Sampling-Dependent Up-regulation of Gene Expression in Sequential Samples of Human Airway Epithelial Cells
As part of a study of in vivo gene expression levels in the human airway epithelium in response to chronic cigarette smoking, we have identified a number of genes whose expression levels are altered in a time-dependent fashion resulting from the procedure used to sample epithelial cells. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and airway epithelium brushing were used to obtain independent samples from a single individual, 1st from the right lung, followed by sampling of the left lung. We observed that a specific subset of early response genes encoding proteins involved in transcription, signal transduction, cell cycle/growth, and apoptosis were significantly up-regulated in the left lung samples (the 2nd region to be sampled) compared with the right lung samples (the 1st region to be sampled). This response was due to the temporal nature of the sampling procedure and not to inherent gene expression differences between airway epithelium of the right and left lungs. When the order of sampling was reversed, with the left airway epithelium sampled 1st, the same subset of genes were up-regulated in the samples obtained from the right airway epithelium. The time-dependent up-regulation of these genes was likely in response to the stress of the procedure and/or the anesthesia used. Sampling-dependent uncertainty of gene expression is likely a general phenomenon relevant to the procedures used for obtaining biological samples, particularly in humans where the sampling procedures are dependent on ensuring comfort and safety.
We thank M Harris for her assistance in the recruitment of volunteers for this study, K Luettich for microarray processing, and N Mohamed for help in preparing this manuscript. These studies were supported, in part, by P01 HL51746 Gene Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis CFF/NIH/NHLBI; Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (Bethesda, MD, USA); Will Rogers Memorial Fund (Los Angeles, CA, USA); and CUMC GCRC: NIH M01RR00047.
- 2.Schulze A, Downward J. (2001) Navigating gene expression using microarrays—a technology review. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E190–5.Google Scholar
- 6.Malkinson AM, Belinsky SA. (2000) Animal models for studying lung cancer and evaluating novel intervention strategies. In: Lung Cancer: Principles and Practice. Pass HI, Mitchell JB, Johnson DH, Turrisi AT, Minna JD (eds.) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 347–63.Google Scholar
- 10.Russi TJ, Crystal RG. (1997) Use of bronchoalveolar lavage and airway brushing to investigate the human lung. In: The Lung: Scientific Foundations. Crystal, RG (ed.) Lippencott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA. pp. 371–82.Google Scholar
- 12.Cassidy DC. https://doi.org/aip.org/history/heisenberg/bibliography/1920-29.htm. 2003. (GENERIC).
- 28.Khachigian LM, Anderson KR, Halnon NJ, Gimbrone MA Jr, Resnick N, Collins T. (1997) Egr-1 is activated in endothelial cells exposed to fluid shear stress and interacts with a novel shear-stress-response element in the PDGF A-chain promoter. Arferioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17:2280–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Shaulian E, Karin M. (2002) AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death. Naf. Cell Biol. 4:E131–6.Google Scholar