Advertisement

Molecular Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 5–6, pp 378–390 | Cite as

Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibition as a Novel Treatment for Diabetes Mellitus

  • Dan P Christensen
  • Mattias Dahllöf
  • Morten Lundh
  • Daniel N Rasmussen
  • Mette D Nielsen
  • Nils Billestrup
  • Lars G Grunnet
  • Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen
Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

Both common forms of diabetes have an inflammatory pathogenesis in which immune and metabolic factors converge on interleukin-1β as a key mediator of insulin resistance and β-cell failure. In addition to improving insulin resistance and preventing β-cell inflammatory damage, there is evidence of genetic association between diabetes and histone deacetylases (HDACs); and HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) promote β-cell development, proliferation, differentiation and function and positively affect late diabetic microvascular complications. Here we review this evidence and propose that there is a strong rationale for preclinical studies and clinical trials with the aim of testing the utility of HDACi as a novel therapy for diabetes.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus designates a group of chronic diseases where absolute or relative lack of insulin leads to aberrancies in substrate metabolism, causing acute and long-term complications. Although the clinical and diagnostic hallmark is elevated blood glucose, the metabolic disturbances in diabetes mellitus are not limited to glucose but encompass most processes of the intermediary metabolism of nutrients, including proteins and lipids. Insulin resistance is a component of most types of diabetes mellitus, but with the exception of rare mutations in the insulin signaling cascade, the disease does not occur if insulin release from the pancreatic β cells in the islets of Langerhans (hereafter islets) is intact. Preserving a functional β-cell mass is therefore the primary target of novel treatments aimed at curing and preventing diabetes mellitus.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) constitute the two main forms of diabetes. It has been estimated that 250 million individuals are currently afflicted by diabetes worldwide and the prevalence is doubling every 10 years. Whereas T1D is associated with absolute insulin deficiency as a consequence of selective destruction of β cells, T2D is associated with a relative lack of insulin most commonly due to failure of the β cells to compensate for insulin resistance caused by obesity. Of note, T1D and T2D are genetically distinct diseases (1). Thus, T1D is believed to be an autoimmune disease where variations in mainly immune-regulatory genes predispose individuals to immune-mediated destruction of the β cells by a T-cell-driven chronic inflammatory process in the islets (insulitis) (2,3). In contrast, genome-wide association scans (GWAS) have suggested T2D to be predominately a disease of the β cell, where variations in genes affecting β-cell function and/or mass impair β-cell compensation to increased insulin demands (4). In both diseases, there are strong gene-environment interactions that trigger the pathogenetic process (in T1D, hitherto unidentified viral and nutritional etiologies, and in T2D, mainly lifestyle-related factors).

With respect to pathogenesis, the strict dichotomy between T1D and T2D is most likely an oversimplification. There is increasing recognition that T1D and T2D may represent extremes of a continuous spectrum with a dominating β-cell defect at one end and dominating insulin resistance at the other (5). However, when disregarding diabetes caused by rare mutations in insulin signaling, insulin resistance is neither necessary nor sufficient to cause diabetes, whereas β-cell dysfunction is both a necessary and sufficient cause. This notion is supported by studies demonstrating progressive reduction in β-cell function and mass in T2D (6, 7, 8). Autoimmune islet inflammation and β-cell destruction are long-recognized causes of T1D, although it is debated if the molecular effector mechanisms involve predominantly classical cytotoxic T-cell-mediated or predominantly inflammatory cytokine-mediated β-cell killing or both. Several mechanisms leading to β-cell destruction in T2D have been proposed: glucolipotoxicity, membrane disruption caused by islet amyloid polypeptide deposition and, more recently, inflammation in the islets (9). Recently, a unifying hypothesis was proposed by the observation that all these stimuli lead to the induction of inflammatory mediators in the pancreatic islets (10,11) that cause β-cell destruction by activating pathways in β cells similar to those in T1D.

Thus, despite their different genetic background, the immune and metabolic pathogeneses of T1D and T2D, respectively, seem to converge on common extracellular inflammatory stressors in the islets and intracellular signaling induced by these stressors (reviewed in [12]). Within the last years, several publications reported that the inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β can act as a common extracellular inflammatory stressor. In the mid-1980s, IL-1β secreted from activated mononuclear cells was found to be selectively toxic to β cells and was found to both inhibit β-cell function and induce β-cell death after prolonged exposure (reviewed in [13]). IL-1β has since received much attention as an important mediator of the immune-induced β-cell destruction underlying T1D. Moreover, a number of observations in the last decade argue strongly for an important role of IL-1β in the pathogenesis of T2D as well. Thus, mice deficient in caspase-1 and thereby unable to process pro-IL-1β to mature biologically active IL-1β are more insulin sensitive than wild-type animals (14); IL-1β is secreted by β cells exposed to high glucose concentrations (15) and the adipocytokine leptin (16) and by macrophages exposed to free fatty acids and islet amyloid polypeptide (10,11); the naturally occurring IL-1 inhibitor, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-Ra), protects against high glucose-induced human β-cell toxicity (glucotoxicity) in vitro (15) and diabetes as well as β-cell dysfunction induced by a high-fat diet (lipotoxicity) in an animal model (17); elevated IL-1β levels contribute to the risk of developing T2D (18); and IL-1Ra treatment improves β-cell function in patients with T2D for up to 39 weeks after 13 weeks of treatment (19,20).

In summary, antiinflammatory treatment, and in particular inhibition of IL-1β—induced toxicity, has therapeutic potential in the treatment of both T1D and T2D. However, antiinflammatory biologics are costly and require parenteral administration either via the subcutaneous or intravenous route. There is thus an unmet need to develop safe, inexpensive and patient-convenient (oral) antiinflammatory drugs that mimic the beneficial effects of IL-1 blockade.

Antiinflammatory Properties of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

As outlined in the current issue of Molecular Medicine, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) show promising antiinflammatory properties, as demonstrated in an increasing number of animal and cellular models of inflammatory diseases (21). As indicated by their name, the molecular function of histone deacetylases (HDACs) was thought to be restricted to histone deacetylation, but recent advances in phylogenetic analysis suggested that HDACs regulate the activity of a wide range of nonhistone proteins (22). This was substantiated in a recent study (23) by the finding of 3,600 acetylation sites (of which only 61 were on histones) on 1,750 proteins including exclusively cytoplasmic proteins. Thus, the impact of acetylation in terms of posttranslational regulation is comparable to that of phosphorylation. A growing number of HDACi are being developed for the treatment of an expanding range of diseases. While transcriptional control over oncogene networks in cancer was the original target of HDAC inhibition, neurodegenerative and other inflammatory diseases are now increasingly being evaluated as novel indications, as illustrated by the reviews in this issue of Molecular Medicine.

Acetylation is now recognized to regulate the master transcription factor in the inflammation nuclear factor (NF)-κB (reviewed in [24]). Because the activation of NFκB is a critical event in IL-1β-induced β-cell death (25,26), these findings led to the investigation and demonstration of the protective effects of HDAC inhibition in β cells exposed to toxicity-mediating cytokines (27).

In this article, we review the potential of inhibiting the classical HDACs as a novel treatment for diabetes. This review includes a short overview of genetic associations between HDACs and the etiology of diabetes followed by a discussion of the potential for HDACi as an oral therapy with respect to modulation of the immune system, insulin resistance, β-cell development, differentiation and function, and pathogenetic events relevant for β-cell failure and destruction and islet graft rejection. Of note, HDACi also hold promise with respect to treatment of late diabetic complications such as diabetic nephropathy (28,29) and retinal ischemia playing a central role in diabetic retinopathy (30). HDACi and late diabetic complications will not be discussed further here, and readers are referred to the aforementioned references.

HDACs in the Etiology of Diabetes

As mentioned above, the etiology of diabetes is complex and multifactorial with contributions from many genes and unknown environmental factors. Although GWAS point to T1D and T2D as being genetically distinct (31,32), at least two GWAS studies have found significant linkage between the chromosomal region 6q21, where HDAC2 is located, and both T1D and T2D (33,34), indicating that HDAC2 could play a role in both diseases.

Although T1D and T2D are clearly polygenetic disorders, the concordance rate in twin studies is far from 100% (35,36), indicating a significant etiologic contribution from environmental and/or epigenetic factors. Fetal exposure to intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) contributes to the development of T2D, as reviewed by Pinney and Simmons (37). An adverse fetal milieu affects β-cell development by modifying key regulatory genes such as pancreatic and duodenal homeobox factor 1 (Pdx1) (38) as well as muscular glucose transport through glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) (39). Interestingly, the reduced expression of Pdx1 after IUGR is mediated by loss of histone acetylation through the recruitment of HDAC1 in complex with the corepressor Sin3A to the proximal promoter of Pdx1 (Figure 1). Thereby, a self-propagating epigenetic cycle is induced in which the HDAC1/Sin3 complex recruits a histone demethylase leading to loss of histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3), further repressing Pdx1 transcription. This effect was reversed by HDAC inhibition in the neonatal animal but not in the adult animal, where H3K9 dimethylation and extensive DNA methylation locked the Pdx1 promoter in its transcriptionally inactive state (38).
Figure 1

Model of changes in acetylation levels in pancreatic β cells of IUGR. (A) Under normal conditions, the Pdxl proximal promoter is associated with acetylated nucleosomes (Ac, green squares) (B) During IUGR, a complex containing HDAC1 and Sin3A induces a progressive loss of histone acetylation in islets from fetal and 2-week-old mice. This then leads to repression of Pdxl expression. (C) This effect is reversed by HDAC inhibition. Simplified from Park et al. (38).

Prenatal nutritional restriction leading to IUGR also leads to HDAC1- and HDAC4-mediated loss of histone acetylation of the Glut4 promoter in adult muscle tissue, thereby inhibiting Glut4 transcription (39). The effective metabolic repression of this important regulator of peripheral glucose uptake and insulin resistance may contribute importantly to the T2D phenotype. Of note, chromatin remodeling may already be induced by current T2D treatments, since incretin hormones such as glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide 1 increase in vitro global acetylation of histone H3, leading to increased association with transcription factors (40).

Histone acetylation and HDACs are not only relevant to T1D and T2D but also to the more infrequent forms of monogenic autosomal diabetes termed “maturity-onset diabetes of the young” (MODY). MODY comprises at least seven distinct subtypes on the basis of the mutated genes in question (31). With the exception of glucokinase and insulin, these genes all encode transcription factors—namely hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1α, -1β and -4α, involved in insulin transcription and hepatic gluconeogenesis, and pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1) and neurogenic differentiation 1 (NeuroD1), involved in pancreatic development and insulin production. These transcription factors all associate with histone acetyl-transferases (HATs) and HDACs, suggesting an important role of histone acetylation in their normal function. Underlining this, some of the MODY mutations directly affect the ability of the transcription factors to interact with HAT/HDACs (41).

In summary, these findings all point to inappropriate chromatin remodeling and histone acetylation as an important pathogenetic factor in diabetes.

Innate and Adaptive Immune Systems and HDACi in Diabetes

As reviewed in other sections of this issue of Molecular Medicine, HDAC inhibition modifies innate and adaptive immune responses (42, 43, 44, 45). The specific impact of HDACi on the immune system in relation to T1D and T2D is under-investigated. However, histone H3 is hyperacetylated in the promoters of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and the inflammatory-associated enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 in monocytes isolated from patients with T1D or T2D (46), suggesting a potential importance of the activity of HATs and HDACs in the expression of proinflammatory genes in monocytes from patients suffering from diabetes (46). In vitro, increased histone acetylation is induced by high glucose concentrations and the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) in monocytes from diabetics (46), and the production of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα was induced by high glucose concentrations through activation of NFκB (47), suggesting that hyperacetylation is a consequence of hyperglycemia or other metabolic aberrancies of diabetes rather than a cause of diabetes. Further, NFκB activity was enhanced by HAT overexpression and TSA and accordingly reversed by overexpression of HDAC1, -2, -3, -4, -5, and -6 (46). Taken together, these data suggest that HDACi treatment of patients suffering from diabetes could have an undesirable effect on cytokine production by monocytes. However, since effects of HDACi are highly concentration dependent, this potential adverse effect may not be seen if lower HDACi concentrations are used, since lower concentrations are generally associated with antiinflammatory responses. In the above-mentioned study by Miao et al. (46), TSA was used in a concentration of 300 nmol/L and was found to increase expression of TNFα and COX-2. Similar results were reported from another study using 500 nmol/L TSA (48). Lower concentrations of TSA (1-10 nmol/L) were not reported to have this effect while still causing histone hyperacetylation (48). In contrast to the effects of TSA, the HDAC inhibitor ITF2357 was shown to reduce the inflammatory response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by lowering the release of TNFα, secretion of IL-1β and synthesis of interferon γ (IFNγ) (49).

In summary, the effects of HDAC inhibition on the immune system specifically with respect to diabetes are not clarified, and further studies are needed to unravel the dose-response relationships for different HDACi on cytokine production from monocytes. Studies from other inflammatory diseases have to our knowledge not reported monocyte activation as an adverse effect, lending optimism to future safe utility of HDACi in treating diabetes.

Insulin Resistance and HDAC Inhibition

Insulin action is critical for cellular glucose uptake in most cells. As simplified in Figure 2, insulin signals via binding to the insulin receptor leading to receptor autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of members of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) family (see i, Figure 2). Upon phosphorylation, IRSs bind (and activate) phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), which in turn leads to phosphorylation of the protein kinase Akt (see ii, Figure 2). Among other effects, Akt induces translocation of the glucose transporter (GLUT4) from intracellular vesicles to the plasma membrane, mediating glucose uptake (see iii, Figure 2) (reviewed in [50]). Obstruction of insulin signaling leading to insulin resistance may occur at several levels in this pathway. As mentioned above, insulin resistance is a feature of both T1D and T2D— in the former case suspected to be secondary to deficient insulin secretion in lean and underweight subjects (51), but also increasingly associated with overweight of T1D subjects. In addition to obesity, aging and genetic predisposition are proposed to enhance risk of developing insulin resistance (52,53).
Figure 2

Effects of HDACs and HDACi on insulin signaling. For details, see the text.

HDACs have been suggested to play a regulatory role in physiological insulin signaling (see Figure 2). Thus, HDACi increase GLUT4 translocation and augment basal and insulin-induced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle (54). IRS-1 binds to HDAC2 in liver cells from the ob/ob mouse, a model of insulin resistance (55). This result was associated with decreased acetylation of IRS-1 and reduced insulin receptor-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1. Accordingly, inhibition of HDAC2 with TSA or RNAi-mediated knockdown inhibited deacetylation of IRS-1 and partially restored insulin signaling (55).

Both translocation and expression of GLUT4 are important for glucose uptake. Thus, overexpression of GLUT4 increases basal and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in mice (56,57). Transcription of GLUT4 is mainly under the regulation of the GLUT4 enhancer factor (GEF) and the myocyte enhancer factor (MEF)-2, both of which bind to transcriptional elements in the GLUT4 promoter (58). Through complex formation with GEF and MEF2, HDAC5 functions as a transcriptional repressor of GLUT4 by histone deactylation and compacting of the chromatin structure (59, 60, 61). The formation of this inhibitory complex is regulated by phosphorylation of HDAC5 by AMPK and CaMK, which induces the release of HDAC5 from the complex (59,62). This allows recruitment of, for example, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1 (PGC-1), which functions as a transcriptional coactivator allowing GLUT4 transcription (see Figure 2, iv) (63,64). The HDAC inhibitor TSA upregulates PGC-1 expression in skeletal muscle (65). This observation is clinically relevant, since decreased myocyte PGC-1α expression in patients with T2D is associated with elevated fasting insulin concentrations (reviewed in [66]). As described above, HDAC1 and HDAC4 are also inhibitors of GLUT4 expression, further underlining an important regulatory role of HDACs in glucose uptake and insulin resistance. HDACs may thus be a target for treatment of insulin resistance in muscular tissue, since compensatory GLUT4 transcription may reverse the resistant state (56,67).

To summarize, insulin signaling is regulated in a complex and not fully understood manner, and defects causing insulin resistance occur on many levels, including at the level of histone and nonhistone protein deacetylation. On the basis of preclinical evidence, inhibition of various HDACs is a promising novel therapeutic principle to correct the insulin-resistant state.

Clinical support for this notion, however, is lacking. Valproate (VPA) used in the long-term treatment of, for example, epilepsy and bipolar disorders is associated with weight gain and hyperinsulinemia. However, the causal interaction and the role of insulin resistance herein are not clarified. The development of insulin resistance is suggested in many studies, mainly on the basis of the occurrence of hyperinsulinemia and on estimations of the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index (reviewed in [68]). In a study that more directly measured insulin resistance using a modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with tolbutamide, Verrotti et al. (69) reported increased insulin resistance only in epileptic patients who gained weight and not in those who remained lean following 1 year of VPA treatment. Hyperinsulinemia occurred both in VPA-treated patients with epilepsy who gained weight as well as in VPA-treated patients who remained lean (70), and fasting hyperinsulinemia in VPA-treated patients was not associated with increased fasting serum proinsulin or C-peptide concentrations (71). Together, these data do not imply insulin resistance as the cause of hyperinsulinemia; rather, inhibition of insulin metabolism in the liver was suggested to be the cause (reviewed in [68]). It remains to be examined if these side effects of VPA are associated with its HDAC inhibitor function, its effects on the central nervous system or other actions of the drug. The fact that VPA is a branched-chain fatty acid may account for these side effects (68). To our knowledge, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance and obesity have not been associated with other HDACi in clinical use.

In conclusion, there is a preclinical rationale to conduct clinical trials with HDACi other than VPA to investigate the therapeutic potential of HDAC inhibition in the therapy of insulin resistance.

Pancreatic and Endocrine Cell Development and HDAC Inhibition

The pancreas consists of mainly two types of tissue: (a) the exocrine tissue composed of acinar cells secreting digestive enzymes into the duodenum and (b) the endocrine tissue that produces hormones such as glucagon (a cells), insulin (β cells), somatostatin (δ cells), pancreatic polypeptide (PP-cells) and ghrelin (ε cells). The endocrine tissue, representing approximately 1% of the fully developed pancreas is organized into ∼106 islets that develop concomitantly with the ongoing pancreatic morphogenesis.

Characterization of the mechanisms regulating the development of the endocrine pancreas and especially the insulin-producing β cells has undergone an immense development in particular with the mapping of the network of transcription factors that constitute the decision-makers of pancreatic cell fate during morphogenesis, proliferation and differentiation. In nonpancreatic tissues, HDACs are not redundant, and it is generally accepted that individual HDACs are required for specific functions during embryogenesis and postnatal life. For example, HDAC1 is essential for unrestricted cell proliferation by suppressing the expression of cell cycle inhibitors, a function unique to HDAC1 (72); deletion of Hdac3 was found to lead to early embryonic death and apoptosis due to DNA damage correlated with inefficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks (73); and HDAC4 inhibits cell cycle progression and has been suggested as a neuroprotective enzyme (74).

A plethora of transcription factors have to be minutely orchestrated at the expressional level to mediate the formation of the fully differentiated tissue. The pancreatic development network of transcription factors, their interaction and temporal control are reviewed elsewhere (75,76). Here, only a few essential transcription factors linked to HDACs will be mentioned. The transcription factor Pdx1 is synthesized in the entire early pancreatic rudiment that comprises the pancreatic buds (77), and Pdx1 plays a central role in the early development of the pancreas, since deletion of Pdx1 results in complete pancreatic agenesis (78,79). The Pdx1-expressing progenitor cells differentiate into endo- and exocrine cells. It is generally believed that the endocrine differentiation from the Pdx1-expressing progenitor cells is initiated by the expression of neurogenin 3 (Ngn3), since Ngn3-deficient mice fail to generate endocrine cells (80), and recently, lineage-tracing experiments have provided direct evidence that Ngn3-expressing cells are islet progenitors (81). Further, the expression of Pax4 has been linked to the specific development of the β/δ-cell lineage in rodents (82,83).

The understanding of the biology of HDACs in pancreatic development is incomplete. HDACs are expressed and developmentally regulated in the pancreas (82). As described above, HDAC1 is involved in silencing of Pdx1 in a model of IUGR, leading to failure in β-cell development and β-cell dysfunction (38). Additionally, treatment of rat embryonic explants with HDACi ex vivo enhances and maintains the expression profile of the proendocrine marker Ngn3 (82). As Ngn3 is believed to initiate endocrine differentiation from Pdx1-expressing progenitor cells (80), HDACi may lead to an increased pool of endocrine progenitor cells without modifying the proliferation/apoptosis balance (82). Furthermore, HDAC1 associates with the sex-determining region Y-box (SOX)-6, leading to an inhibitory effect of SOX6 on β-cell proliferation (84) (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Overview of the roles of HDACs in pancreatic endocrine cell development.

In zebrafish embryos with HDAC1 loss-of-function or HDAC1 knockdown, the exocrine pancreas failed to form correctly, whereas no marked effects were found on insulin expression (85,86), since ectopic clusters of insulin-expressing cells were observed outside the normal aggregation of endocrine insulin-expressing cells (85). However, the effect of HDAC1 inhibition on endocrine pancreas formation is debated (86).

Different HDACi have distinct effects on endocrine lineage development. Thus, TSA enhances, while VPA suppresses, β/δ-cell lineage differentiation. In contrast, both inhibitors promote the α/PP-cell lineage, illustrating the specific series of events that control pancreatic development (82). However, these observations cannot be construed to assign specific functions of certain HDAC subtypes in pancreatic development (87,88), since different HDACi have distinct structures and thereby possibly distinct functions independent of their inhibitory action on HDAC activity and since the action of many HDACi vary with concentration.

HDACi also promote differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into insulin-producing cells, a property of considerable importance for β-cell replacement therapy. TSA inhibits ES cell differentiation, while sodium butyrate (NaB) stimulates early events of pancreatic specification in ES cells (89, 90, 91). In concordance with the studies in ES cells, TSA improved the transdifferentiation of bone marrow stem cells into insulin-producing cells (92). The inclusion of NaB in early stages of the differentiation protocol led to differentiation of human ES cells into islet-like clusters expressing insulin as well as glucagon and somatostatin (93).

In summary, HDACi have a potential to differentiate stem cells into insulin-producing cells. However, further studies are needed to clarify the differential importance of various HDAC subtypes and thereby different HDACi and the impact of concentration of HDACi on the effects observed. The use of more specific HDACi along with careful titration studies should allow clarification of these questions.

β-Cell Function and HDAC Inhibition

The most important function of the pancreatic β cell is to release insulin in response to nutrients, hormones and other humoral mediators as well as to neuronal signals to maintain glucose homeostasis and lipid and protein metabolism. Insulin is a peptide hormone synthesized as a longer precursor (proinsulin) that consists of three peptide chains (A, B and C). The hormone is processed by prohormone convertases 1 and 2, which excise the central part of the protein (the connecting [C]-peptide), leaving the A and B chains linked by two disulfide bonds. Insulin is finally processed by carboxypeptidase E to produce the mature form that is stored as homohexamers in secretory vesicles and released in response to increased blood glucose and other stimuli (reviewed in [94]). As depicted in Figure 4, glucose induces both release (see i in figure) and transcription of insulin (see ii in figure), with the latter depending on at least three β-cell-specific transcription factors: Pdx1, NeuroD1 and V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homologue A (MafA) (95).
Figure 4

Simplified overview of the effect of HDACs and HATs on glucose-induced insulin expression. NeuD1, NeuroD1.

In Vitro Studies

The expression of insulin from β cells is regulated by acetylation. Thus, at high glucose levels, Pdx1 associates with the histone acetyltransferase p300, leading to increased acetylation of histone H4 in the insulin promoter. These events appear to be necessary for preproinsulin transcription induced by glucose (96, 97, 98, 99, 100). Conversely, at low glucose levels where insulin production is shut off, the acetylation of histone H4 at the insulin promoter is abolished, correlating with recruitment of HDAC1 and -2 to the insulin promoter by Pdx1 (97,101). NeuroD1 also interacts with p300 and is acetylated by the p300-associated factor (PCAF). This acetylation increases the binding of the transcription factor to the insulin promoter, leading to enhanced insulin gene expression (102). In β cells, MafA protein is constitutively phosphorylated by glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3), leading to ubiquitination and proteosomal degradation (103). However, phosphorylation of MafA is also required for binding of the insulin promoter and transactivating properties (104,105). In a non-β-cell system, phosphorylated MafA recruits PCAF, the effect of which is not only associated with increased transcriptional activity but also with reduced ubiquitination and degradation of MafA (106). In β cells, the degradation of MafA is delayed by exposure to high concentrations of glucose, even though MafA is still phosphorylated (103). This may suggest that high concentrations of glucose allow interaction between MafA and PCAF (or another HAT), thereby stabilizing MafA and increasing insulin transcription through opening of the chromatin structure in the insulin promoter. However, further studies are needed to clarify the putative effect of PCAF on MafA stability and activity in β cells.

Taken together, the above-mentioned studies suggest that acetylation favors insulin expression and that HDAC activity accordingly decreases insulin expression. The HDACi TSA and NaB increase histone H4 acetylation and enhance insulin expression at low glucose levels (3 mmol/L), supporting a repressive role of HDACs on preproinsulin transcription (97). Of note, TSA and NaB did not potentiate acetylation of H4 after exposure to high concentrations of glucose (30 mmol/L) (97). A stimulatory effect of VPA on insulin release has also been reported in human islets incubated in low glucose concentrations (2.8 mmol/L) (107). In contrast, accumulated insulin release from rat islets incubated in 11 mmol/L glucose was unaffected by suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) and ITF2357 but was slightly inhibited by TSA (27,108).

Clinical Studies

As described above, several studies investigated long-term metabolic effects of treatment with VPA. In general, no changes were reported with respect to fasting serum insulin and C-peptide in VPA-treated patients, whereas a single study found increased postprandial C-peptide and proinsulin levels (reviewed in [71]). Although VPA stimulates insulin release from isolated islets in vitro (107), a more recent report argues against a direct stimulatory effect of VPA on insulin release in vivo and suggests that the elevated insulin concentrations are a consequence of decreased hepatic degradation of insulin, as mentioned above (71). Again, it is unclear whether the effects of VPA are caused by its function as an HDAC inhibitor, its actions as a fatty acid derivative or other putative mechanisms, and more research is needed to shed light on the effects of other HDACi on insulin secretion in vivo.

In summary, insulin production depends on acetylation and is inhibited by deacetylation. Taken together, studies examining the effects of HDACi on insulin expression indicate that HDACi treatment increases insulin expression at low glucose levels, whereas insulin release is less affected (see Figure 4). As discussed later, HDACi protects against β-cell inhibitory and cytotoxic effects of cytokines. In addition to a direct induction of apoptosis, cytokines also induce a β-cell dedifferentiation associated with decreased expression and/or activity of Pdx1, NeuroD1 and MafA (109, 110, 111). It is likely that a part of the protective effects of HDACi against cytokine-induced toxicity are consequences of a maintained β -cell differentiation.

Recent studies suggest that a 40% reduction of the β-cell mass is sufficient to precipitate clinical symptoms of T1D (112) and that a significant proportion of insulinopenia is likely to be caused by reversible functional inhibition of β cells due to inflammation. If HDACi treatment is able to derepress the functional inhibition of residual β-cell mass, it would have significant therapeutic potential, not only with respect to treatment of patients with T2D, but also in newly diagnosed patients with T1D.

β-Cell Destruction and HDACi

To the best of our knowledge, investigations of the role of HDACi on the pathogenetic events that lead to β-cell destruction have been restricted to examinations on cytokine-induced β-cell death. As described above, the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β causes β-cell apoptosis and is implicated in the pathogenesis of both T1D and T2D. Furthermore, two other proinflammatory cytokines, namely TNFα and IFNγ, have been shown to potentiate the toxic effects of IL-1β (113, 114, 115, 116). In T1D in particular, there is a pronounced selective destruction of the β cells, and in accordance with a role of proinflammatory cytokines as mediators of the β-cell destruction, the toxic effects of cytokines are selective for β cells (117). This selectivity is further supported by studies showing that maturation of the β cell makes it prone to the toxic effects of IL-1β (118). On the basis of animal studies, IL-1β plays an important role in destruction of transplanted islet grafts (119, 120, 121, 122, 123), and blocking cytokines in clinical islet transplantation has also been suggested as a future intervention to prevent graft destruction (124).

We originally reported a protective effect of HDACi treatment against cytokine-induced β-cell death (27), an observation now confirmed by us and others (108,125,126). Accordingly, several HDACi (ITF2357, TSA and SAHA) protect against cytokine-induced reduction in accumulated insulin secretion (27,108). Of note, ITF2357 was not only found to prevent cytokine-mediated reduction of accumulated insulin release but increased insulin release over and above that of control islets (108). Because cytokines at low concentrations stimulate insulin secretion (127), we interpret these observations to suggest that ITF2357 selectively prevents proapoptotic cytokine signaling while sparing the cytokine-mediated regulatory signaling that stimulates insulin secretion (108). However, a reversal of cytokine-in-duced reduction of insulin release to levels over and above the control level has not been seen with other HDACi (27), and further studies are needed to substantiate these observations.

Cytokines inhibit both first- and second-phase insulin release through decreased expression of insulin (128) and proteins that are important for insulin secretion (129). Interestingly, the cytokine-mediated reduction in acute glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, which mainly depends on release of preformed insulin vesicles and less on de novo insulin transcription, translation and processing, is unaffected by HDACi (27). Taken together, these data indicate that in addition to antiapoptotic effects of HDACi, these compounds preferentially protect preproinsulin transcription, and/or proinsulin translation and processing or expression of genes involved in non-glucose-induced signaling of insulin secretion from the inhibitory effects of cytokines (27), with little effect on insulin granule formation, translocation, docking and exocytosis, although this needs to be investigated in more detail.

The β cell expresses all classical HDACs, albeit at different levels, and they are differently regulated by cytokines (108). On the basis of relative expressions and regulation by cytokines, important roles of especially HDAC1, -2, -6 and -11 have been suggested (108). However, it remains to be experimentally investigated on which specific HDAC family member(s) cytokine-induced proapoptotic signaling depends. Studies that include molecular approaches and/or more selective inhibitors of individual HDAC members are needed to elucidate this question.

Mechanisms of HDACI-Mediated β-Cell Protection Against Inflammatory Attack

Exposure of islets to the cytokines IL-1β and IFNγ modifies the expression of more than 2,000 genes, many of which are related to pathways signaling apoptosis, cell cycle regulation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, but also pathways involved in maintenance of differentiation, cell metabolism (for example, through the Krebs cycle) and alternative splicing (130). NFκB has received much attention for its role in cytokine-induced β-cell death and plays an essential role in mediating the proapoptotic effects of cytokines (25,26). HDACi reduce cytokine-induced NFκB activity and decrease expression of NFκB-dependent genes (for example, inducible nitric oxide synthase [iNOS] and inhibitor of kappa B [IκB]) (27,108,125,126). On the basis of results from an electrophoretic mobility shift assay showing no effects of HDACi on cytokine-induced NFκB binding to synthetic oligonucleotides, HDACi were suggested to modulate the chromatin structure of NFκB-dependent genes, resulting in decreased NFκB transactivation by unknown coactivators (27). In non-β cells, NFκB interacts with HDAC1, -2 and -3 (131,132), but whether these interactions also take place in β cells and what the impact is of the interplay on the protective effect of HDAC inhibition on cytokine-mediated β-cell toxicity are unknown.

In the β cell, IFNγ signal transduction proceeds through the JAK/STAT pathway by activation of STAT1. Purified β cells from STAT1 knockout mice are protected against apoptosis induced by IFNγ and IL-1β, suggesting an important role of STAT1 in cytokine-induced β-cell death (133). In non-β cells, IFNγ-induced JAK activation and STAT1 activity depend on HDAC1, -2 and -3 activity (134). Whether IFNγ-induced STAT1 activity is inhibited after HDACi treatment in β cells has to our knowledge not been investigated.

