Advertisement

Self-reported work conditions in Canada: examining changes between 2002 and 2012

  • Jonathan K. Fan
  • Peter M. Smith
Quantitative Research
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

To examine changes in self-reported work conditions over a 10-year time period in Canada, as measured using two comparable cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2002 and 2012.

Methods

Population-based data were obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Work conditions (psychosocial work conditions, work hours, work demands, job satisfaction) were measured using the same modules across survey cycles. Regression models provided estimates for trends in work conditions, adjusting for differences in socio-demographic and survey administration characteristics over time.

Results

We observed changes in self-reported work conditions across cycles, including higher levels of co-worker/supervisor support and job security; lower levels of psychological demands; and increases in shorter/regular work hours over time. These findings were consistent in both the base and adjusted models. Although skill discretion, decision authority, and job satisfaction improved over time in our base models, these findings were attenuated towards the null in adjusted models. Respondents in 2012 had a greater odds of reporting a physically demanding work environment compared to 2002. Differential time trends were observed by geographic region.

Conclusions

Our study found improvements in some self-reported measures of the psychosocial work environment in Canada over time. These changes were not accounted for by socio-demographic or survey administration differences across survey cycles. Despite these overall trends, absolute levels of some work conditions have not changed. Given the relevance of work conditions as a determinant of health, a continued focus on improving all aspects of the work environment should remain a public health priority to improve the health of working-aged Canadians.

Keywords

Psychosocial work environment Work exposures Canada Trends 

Résumé

Objectifs

Examiner les changements dans les conditions de travail autodéclarées au Canada sur une période de 10 ans, mesurées à l’aide de deux enquêtes transversales comparables menées en 2002 et en 2012.

Méthode

Les données sur la population ont été tirées de l’Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes. Les conditions de travail (environnement psychosocial du travail, heures de travail, exigences du travail, satisfaction professionnelle) ont été mesurées à l’aide des mêmes modules d’un cycle à l’autre de l’enquête. Des modèles de régression ont fourni des estimations des tendances dans les conditions de travail en tenant compte des différences dans les caractéristiques sociodémographiques et les caractéristiques d’administration de l’enquête au fil du temps.

Résultats

Nous avons observé des changements d’un cycle à l’autre dans les conditions de travail autodéclarées, notamment des niveaux plus élevés de soutien des collègues et des superviseurs et de sécurité d’emploi; des niveaux moins élevés des exigences psychologiques; et des heures de travail plus courtes et plus régulières avec le temps. Ces constatations ressortent à la fois dans les modèles de base et les modèles ajustés. Mais bien que l’utilisation des compétences, la latitude décisionnelle et la satisfaction professionnelle s’améliorent au fil du temps dans nos modèles de base, ces constatations sont pratiquement annulées dans les modèles ajustés. Les répondants de 2012 étaient plus susceptibles de déclarer travailler dans un milieu physiquement exigeant que ceux de 2002. Des écarts dans les tendances temporelles sont observés selon la région géographique.

Conclusions

L’étude fait état d’améliorations de certains indicateurs de l’environnement psychosocial du travail au Canada avec le temps selon les déclarations des répondants. Ces changements ne s’expliquent ni par les différences sociodémographiques, ni par les différences dans l’administration de l’enquête d’un cycle à l’autre. Malgré ces tendances générales, les niveaux absolus de certaines conditions de travail restent inchangés. Étant donné la pertinence des conditions de travail comme déterminant de la santé, l’amélioration de tous les aspects de l’environnement du travail devrait donc demeurer une priorité pour la santé publique afin d’améliorer la santé des Canadiennes et des Canadiens en âge de travailler.

Mots-clés

Environnement psychosocial du travail Exposition professionnelle Canada Tendances 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval for the secondary analysis of survey data was obtained from the University of Toronto Health Sciences Ethics Committee. Data were obtained from the record-level microdata files, accessed via Statistics Canada’s Research Data Centre.

References

  1. Bielecky, A., Ibrahim, S., Mustard, C., Brisson, C., Smith, P. (2017). An analysis of measurement invariance in work stress by sex: are we comparing apples to apples? J Artic Support Null Hypothesis;13(2).Google Scholar
  2. Brisson C, Larocque B. Validité des indices de demande psychologique et de latitude décisionnelle utilisés dans l’Enquête nationale sur la santé de la population (ENSP) de 1994–95. Can J Public Heal. 2001;92(6).Google Scholar
  3. Burr, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kristensen, T. S., Tüchsen, F., & Bach, E. (2003). Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990-2000 and their associations with labor-force changes. Scand J Work Environ Health, 29(4), 270–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, Y., Chen, I. S., Burr, H., Chen, C. J., & liang, C. T. (2013). Changes in psychosocial work conditions in Taiwanese employees by gender and age from 2001 to 2010. J Occup Health, 55(5), 323–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dollard, M., Skinner, N., Tuckey, M. R., & Bailey, T. (2007). National surveillance of psychosocial risk factors in the workplace: an international overview. Work Stress, 21(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eurofound. Sixth European working conditions survey—overview report. Luxembourg; 2016.Google Scholar
  7. Health and Safety Executive. Psychosocial working conditions in Britain in 2010. Liverpool, UK; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Houdmont, J., Kerr, R., & Addley, K. (2012). Psychosocial factors and economic recession: the Stormont study. Occup Med (Lond), 62(2), 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jorm, A., Patten, S. B., Brugha, T. S., & Mojtabi, R. (2017). Has increased provision of treatment reduced the prevalence of common mental disorders? Review of the evidence from four countries. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 90–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol, 3(4), 322–355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kivimäki, M., Jokela, M., Nyberg, S. T., Singh-Manoux, A., Fransson, E. I., Alfredsson, L., et al. (2015). Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603 838 individuals. Lancet, 386(10005), 1739–1746.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Malard, L., Chastang, J.-F., Schütte, S., Parent-Thirion, A., Vermeylen, G., & Niedhammer, I. (2013). Changes in psychosocial work exposures among employees between 2005 and 2010 in 30 countries in Europe. J Occup Environ Med, 55(10), 1135–1141.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Malard, L., Chastang, J. F., & Niedhammer, I. (2014). Changes in psychosocial work factors in the French working population between 2006 and 2010. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 88(2), 235–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2015). Informing the future: mental health indicators for Canada. Ottawa. In ON.Google Scholar
  15. Nyberg, S. T., Fransson, E. I., Heikkilä, K., Alfredsson, L., Casini, A., Clays, E., et al. (2013). Job strain and cardiovascular disease risk factors: meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 47,000 men and women. PLoS One, 8(6), 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Patten, S. B., Williams, J. V. A. A., Lavorato, D. H., Wang, J. L., McDonald, K., & Bulloch, A. G. M. M. (2016). Major depression in Canada: what has changed over the past 10 years? Can J Psychiatr, 61(2), 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pearson, C., Janz, T., Ali, J. (2013). Mental and substance use disorders in Canada. Health at a Glance. Ottawa, ON.Google Scholar
  18. Pejtersen, J. H., & Kristensen, T. S. (2009). The development of the psychosocial work environment in Denmark from 1997 to 2005. Scand J Work Environ Health, 35(4), 284–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shannon, H. S., Ibrahim, S. A., Robson, L. S., & Zarinpoush, F. (2006). Changes in job stressors in the Canadian working population. Can J Public Heal, 97(3), 225–229.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, P. M., & LaMontagne, A. D. (2015). What is needed to make research on the psychosocial work environment and health more meaningful? Reflections and missed opportunities in IPD debates. Scand J Work Environ Health, 41(6), 594–596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, P., Frank, J. W., & Mustard, C. A. (2008). The monitoring and surveillance of the psychosocial work environment in Canada: a forgotten determinant of health. Can J Public Heal, 99(6), 475–477.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, P., Morassaei, S., & Mustard, C. (2011). Examining changes in reported work conditions in Quebec, Ontario and Saskatchewan between 1994 and 2003–05. Can J Public Heal, 102(2), 127–132.Google Scholar
  23. Stansfeld, S., & Candy, B. (2006). Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Env Heal, 32(6), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)—mental health microdata user guide. Ottawa, ON; 2013.Google Scholar
  25. The Conference Board of Canada. Healthy brains at work: estimating the impact of workplace mental health benefits and programs. Ottawa, ON; 2016.Google Scholar
  26. Theorell, T., Hammarström, A., Aronsson, G., Träskman Bendz, L., Grape, T., Hogstedt, C., et al. (2015). A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 738.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Torá, I., Martínez, J. M., Benavides, F. G., Leveque, K., & Ronda, E. (2015). Effect of economic recession on psychosocial working conditions by workers’ nationality. Int J Occup Environ Health, 21(4), 328–332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Usalcas, J. (2008). Hours polarization revisited. Perspect Labour Income;9(3):5–15.Google Scholar
  29. Vos, T., Abajobir, A. A., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abate, K. H., Abd-Allah, F., et al. (2017). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet, 390(10100), 1211–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zmitrowicz, K., Khan, M. (2014). Beyond the unemployment rate: assessing Canadian and U.S. labour markets since the Great Recession. Bank Canada Rev (Spring):42–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Work & HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.School of Public Health and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations