Validation of the Glaucoma Filtration Surgical Mouse Model for Antifibrotic Drug Evaluation
Glaucoma Is a progressive optic neuropathy, which, If left untreated, leads to blindness. The most common and most modifiable risk factor in glaucoma is elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), which can be managed surgically by filtration surgery. The postoperative subconjunctival scarring response, however, remains the major obstacle to achieving long-term surgical success. Antiproliferatives such as mitomycin C are commonly used to prevent postoperative scarring. Efficacy of these agents has been tested extensively on monkey and rabbit models of glaucoma filtration surgery. As these models have inherent limitations, we have developed a model of glaucoma filtration surgery in the mouse. We show, for the first time, that the mouse model typically scarred within 14 d, but when augmented with mitomycin C, more animals maintained lower intraocular pressures for a longer period of time concomitant with prolonged bleb survival to beyond 28 d. The morphology of the blebs following mitomycin C treatment also resembled well-documented clinical observations, thus confirming the validity and clinical relevance of this model. We demonstrate that the antiscarring response to mitomycin C is likely to be due to its effects on conjunctival fibroblast proliferation, apoptosis and collagen deposition and the suppression of inflammation. Indeed, we verified some of these properties on mouse conjunctival fibroblasts cultured in vitro. These data support the suitability of this mouse model for studying the wound healing response in glaucoma filtration surgery, and as a potentially useful tool for the in vivo evaluation of antifibrotic therapeutics in the eye.
The most common reason for failure in glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) is scarring and fibrosis. Subconjunctival scarring at the level of the subconjunctival fibroblasts often leads to poorly filtering blebs and a subsequent rise in intraocular pressure (IOP) (1). To prevent scarring, pharmacological approaches, such as the use of antifibrotic agents, have been attempted in experimental and clinical studies. Drugs with proven efficacy in humans include topical corticosteroids, and intraoperatively applied antiproliferatives such as 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) (2, 3, 4, 5). MMC, an antibiotic secreted by Streptomyces caespitosus, acts as an alkylating agent that crosslinks DNA, thereby inhibiting DNA synthesis. MMC also inhibits RNA and protein synthesis and it interacts with molecular oxygen, which in turn generates free radical damage to DNA and protein (6). These nonspecific effects are, however, associated with severe and often blinding complications that include hypotonous maculopathy (7), thin, cystic and leaky blebs that are prone to infections, and bleb-related endophthalmitis (8,9). Furthermore, GFS fails in a substantial number of high-risk eyes despite the use of these antiproliferative agents. As a result, the subject and understanding of the subconjunctival wound healing response is far from complete, and the quest to find a safer alternative and more specific antiscarring agent remains a top priority.
To address this area of research, several animal models, including rat (10,11), rabbit (12, 13, 14, 15) and monkey (16,17), have been developed to study the clinical and histological scarring response after GFS. The rabbit has, by far, been the most popular animal used for such studies owing to both the relatively large ocular structures, allowing ease of surgical manipulation, and cost-effectiveness. However, many aspects of GFS cannot be examined in detail in the rabbit owing to the limited availability of reagents such as antibodies, gene expression arrays, and so on. To date, a successful mouse model for GFS has not been described, although simplified models for the study of subconjunctival wound healing have been reported previously (18,19). A mouse model of GFS would be invaluable for several reasons. First of all, many critical reagents such as antibodies are available for the mouse to study the wound healing response by histology, flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and so on, and in vivo ocular imaging techniques are readily accessible. Understanding the wound healing or fibrotic process is crucial to the discovery of novel antifibrotic therapeutics. Secondly, the mapped and sequenced mouse genome makes possible the manipulation of target genes in the mouse, facilitating the design of overexpression DNA constructs, microRNA or small interfering RNA molecules as potential therapeutics to be validated first in the mouse. Thirdly, many potential therapeutics such as neutralizing antibodies or antagonizing reagents specifically for the mouse are available, allowing proof-of-concept experiments to be performed readily. Fourthly, the GFS response in genetically altered animals such as knockouts or transgenic mice can be easily studied.
We have developed a mouse model of GFS which can be employed to investigate the postoperative subconjunctival scarring response (21). To ascertain that the murine model is relevant to the clinical setting, we applied MMC in the mouse model and examined the postoperative surgical responses. MMC is commonly applied intraoperatively to reduce the postoperative scarring response following filtration surgery in patients. We investigated the effect of intraoperative MMC on bleb survival and morphology by incorporating major imaging techniques used in the clinic, including slit lamp examination, anterior segmentoptical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) as well as in vivo confocal imaging. We also examined the pathohistology of the blebs with and without MMC treatment by polarization microscropy and immunofluorescent analyses. These were further corroborated by in vitro studies using cultured mouse conjunctival fibroblasts. We provide data to show not only the mechanisms whereby MMC may improve surgical success in GFS, but at the same time, the probable reasons for the known side effects attributed to MMC in humans. Most importantly, we demonstrate that our mouse model is suitable, valid and closer to the actual human glaucoma filtration surgery than other hitherto described mouse models of conjunctival wound healing.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Model of Glaucoma Filtration Surgery
C57BL/6 mice were bred and maintained at the Singhealth Experimental Medical Centre (Singapore General Hospital, Singapore). All experiments with animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and treated in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement on the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of a 0.1 mL ketamine/xylazine mixture containing 2 mg/mL xylazine hydrochloride (Troy Laboratories, Smith-field, Australia) and 20 mg/mL ketamine hydrochloride (Ketamine, Parnell Laboratories, Alexandria, Australia) before the operation was carried out. The modified filtering surgery was performed only on the left eye of each mouse as described in the text. MMC (Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co. Ltd, Shizuoko, Japan) was applied at 0.4 mg/mL with a small piece of surgical sponge (MQA, Inami, Tokyo, Japan). Irrigation of the MMC-treated area was performed with 2 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride (B Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) using a syringe. The dissected conjunctiva was secured and closed by an 11-0 (0.1 metric) Ethilon monofilament nylon scleral suture (Ethicon Inc., Somerville, New Jersey, USA). Fucithalmic ointment (Leo Pharmaceutical Products, Ltd, Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire, UK) was instilled at the end of the procedure. MMC treatment was performed on eight eyes, and control (without treatment) was performed on 10 eyes.
Measurement of IOP
The mice were anesthetized as described above before IOP measurements. Intraocular pressures were recorded in both eyes of each animal with a handheld commercial rebound tonometer according to instructions by the manufacturer (TonoLab, Icare, Espoo, Finland). All measurements were taken between 4 and 7 min after anesthetic injection, as suggested by a prior study (20); 5 to 10 measurements of IOP in each eye were taken and the mean value of the IOP of the left operated eye is expressed as a percentage over that of the unoperated right eye of the same animal. An IOP that is < 70% of baseline IOP is used as an indicator of effective filtration and bleb function. Eight animals from each group were subjected to IOP measurements.
Detection and Analysis of Blebs
Careful slit lamp, anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and in vivo confocal microscopic examinations on subconjunctival blebs were performed at postoperative day 2, and weekly thereafter for a total of 4 wks as described previously (21). A bleb was judged to have failed if the surgical site appeared flat by slit lamp analysis. Slit lamp examination was performed by three examiners who were masked to the treatment groups. All animals from each group were subjected to slit lamp and AS-OCT analyses. In vivo confocal microscopy was performed on two animals from each group as described previously (21).
Histology and Immunofluorescent Analyses
Mice were euthanized on day 28 after surgery, and the eyes were enucleated for immediate fixation and processing as described (21). Five-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to visualize tissue morphology. To assess the collagen matrix, picrosirius red staining was performed as described previously (22) and visualized by polarization microscopy (Olympus BX51, Olympus, Center Valley, PA, USA). For immunofluorescent analysis, antibodies specific for collagen (Abcam plc, Cambridge, UK), Ki67 (Abcam plc), CD45 (BD Pharmingen, Lexington, KY, USA), CD11b (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) and α-SMA (Abcam plc) were used. The primary antibodies were visualized using secondary antibodies conjugated to either AlexaFluor-488 or AlexaFluor-594 (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). Sections were visualized using the Zeiss Imager.Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microimaging GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). Histology was performed on three eyes from each group.
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL) Analysis
End labeling of exposed 3’-OH ends of DNA fragments in cryosections and cultured mouse conjunctival fibroblasts was performed with the DeadEnd Fluorometric TUNEL System according to manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Staining of the cell nucleus was achieved by mounting the TUNEL-stained cryosections or fibroblasts in DAPI-containing Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Sections and cells were visualized using the Zeiss Imager.Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc.).
Cell Culture and Treatment with MMC
Conjunctival fibroblasts obtained from C57BL6/J mice were cultured as described previously (21). For treatment with MMC, cells were treated with a single application of 0.4 mg/mL MMC for 1 min. After treatment, cells were washed 3x with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Invitrogen) and maintained in culture medium for 72 h before analyses.
Real-Time Cell Proliferation Analysis
The xCelligence real-time cell analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany) was used to assess cell proliferation according to manufacturer’s instructions. Mouse conjunctival fibroblasts were trypsinized and seeded at 8,000 cells per well in an E-Plate 96 (Roche) in quadruplicates. For cells treated with MMC, drug treatment was performed at 0.4 mg/mL for 1 min on trypsinized cells followed by three washes in PBS before being seeded onto the wells at 8,000 cells/well in normal culture medium. The plated cells were allowed to equilibrate for at least 30 min in the tissue culture incubator before electrode resistance was recorded. Cell growth was monitored continuously for up to 6 d.
RNA Isolation and Expression
Total RNA recovery, first-strand cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed as described previously (21). All PCR reactions were performed in triplicate. All mRNA levels were measured as CT threshold levels and were normalized with the corresponding β-actin CT values. Values were expressed as fold increases over the corresponding values for untreated control by the 2ΔΔCT method. The primers for collagen Iα1 and β-actin were as described previously (21). The presented data is representative of three independent experiments.
All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) where appropriate. Survival analysis was performed for bleb failure using the Kaplan-Meier logrank test. The significance of differences among groups was determined by the one-tailed Student t test using the Microsoft Excel 5.0 software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A Murine Model of Glaucoma Filtration Surgery
MMC Treatment Was More Effective in Lowering IOP
MMC Prolonged Bleb Survival
In vivo confocal microscopy of the control blebs on day 2 revealed the presence of optically clear spaces filled with fluid (Figure 4B, ii) which were absent in the unoperated eye (Figure 4B, i). These spaces may correspond with microcysts which were reported to be numerous in functioning human blebs (24). The subconjunctival connective tissue also appeared to be arranged loosely in the control day 2 bleb (Figure 4B, ii, iii). Likewise, we observed numerous well-defined clear spaces in the blebs of the MMC-treated eyes that are reminiscent of microcysts (Figure 4B, vi, vii). Interestingly, we also observed the presence of hyperreflective microdots in the bleb of the MMC-treated eye (see Figure 4B, vii). On day 28, the subconjunctival space in the flattened bleb area of the control eye was observed as an optically dense, fibrotic connective tissue with no clear spaces (Figure 4B, iv). In contrast, relatively large microcystic spaces remained in the bleb of the MMC-treated eye and these were surrounded by loosely organized connective tissue (Figure 4B, viii). Optically dense fibrotic tissue adjunct to the conjunctival epithelium that is evocative of encapsulation was also observed in the MMC-treated bleb (see Figure 4B, viii).
MMC Reduced Collagen Deposition in the Bleb
To assess the collagen deposition in the control versus MMC treatment, we performed sirius red polarization microscopy on the tissue sections. Indeed, the surgical site in the control eye was densely compacted with thick, well-aligned collagen fibers resembling a scar (Figure 5E, F). Moreover, the control wound site showed a predominance of mature collagen fibers which were orange-red birefringent (see Figure 5F). In contrast, the bleb in the MMC-treated eyes contained few and thin, loosely assembled collagen fibers in an expanded noncollagenous subconjunctival space (Figure 5G, H). The majority of the collagen fibers also were noticeably yellow-green birefringent in the MMC-treated bleb, suggesting the preponderance of immature fibers (see Figure 5H). Thus, the survival of the bleb in the MMC-treated eye is, in part, due to reduced deposition of collagen fibers and deficient maturation of the scar at the wound site.
To further determine differences in the extracellular matrix of the control and MMC-treated conjunctiva, immunofluorescence analysis for collagen expression was carried out. The controloperated conjunctiva exhibited more enhanced staining for collagen I in the subconjunctival space (Figure I) when compared with the MMC-treated counterpart (Figure 5J).
MMC Inhibited Proliferation and Induced Apoptosis in the Mouse Operated Conjunctiva
To determine the induction of apoptosis by MMC, cryosections were subjected to TUNEL staining. The control conjunctiva did not present with any TUNEL-positive cells (Figure 6B, upper panel). In striking contrast, almost all of the cells in the conjunctival epithelium as well as cells in the subconjunctival space and those abutting the episclera were apoptotic in the MMC-treated surgical site (Figure 6B, lower panel, arrowheads). This finding raises concern about tissue recovery, especially of the conjunctival epithelium, since the presence of apoptotic cells here seemed to persist for at least 28 d after surgery and there were no apparent proliferative cells to repair eventual cell loss due to apoptosis.
MMC Suppressed the Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells to the Surgical Site
MMC Inhibited Proliferation, Induced Apoptosis and Inhibited Collagen Iα1 Expression in Cultured Mouse Conjunctival Fibroblasts
We confirm in this study the validity of a model for GFS in the mouse. To our knowledge, the closest known mouse model for GFS is a simple conjunctival scarring model where a fixed volume of saline was injected into the subconjunctival space to create a visible bleb (19). Our model is significantly closer to the surgical procedure, known as a trabeculectomy that is performed on human eyes. The major surgical endpoint of a trabeculectomy is a filtering bleb allowing aqueous humour to flow from the anterior chamber into the subconjunctival space. This endpoint is achieved with our mouse model. The only major difference in the mouse surgical model is that, unlike in trabeculectomy, a partial thickness guarded scleral flap is not created owing to the very thin sclera of the mouse eye, causing this step of the operation to be technically and surgically very challenging. Therefore needle tract sclerostomy, which scarred in 14 days, was performed instead, as described in this study. The intraoperative application of MMC extended the bleb survival period to beyond 28 days, supporting the use of this drug in the clinic to improve surgical success. We also demonstrated that treatment with MMC resulted in a higher frequency of surgical success based on maintenance of an IOP below 70% of baseline. These two MMC-induced effects in our mouse model parallel those observed previously in the rabbit (32) and the monkey (33) models. Furthermore, alterations in the in vivo bleb structure in our model were reminiscent of those observed previously in the clinic (24). Histologic features also mirrored those observed in the clinic with reduced matrix deposition in the MMC eyes compared with the control eyes. Given the close correlation with documented clinical response, our model is ideal not only for studying the healing and fibrotic processes that are activated following surgery, but also for delineating the mode of drug action.
In the present study, we evaluated the effect of MMC on three aspects of conjunctival wound healing in the mouse GFS model: cell proliferation, deposition of collagen and inflammation in the wound bed. As in trabeculectomies (34), the majority of the scarring effects in our mouse model were observed at the level of the episclera and the subconjunctival space.
The profound cytotoxic effect of MMC in the proliferation phases of Tenon’s fibroblasts (35, 36, 37) was demonstrated clearly in our model where the MMC-treated conjunctiva contained no detectable proliferative cells compared with the control wound site, which did contain proliferative cells. Mouse conjunctival fibroblasts cultured in vitro showed the same antiproliferative response to MMC. It has been suggested that MMC prevents the recruitment and activation of conjunctival fibroblasts through the induction of apoptosis in these cells (38). Indeed, the majority of the cells in the MMC-treated conjunctival epithelium, subconjunctival space, as well as the sclera at the wound site, were apoptotic, which was not the case with the control wound site. The apoptotic effect of MMC also was observed in cultured mouse conjunctival fibroblasts. However, not all the cells cultured in vitro were apoptotic, as was also observed in an earlier study on human Tenon fibroblasts (38). Thus, the question arises as to whether activated conjunctival fibroblasts, which cultured cells essentially represent, being devoid of inhibitory compact surroundings, are less sensitive to MMC. This is clinically important because, if MMC causes indiscriminate apoptosis in both activated and inactivated cells, the loss of conjunctival epithelial and fibroblast cells may cause detrimental conjunctival thinning after a single application. Our observation confirms a previous report that MMC effects on rabbit subconjunctival and scleral fibroblast growth was maintained 30 days after GFS (39). This may explain why the use of MMC clinically increases the likelihood that blebs will become thin and cystic, which in turn leads to a lifelong risk of conjunctival breakdown, aqueous humour leakage and bleb-related infections and endophthalmitis (40). Hence, although it has been reported that MMC disappears rapidly from the ocular tissue and that concentration of the agent is reduced significantly by irrigating the tissue copiously immediately after its application (37), the mouse model suggests that long-term effects of MMC in vivo should be investigated in detail.
MMC is also thought to inhibit collagen deposition and disorganization, a major phenomenon in fibrosis, by the induction of apoptosis of conjunctival fi-broblasts (38). While this may definitely play a part in vivo, we showed in this study that MMC treatment may also suppress collagen I expression independent of apoptosis in vitro. We believe that apoptotic cells, which were fairly low in numbers in vitro based on TUNEL staining, could not have been the cause for the significant reduction in collagen I mRNA expression in the presence of MMC. We speculate that MMC may affect collagen I expression via a distinct pathway. Further work is required to address this issue since regulation of collagen production and organization is key to the inhibition of fibrosis in the conjunctiva (21).
The avascular MMC-treated blebs observed in our model suggest that the inflammatory response, which is linked to fibrosis, may be dampened in the MMC-treated eyes. Indeed, we observed fewer persisting inflammatory cells at the operated site after MMC treatment compared with control eyes. We believe this is due in part to the suppression of angiogenesis at the wound site by MMC, which is known to have potent antiangiogenic properties (39). While a microvascular network was apparent around the operated site soon after wounding in the control mouse eye, the MMC-treated blebs were characterized by the lack of vasculature which corresponded with similar observations in the clinic (41). The suppression of angiogenesis is, however, a double-edged sword. On the one hand, inhibiting angiogenesis may limit tissue scarring, but on the other, the lack of a protective inflammatory response stemming from lack of vasculature may contribute to an increased risk of infection at the operated site.
In conclusion, this study has demonstrated that MMC can delay wound healing or fibrosis by mechanisms beyond the inhibition of proliferation. However, the sustained apoptotic effect of MMC on the conjunctival epithelium, subconjunctiva and episclera should be cause for concern particularly with respect to conjunctival breakdown and risk of infection in the long term when used in conjunction with GFS. Finally, the comparable similarities between the clinical effects of MMC and that observed in our mouse model not only highlighted the suitability of this model for studying the surgical response to known therapeutics but also indicated the application of this model as an invaluable platform for an in-depth understanding of the wound healing response per se which will in turn facilitate the discovery and testing of novel antifibrotics.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests as defined by Molecular Medicine, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and discussion reported in this paper.
We thank Hla Myint Htoon (Singapore Eye Research Institute) for help with the statistical analysis and the Department of Pathology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, for help with the polarizing microscopy. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation Council Translational and Clinical Research (TCR) Programme Grant (NMRC/TCR/002-SERI/2008) and a research grant from the National Medical Research Council (NMRC/EDG/0019/2008) to TT Wong.
- 6.Chabner BA, et al. (2006) Antineoplastic Agents. In: Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed. Brunton LL (ed.) McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 1315–403.Google Scholar