IL-1β in combination with IFNγ reduces the expression of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA)-2 pump, resulting in depletion of the ER Ca2+ stores (135,136). Ca2+ depletion hinders proper protein folding, leading to the unfolded protein response, ER stress and β-cell death (137). Upon activation of the unfolded protein response, several protective cellular compensatory mechanisms are initiated to stabilize ER homeostasis (for example, production of chaperones, such as Hsp70) (138,139). Accordingly, expression of Hsp70 is also induced by cytokines, and overexpression of Hsp70 protects against cytokine-induced β-cell death (140). In non-β cells, Hsp70 forms complexes with HDAC1, -2 and -3 (141), but whether these complexes are also found in β cells and whether HDACs affect Hsp70 activity has not been examined. Furthermore, TSA increases the expression of the chaperone BiP (an Hsp70 class protein) in non-β cells (142). In β-cells, overexpression of BiP protects against in vitro cytotoxic effects of the fatty acid palmitate (143) but not of cytokines (144). Whether HDACi modulates BiP expression in β cells and whether BiP is part of the protective mechanism require further investigation.

Although the unfolded protein response is a protective ER response, prolonged unfolded protein response leads to β-cell death by mechanisms that are not fully clarified. The transcription factor C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) is induced upon ER Ca2+ depletion. CHOP may induce apoptosis through several mechanisms including activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway (137). In non-β cells, CHOP interacts with HDAC1, -5 and -6, and TSA has been shown to repress degradation of CHOP (145), although other investigators have shown that TSA does not affect the protein level of CHOP (142). Further, the importance of CHOP and ER stress in cytokine-induced β-cell death is debated, since neither knockdown of CHOP nor overexpression of BiP protect against cytokine-induced β-cell death (144). Further, a role of ER stress in the pathogene-sis of T1D in humans is also questioned, since CHOP expression was not consistently demonstrated in eight pancreatic autopsies of T1D patients (146).

Another mechanism by which cytokines induce apoptosis is through direct activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Thus, cytokines induce activation of proapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins, and inhibition of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins causes release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria, followed by activation of caspase-9 and subsequently caspase-3 activation (147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152). Overexpression of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins protects against cytokine-induced β-cell death, supporting an important role of the Bcl-2 proteins (153,154). Several links between Bcl-2 proteins and HDACi have been found primary in models of cancer where high concentrations of HDACi are used to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. In transformed cells, HDACi operates via the proapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins Bim (155), Bid (156) and Bax (157), which are upregulated, processed or translocated to the mitochondrial membrane, respectively, while expression of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein Bcl-XL is downregulated (158). The effects of lower HDACi concentrations used in inflammatory diseases on the regulation of the Bcl-2 protein family and an effect of HDACi on cytokine-induced activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in β cells are yet to be examined.

As summarized in Figure 5, cytokine-induced β-cell apoptosis depends on HDAC activity, since it is prevented by HDACi treatment. Although NFκB signaling has been identified as an HDACi target, the exact molecular mechanisms by which HDACi prevents cytokine-in-duced β-cell death are not clarified, and effects of HDACi on other key players in cytokine-induced signaling such as JAK/STAT1, Bcl-2 proteins and proteins involved in ER stress have not yet been investigated. Finally, studies in animal models and phase II clinical trials are needed to shed light on the translational significance of the promising in vitro effects of HDACi on cytokine-induced β-cell toxicity.
Figure 5

Proinflammatory cytokines induce β-cell apoptosis through regulation of a range of pro- (red) and antiapoptotic (blue) genes and proteins. The protective effect of HDAC inhibition likely involves NFκB and possibly other death pathways.

Conclusions and Perspectives

The evidence reviewed here indicates that HDACs are involved in several biological pathways relevant for the etiology and pathogenesis of T1D and T2D. As summarized in Table 1 and in Figure 6, there is evidence of genetic association between diabetes and HDACs, as there is of HDACi promoting β-cell development, proliferation, differentiation and function; preventing β-cell inflammatory damage; improving insulin resistance; and positively affecting late diabetic microvascular complications. Taken together, this evidence provides a strong rationale for continuing preclinical studies and initiating clinical trials, with the aim of testing the clinical utility of HDACi in diabetes.
Table 1

Evidence in favor of HDACs as therapeutic targets in diabetes mellitus.

Genetic associations Genetic association with the 6q21 region harboring HDAC2 with T1D and T2D MODY gene mutations directly affect the ability of the MODY proteins to interact with HAT/HDACs

HDACs and β-cell development and function

HDACl associates with SOX6 to inhibit β-cell proliferation

HDACl silences Pdxl in IUGR, leading to failure in β-cell development and β-cell dysfunction and reversible in the neonatal state by HDAC inhibition

HDACi enhances and maintains expression of the proendocrine transcription factor Ngn3

HDACi stimulates early events of pancreatic specification in embryonic stem cells

HDACi improves transdifferentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells into insulin-producing cells

HDACi enhances insulin expression

HDACs and inflammatory pathogenesis of T1D and T2D

HDACi reduces the peripheral blood mononuclear cell production of IL-1β, TNFα and IFNγ

HDACi protects against cytokine-induced reduction in accumulated insulin secretion

HDACi protects β cells against cytokine-induced apoptosis by targeting NF-κB

HDACs and insulin resistance

IUGR promotes HDACl- and -4-mediated histone deacetylation of the Glut4 promoter in adult muscle tissue, thereby repressing its transcription

HDAC5 functions as a transcriptional repressor of GLUT4

HDACi upregulates PGC-1 expression, GLUT4 translocation and insulin-induced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle

HDAC2 inhibition hyperacetylates IRS-1 and partially restores insulin signaling

HDACs and late diabetic complications

HDACi in part protects against diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy

Figure 6

Overview of the therapeutic potential of HDACi in diabetes.

However, there is still much to be learned about the mechanisms of action and the differential importance of the 11 classic HDACs, the sirtuins and the HATs controlling the acetylation balance in diabetes. An important task will be to define the relative importance of acetylated histones, transcription factors and other nuclear, cytosolic and compartmentalized proteins in the β-cell acetylome, and, eventually, the interaction between acetylation and other posttranslational protein modifications needs to be interpreted into the language now known as the histone or protein code. Lastly, the enigma of how HDAC inhibition, an apparently nonspecific treatment, can exert therapeutic benefit to so many diverse disorders needs to be unraveled. Does HDACi only reset a disturbed protein acetylation balance as a result of cell stress without affecting cell homeostasis? Why does HDACi-mediated hyperacetylation mainly associated with increased gene transcription counteract inflammatory gene expression changes? Is this a consequence of expressional upregulation of genes encoding antiapoptotic proteins or microRNAs? How can this be reconciled with an inhibitory effect of HDACi on NFκB transcriptional activity? These basic research questions and many more will have to be addressed in parallel with further preclinical and clinical development to pave the way for futuregeneration HDACi with higher specificity and safety for the treatment of diabetes and other inflammatory diseases.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests as defined by Molecular Medicine, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and discussion reported in this paper.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This review was written with financial support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International grant 26-2008-893, the University of Copenhagen and the Novo Nordisk TRAP Program.

References

  1. 1.
    Raj SM, et al. (2009) No association of multiple type 2 diabetes loci with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 52:2109–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrett JC, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 41:703–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willcox A, Richardson SJ, Bone AJ, Foulis AK, Morgan NG. (2009) Analysis of islet inflammation in human type 1 diabetes. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 155:173–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prokopenko I, McCarthy MI, Lindgren CM. (2008) Type 2 diabetes: new genes, new understanding. Trends Genet. 24:613–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilkin TJ. (2007) Changing perspectives in diabetes: their impact on its classification. Diabetologia 50:1587–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Butler AE, et al. (2003) Beta-cell deficit and increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52:102–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakuraba H, et al. (2002) Reduced beta-cell mass and expression of oxidative stress-related DNA damage in the islet of Japanese type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia 45:85–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoon KH, et al. (2003) Selective beta-cell loss and alpha-cell expansion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Korea. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88:2300–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehses JA, Ellingsgaard H, Boni-Schnetzler M, Donath MY. (2009) Pancreatic islet inflammation in type 2 diabetes: from alpha and beta cell compensation to dysfunction. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 115:240–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masters SL, et al. (2010) Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by islet amyloid polypeptide provides a mechanism for enhanced IL-1beta in type 2 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 11:897–904.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandrup-Poulsen T. (2010) IAPP boosts islet macrophage IL-1 in type 2 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 11:881–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donath MY, Storling J, Berchtold LA, Billestrup N, Mandrup-Poulsen T. (2008) Cytokines and beta-cell biology: from concept to clinical translation. Endocr. Rev. 29:334–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandrup-Poulsen T. (1996) The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of IDDM. Diabetologia 39:1005–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stienstra R, et al. (2010) The inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation controls adipocyte differentiation and insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. 12:593–605.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maedler K, et al. (2002) Glucose-induced beta cell production of IL-1beta contributes to glucotoxicity in human pancreatic islets. J. Clin. Invest. 110:851–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maedler K, et al. (2004) Leptin modulates beta cell expression of IL-1 receptor antagonist and release of IL-1beta in human islets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:8138–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauter NS, Schulthess FT, Galasso R, Castellani LW, Maedler K. (2008) The antiinflammatory cytokine interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protects from high-fat diet-induced hyperglycemia. Endocrinology 149:2208–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spranger J, et al. (2003) Inflammatory cytokines and the risk to develop type 2 diabetes: results of the prospective population-based European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Diabetes 52:812–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larsen CM, et al. (2007) Interleukin-1-receptor antagonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 356:1517–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Larsen CM, et al. (2009) Sustained effects of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist treatment in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1663–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halili MA, Andrews MR, Sweet MJ, Fairlie DP. (2009) Histone deacetylase inhibitors in inflammatory disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 9:309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gregoretti IV, Lee YM, Goodson HV. (2004) Molecular evolution of the histone deacetylase family: functional implications of phylogenetic analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 338:17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choudhary C, et al. (2009) Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 325:834–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mankan AK, Lawless MW, Gray SG, Kelleher D, McManus R. (2009) NF-kappaB regulation: the nuclear response. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13:631–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giannoukakis N, Rudert WA, Trucco M, Robbins PD. (2000) Protection of human islets from the effects of interleukin-1beta by adenoviral gene transfer of an Ikappa B repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 275:36509–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heimberg H, et al. (2001) Inhibition of cytokine-induced NF-kappaB activation by adenovirus-mediated expression of a NF-kappaB super-repressor prevents beta-cell apoptosis. Diabetes 50:2219–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Larsen L, et al. (2007) Inhibition of histone deacetylases prevents cytokine-induced toxicity in beta cells. Diabetologia 50:779–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee HB, Noh H, Seo JY, Yu MR, Ha H. (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors: a novel class of therapeutic agents in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. Suppl. S61-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Villeneuve LM, Natarajan R. (2010) The role of epigenetics in the pathology of diabetic complications. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 299:F14–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Crosson CE, Mani SK, Husain S, Alsarraf O, Menick DR. (2010) Inhibition of histone deacetylase protects the retina from ischemic injury. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51:3639–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bonnefond A, Froguel P, Vaxillaire M. (2010) The emerging genetics of type 2 diabetes. Trends Mol. Med. 16:407–16.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pociot F, et al. (2010) Genetics of type 1 diabetes: what’s next? Diabetes 59:1561–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nerup J, Pociot F. (2001) A genomewide scan for type 1-diabetes susceptibility in Scandinavian families: identification of new loci with evidence of interactions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69:1301–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xiang K, et al. (2004) Genome-wide search for type 2 diabetes/impaired glucose homeostasis susceptibility genes in the Chinese: significant linkage to chromosome 6q21-q23 and chromosome 1q21-q24. Diabetes 53:228–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Redondo MJ, Fain PR, Eisenbarth GS. (2001) Genetics of type 1A diabetes. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 56:69–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Poulsen P, Kyvik KO, Vaag A, Beck-Nielsen H. (1999) Heritability of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance: a population-based twin study. Diabetologia 42:139–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pinney SE, Simmons RA. (2010) Epigenetic mechanisms in the development of type 2 diabetes. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 21:223–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Park JH, Stoffers DA, Nicholls RD, Simmons RA. (2008) Development of type 2 diabetes following intrauterine growth retardation in rats is associated with progressive epigenetic silencing of Pdx1. J. Clin. Invest. 118:2316–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Raychaudhuri N, Raychaudhuri S, Thamotharan M, Devaskar SU. (2008) Histone code modifications repress glucose transporter 4 expression in the intrauterine growth-restricted offspring. J. Biol. Chem. 283:13611–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim SJ, Nian C, McIntosh CH. (2009) Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 modulate beta-cell chromatin structure. J. Biol. Chem. 284:12896–904.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gray SG, De Meyts P. (2005) Role of histone and transcription factor acetylation in diabetes pathogenesis. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 21:416–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Camelo S, et al. (2005) Transcriptional therapy with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 164:10–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lin HS, et al. (2007) Anti-rheumatic activities of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in vivo in collagen-induced arthritis in rodents. Br. J. Pharmacol. 150:862–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Suuronen T, Huuskonen J, Pihlaja R, Kyrylenko S, Salminen A. (2003) Regulation of microglial inflammatory response by histone deacetylase inhibitors. J. Neurochem. 87:407–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Suh HS, Choi S, Khattar P, Choi N, Lee SC. (2010) Histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress the expression of inflammatory and innate immune response genes in human microglia and astrocytes. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 5:521–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Miao F, Gonzalo IG, Lanting L, Natarajan R. (2004) In vivo chromatin remodeling events leading to inflammatory gene transcription under diabetic conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 279:18091–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shanmugam N, Reddy MA, Guha M, Natarajan R. (2003) High glucose-induced expression of proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine genes in monocytic cells. Diabetes 52:1256–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Halili MA, et al. (2010) Differential effects of selective HDAC inhibitors on macrophage inflammatory responses to the Toll-like receptor 4 agonist LPS. J. Leukoc. Biol. 87:1103–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Leoni F, et al. (2005) The histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 reduces production of proinflammatory cytokines in vitro and systemic inflammation in vivo. Mol. Med. 11:1–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Choi K, Kim YB. (2010) Molecular mechanism of insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Korean J. Intern. Med. 25:119–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Greenbaum CJ. (2002) Insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 18:192–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Scheen AJ. (2005) Diabetes mellitus in the elderly: insulin resistance and/or impaired insulin secretion? Diabetes Metab. 31:5S27–25S34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mercado MM, McLenithan JC, Silver KD, Shuldiner AR. (2002) Genetics of insulin resistance. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2:83–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Takigawa-Imamura H, et al. (2003) Stimulation of glucose uptake in muscle cells by prolonged treatment with scriptide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 67:1499–1506.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kaiser C, James SR. (2004) Acetylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 is permissive for tyrosine phosphorylation. BMC Biol 2:23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ren JM, et al. (1995) Overexpression of Glut4 protein in muscle increases basal and insulin- stimulated whole body glucose disposal in conscious mice. J. Clin. Invest. 95:429–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Leturque A, Loizeau M, Vaulont S, Salminen M, Girard J. (1996) Improvement of insulin action in diabetic transgenic mice selectively overexpressing GLUT4 in skeletal muscle. Diabetes 45:23–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Thai MV, Guruswamy S, Cao KT, Pessin JE, Olson AL. (1998) Myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2)-binding site is required for GLUT4 gene expression in transgenic mice: regulation of MEF2 DNA binding activity in insulin-deficient diabetes. J. Biol. Chem. 273:14285–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    McGee SL, et al. (2008) AMP-activated protein kinase regulates GLUT4 transcription by phosphorylating histone deacetylase 5. Diabetes 57:860–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sparling DP, Griesel BA, Weems J, Olson AL. (2008) GLUT4 enhancer factor (GEF) interacts with MEF2A and HDAC5 to regulate the GLUT4 promoter in adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 283:7429–37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Olson EN. (2001) Control of muscle development by dueling HATs and HDACs. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:497–504.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Olson EN. (2000) Activation of the myocyte enhancer factor-2 transcription factor by calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-stimulated binding of 14-3-3 to histone deacetylase 5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:14400–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    McGee SL, Hargreaves M. (2004) Exercise and myocyte enhancer factor 2 regulation in human skeletal muscle. Diabetes 53:1208–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Michael LF, et al. (2001) Restoration of insulinsensitive glucose transporter (GLUT4) gene expression in muscle cells by the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:3820–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Crunkhorn S, et al. (2007) Peroxisome proliferator activator receptor gamma coactivator-1 expression is reduced in obesity: potential pathogenic role of saturated fatty acids and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:15439–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bonen A. (2009) PGC-1alpha-induced improvements in skeletal muscle metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 34:307–14.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    McGee SL, Hargreaves M. (2010) Histone modifications and skeletal muscle metabolic gene expression. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 37:392–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Verrotti A, D’Egidio C, Mohn A, Coppola G, Chiarelli F. (2010) Weight gain following treatment with valproic acid: pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical implications. Obes. Rev. 12:e32–43.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Verrotti A, et al. (2002) Insulin resistance in epileptic girls who gain weight after therapy with valproic acid. J. Child Neurol. 17:265–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pylvanen V, et al. (2002) Serum insulin and leptin levels in valproate-associated obesity. Epilepsia 43:514–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pylvanen V, Pakarinen A, Knip M, Isojarvi J. (2006) Characterization of insulin secretion in valproate-treated patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 47:1460–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lagger G, et al. (2002) Essential function of histone deacetylase 1 in proliferation control and CDK inhibitor repression. EMBO J. 21:2672–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bhaskara S, et al. (2008) Deletion of histone deacetylase 3 reveals critical roles in S phase progression and DNA damage control. Mol. Cell 30:61–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Majdzadeh N, et al. (2008) HDAC4 inhibits cell-cycle progression and protects neurons from cell death. Dev. Neurobiol. 68:1076–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Collombat P, Hecksher-Sorensen J, Serup P, Mansouri A. (2006) Specifying pancreatic endocrine cell fates. Mech. Dev. 123:501–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chakrabarti SK, Mirmira RG. (2003) Transcription factors direct the development and function of pancreatic beta cells. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 14:78–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ohlsson H, Karlsson K, Edlund T. (1993) IPF1, a homeodomain-containing transactivator of the insulin gene. EMBO J. 12:4251–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Jonsson J, Carlsson L, Edlund T, Edlund H. (1994) Insulin-promoter-factor 1 is required for pancreas development in mice. Nature 371:606–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Offield MF, et al. (1996) PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum. Development 122:983–95.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gradwohl G, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Guillemot F. (2000) Neurogenin3 is required for the development of the four endocrine cell lineages of the pancreas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:1607–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Gu G, Dubauskaite J, Melton DA. (2002) Direct evidence for the pancreatic lineage: NGN3+ cells are islet progenitors and are distinct from duct progenitors. Development 129:2447–57.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Haumaitre C, Lenoir O, Scharfmann R. (2008) Histone deacetylase inhibitors modify pancreatic cell fate determination and amplify endocrine progenitors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:6373–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sosa-Pineda B, Chowdhury K, Torres M, Oliver G, Gruss P. (1997) The Pax4 gene is essential for differentiation of insulin-producing beta cells in the mammalian pancreas. Nature 386:399–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Iguchi H, et al. (2007) SOX6 suppresses cyclin D1 promoter activity by interacting with betacatenin and histone deacetylase 1, and its down-regulation induces pancreatic beta-cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:19052–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Noel ES, et al. (2008) Organ-specific requirements for Hdac1 in liver and pancreas formation. Dev. Biol. 322:237–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Farooq M, et al. (2008) Histone deacetylase 3 (hdac3) is specifically required for liver development in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 317:336–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bradner JE, et al. (2010) Chemical genetic strategy identifies histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC2 as therapeutic targets in sickle cell disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:12617–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Matalon S, et al. (2010) The histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 decreases surface CXCR4 and CCR5 expression on CD4(+) T-cells and monocytes and is superior to valproic acid for latent HIV-1 expression in vitro. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 54:1–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Goicoa S, Alvarez S, Ricordi C, Inverardi L, Dominguez-Bendala J. (2006) Sodium butyrate activates genes of early pancreatic development in embryonic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells 8:140–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lee JH, Hart SR, Skalnik DG. (2004) Histone deacetylase activity is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. Genesis 38:32–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Li L, et al. (2008) Combination of GLP-1 and sodium butyrate promote differentiation of pancreatic progenitor cells into insulin-producing cells. Tissue Cell 40:437–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tayaramma T, Ma B, Rohde M, Mayer H. (2006) Chromatin-remodeling factors allow differentiation of bone marrow cells into insulin-producing cells. Stem Cells 24:2858–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Jiang J, et al. (2007) Generation of insulin-producing islet-like clusters from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25:1940–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Weiss MA. (2009) Proinsulin and the genetics of diabetes mellitus. J. Biol. Chem. 284:19159–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Aramata S, Han SI, Yasuda K, Kataoka K. (2005) Synergistic activation of the insulin gene promoter by the beta-cell enriched transcription factors MafA, Beta2, and Pdx1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1730:41–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mosley AL, Corbett JA, Ozcan S. (2004) Glucose regulation of insulin gene expression requires the recruitment of p300 by the beta-cell-specific transcription factor Pdx-1. Mol. Endocrinol. 18:2279–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Mosley AL, Ozcan S. (2003) Glucose regulates insulin gene transcription by hyperacetylation of histone h4. J. Biol. Chem. 278:19660–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Evans-Molina C, et al. (2007) Glucose regulation of insulin gene transcription and pre-mRNA processing in human islets. Diabetes 56:827–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Qiu Y, Guo M, Huang S, Stein R. (2002) Insulin gene transcription is mediated by interactions between the p300 coactivator and PDX-1, BETA2, and E47. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:412–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Qiu Y, Sharma A, Stein R. (1998) p300 mediates transcriptional stimulation by the basic helix-loop-helix activators of the insulin gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2957–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Mosley AL, Ozcan S. (2004) The pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 protein (Pdx-1) interacts with histone deacetylases Hdac-1 and Hdac-2 on low levels of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54241–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Qiu Y, Guo M, Huang S, Stein R. (2004) Acetylation of the BETA2 transcription factor by p300-associated factor is important in insulin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 279:9796–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Han SI, Aramata S, Yasuda K, Kataoka K. (2007) MafA stability in pancreatic beta cells is regulated by glucose and is dependent on its constitutive phosphorylation at multiple sites by glycogen synthase kinase 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6593–605.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Zhao L, Cissell MA, Henderson E, Colbran R, Stein R. (2000) The RIPE3b1 activator of the insulin gene is composed of a protein(s) of approximately 43 kDa, whose DNA binding activity is inhibited by protein phosphatase treatment. J. Biol. Chem. 275:10532–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Guo S, et al. (2009) The stability and transactivation potential of the mammalian MafA transcription factor are regulated by serine 65 phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 284:759–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Rocques N, et al. (2007) GSK-3-mediated phosphorylation enhances Maf-transforming activity. Mol. Cell 28:584–97.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Luef GJ, Lechleitner M, Bauer G, Trinka E, Hengster P. (2003) Valproic acid modulates islet cell insulin secretion: a possible mechanism of weight gain in epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res. 55:53–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Lundh M, et al. (2010) Lysine deacetylases are produced in pancreatic beta cells and are differentially regulated by proinflammatory cytokines. Diabetologia 53:2569–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Eizirik DL, Mandrup-Poulsen T. (2001) A choice of death: the signal-transduction of immunemediated beta-cell apoptosis. Diabetologia 44:2115–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Maier B, et al. (2010) The unique hypusine modification of eIF5A promotes islet beta cell inflammation and dysfunction in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 120:2156–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Oetjen E, et al. (2007) Inhibition of MafA transcriptional activity and human insulin gene transcription by interleukin-1beta and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in pancreatic islet beta cells. Diabetologia 50:1678–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Atkinson MA, Gianani R. (2009) The pancreas in human type 1 diabetes: providing new answers to age-old questions. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 16:279–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Mandrup-Poulsen T, Bendtzen K, Dinarello CA, Nerup J. (1987) Human tumor necrosis factor potentiates human interleukin 1-mediated rat pancreatic beta-cell cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 139:4077–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Pukel C, Baquerizo H, Rabinovitch A. (1988) Destruction of rat islet cell monolayers by cytokines: synergistic interactions of interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor, lymphotoxin, and interleukin 1. Diabetes 37:133–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Cetkovic-Cvrlje M, Eizirik DL. (1994) TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma potentiate the deleterious effects of IL-1 beta on mouse pancreatic islets mainly via generation of nitric oxide. Cytokine 6:399–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Rabinovitch A, et al. (1994) Human pancreatic islet beta-cell destruction by cytokines is independent of nitric oxide production. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79:1058–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Mandrup-Poulsen T, et al. (1987) Ultrastructural studies of time-course and cellular specificity of interleukin-1 mediated islet cytotoxicity. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. C. 95:55–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Nielsen K, et al. (1999) Beta-cell maturation leads to in vitro sensitivity to cytotoxins. Diabetes 48:2324–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Drage M, et al. (2002) Nondepleting anti-CD4 and soluble interleukin-1 receptor prevent autoimmune destruction of syngeneic islet grafts in diabetic NOD mice. Transplantation 74:611–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Gysemans C, et al. (2003) Prevention of primary non-function of islet xenografts in autoimmune diabetic NOD mice by anti-inflammatory agents. Diabetologia 46:1115–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Sandberg JO, Eizirik DL, Sandler S. (1997) IL-1 receptor antagonist inhibits recurrence of disease after syngeneic pancreatic islet transplantation to spontaneously diabetic non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 108:314–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Sandberg JO, Eizirik DL, Sandler S, Tracey DE, Andersson A. (1993) Treatment with an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein prolongs mouse islet allograft survival. Diabetes 42:1845–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Tellez N, et al. (2007) Adenoviral overproduction of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist increases beta cell replication and mass in syngeneically transplanted islets, and improves metabolic outcome. Diabetologia 50:602–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Amoli MM, Larijani B. (2006) Would blockage of cytokines improve the outcome of pancreatic islet transplantation? Med. Hypotheses 66:816–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Susick L, Veluthakal R, Suresh MV, Hadden T, Kowluru A. (2008) Regulatory roles for histone deacetylation in IL-1beta-induced nitric oxide release in pancreatic beta-cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 12:1571–1583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Susick L, Senanayake T, Veluthakal R, Woster PM, Kowluru A. (2009) A novel histone deacetylase inhibitor prevents IL-1beta induced metabolic dysfunction in pancreatic beta-cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13:1877–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Spinas GA, et al. (1986) Low concentrations of interleukin-1 stimulate and high concentrations inhibit insulin release from isolated rat islets of Langerhans. Acta. Endocrinol. (Copenh.) 113:551–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Sandler S, Andersson A, Hellerstrom C. (1987) Inhibitory effects of interleukin 1 on insulin secretion, insulin biosynthesis, and oxidative metabolism of isolated rat pancreatic islets. Endocrinology 121:1424–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Ohara-Imaizumi M, Cardozo AK, Kikuta T, Eizirik DL, Nagamatsu S. (2004) The cytokine interleukin-1beta reduces the docking and fusion of insulin granules in pancreatic beta-cells, preferentially decreasing the first phase of exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 279:41271–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Ortis F, et al. (2010) Cytokines interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha regulate different transcriptional and alternative splicing networks in primary beta-cells. Diabetes 59:358–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Ashburner BP, Westerheide SD, Baldwin AS Jr. (2001) The p65 (RelA) subunit of NF-kappaB interacts with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) corepressors HDAC1 and HDAC2 to negatively regulate gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:7065–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Kiernan R, et al. (2003) Post-activation turn-off of NF-kappa B-dependent transcription is regulated by acetylation of p65. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2758–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Gysemans CA, et al. (2005) Disruption of the gamma-interferon signaling pathway at the level of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 prevents immune destruction of beta-cells. Diabetes 54:2396–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Klampfer L, Huang J, Swaby LA, Augenlicht L. (2004) Requirement of histone deacetylase activity for signaling by STAT1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:30358–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Cardozo AK, et al. (2005) Cytokines downregulate the sarcoendoplasmic reticulum pump Ca2+ ATPase 2b and deplete endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+, leading to induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 54:452–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Oyadomari S, et al. (2001) Nitric oxide-induced apoptosis in pancreatic beta cells is mediated by the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:10845–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Eizirik DL, Cardozo AK, Cnop M. (2008) The role for endoplasmic reticulum stress in diabetes mellitus. Endocr. Rev. 29:42–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Eizirik DL, Cnop M. (2010) ER stress in pancreatic beta cells: the thin red line between adaptation and failure. Sci Signal 3:pe7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Weber SM, Chambers KT, Bensch KG, Scarim AL, Corbett JA. (2004) PPARgamma ligands induce ER stress in pancreatic beta-cells: ER stress activation results in attenuation of cytokine signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 287:E1171–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Mokhtari D, et al. (2009) Increased Hsp70 expression attenuates cytokine-induced cell death in islets of Langerhans from Shb knockout mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 387:553–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Johnson CA, White DA, Lavender JS, O’Neill LP, Turner BM. (2002) Human class I histone deacetylase complexes show enhanced catalytic activity in the presence of ATP and co-immuno-precipitate with the ATP-dependent chaperone protein Hsp70. J. Biol. Chem. 277:9590–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Shi Y, Gerritsma D, Bowes AJ, Capretta A, Werstuck GH. (2007) Induction of GRP78 by valproic acid is dependent upon histone deacetylase inhibition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17:4491–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Laybutt DR, et al. (2007) Endoplasmic reticulum stress contributes to beta cell apoptosis in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 50:752–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Akerfeldt MC, et al. (2008) Cytokine-induced beta-cell death is independent of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. Diabetes 57:3034–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Ohoka N, Hattori T, Kitagawa M, Onozaki K, Hayashi H. (2007) Critical and functional regulation of CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein) through the N-terminal portion. J. Biol. Chem. 282:35687–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Huang CJ, et al. (2007) High expression rates of human islet amyloid polypeptide induce endoplasmic reticulum stress mediated beta-cell apoptosis, a characteristic of humans with type 2 but not type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 56:2016–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Grunnet LG, et al. (2009) Proinflammatory cytokines activate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway in beta-cells. Diabetes 58:1807–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Chang I, et al. (2004) Role of calcium in pancreatic islet cell death by IFN-gamma/TNF-alpha. J. Immunol. 172:7008–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    McKenzie MD, et al. (2008) Proapoptotic BH3-only protein Bid is essential for death receptor-induced apoptosis of pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 57:1284–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Allagnat F, et al. (2011) Mcl-1 downregulation by pro-inflammatory cytokines and palmitate is an early event contributing to β-cell apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 18:328–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Gurzov EN, et al. (2010) p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) activation contributes to pancreatic beta-cell apoptosis induced by proinflammatory cytokines and endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Biol. Chem. 285:19910–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Gurzov EN, et al. (2009) Signaling by IL-1beta+IFN-gamma and ER stress converge on DP5/Hrk activation: a novel mechanism for pancreatic beta-cell apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 16:1539–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Rabinovitch A, et al. (1999) Transfection of human pancreatic islets with an anti-apoptotic gene (bcl-2) protects beta-cells from cytokine-induced destruction. Diabetes 48:1223–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Holohan C, Szegezdi E, Ritter T, O’Brien T, Samali A. (2008) Cytokine-induced beta-cell apoptosis is NO-dependent, mitochondria-mediated and inhibited by BCL-XL. J. Cell Mol. Med. 12:591–606.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Chen S, Dai Y, Pei XY, Grant S. (2009) Bim up-regulation by histone deacetylase inhibitors mediates interactions with the Bcl-2 antagonist ABT-737: evidence for distinct roles for Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:6149–69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Ruefli AA, et al. (2001) The histone deacetylase inhibitor and chemotherapeutic agent suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) induces a cell-death pathway characterized by cleavage of Bid and production of reactive oxygen species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:10833–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Sutheesophon K, et al. (2006) Histone deacetylase inhibitor depsipeptide (FK228) induces apoptosis in leukemic cells by facilitating mitochondrial translocation of Bax, which is enhanced by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Acta. Haematol. 115:78–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Cao XX, Mohuiddin I, Ece F, McConkey DJ, Smythe WR. (2001) Histone deacetylase inhibitor downregulation of bcl-xl gene expression leads to apoptotic cell death in mesothelioma. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 25:562–68.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan P Christensen
    • 1
  • Mattias Dahllöf
    • 1
  • Morten Lundh
    • 1
  • Daniel N Rasmussen
    • 1
  • Mette D Nielsen
    • 1
  • Nils Billestrup
    • 2
  • Lars G Grunnet
    • 1
  • Thomas Mandrup-Poulsen
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Medical Research Methodology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, The Panum InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark
  2. 2.Cellular and Metabolic Research, Department of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department for Diabetes InflammationHagedorn Research InstituteGentofteDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstituteStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Institute of Biomedical Sciences, the Panum InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations