severe acute inflammation and cytokine storms that, if improperly controlled, ultimately result in death (Figure 1B) (9). In other cases, poor immune regulation may contribute to chronic or aberrant inflammation including allergies, asthma and autoimmune diseases (10,11). Reciprocally, over-suppression of the immune system may lead to poor clearance of pathogens, leading to persistent infections (Figure 1C) (12) or ineffective tumor surveillance leading to cancer (13). Many pathogenic strains of viruses and bacteria have adopted immunosuppressive mechanisms to circumvent detection and destruction by the immune system (14). This delicate balance between inflammation and immune suppression depends on all of the components of the immune response working in concert and requires complex mechanisms of communication between all of the effector and regulatory cell populations (15). Therefore, a thorough understanding of the specialized processes and cell types that control immune suppression is essential to our understanding of many human diseases and in developing effective therapeutic approaches.
Figure 1

Normal immune responses depend on appropriate levels of immune suppression. This schematic depicts three potential outcomes of an infection and the resulting inflammatory responses on the basis of varying the level and dynamics of immune suppression. (A) In a normal immune response, the infectious agent stimulates an early inflammatory response that begins to control the infection before immune suppression begins. As the infection is cleared, inflammation decreases while immune suppression continues to increase, resulting in the resolution of inflammation and return to homeostasis. (B) An immune response with delayed or weakened immune suppression leads to increased inflammation and impaired resolution despite the absence of the eliciting infectious agent. If unresolved, this scenario would lead to severe acute inflammation and death. (C) Early and/or increased suppression may inappropriately lower inflammation and prevent clearance of the infectious agent. Depending on the nature of the infection and the balance between inflammation and suppression, this result could lead to morbidity caused by the infectious agent, a chronic state of inflammation and/or higher baseline suppression toward the next inflammatory stimulus. Open image in new window Infection; Open image in new window inflammation; Open image in new window immune suppression.

Immune suppression can be classified in two broad categories: passive and active suppression. Passive immune suppression is generally a result of the removal of immune stimuli. This can come in the form of clearance of the pathogenic microorganism, sequestration of antigens or decreased antigen presentation resulting in decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines and reduced inflammation. In contrast, active immune suppression is mediated by specialized cells and their molecular products that direct the effector cells of the immune system to either decrease their activity or undergo programmed cell death (apoptosis). Active immune suppression can occur despite the presence of antigens, and its mediators are often detectable during acute or chronic inflammatory processes. Cooperation between passive and active immune suppressive mechanisms is critical to controlling inflammation and maintaining homeostasis.

Immune suppression occurs through multiple mechanisms and is mediated by a wide variety of cell populations. Although the antibody-producing functions of B cells have been intensely studied, their immunosuppressive functions have received relatively little attention compared with other regulatory cell populations. Thus, despite sporadic reports of B cell-mediated immune suppression over the last three decades, the regulatory functions of B cells have only been rigorously examined in the last 10 years (16, 17, 18, 19). As will be discussed further below, most of the immune-suppressive mechanisms previously attributed to regulatory T cells and cytotoxic cells have also been demonstrated in B cells (Figure 2). Some immunosuppressive mechanisms are unique to B cells, such as the production of regulatory antibodies that contribute to immune regulation. In this review, we aim to survey the demonstrated mechanisms of immunosuppression used by B cells and discuss the importance of these mechanisms in normal immune responses and in maintaining immunological tolerance. Taken together, the reviewed studies demonstrate that B cells are critical for the effective regulation of the immune system and use a wide array of immunosuppressive mechanisms. We will also discuss which B-cell subsets are known to use these suppressive mechanisms and present the evidence for the existence of a multipotent suppressor B-cell population.
Figure 2

B-cell subsets can mediate immune suppression through multiple effector mechanisms. The major pathways involved in immune suppression have been shown to be expressed by various subsets of B lymphocytes. T2-MZP and B10 cells have been independently described as important B-cell sources of IL-10, but IL-10 might also be produced by any B cell given the proper stimulus. In some cases, TGFβ has also been shown to be produced by B cells, but the phenotype of these cells is undetermined. Human but not mouse B cells have been shown to express granzyme B, the enzymatic component of cytotoxic granules. B cells expressing PD-L2 on the cell surface (L2pB1 cells) can send either stimulatory or regulatory signals through interactions of PD-L2 with the receptor PD-1 on target cells. Killer B lymphocytes are defined by expression of the death ligands FasL and/or TRAIL. The CD5+ B-cell subset has been independently reported to express IL-10, PD-L2, granzyme B (in humans) and FasL, suggesting that CD5+ B lymphocytes may function as multipotent suppressor B cells. CD4+ T cells are documented targets of immune suppression by B cells, but many of the mechanisms described also have effects on NKT cells, CD8+ T cells, APCs and other lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells.

B-Cell Secretion of Interleukin-10

The most widely studied and best understood immunosuppressive mechanism of B lymphocytes is the secretion of interleukin (IL)-10 (1), which is one of the most important antiinflammatory cytokines regulating inflammation (8). Although IL-10 has multifaceted effects on nearly all hematopoietic cells, its most important roles appear to be in the direct regulation of myeloid-derived antigen-presenting cells and T lymphocytes (20). In antigen-presenting cells, IL-10 inhibits the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1β and reduces surface expression of the antigen presentation machinery (major histocompatibility complex [MHC] class II, costimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules) (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). IL-10 directly affects differentiated CD4+ T cells, as demonstrated in studies in which both T helper 1 (TH1) and TH2 cells exhibited reduced proliferation and cytokine secretion in the presence of IL-10 (26,27). It should be noted that both TH17 and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells appear to be relatively unaffected by IL-10, suggesting that other antiinflammatory mediators are necessary for the regulation of these T-cell subsets (28).

Although B cells have previously expressed IL-10 under various conditions, the importance of B cell-derived IL-10 in immunosuppression was not definitively demonstrated until the last decade (1,18,29,30). In 2002, Mizoguchi et al. (30) identified a subset of IL-10-producing B cells in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) that upregulated the MHC class I-like molecule CD1d over the course of chronic intestinal inflammation. These CD1d-expressing B cells mediated IL-10-dependent suppression of intestinal inflammation in recipient animals upon transfer. In the same year, Fillatreau et al. (29) showed a role for IL-10-producing splenic B cells in auto-immunity. In these experiments, the authors showed that splenic B cells could produce IL-10 in response to stimulation through the B cell receptor (BCR) and CD40 and that B cell-specific IL-10 production correlated with recovery in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Importantly, they found that IL-10-competent B cells could reduce disease severity upon adoptive transfer, but B cells from IL-10−/− mice were unable to do so. In the intervening years, others have demonstrated that B cell-derived IL-10 regulates autoimmunity in various other mouse models of autoimmune conditions, including chronic intestinal inflammation (30), collagen-induced arthritis (31), type 1 diabetes (32) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (33,34).

A great deal of attention has been paid to the factors that generate or expand IL-10-producing B cells. Stimuli known to increase the number of IL-10-producing B cells in vitro include signaling through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (35), the BCR (36), CD40 (37) or combinations thereof. Recently, it was shown that the TNF family cytokine, B cell-activating factor (BAFF; B-lymphocyte stimulator [BlyS]), increased the frequency of IL-10-producing B cells in vitro and in vivo, and BAFF-treated B cells suppressed inflammation upon adoptive transfer (38). Genetic studies have revealed that splenic IL-10-producing B cells are found at nearly normal levels in mice deficient in T cells, CD21, MHC class I and class II and CD40 (30,35). In contrast, loss of CD1d, CD19 or MyD88 expression essentially eliminates IL-10-producing B cells, suggesting these molecules are required for IL-10-producing B-cell development or function (30,35). Mice that express higher levels of CD19, that ectopically express CD40L in B cells or are deficient in CD22 or NFATc1 have greatly increased numbers of IL-10-producing B cells (35,39). BCR-mediated Ca2+ flux appears to be required for IL-10 production in B cells, since B cells deficient in the calcium sensors STIM1 and STIM2 have a profound defect in IL-10 secretion and abrogated suppression abilities in vivo (40). Remarkably, antibody responses and B-cell development are largely intact in these animals, suggesting that BCR-mediated calcium flux is crucially important for B cell-mediated immune suppression but is dispensable for effector functions. Mice prone to spontaneous autoimmunity (NZB/W, NOD and MRL/lpr mice) have increased numbers of IL-10-producing B cells relative to normal strains, whereas mice susceptible to induced autoimmunity (DBA/1, SJL) have lower basal numbers of IL-10-producing cells (35). The mechanisms and consequences of these differences in IL-10-producing B-cell frequency have yet to be elucidated.

Splenic IL-10-producing B cells were initially reported to have a surface phenotype consistent with transitional 2-marginal zone precursor (T2-MZP) B cells, namely high expression of CD21, CD23 and IgM (41). Additionally, transfer of T2-MZP B cells reduced the severity of collagen-induced arthritis in recipients to a greater extent than other B-cell subsets, suggesting the presence of regulatory B cells within this subset. Later, a portion of splenic IL-10-producing B cells were shown to coexpress CD5 and CD1d in addition to the previously described T2-MZP B-cell markers, and CD19+CD5+CD1dhigh B cells were found to have IL-10-dependent immunosuppressive properties upon transfer into recipient animals (36). Using a contact hypersensitivity model, the authors showed that the suppression mediated by CD5+CD1dhigh B cells was antigen specific, since CD5+CD1dhigh B cells from naive animals or those sensitized with an irrelevant antigen did not suppress the immune response to subsequent antigenic challenge. More recently, the protein TIM-1 (T-cell Ig domain and mucin domain protein 1) was reported to identify 70% of IL-10-producing B cells, making this marker the most specific yet identified for IL-10-producing B cells (42). Treatment of mice with an anti-TIM-1 antibody led to an increase in IL-10-producing TIM-1+ B cells and improved tolerance of an allogeneic tissue graft, suggesting that TIM-1 is of functional significance for IL-10-producing B cells rather than simply an identification marker (42). These results suggest that targeting TIM-1 signaling may provide a novel therapeutic strategy for increasing the number of IL-10-producing B cells in transplant recipients or patients with autoimmunity. It should be noted that the same anti-TIM-1 antibody that mediated tolerance in wild-type mice actually hastened allograft rejection in B cell-deficient mice, suggesting that TIM-1 signaling has different effects in non-B cells.

Much controversy still exists regarding the relationship of IL-10-producing B cells to known B-cell subsets. Whereas IL-10-producing B cells are enriched in the T2-MZP and CD5+CD1dhigh subsets, not all cells in these subsets express IL-10, suggesting that there is not an absolute correspondence between these B-cell subsets and IL-10-producing B cells. The fact that many IL-10-producing B cells express CD5 suggests that they may also be related to the peritoneal B-1a cell population, which is in accord with the known ability of B-1a cells to secrete much IL-10 (18). Additionally, splenic IL-10-producing B cells are present at much higher frequencies in neonates than in older mice, as is also true of B-1a cells (35). Although it has been suggested that IL-10-producing B cells represent a distinct lineage of B cell (termed “B10” cells) (43), more study is required to demonstrate that IL-10-producing B cells are indeed distinct from T2-MZP B and B-1a cells. Finally, whereas the CD5+CD1dhigh B-cell population is enriched for IL-10-producing B cells, only ∼25% of IL-10-producing B cells are found in this population. Indeed, IL-10-producing B cells can be found among most major subsets of splenic B cells, albeit at smaller frequencies than that seen among CD5+CD1dhigh B cells (42). Given that no set of surface markers identifies all IL-10-producing B cells, it is also possible that IL-10 production occurs in several B-cell subsets, depending on the differentiation or activation state.

Although murine IL-10-producing B cells have been well studied, only recently has evidence for an orthologous human cell emerged. Blair et al. (44) compared the capacity of different peripheral blood B-cell subsets to suppress T-cell cytokine production in vitro and found that the CD24highCD38high subset inhibited interferon (IFN)-γ and TNFα production in autologous T cells (44). This B-cell subset was found to be enriched for IL-10-producing B cells, and blockade of IL-10 largely abrogated T-cell suppression mediated by these B cells. The authors also compared the suppressive effects of CD24highCD38high B cells from SLE patients to those of healthy controls and found that those cells derived from SLE patients had both a reduced ability to produce IL-10 and a reduced suppression of T-cell cytokine production, although it is not clear if this defect is a cause or a consequence of SLE (44). In work from another group, human IL-10-producing B cells were found to suppress monocytes in an IL-10-dependent manner and were present in greater numbers in patients with autoimmune diseases (45). In this study, IL-10-producing B cells were identified as CD24hiCD27+ B cells, a phenotype similar to that recently reported for human B-1 cells (46). As in mice, the relationship of IL-10-producing B cells to other B-cell subsets is still controversial, and further work will be needed to clarify the identity of IL-10-producing human B cells.

It is clear from these studies that IL-10 plays a major role in B cell-mediated immune suppression, but it is not currently known if B cell-derived IL-10 acts exclusively on target cells or if the loss of IL-10 in B cells also leads to defects in other immunosuppressive functions. This is an important area of study, since IL-10 is a known growth factor for B cells and other suppressive mechanisms used by B cells may work in synergy with IL-10 (47). Further studies are required to fully understand the role B cell-derived IL-10 has in immunosuppression and autoimmunity.

Granzyme B Expression By B Cells

Granzyme B is an enzymatic component of the cytotoxic granules produced by CTL and NK cells that mediates cleavage of caspases and initiation of apoptosis in virus-infected cells (48). B lymphocyte-associated granzyme B expression was first detected in a panel of human B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells that underwent apoptosis after stimulation with the TLR9 ligand, CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) and the cytokine IL-21 (49). The same group also demonstrated IL-21-inducible expression of granzyme B by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed and nontransformed human B cells, as well as B cells isolated from patients with SLE, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis (49, 50, 51). In SLE patients, the predominant B-cell population that produced granzyme B was the CD5+ B-cell subset, and treatment of umbilical cord blood-derived B cells with IL-21 led to de novo granzyme B expression by CD5+ B cells (51). Whereas these studies clearly show that B cells can express functional granzyme B, the in vivo significance of this phenomenon is still unknown.

FAS Ligand and Trail Expression and Killer B-Cell Function

A major mechanism for maintaining peripheral tolerance, establishing sites of immune privilege, and controlling the duration and magnitude of immune responses is the expression of death-inducing ligands by lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells. The best characterized death-inducing ligands in mice and humans are Fas ligand (FasL) (CD178) (2) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (CD253) (52) molecules, which activate programmed cell death in target cells through ligation of cell surface death receptors. Defective expression of FasL or its receptor in mice results in increased lymphocyte proliferation, splenomegaly and high production of self-reactive antibodies (53). In humans, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome has been linked to defective Fas-mediated apoptosis (54). TRAIL has also been identified as an important regulator of autoimmunity in mice (55).

B lymphocyte expression of FasL was first demonstrated in human peripheral blood B cells after activation by the mitogens LPS or PMA and ionomycin (56). Since this report, several groups have demonstrated expression of FasL by transformed and nontransformed B cells from humans and mice (57). Expression of FasL by malignant human B cells, most notably in multiple myeloma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, has been associated with induction of apoptosis of T cells and other cells and increased tumor pathogenesis (58, 59, 60, 61). FasL-expressing B cells were also detected after several types of viral infections, including EBV (62), human immunodeficiency virus (63) and murine leukemia virus (64), where it was proposed that death ligand expression led to T-cell apoptosis and potentially the persistence of the infections.

Our studies of FasL expression by B lymphocytes began with the observation that FasL was highly expressed by CD19+ splenocytes in schistosome-infected mice (65). In the schistosome infection model, CD19+ B cells were the predominant FasL+ cell type in the spleen, and depletion of CD19+ cells led to decreased CD4+ T-cell apoptosis in response to antigenic stimulation. The number of FasL+ CD19+ “killer” B cells increased during infection, following a time course that closely matched the increase in granulomatous inflammation around schistosome eggs in the liver. In a subsequent study, it was found that the splenic CD5+ B-cell subset expressed higher levels of FasL than CD5-negative B cells at every time point tested during schistosome infection (66). Perhaps the most important observations from this latter study were as follows: (a) splenic CD5+ B cells from uninfected mice expressed FasL; (b) purified CD5+ B cells from infected and uninfected mice were potent killers of CD4+ T cells in the presence of antigen; and (c) FasL expression could be enhanced on CD5+ B cells by addition of schistosome antigens, IL-4 and IL-10 to cell cultures (66). These data led to the hypothesis that splenic CD5+ B cells are a naturally occurring and inducible killer cell population with potent apoptosis-inducing capabilities against antigen-specific CD4+ T cells (57).

Additional studies have shown that FasL+ B cells may play a role in autoimmune diseases and induction of T-cell tolerance. Activated B cells that expressed FasL and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β were able to suppress the onset of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice (67). FasL+ B cells with cytotoxic activity against T cells were elevated in the lupus-susceptible MRL/lpr (Fas-deficient) strain of mice (68). An inverse correlation between the number of splenic FasL+CD5+ B cells and severity of collagen-induced arthritis was also demonstrated (69). FasL expression increased on lung CD5+ B cells during chronic exposure to cockroach antigens in an asthma model, and lung T-cell apoptosis was reduced in CD5+ B cell-deficient Xid mice during asthma (70). The power of FasL+ killer B cells to mediate immune tolerance was best demonstrated in a male-to-female skin graft model in which purified splenic B cells transferred from control male mice were able to tolerize female graft recipients, but purified B cells from FasL-defective (gld/gld) mice could not induce tolerance (71). Thus, FasL+ killer B cells have been demonstrated in many disease situations as well as in healthy individuals, and they have been shown to have therapeutic potential.

In comparison to what is known about FasL expression and its role in immune suppression and tolerance, the role of TRAIL is less well characterized. The importance of TRAIL has mainly been studied in the context of cancer apoptosis, and initial studies in TRAIL-deficient mice did not indicate an altered immune phenotype (72,73). However, a recent study in TRAIL and FasL double-deficient mice indicated that FasL and TRAIL may have somewhat redundant yet cooperative roles in regulating immune homeostasis (74). TRAIL/FasL double-deficient mice had significantly increased splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy and autoantibody production compared with FasL-defective mice. TRAIL/FasL double deficiency also resulted in decreased breeding capacity and increased early mortality, indicating the importance of these molecules in maternal/fetal immune tolerance and regulation of inflammation. TRAIL expression by B lymphocytes was first reported on human and mouse B lymphoma cell lines (75). TRAIL has also been detected on B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and multiple myeloma cells as well as on nontransformed mouse and human B cells (76, 77, 78). Primary human B cells could be induced to express TRAIL upon treatment with TLR9 ligand or with the cytokine IFNα (79). The unique role of TRAIL-expressing B cells compared with FasL-expressing B cells to immune suppression, if one exists, has yet to be determined.

PD-L1- and PD-L2-Expressing B Lymphocytes

The programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor has been shown to be a critical regulator of immune activation and maintenance of peripheral tolerance (6). PD-1 expression by T and B cells increases after stimulation and was first detected in T cells undergoing activation-induced cell death (80,81). Although the name “programmed death-1” implies that this molecule is directly involved in cell death, its immune-suppressive functions are not thought to depend on induction of apoptosis (82). Two ligands for PD-1 (PD-1 ligands 1 and 2 [PD-L1 and PD-L2]) have been identified that have distinct patterns of cell expression and unique roles in immune suppression (83, 84, 85). PD-L1 is constitutively expressed by T and B lymphocytes, dendritic cells and monocytes, and its expression is induced by ligation of cell surface receptors and/or stimulation with the TH1-associated cytokine IFNγ (83). In contrast, expression of PD-L2 was originally described as being restricted to activated dendritic cells and monocytes (86,87). PD-L2 expression in these cells was inducible by treatment with the TH2-associated cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 (84). PD-L1 plays a dominant role in regulating TH1-mediated immune responses, whereas PD-L2 appears to be more important in regulating mucosal and TH2-associated responses such as oral tolerance and asthma (88,89).

In 2007, Zhong et al. (90) first described the expression of PD-L2 on 50–70% of mouse peritoneal CD5+ B cells. This subset, which the authors named L2pB1 cells, was enriched for cells that produce antiphosphatidylcholine antibodies, a specificity that has also been associated with binding to self-antigens. These L2pB1 cells are also major producers of anti-double-stranded DNA binding antibodies and are more abundant in lupusprone BXSB mice than in BALB/c control mice (91). Although the latter study demonstrated that L2pB1 cells were potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that favored the activation of IL-17-producing TH17 cells, the mechanisms behind this ability did not depend on PD-L2 expression. The immunosuppressive capacity of PD-L2 expressed by B cells has not been directly demonstrated and requires further study.

Inhibitory Effects of Sialylated

Over the course of a productive immune response, high-affinity IgG antibodies are developed that recognize epitopes on the invading pathogen or its toxic products. The Fc region of IgG binds to a family of Fcγ receptors expressed on cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system altering their phagocytic activity and responses to other stimuli (5). Both activating and inhibitory receptors exist within the Fcγ receptor family, and their relative levels of expression determine the activation threshold for a given cell. The production of IgG is vital for pathogen clearance, since individuals with hypogammaglobulinemia are extremely susceptible to infection. These patients are often treated with intravenous injection of polyclonal IgG pooled from thousands of blood donors, a method known as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. Despite the clear role of IVIG in pathogen clearance, it has been known for decades that very high doses of IVIG have an antiinflammatory effect, and high-dose IVIG is now commonly administered to patients with the autoimmune disease idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (92,93). Because the antiinflammatory function of IVIG is only evident at doses much higher than that needed for passive IVIG antibody replacement therapy, it was hypothesized that only a minor fraction of IgG molecules possessed antiinflammatory activity.

The Fc portion of IgG contains a single biantennary N-linked glycan required for binding IgG to its cognate Fcγ receptors. Whereas all IgG molecules appear to have a core heptasaccharide moiety comprised of N-acetlylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and mannose at this site, more than 30 alternatively modified glycoforms were identified on naturally occurring IgG molecules (94). Given that changes in this glycan had been reported to affect IgG receptor binding and cytotoxicity, it was hypothesized that the immunosuppressive IgG could be distinguished from proinflammatory IgG as a unique glycoform. Indeed, IVIG fractions enriched for a glycoform of IgG possessing sialic acid terminal additions displayed an antiinflammatory activity at much reduced doses relative to unfractionated IVIG in mouse models (95). Conversely, the removal of sialic acid residues from IVIG preparations severely abrogated immunosuppressive function.

The mechanism through which sialylated IgG suppresses inflammation involves a novel innate immunosuppressive pathway using TH2-related cytokines. The addition of sialic acids to the IgG glycan alters its receptor-binding profile, severely reducing its affinity for classic Fcγ receptors while increasing its ability to bind to an alternate C-type lectin receptor, specific intracellular adhesion molecule-3 grabbing nonintegrin homolog-related 1 (SIGN-R1) (96). Macrophages and dendritic cells from mice expressing the human orthologue of SIGN-R1 (hDC-SIGN) are thought to respond to sialylated IgG by secreting IL-33, which in turn increases the number of circulating IL-4-producing basophils (97). IL-4 produced by these activated basophils then acts on effector macrophages in the periphery, causing them to upregulate the inhibitory Fcγ receptor IIB (FcγRIIB), thus increasing the activation threshold of these cells and downregulating their proinflammatory capacity (98). In accord with this model, IVIG treatment shows little benefit in mice lacking SIGN-R1, FcγRIIB or IL-4, and mice treated with exogenous IL-33 have increased levels of IL-4-producing basophils and reduced susceptibility to antibody-mediated arthritis (96,97). Additionally, IVIG treatment is ineffective in mice depleted of basophils, strongly suggesting a central role for these cells in IVIG-mediated immunosuppression (97).

IgG sialylation status may prove to be an important factor in the pathogenesis or disease course of autoimmunity. Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a decrease in galactosylated and sialylated serum IgG (94). It has been shown that autoantigen-specific serum IgG displays reduced sialylation, and this reduction was even more pronounced at the site of active inflammation (99). Remarkably, little is known about what factors act on B cells to influence the glycosylation status of secreted antibodies. It appears that an active inflammatory response reduces the relative amount of sialylated IgG, although no mechanism for this reduction is currently known (95). A recent study characterized the glycan profile of IgG secreted from human primary B cells in response to various proinflammatory cytokines and other stimuli (100). Somewhat surprisingly, it was found that many stimuli tested (including IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, TNFα, TGFβ and lymphotoxin alpha [LTα]) had no measurable effect on the sialylation status of secreted IgG. Even more intriguingly, those proinflammatory stimuli that did have an effect (CpG-ODN, IL-21, IFNγ and all-trans retinoic acid) actually increased levels of sialylation and galactosylation rather than decreasing them. Because this is only a single in vitro study, and the B cells in question were stimulated with other factors in addition to the experimental conditions, further study will be required to better understand what causes B cells to change the sialylation status of secreted IgG in vivo.

While the identity of the B cells that secrete sialylated IgG is currently unknown, marginal zone B (MZB) cells may play a role in regulating the expression of SIGN-R1 on macrophages in the marginal zone (101). In mice genetically lacking MZB cells, macrophages in the marginal zone do not express SIGN-R1. In addition, loss of SIGN-R1+ macrophages occurs transiently when B cells are stimulated to exit the marginal zone.

Regulatory Natural Antibodies

Both humans and mice are born with a significant level of circulating IgM antibodies generated by neonatal B cells. Because these antibodies are present in mice raised in germ-free conditions, they are often called “natural” or “nonimmune” antibodies. Natural antibodies possess a limited and recurring repertoire of specificities and are generated by B-1 cells, a subset of B cells found mostly in the peritoneal and pleural cavities but also in smaller quantities in the spleen (102). In contrast to B-2 cells, B-1 cells exist as a self-renewing pool with little addition from bone marrow precursors after infancy. Given their limited repertoire and ability to respond to T cellindependent signals, they are thought to represent a primitive “innatelike” lymphocyte population. IgM antibodies made by B-1 cells are unique in that they display lower-affinity interactions with their cognate antigen and display more cross-reactivity than antibodies derived from B-2 cells.

Natural antibodies are thought to play a role in the elimination of apoptotic cells, a key function of the immune system (103). Under steady state, phagocytic cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells efficiently clear apoptotic cells with little induction of inflammation in a process known as efferocytosis. If this process is inhibited or overwhelmed, however, apoptotic cells are not removed before their plasma membrane loses integrity, resulting in the release of self-antigens and inflammatory signals into the interstitial space. This in turn can lead to increased tissue destruction and induction or exacerbation of autoimmunity.

The surface phenotype of cells undergoing apoptosis is altered from that of healthy cells by the presence of apoptosis-specific neoepitopes, sometimes called “eat-me” signals (104). These apoptotic surface determinants bind to surface receptors on phagocytic cells and allow for the selective identification and elimination of apoptotic cells. Among these neoepitopes is an alteration in the lipid profile of the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, such as an enrichment of lipids containing phosphorylcholine (PC) or malondialdehyde (MDA). The antibody repertoire of B-1 cells is highly enriched for antibodies that bind these apoptosis-induced determinants.

Natural antibodies appear to have a potent immunosuppressive function both in vitro and in vivo. Upon binding to the surface of apoptotic cells, natural antibodies recruit the complement components C1q and mannose-binding lectin (105). The deposition of these molecules makes the apoptotic cell more appetizing to macrophages and dendritic cells, resulting in the increased phagocytosis of opsonized apoptotic cells. In addition to increasing the rate of phagocytosis, natural antibody-coated apoptotic cells negatively regulate the inflammatory capacity of APCs in a variety of ways. Notably, the addition of natural antibodies to cultured dendritic cells inhibits their maturation, blunts their response to a variety of TLR ligands and reduces their expression of molecules involved in antigen presentation. Similar effects were seen in APCs from animals receiving a model monoclonal natural antibody, T15 (106). The administration of T15 has a general immunosuppressive effect, since mice receiving the antibody were protected from both collagen-induced arthritis and a passive transfer model of arthritis induced by anticollagen IgG antibodies.

In addition to apoptotic cells, the lipid epitopes bound by natural antibodies are also found on the surface of bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (104) and oxidized low density lipoprotein (LDL) deposits found in atherosclerotic lesions. In mouse models of atherosclerosis, natural antibodies reduce the severity of disease, and immunization of atherosclerosis-susceptible mice with S. pneumonia, which increases the levels of anti-PC natural antibodies, leads to a decrease in atherosclerotic lesion formation (107). These results suggest that increasing the level of natural antibodies, either by immunization or other means, could be therapeutically beneficial in patients with atherosclerosis.

The production of natural antibodies is critically dependent on the presence of B-1 cells and occurs independently of T cells. Circulating levels of natural antibodies are increased in mice that have received either large doses of apoptotic cells or have been immunized with pneumococcal extracts, suggesting that the presence of cognate antigen determines the level of natural antibody secretion.

In some cases, natural antibody responses to different antigens appear to be coordinately regulated, since immunization with one B-1 cell-specific antigen (MDA-LDL) resulted in an increase in natural antibodies recognizing another B-1 cell-specific antigen (PC) (104). Finally, T-cell responses in mice immunized with natural antibody-binding antigens are dominated by the TH2-type response, even if the antigen is administered with TH1-skewing adjuvant, suggesting that the selective expansion of TH2 cells may be another regulatory mechanism of natural antibodies (108).

B-Cell Interactions with Regulatory T-Cell Populations

Although B cells can directly suppress immune responses, there is also strong evidence that part of their immunosuppressive function is mediated by interactions with other regulatory cell populations. B cells constitutively express both MHC class I and class II molecules, making them capable of antigen-specific interactions with CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively. In addition, regulatory B cells may have direct interactions with natural killer T (NKT) cells through surface expression of CD1d molecules.

Most studies of regulatory T cells (Tregs) have focused on CD4+ T cells that exert immune suppressive functions mainly through production of IL-10 and/or TGFβ, or through direct interactions with APCs (109). Although the importance of Tregs in immune regulation and their potential clinical relevance is well supported and has been reviewed extensively, the relative importance of B cells as APCs for Treg differentiation and activation has only recently become a focus of research. An early study demonstrated that both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells with immunosuppressive properties were generated by coculture with purified B cells derived from antigen-tolerized mice in a corneal transplant model (110). Subsequently, the accumulation of Tregs in the central nervous system in a murine model of multiple sclerosis was shown to depend on B cells, but the direct regulatory properties of these B cells were not determined (111). However, a recent study demonstrated that IL-10 production by regulatory B cells directly affected the accumulation of Tregs and suppression of inflammation in an arthritis model (112). Arthritic mice with IL-10−/− B cells had decreased Tregs, increased TH1 and TH17 cells and increased joint inflammation, all of which were reversed by adoptive transfer of IL-10-producing B cells.

B cells have also been shown to be critical to the expansion of CD4+FoxP3+ Tregs at mucosal sites. Sublingual antigen challenge, a strategy for inducing oral tolerance, was partially impaired in B cell-deficient mice through a mechanism that depended on induction of FoxP3+ Tregs (113). In a separate study, repeated nasal antigenic challenge of mice induced a regulatory B-cell population in the local draining lymph node that suppressed lung inflammation and asthma in recipient ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized mice after adoptive transfer (114). The effectiveness of these regulatory B cells was linked to B-cell expression of TGFβ but not IL-10 and the accumulation of FoxP3+ Tregs in the lung mucosa and local lymph nodes. Similarly, B cells isolated from the spleens of mice infected with schistosome worms were able to induce lung accumulation of FoxP3+ Tregs and to suppress allergic asthma after adoptive transfer (115). In contrast to the previous study, IL-10 rather than TGFβ was shown to have a dominant effect in the function of regulatory B cells from schistosome-infected mice (114,115). These discrepancies may have been the result of the different types of stimuli, the different anatomical sources of the regulatory B cells or possibly because the B cells represented separate subsets. The CD5+ and CD5 B-cell subsets have differed in their capacity to drive differentiation of CD4+ T cells toward effector or regulatory phenotypes (116). Whether specific cell-to-cell molecular interactions are critically involved in the crosstalk between B cells and subsets of regulatory T cells has yet to be determined.

The ability of B cells to drive the differentiation of Tregs has sparked some interest in the manipulation of this interaction as a therapeutic strategy. Experiments that induced overexpression of the type 1 diabetes-associated autoantigens GAD65 or insulin specifically in B lymphocytes resulted in immune tolerance that was attributed to an increase in Treg cell differentiation (117). Similarly, retroviral transduction of B cells with a construct containing the allergen DerP2 followed by adoptive transfer of the transduced B cells into allergen-sensitized mice resulted in immune tolerance and expansion of a subset of Tregs (118). A series of studies using B cells that were not genetically modified in a mixed lymphocyte reaction demonstrated that both CD4+ and CD8+ alloantigen-specific Tregs with suppressive abilities can be generated by MHC mismatched B cells (119,120).

A unique feature that has been described for IL-10-producing B cells compared with other B-cell subsets is high expression of the CD1d cell surface molecule (30,36,41). CD1d is required for the presentation of glycolipid and phospholipid antigens to NKT cells, a subset of NK1.1+ and TCR+ cells that was originally shown to have immune suppressive function in a mouse model of SLE (121). Immunosuppressive NKT cells have also been described in mouse models of autoimmune diabetes (122), arthritis (123) and multiple sclerosis (124,125). A critically important role for CD1dhi-expressing B cells in promoting immune tolerance through activation of NKT cells has been demonstrated in several mouse models (115,126,127). However, NKT cells have been shown to have immune stimulatory functions as well, and it is now clear that the function of NKT cells varies depending on how they are activated (85,128). We recently determined that FasL+CD5+ killer B cells also have relatively high expression of CD1d (manuscript in preparation), suggesting that these cells can interact with NKT cells as well. Further study is required to determine what role B cell-derived FasL and apoptosis play in regulating NKT cell functions. Reciprocally, it is also possible that NKT cells play a significant role in the generation and/or maintenance of FasL+ killer B cells.

Resistance to Apoptosis Among T-Cell Subsets

In circumstances where immune suppression is mediated by death-ligand expressing cells, the relative susceptibility of T-cell subsets to death ligand-induced apoptosis can result in a skewing of the response toward the apoptosis-resistant cell type (129,130). Response to death ligands depends on the activation status of the target cell and expression of cell intrinsic anti- and proapoptotic molecules such as cellular FLICE/caspase 8 inhibitory protein (cFLIP) and members of the Bcl family (131,132). Although most activated T cells are susceptible to death ligand-mediated apoptosis and are eliminated after an immune response, a small percentage of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells resist apoptosis and can persist in the antigen-specific memory pool (133,134). Many studies have attempted to determine whether T-cell resistance to apoptosis is related to cytokine expression patterns. Comparisons between TH1 and TH2 cell types have mostly concluded that TH1 cells are more susceptible than TH2 cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis; however, one group determined that there was no difference (129,135, 136, 137). These results may be partially explained by the presence of TH1- and TH2-type cytokines in the cultures, since these have been reported to have pro- and antiapoptotic effects, respectively (138,139). Another factor that regulates the susceptibility of T cells to death receptor signals is costimulation, particularly through the CD28 molecule (140,141).

The identification and functional characterization of other important subsets of T cells, namely Tregs, TH17 and NKT cells, has renewed interest in susceptibility to apoptosis as a mechanism of skewing of the immune response. Mouse Tregs have been shown to be highly resistant to FasL-mediated apoptosis, whereas freshly isolated human Tregs were susceptible but became resistant upon stimulation (142, 143, 144, 145). The data on TH17 cell resistance to apoptosis is relatively sparse. One study in which hen-egg lysozyme (HEL) was specifically expressed in the anterior chamber of the eye, followed by adoptive transfer of HEL-specific T cells, clearly showed that TH17 cells are more resistant than TH1 cells to apoptosis (146). The eye is a site of immune privilege that is known to be protected by the local expression of Fas ligand and TRAIL along with other immune-suppressive mediators. Interestingly, ocular tolerance has previously been shown to depend on the presence of splenic B cells, although the mechanism has been attributed to induction of Tregs rather than linked directly to B cell-mediated apoptosis (147). The generation of Tregs in ocular immune privilege is also under the control of IL-10-expressing NKT cells, which, as has been discussed above, may be under the control of CD1dhi expressing regulatory and/or killer B lymphocytes (126). Although NKT cells have been shown to be sensitive to Fas-mediated apoptosis in vitro and in vivo, several lines of evidence have also suggested that their susceptibility may be limited by down-modulation of their TCR after activation (148,149). Taken together, these data suggest that T-cell subsets and even individual T cells may differ in their sensitivity to apoptosis on the basis of their differentiation, activation status and microenvironment. B lymphocytes that (a) act directly as APCs to T cells and NKT cells; (b) provide various forms of costimulation, cytokines and chemokines; and (c) simultaneously express death ligands may play an important role in providing these contexts and are likely to favor some T-cell subsets while eliminating or suppressing others.

Are There Multipotent Suppressor B Cells?

The studies we have reviewed above clearly demonstrate that individual B cells use a variety of antiinflammatory mechanisms and that B cell-mediated immunosuppression plays a critical role in many normal and disease contexts. A question that remains about the nature of these regulatory B cells is whether a single regulatory B-cell population can simultaneously use more than one immunosuppressive mechanism. Although there is no direct evidence for the coexpression of multiple immunosuppressive molecules in B cells, circumstantial evidence on the basis of a shared surface phenotype suggests that such a B-cell population may exist. Notably, expression of IL-10, FasL, granzyme B and PD-L2 have all been attributed to B cells that express the surface molecule CD5 (18,36,51,66,90). CD5+ B cells are a minor subset of B cells with unique antigen specificities, developmental patterns, anatomical distributions and sensitivities to stimuli (102,150). Additionally, we have recently found that FasL+ B cells share other phenotypic markers with IL-10-producing B cells (manuscript in preparation), effectively localizing both IL-10-producing B cells and FasL+ B cells to the same B-cell subset. These data support the possibility of a multipotent suppressor B-cell subset residing within the CD5+ B-cell population (Figure 2 and Table 1). Further work is required, however, to definitively show that the B cells using these suppressive mechanisms are indeed the same cells.
Table 1

Summary of immunosuppressive mediators used by B lymphocytes.

Suppressive mediatora

B-cell subset phenotype(s)


Main target Cell(s)



CD5+CDldhigh or CD21highCD23hiCDldhigh (Mouse) TIM-1+ (Mouse) CD24high CD38high or CD24high CD27+(Human)

TLR ligands, CD40L, BCR ligation, overexpression of CD 19, BAFF/BlyS, anti-TIM-l

APCT cells

35,36,38,41, 42, 43, 44, 45

Granzyme B

CD5+ (human)

CpG-ODN, IL-21




CD5+ (mouse)

LPS, schistosome infection, viral Infection

CD4+ T cells

56,62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67,69


CD5+ (mouse)

IL-4, IL-13

Th2 cells


Sialylated IgG



Macrophages, DC

95, 96, 97

Regulatory natural antibodies

CD5+CDllb+ (mouse)

Immunization with S, pneumonia apoptotic cells, or the lipid antigens PC or MDA

Macrophages, DC

102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108

aTRAIL, PD-L1 and TGFβ have also been reported from B cells, but much less is known about specific subset phenotypes and target cells of these mediators relating to B-cell production.

The relationship of immunosuppressive CD5+ B cells to the other established B-cell subsets is still incompletely understood. On the basis of the surface phenotype, regulatory IL-10-producing CD5+ B cells appear most similar to either T2-MZP B cells or B-1 cells. Both MZB cells, which differentiate from T2-MZP cells, and B-1 cells appear to arise from a single precursor population distinct from that of B-2 cells (151,152). B-1 and MZB cells have been described as having functional similarities, particularly in the production of natural antibodies (153). Given the known propensity for autoreactivity in these subsets, it makes sense that immunosuppressive B cells would arise from this compartment, since these cells would then be apt to suppress immune reactions to self-antigens rather than inducing or accelerating them. However, it is also possible that these cells may not retain immunosuppressive function at all times and could actually contribute to autoimmune pathogenesis under some circumstances. This makes understanding the biology of these cells even more interesting in the context of treating autoimmunity.

As mentioned above, there was not an absolute correspondence between B-1 or T2-MZP B-cell phenotype and IL-10 production. Thus, the immunosuppressive activity of B cells may be transient and dependent on the presence or absence of stimulatory signals. It is also possible that the surface marker phenotype of the B cells is secondary to their functional properties or that the immunosuppressive B cells may represent a completely distinct population from any of the currently recognized subsets. Much further study is required to define the relationship of immunosuppressive B cells with B-l, T2-MZP and MZB cells and to confirm their multipotency.


There are likely to be many clinical implications to the findings cited in this review. The elegant set of studies determining the role of sialylated immunoglobulins in the efficacy of IVIG treatment is just one example of how immune-suppressive mechanisms mediated by B lymphocytes have been a part of clinical practice without being fully understood (95,97). That the identity of B-cell subsets that might preferentially produce sialylated IgG have not been determined and that the biochemical pathways involved in this process are not fully understood emphasizes the point that immune-suppressive functions of B cells still need further study. Recent progress in classifying B-cell subsets and renewed interest in understanding the diverse functions of these subsets should aid in developing new strategies to manipulate the activities of defined populations of regulatory as well as effector B cells (154).

In the field of oncology, it should be noted that malignancies arising from B cells with natural immune-suppressive qualities may pose a greater risk to patients because the transformed cells may directly inhibit the immune response against them. Although it remains to be formally proven, this result could underlie the difference between the aggressive and nonaggressive forms of B chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). B-CLL cells have been independently reported to express Fas ligand, TRAIL and granzyme B (49,61,76,155). Other B-cell malignancies such as multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma have also been reported to express death ligands (58,60,156). The EBV not only carries a form of human IL-10 in the viral genome, but also drives FasL expression in transformed B cells (14,62). A better understanding of the phenotypic properties of human killer and regulatory B cells could therefore lead to improved cancer diagnostics. Pharmacological methods of inhibiting expression of immune-suppressive molecules specifically in B lymphocytes might reverse tumor-mediated regulation and significantly improve treatment of B-cell lymphoma and leukemia.

Conversely, immune-suppressive B cells could prove useful as a tool for therapeutic induction of tolerance in solid organ transplantation. Direct evidence of the efficacy of adoptively transferred FasL+ B cells toward inducing immune tolerance has been demonstrated in a male-to-female skin graft model in mice (71). Much work is still needed to determine how effective this strategy could be in other models such as organ allograft, in which tolerance to a greater number of antigenic determinants is required. Promising evidence of efficacy was recently reported using TIM-1-stimulated B cells that produce IL-10 to tolerize mice toward an allograft of pancreatic islet tissue (42). If proven safe and effective, pre-graft tolerization by adoptive transfer of donor B cells would be expected to target a broad spectrum of graft-specific T cells, and yet should not harm the other T cells that are involved in host defense. Developing new and improved methods to identify, purify and grow killer and regulatory B-cell subsets from humans should help to advance the possibilities of translating this research into clinical practice.

Many of the studies that we have referenced above are focused on the role of regulatory and killer B cells in T cell-mediated diseases such as asthma and autoimmunity. There should be little doubt that immune suppression directed by B lymphocytes is an important factor in regulating T-cell functions and therefore in modulating allergic and autoimmune pathogenesis. Impairments in B cell-mediated immune regulation or resistance to their suppressive functions may turn out to be critical contributing factors to T cell-mediated diseases. It will be of interest to determine whether any of the known genetic and environmental risk factors that have been identified in these diseases play a role in the survival and function of suppressive B cells. Finding pharmacological or biological methods for reversing defects in B cell-mediated immune suppression may lead to novel therapeutics for many diseases. It is also possible that functional immune-suppressive B cells may contribute to autoimmune pathogenesis in some cases. Elevated IL-10 levels have been linked to increased pathogenesis in SLE in patients and mouse models, yet B cell-specific IL-10 production and T-cell suppression was impaired in a cohort of SLE patients (44,157, 158, 159). These seemingly conflicting results highlight the need for a deeper understanding not only of the direct functions of suppressive B cells but also their interactions with other effector and regulatory cell populations. It may matter whether immune suppression is dominated by T cells or B cells in certain clinical situations, and this may influence the patient’s response to treatment.

Immune suppression, like other important biological processes, involves an integrated network of cells and molecules that work together to balance the potentially deleterious effects of uncontrolled inflammation. B lymphocytes are part of this integrated network and can mediate their immune-suppressive functions through many of the known pathways that regulate inflammation. B cells also play important nonredundant roles in immunosuppression through production of regulatory antibodies and unique interactions with other cells. While B cells are clearly not the only regulatory cell population involved in immunosuppression, a growing body of evidence suggests that B cell-mediated immune suppression is important in many inflammatory contexts. In the current era of increasing usage of clinical therapeutics on the basis of blockade of cytokines and depletion of cell populations, the balance of regulatory and proinflammatory immune mechanisms is of critical importance. Ignoring the many immunesuppressive functions contributed by B lymphocytes during inflammatory processes would be a mistake. Instead, therapeutic strategies that consider the full range of functions of B cells and their interactions with other cells and incorporate methods to protect desirable B-cell subsets or mechanisms of action will likely result in higher clinical success.


The authors declare that they have no competing interests as defined by Molecular Medicine, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and discussion reported in this paper.



The authors wish to thank Dr. David Fox for critical review of the manuscript and Julie Olivero for administrative assistance. Financial support for MW Klinker was received from the Rackham Graduate School Merit Fellowship Program and Immunology Training Program grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). SK Lundy received support from the Edward T. and Ellen K. Dryer Foundation, the Arthritis Foundation and the NIH-National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) (5-K01-AR-053846). Additional support was received from the University of Michigan Rheumatic Diseases Core Center (grant NIH-NIAMS P30-AR-048310).


  1. 1.
    O’Garra A, et al. (1990) Production of cytokines by mouse B cells: B lymphomas and normal B cells produce interleukin 10. Int. Immunol. 2:821–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagata S, Suda T. (1995) Fas and Fas ligand: lpr and gld mutations. Immunol. Today. 16:39–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiley SR, et al. (1995) Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity 3:673–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chowdhury D, Lieberman J. (2008) Death by a thousand cuts: granzyme pathways of programmed cell death. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26:389–420.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. (2008) Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8:34–47.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. (2008) PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26:677–704.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ouyang W, Rutz S, Crellin NK, Valdez PA, Hymowitz SG. (2011) Regulation and functions of the IL-10 family of cytokines in inflammation and disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29:71–109.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Couper KN, Blount DG, Riley EM. (2008) IL-10: the master regulator of immunity to infection. J. Immunol. 180:5771–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferrara JL. (1993) Cytokine dysregulation as a mechanism of graft versus host disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 5:794–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palomares O, et al. (2010) Role of Treg in immune regulation of allergic diseases. Eur. J. Immunol. 40:1232–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mauri C, Blair PA. (2010) Regulatory B cells in autoimmunity: developments and controversies. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6:636–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McHugh RS, Shevach EM. (2002) The role of suppressor T cells in regulation of immune responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 110:693–702.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ben-Baruch A. (2006) Inflammation-associated immune suppression in cancer: the roles played by cytokines, chemokines and additional mediators. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16:38–52.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vieira P, et al. (1991) Isolation and expression of human cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor cDNA clones: homology to Epstein-Barr virus open reading frame BCRFI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88:1172–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahnke K, Bedke T, Enk AH. (2007) Regulatory conversation between antigen presenting cells and regulatory T cells enhance immune suppression. Cell. Immunol. 250:1–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shimamura T, Habu S, Hashimoto K, Sasaki S. (1984) Feedback suppression of the immune response in vivo. III. Lyt-1+ B cells are suppressorinducer cells. Cell. Immunol. 83:221–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lopez DM, Blomberg BB, Padmanabhan RR, Bourguignon LY. (1989) Nuclear disintegration of target cells by killer B lymphocytes from tumor-bearing mice. FASEB J. 3:37–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Garra A, et al. (1992) Ly-1 B (B-1) cells are the main source of B cell-derived interleukin 10. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:711–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolf SD, Dittel BN, Hardardottir F, Janeway CA Jr. (1996) Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induction in genetically B cell-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 184:2271–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sabat R, et al. (2010) Biology of interleukin-10. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 21:331–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Waal Malefyt R, Abrams J, Bennett B, Figdor CG, de Vries JE. (1991) Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits cytokine synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes. J. Exp. Med. 174:1209–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fiorentino DF, Zlotnik A, Mosmann TR, Howard M, O’Garra A. (1991) IL-10 inhibits cytokine production by activated macrophages. J. Immunol. 147:3815–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    de Waal Malefyt R, et al. (1991) Interleukin 10 (IL-10) and viral IL-10 strongly reduce antigen-specific human T cell proliferation by diminishing the antigen-presenting capacity of monocytes via downregulation of class II major histocompatibility complex expression. J. Exp. Med. 174:915–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ding L, Linsley PS, Huang LY, Germain RN, Shevach EM. (1993) IL-10 inhibits macrophage costimulatory activity by selectively inhibiting the up-regulation of B7 expression. J. Immunol. 151:1224–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Willems F, et al. (1994) Interleukin-10 inhibits B7 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on human monocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1007–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Del Prete G, et al. (1993) Human IL-10 is produced by both type 1 helper (Th1) and type 2 helper (Th2) T cell clones and inhibits their antigen-specific proliferation and cytokine production. J. Immunol. 150:353–60.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Groux H, Bigler M, de Vries JE, Roncarolo MG. (1996) Interleukin-10 induces a long-term antigen-specific anergic state in human CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 184:19–29.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Groux H, Bigler M, de Vries JE, Roncarolo MG. (1998) Inhibitory and stimulatory effects of IL-10 on human CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 160:3188–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fillatreau S, Sweenie CH, McGeachy MJ, Gray D, Anderton SM. (2002) B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 3:944–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mizoguchi A, Mizoguchi E, Takedatsu H, Blumberg RS, Bhan AK. (2002) Chronic intestinal inflammatory condition generates IL-10-producing regulatory B cell subset characterized by CD1d upregulation. Immunity. 16:219–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mauri C, Gray D, Mushtaq N, Londei M. (2003) Prevention of arthritis by interleukin 10-producing B cells. J. Exp. Med. 197:489–501.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hussain S, Delovitch TL. (2007) Intravenous transfusion of BCR-activated B cells protects NOD mice from type 1 diabetes in an IL-10-dependent manner. J. Immunol. 179:7225–32.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haas KM, et al. (2010) Protective and pathogenic roles for B cells during systemic autoimmunity in NZB/W F1 mice. J. Immunol. 184:4789–800.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watanabe R, et al. (2010) Regulatory B cells (B10 cells) have a suppressive role in murine lupus: CD19 and B10 cell deficiency exacerbates systemic autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 184:4801–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yanaba K, Bouaziz JD, Matsushita T, Tsubata T, Tedder TF. (2009) The development and function of regulatory B cells expressing IL-10 (B10 cells) requires antigen receptor diversity and TLR signals. J. Immunol. 182:7459–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yanaba K, et al. (2008) A regulatory B cell subset with a unique CD1dhiCD5+ phenotype controls T cell-dependent inflammatory responses. Immunity 28:639–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hayakawa K, et al. (1999) Positive selection of natural autoreactive B cells. Science. 285:113–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang M, et al. (2010) Novel function of B cell-activating factor in the induction of IL-10-producing regulatory B cells. J. Immunol. 184:3321–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bhattacharyya S, et al. (2011) NFATc1 affects mouse splenic B cell function by controlling the calcineurin-NFAT signaling network. J. Exp. Med. 208:823–39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Matsumoto M, et al. (2011) The calcium sensors STIM1 and STIM2 control B cell regulatory function through interleukin-10 production. Immunity. 34:703–14.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Evans JG, et al. (2007) Novel suppressive function of transitional 2 B cells in experimental arthritis. J. Immunol. 178:7868–78.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ding Q, et al. (2011) Regulatory B cells are identified by expression of TIM-1 and can be induced through TIM-1 ligation to promote tolerance in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121:3645–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    DiLillo DJ, Matsushita T, Tedder TF. (2010) B10 cells and regulatory B cells balance immune responses during inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1183:38–57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Blair PA, et al. (2010) CD19+ CD24(hi) CD38(hi) B cells exhibit regulatory capacity in healthy individuals but are functionally impaired in systemic Lupus Erythematosus patients. Immunity. 32:129–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Iwata Y, et al. (2011) Characterization of a rare IL-10-competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells. Blood. 117:530–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Griffin DO, Holodick NE, Rothstein TL. (2011) Human B1 cells in umbilical cord and adult peripheral blood express the novel phenotype CD20+ CD27+ CD43+ CD70. J. Exp. Med. 208:67–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rousset F, et al. (1992) Interleukin 10 is a potent growth and differentiation factor for activated human B lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:1890–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Trapani JA, Sutton VR. (2003) Granzyme B: proapoptotic, antiviral and antitumor functions. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15:533–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jahrsdorfer B, et al. (2006) B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and other B cells can produce granzyme B and gain cytotoxic potential after interleukin-21-based activation. Blood. 108:2712–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hagn M, et al. (2009) Human B cells secrete granzyme B when recognizing viral antigens in the context of the acute phase cytokine IL-21. J. Immunol. 183:1838–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hagn M, et al. (2010) CD5+ B cells from individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus express granzyme B. Eur. J. Immunol. 40:2060–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Srivastava RK. (2001) TRAIL/Apo-2L: mechanisms and clinical applications in cancer. Neoplasia. 3:535–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Takahashi T, et al. (1994) Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell 76:969–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Puck JM, Sneller MC. (1997) ALPS: an autoimmune human lymphoproliferative syndrome associated with abnormal lymphocyte apoptosis. Semin. Immunol. 9:77–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Song K, et al. (2000) Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is an inhibitor of autoimmune inflammation and cell cycle progression. J. Exp. Med. 191:1095–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hahne M, et al. (1996) Activated B cells express functional Fas ligand. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:721–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lundy SK. (2009) Killer B lymphocytes: the evidence and the potential. Inflamm. Res. 58:345–57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Villunger A, et al. (1997) Constitutive expression of Fas (Apo-1/CD95) ligand on multiple myeloma cells: a potential mechanism of tumor-induced suppression of immune surveillance. Blood. 90:12–20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Silvestris F, Tucci M, Cafforio P, Dammacco F. (2001) Fas-L up-regulation by highly malignant myeloma plasma cells: role in the pathogenesis of anemia and disease progression. Blood. 97:1155–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kojima Y, et al. (2006) Fas and Fas ligand expression on germinal center type-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is associated with the clinical outcome. Eur. J. Haematol. 76:465–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tinhofer I, et al. (1998) Differential sensitivity of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes to the killing efficacy of Fas (Apo-1/CD95) ligand+ tumor cells in B chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 91:4273–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tanner JE, Alfieri C. (1999) Epstein-Barr virus induces Fas (CD95) in T cells and Fas ligand in B cells leading to T-cell apoptosis. Blood. 94:3439–47.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Samuelsson A, Sonnerborg A, Heuts N, Coster J, Chiodi F. (1997) Progressive B cell apoptosis and expression of Fas ligand during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses. 13:1031–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rich RF, Cook WJ, Green WR. (2006) Spontaneous in vivo retrovirus-infected T and B cells, but not dendritic cells, mediate antigen-specific Fas ligand/Fas-dependent apoptosis of antiretroviral CTL. Virology. 346:287–300.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lundy SK, Lerman SP, Boros DL. (2001) Soluble egg antigen-stimulated T helper lymphocyte apoptosis and evidence for cell death mediated by FasL(+) T and B cells during murine Schistosoma mansoni infection. Infect. Immun. 69:271–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lundy SK, Boros DL. (2002) Fas ligand-expressing B-1a lymphocytes mediate CD4(+)-T-cell apoptosis during schistosomal infection: induction by interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-10. Infect. Immun. 70:812–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tian J, et al. (2001) Lipopolysaccharide-activated B cells down-regulate Th1 immunity and prevent autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. J. Immunol. 167:1081–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bonardelle D, Benihoud K, Kiger N, Bobe P. (2005) B lymphocytes mediate Fas-dependent cytotoxicity in MRL/lpr mice. J. Leukoc. Biol. 78:1052–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lundy SK, Fox DA. (2009) Reduced Fas ligand-expressing splenic CD5+ B lymphocytes in severe collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 11:R128.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lundy SK, Berlin AA, Martens TF, Lukacs NW. (2005) Deficiency of regulatory B cells increases allergic airway inflammation. Inflamm. Res. 54:514–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Minagawa R, et al. (2004) The critical role of Fas-Fas ligand interaction in donor-specific transfusion-induced tolerance to H-Y antigen. Transplantation. 78:799–806.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Takeda K, et al. (2002) Critical role for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in immune surveillance against tumor development. J. Exp. Med. 195:161–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sedger LM, et al. (2002) Characterization of the in vivo function of TNF-alpha-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, TRAIL/Apo2L, using TRAIL/Apo2L gene-deficient mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 32:2246–54.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sedger LM, et al. (2010) Extreme lymphoproliferative disease and fatal autoimmune thrombocytopenia in FasL and TRAIL double-deficient mice. Blood. 115:3258–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mariani SM, Krammer PH. (1998) Differential regulation of TRAIL and CD95 ligand in transformed cells of the T and B lymphocyte lineage. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:973–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Secchiero P, et al. (2005) Aberrant expression of TRAIL in B chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 205:246–52.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Silvestris F, Cafforio P, Tucci M, Grinello D, Dammacco F. (2003) Upregulation of osteoblast apoptosis by malignant plasma cells: a role in myeloma bone disease. Br. J. Haematol. 122:39–52.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mariani SM, Krammer PH. (1998) Surface expression of TRAIL/Apo-2 ligand in activated mouse T and B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:1492–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kemp TJ, Moore JM, Griffith TS. (2004) Human B cells express functional TRAIL/Apo-2 ligand after CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide stimulation. J. Immunol. 173:892–99.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Agata Y, et al. (1996) Expression of the PD-1 antigen on the surface of stimulated mouse T and B lymphocytes. Int. Immunol. 8:765–72.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, Honjo T. (1992) Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 11:3887–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vibhakar R, Juan G, Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Finger LR. (1997) Activation-induced expression of human programmed death-1 gene in T-lymphocytes. Exp. Cell. Res. 232:25–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Yamazaki T, et al. (2002) Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J. Immunol. 169:5538–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Loke P, Allison JP. (2003) PD-L1 and PD-L2 are differentially regulated by Th1 and Th2 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:5336–41.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Akbari O, et al. (2010) PD-L1 and PD-L2 modulate airway inflammation and iNKT-cell-dependent airway hyperreactivity in opposing directions. Mucosal Immunol. 3:81–91.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Latchman Y, et al. (2001) PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2:261–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tseng SY, et al. (2001) B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J. Exp. Med. 193:839–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Carter LL, et al. (2007) PD-1/PD-L1, but not PD-1/PD-L2, interactions regulate the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 182:124–34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Singh AK, Stock P, Akbari O. (2011) Role of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in allergic diseases and asthma. Allergy. 66:155–62.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zhong X, Tumang JR, Gao W, Bai C, Rothstein TL. (2007) PD-L2 expression extends beyond dendritic cells/macrophages to B1 cells enriched for V(H)11/V(H)12 and phosphatidylcholine binding. Eur. J. Immunol. 37:2405–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Zhong X, et al. (2009) A novel subpopulation of B-1 cells is enriched with autoreactivity in normal and lupus-prone mice. Arthritis Rheum. 60:3734–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Fehr J, Hofmann V, Kappeler U. (1982) Transient reversal of thrombocytopenia in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura by high-dose intravenous gamma globulin. N. Engl. J. Med. 306:1254–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Imbach P, et al. (1981) High-dose intravenous gammaglobulin for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in childhood. Lancet. 1:1228–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Parekh RB, et al. (1985) Association of rheumatoid arthritis and primary osteoarthritis with changes in the glycosylation pattern of total serum IgG. Nature. 316:452–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kaneko Y, Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. (2006) Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation. Science. 313:670–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Anthony RM, Wermeling F, Karlsson MC, Ravetch JV. (2008) Identification of a receptor required for the anti-inflammatory activity of IVIG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:19571–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Anthony RM, Kobayashi T, Wermeling F, Ravetch JV. (2011) Intravenous gammaglobulin suppresses inflammation through a novel T(H)2 pathway. Nature. 475:110–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Bruhns P, Samuelsson A, Pollard JW, Ravetch JV. (2003) Colony-stimulating factor-1-dependent macrophages are responsible for IVIG protection in antibody-induced autoimmune disease. Immunity. 18:573–81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Matsumoto A, Shikata K, Takeuchi F, Kojima N, Mizuochi T. (2000) Autoantibody activity of IgG rheumatoid factor increases with decreasing levels of galactosylation and sialylation. J. Biochem. 128:621–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wang J, et al. (2011) Fc-glycosylation of IgG1 is modulated by B-cell stimuli. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 10:M110.004655.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    You Y, et al. (2011) Marginal zone B cells regulate antigen capture by marginal zone macrophages. J. Immunol. 186:2172–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Herzenberg LA. (2000) B-1 cells: the lineage question revisited. Immunol. Rev. 175:9–22.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Shaw PX, et al. (2000) Natural antibodies with the T15 idiotype may act in atherosclerosis, apoptotic clearance, and protective immunity. J. Clin. Invest. 105:1731–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Shaw PX, Goodyear CS, Chang MK, Witztum JL, Silverman GJ. (2003) The autoreactivity of anti-phosphorylcholine antibodies for atherosclerosis-associated neo-antigens and apoptotic cells. J. Immunol. 170:6151–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Chen Y, Park YB, Patel E, Silverman GJ. (2009) IgM antibodies to apoptosis-associated determinants recruit C1q and enhance dendritic cell phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J. Immunol. 182:6031–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Chen Y, et al. (2009) Regulation of dendritic cells and macrophages by an anti-apoptotic cell natural antibody that suppresses TLR responses and inhibits inflammatory arthritis. J. Immunol. 183:1346–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Binder CJ, et al. (2003) Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL. Nat. Med. 9:736–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Binder CJ, et al. (2004) IL-5 links adaptive and natural immunity specific for epitopes of oxidized LDL and protects from atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Invest. 114:427–37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Shevach EM. (2009) Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 30:636–45.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ashour HM, Niederkorn JY. (2006) Peripheral tolerance via the anterior chamber of the eye: role of B cells in MHC class I and II antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 176:5950–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Mann MK, Maresz K, Shriver LP, Tan Y, Dittel BN. (2007) B cell regulation of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells and IL-10 via B7 is essential for recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 178:3447–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Carter NA, et al. (2011) Mice lacking endogenous IL-10-producing regulatory B cells develop exacerbated disease and present with an increased frequency of Th1/Th17 but a decrease in regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 186:5569–79.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Sun JB, Flach CF, Czerkinsky C, Holmgren J. (2008) B lymphocytes promote expansion of regulatory T cells in oral tolerance: powerful induction by antigen coupled to cholera toxin B subunit. J. Immunol. 181:8278–87.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Singh A, et al. (2008) Regulatory role of B cells in a murine model of allergic airway disease. J. Immunol. 180:7318–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Amu S, et al. (2010) Regulatory B cells prevent and reverse allergic airway inflammation via FoxP3-positive T regulatory cells in a murine model. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 125:1114–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Zhong X, et al. (2007) Reciprocal generation of Th1/Th17 and T(reg) cells by B1 and B2 B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 37:2400–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Soukhareva N, Jiang Y, Scott DW. (2006) Treatment of diabetes in NOD mice by gene transfer of Ig-fusion proteins into B cells: role of T regulatory cells. Cell. Immunol. 240:41–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ahangarani RR, et al. (2009) In vivo induction of type 1-like regulatory T cells using genetically modified B cells confers long-term IL-10-dependent antigen-specific unresponsiveness. J. Immunol. 183:8232–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Chen X, Jensen PE. (2007) Cutting edge: primary B lymphocytes preferentially expand allogeneic FoxP3+ CD4 T cells. J. Immunol. 179:2046–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Zheng J, et al. (2009) Efficient induction and expansion of human alloantigen-specific CD8 regulatory T cells from naive precursors by CD40-activated B cells. J. Immunol. 183:3742–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Mieza MA, et al. (1996) Selective reduction of V alpha 14+ NK T cells associated with disease development in autoimmune-prone mice. J. Immunol. 156:4035–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Gombert JM, et al. (1996) Early quantitative and functional deficiency of NK1+-like thymocytes in the NOD mouse. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2989–98.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Chiba A, et al. (2004) Suppression of collagen-induced arthritis by natural killer T cell activation with OCH, a sphingosine-truncated analog of alpha-galactosylceramide. Arthritis Rheum. 50:305–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Miyamoto K, Miyake S, Yamamura T. (2001) A synthetic glycolipid prevents autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inducing TH2 bias of natural killer T cells. Nature. 413:531–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Singh AK, et al. (2001) Natural killer T cell activation protects mice against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 194:1801–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Sonoda KH, Stein-Streilein J. (2002) CD1d on antigen-transporting APC and splenic marginal zone B cells promotes NKT cell-dependent tolerance. Eur. J. Immunol. 32:848–57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Wei B, et al. (2005) Mesenteric B cells centrally inhibit CD4+ T cell colitis through interaction with regulatory T cell subsets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:2010–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Hayakawa Y, et al. (2001) Differential regulation of Th1 and Th2 functions of NKT cells by CD28 and CD40 costimulatory pathways. J. Immunol. 166:6012–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Varadhachary AS, Perdow SN, Hu C, Ramanarayanan M, Salgame P. (1997) Differential ability of T cell subsets to undergo activation-induced cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:5778–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Roberts AI, et al. (2003) The role of activation-induced cell death in the differentiation of T-helper-cell subsets. Immunol. Res. 28:285–93.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Irmler M, et al. (1997) Inhibition of death receptor signals by cellular FLIP. Nature. 388:190–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Chao DT, Korsmeyer SJ. (1998) BCL-2 family: regulators of cell death. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:395–419.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Zhang L, Miller RG, Zhang J. (1996) Characterization of apoptosis-resistant antigen-specific T cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 183:2065–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Gupta S, Gollapudi S. (2008) CD95-mediated apoptosis in naive, central and effector memory subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in aged humans. Exp. Gerontol. 43:266–74.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Zhang X, et al. (1997) Unequal death in T helper cell (Th)1 and Th2 effectors: Th1, but not Th2, effectors undergo rapid Fas/FasL-mediated apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 185:1837–49.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Akdis M, et al. (2003) T helper (Th) 2 predominance in atopic diseases is due to preferential apoptosis of circulating memory/effector Th1 cells. FASEB J. 17:1026–35.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Watanabe N, et al. (1997) Th1 and Th2 subsets equally undergo Fas-dependent and -independent activation-induced cell death. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:1858–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Refaeli Y, Van Parijs L, Alexander SI, Abbas AK. (2002) Interferon gamma is required for activation-induced death of T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 196:999–1005.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Varadhachary AS, Peter ME, Perdow SN, Krammer PH, Salgame P. (1999) Selective up-regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase activity in Th2 cells inhibits caspase-8 cleavage at the death-inducing complex: a mechanism for Th2 resistance from Fas-mediated apoptosis. J. Immunol. 163:4772–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Boise LH, et al. (1995) CD28 costimulation can promote T cell survival by enhancing the expression of Bcl-XL. Immunity. 3:87–98.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Kishimoto H, Sprent J. (1999) Strong TCR ligation without costimulation causes rapid onset of Fas-dependent apoptosis of naive murine CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 163:1817–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Banz A, Pontoux C, Papiernik M. (2002) Modulation of Fas-dependent apoptosis: a dynamic process controlling both the persistence and death of CD4 regulatory T cells and effector T cells. J. Immunol. 169:750–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Singh N, et al. (2010) CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells resist a novel form of CD28- and Fas-dependent p53-induced T cell apoptosis. J. Immunol. 184:94–104.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Fritzsching B, et al. (2005) In contrast to effector T cells, CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells are highly susceptible to CD95 ligand- but not to TCR-mediated cell death. J. Immunol. 175:32–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Rahman MK, et al. (2010) The pathogen recognition receptor NOD2 regulates human FOXP3+ T cell survival. J. Immunol. 184:7247–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Shi G, et al. (2009) Unlike Th1, Th17 cells mediate sustained autoimmune inflammation and are highly resistant to restimulation-induced cell death. J. Immunol. 183:7547–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Niederkorn JY, Mayhew E. (1995) Role of splenic B cells in the immune privilege of the anterior chamber of the eye. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:2783–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Leite-de-Moraes MC, et al. (2000) Fas/Fas ligand interactions promote activation-induced cell death of NK T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 165:4367–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Wilson MT, et al. (2003) The response of natural killer T cells to glycolipid antigens is characterized by surface receptor down-modulation and expansion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:10913–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Martin F, Kearney JF. (2001) B1 cells: similarities and differences with other B cell subsets. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 13:195–201.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Yoshimoto M, et al. (2011) Embryonic day 9 yolk sac and intra-embryonic hemogenic endothelium independently generate a B-1 and marginal zone progenitor lacking B-2 potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:1468–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Montecino-Rodriguez E, Leathers H, Dorshkind K. (2006) Identification of a B-1 B cell-specified progenitor. Nat. Immunol. 7:293–301.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Martin F, Oliver AM, Kearney JF. (2001) Marginal zone and B1 B cells unite in the early response against T-independent blood-borne particulate antigens. Immunity. 14:617–29.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Allman D, Pillai S. (2008) Peripheral B cell subsets. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20:149–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Sampalo A, Brieva JA. (2002) Humoral immunodeficiency in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: role of CD95/CD95L in tumoral damage and escape. Leuk. Lymphoma. 43:881–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Mullauer L, Mosberger I, Chott A. (1998) Fas ligand expression in nodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Mod. Pathol. 11:369–75.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Amel Kashipaz MR, et al. (2003) Assessment of Be1 and Be2 cells in systemic lupus erythematosus indicates elevated interleukin-10 producing CD5+ B cells. Lupus. 12:356–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Blenman KR, et al. (2006) IL-10 regulation of lupus in the NZM2410 murine model. Lab. Invest. 86:1136–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Chong WP, et al. (2004) Association of interleukin-10 promoter polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus. Genes Immun. 5:484–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, and provide a link to the Creative Commons license. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit (

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of RheumatologyUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations