Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 108, Issue 4, pp 381–387 | Cite as

Comparing “insider” and “outsider” news coverage of the 2014 Ebola outbreak

  • Brittany Humphries
  • Martha RadiceEmail author
  • Sophie Lauzier
Quantitative Research
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Information provided by news media during an infectious disease outbreak can affect the actions taken to safeguard public health. There has been little evaluation of how the content of news published during an outbreak varies by location of the news outlet. This study analyzes coverage of the 2014 Ebola outbreak by one news outlet operating within a country affected by the outbreak and one country not directly affected.

METHODS: A qualitative content analysis was conducted of articles published in two national news outlets, The Globe and Mail (Canada) and the Vanguard (Nigeria), between January 1 and December 31, 2014. Articles available through LexisNexis Academic were sorted by date and sampled using a stratified sampling method (The Globe and Mail n = 100; Vanguard n = 105). A coding scheme was developed and modified to incorporate emerging themes until saturation was achieved.

RESULTS: There were substantial differences in outbreak coverage in terms of the topic and content of the articles, as well as the sources consulted. The Globe and Mail framed the outbreak in terms of national security and national interests, as well as presenting it as an international humanitarian crisis. In contrast, the Vanguard framed the outbreak almost exclusively in terms of public health.

CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight how different geographic contexts can shape reporting on the same event. Further research is required to investigate how the political, social or economic situations of a country shape its news media, potentially influencing actions taken to control disease outbreaks.

Key words

Ebola virus disease qualitative research mass media Canada Nigeria 

Mots Clés

maladie à virus Ebola recherche qualitative médias de masse Canada Nigéria 

Résumé

OBJECTIF : Les informations fournies par les médias lors d’une épidémie peuvent avoir un effet sur les mesures prises pour protéger la santé des populations. Très peu d’études ont analysé le contenu des articles de journaux portant sur des épidémies et la variation de ce contenu selon la région du journal. Cette étude analyse les articles portant sur l’épidémie d’Ebola publiés en 2014 dans deux journaux: un journal provenant d’un pays directement affecté par l’épidémie et un autre provenant d’un pays n’étant pas directement affecté.

MÉTHODES : Nous avons effectué une analyse qualitative du contenu des articles publiés entre le 1er janvier et le 31 décembre 2014 par The Globe and Mail (Canada) et le Vanguard (Nigeria), disponibles sur LexisNexis Academic. Les articles ont été triés par date et échantillonnés en utilisant une méthode d’échantillonnage stratifié (Globe and Mail n = 100; Vanguard n = 105). Le schéma de codage initial et a été modifié en cours d’analyse afin d’intégrer les thèmes émergents jusqu’à l’atteinte de la saturation des thèmes.

RÉSULTATS : Les sujets abordés, le contenu des articles et les sources consultées variaient d’un journal à l’autre. The Globe and Mail a présenté l’épidémie sous l’angle de la sécurité nationale et des intérêts nationaux, ainsi qu’en tant que crise humanitaire internationale. Par contre, le Vanguard a présenté l’épidémie presque exclusivement en termes de santé publique.

CONCLUSION : Nos résultats indiquent que le contexte géographique peut façonner la manière dont sont rapportées les informations sur une épidémie. Les recherches futures pourraient explorer comment la situation politique, sociale ou économique d’un pays influence le contenu des médias, ce qui peut éventuellement orienter les mesures prises pour contrôler une épidémie.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Ebola Virus Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2016. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/ (Accessed August 29, 2016).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hewlett BS, Hewlett, BL. Ebola, Culture and Politics: Anthropology of an Emerging Disease. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning, 2007;192.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa — Case Counts. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014- west-africa/case-counts.html (Accessed August 29, 2016).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alicino C, Bragazzi NL, Faccio V, Amicizia D, Panatto D, Gasparini R, et al. Assessing Ebola-related web search behaviour: Insights and implications from an analytical study of Google trends-based query volumes. Infect Dis Poverty 2015;4:54. doi: 10.1186/s40249-015-0090-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basch C, Basch C, Redlener I. Coverage of the Ebola virus disease epidemic in three widely circulated United States newspapers: Implications for preparedness and prevention. Health Promot Perspect 2014;4(2):247–51. PMID: 25649411. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2014.032.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Towers S, Afzal S, Bernal G, Bliss N, Brown S, Espinoza B, et al. Mass media and the contagion of fear: The case of Ebola in America. PLoS ONE 2015;10(6): e0129179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129179.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagpal SJS, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D. Dissemination of ’misleading’ information on social media during the 2014 Ebola epidemic: An area of concern. Travel Med Infect Dis 2015;13(4): 338–39. PMID: 26013751. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2015.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith S, Smith S. Media coverage of the Ebola virus disease in four widely circulated Nigerian newspapers: Lessons from Nigeria. Health Promot Perspect 2016;6(2):92–5. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2016.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scheufele, DA. Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 1999; 49(1):103–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foucault M. The body of the condemned, Docile bodies, and The means of correct training. In: Rabinow P (Ed.), The Foucault Reader. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith R. Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: Lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Soc Sci Med 2006;63(12):3113–23. PMID: 16978751. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cash RA, Narasimhan V. Impediments to global surveillance of infectious diseases: Consequences of open reporting in a global economy. Bull World Health Organ 2000;78(11):1358–67. PMID: 11143197.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roche JP, Muskavitch MAT. Limited precision in print media communication of West Nile virus risks. Sci Commun 2003;24:353–65. doi: 10.1177/1075547002250300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch E. Free Market Tuberculosis: Managing Epidemics in Post-Soviet Georgia. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2013; 231.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2004;413.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacDonald M, Hoffman-Goetz L. Cancer coverage in newspapers serving large and small communities in Ontario. Can J Public Health 2001;92(5): 372–75. PMID: 11702493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin SP, McDaid LM, Hilton S. Double-standards in reporting of risk and responsibility for sexual health: A qualitative content analysis of negatively toned UK newsprint articles. BMC Public Health 2014;14:792. PMID: 25092156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rachul CM, Ries NM, Caulfield T. Canadian newspaper coverage of the A/H1N1 vaccine program. Can J Public Health 2011;102(3):200–3. PMID: 21714319. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    VANGUARD Media Limited. About Us, 2016. Available at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/about/ (Accessed September 16, 2016).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bradshaw J. Woodbridge acquires full ownership of the Globe and Mail in deal with BCE. The Globe and Mail, August 14, 2015. Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/woodbridge-buys-bces-15-stake-in- the-globe-and-mail/article25973828/ (Accessed September 12, 2016).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bradshaw J. The Globe has Canada’s largest weekly newspaper readership: Cross-platform study. The Globe and Mail, April 14, 2016. Available at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/globe-now-reaches-almost-8- million-readers-study-shows/article29628530/ (Accessed September 16, 2016).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fung IC, Tse ZT, Cheung CN, Miu AS, Fu, KW. Ebola and the social media. Lancet 2014;384(9961):2207. PMID: 25625391. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62418-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klodawsky F, Farrell S, D’Aubry T. Images of homelessness in Ottawa: Implications for local politics. Can Geogr 2002;46(2):126–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00735.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Westbrook L. Qualitative research methods: A review of major stages, data analysis techniques, and quality controls. Libr Inf Sci Res 1994;16(3):241–54. doi: 10.1016/0740-8188(94)90026-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fasina F, Shittu A, Lazarus D, Tomori O, Simonsen L, Viboud C, et al. Transmission dynamics and control of Ebola virus disease outbreak in Nigeria, July to September 2014. Euro Surveill 2014;19(40):20920. PMID: 25323076. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.40.20920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brittany Humphries
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Martha Radice
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sophie Lauzier
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social AnthropologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Pharmacy, Université LavalQuebecCanada
  3. 3.Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research UnitCHU de Quebec—Université Laval Research CentreQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations