Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp e140–e141 | Cite as

Commentary on the new sex and gender editorial policy of the Canadian Journal of Public Health

  • Jacqueline GahaganEmail author
Invited Commentary

Abstract

While the concepts of both “sex” and “gender” are widely recognized as important considerations in health research, the presence of these and other key determinants of health in research findings remains quite variable in the published literature. In an effort to close this knowledge gap in relation to the implications of both sex and gender in the public health research evidence base, the Canadian journal of Public Health (CJPH) has recently adopted an editorial policy requiring authors to ensure that their manuscripts speak to these concepts, where applicable. In keeping with the international trend in sex and gender reporting in health research, the aim of this policy shift is for CJPH to continue to advance excellence in the field of public health research, policy and practice in Canada and internationally.

Key words

Gender research design editorial policies 

Résumé

Les concepts de «sexe» et de «genre» sont largement reconnus comme étant des éléments à considérer dans la recherche en santé, mais leur présence et celle d’autres grands déterminants de la santé dans les résultats de recherche varie encore beaucoup dans les travaux publiés. Afin de combler cette lacune en ce qui a trait aux conséquences du sexe et du genre dans les fondements scientifiques de la recherche en santé publique, la Revue canadienne de santé publique (RCSP) a récemment adopté une politique éditoriale demandant aux auteurs de s’assurer que leurs manuscrits abordent ces concepts, s’il y a lieu. Dans la continuité de la tendance internationale à faire état du sexe et du genre dans la recherche en santé, ce changement de politique vise à ce que la RCSP continue de favoriser l’excellence dans le domaine de la recherche, des politiques et des pratiques en santé publique au Canada et à l’étranger.

Mots clés

conception de la recherche sur le genre politiques éditoriales 

References

  1. 1.
    Gahagan J, Gray K, Whynacht A. Sex and gender matter in health research: Addressing health inequities in health research reporting. Int J Equity Health 2015;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0144-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson J, Beaudet A. Sex and gender reporting in health research: Why Canada should be a leader. Can J Public Health 2013;104(1):e80–81.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eichler M, Lapointe J. On the Treatment of the Sexes in Research. Ottawa, ON: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Sex, gender and health research guide: A tool for CIHR applicants. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2015. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/32019.html (Accessed January 25, 2016).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics. U Chicago Legal Forum 1989;1(article 8):139–67.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hankivsky O, Christoffersen A. Internationality and the determinants of health: A Canadian perspective. Crit Public Health 2008;18(3):271–83. doi: 10.1080/09581590802294296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauer GR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med 2014;110:10–17. PMID: 24704889. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hankivsky O, Springer KW, Bates LM. Response to Johnson and Beaudet’s commentary: Moving beyond sex and gender reporting in health research. Can J Public Health 2015;106(3):e165. PMID: 26125244. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veenstra G. Race, gender, class and sexual orientation: Intersecting axes of inequality and self-rated health in Canada. Int J Equity Health 2011;10:3. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-10-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Promotion Division, Gender and Health Promotion Studies UnitDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations