, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 818–825 | Cite as

Relationships betweenSpartina alterniflora andLittoraria irrorata in a South Carolina salt marsh



Bottom-up factors such as nutrient availability have long been thought to be the primary regulators of plant growth in salt marshes. However, that paradigm has been challenged by investigations showing that grazing by the periwinkle snailLittoraria irrorata regulatesSpartina alterniflora growth through top-down forces. Our investigation was conducted between November 2003 and March 2007 within the North Inlet Estuary (NIE) salt marsh to examine relationships betweenS. alterniflora andL. irrorata. The primary goal was to determine if observed in situ densities ofL. irrorata significantly decreasedS. alterniflora productivity at the study sites. The results indicate thatS. alterniflora productivity positively correlated withL. irrorata snail density during winter. However, no correlation was observed during summer. Hence, there was no inverse relationship between snail density and primary productivity and no support for the hypothesis of ‘top-down’ control of marsh plant production. A significant relationship betweenS. alterniflora stem density andL. irrorata density was observed during summer and winter, suggesting that stem density may play a key role in determining the distribution of periwinkle snails in NIE. These results challenge the applicability of theL. irrorata-S. alterniflora top-down control model as a generalized phenomenon in southeastern salt marshes.

Key Words

bottom-up detritivore herbivory top-down 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adams, D. A. 1962. Factors influencing vascular plant zonation in North Carolina salt marshes. Ecology 44: 445–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bingham, F. O. 1972. Several aspects of the reproductive biology ofLittorina irrorata (Gastropoda). The Nautilus 86: 8–10.Google Scholar
  3. Dai, T. and R. G. Wiegert. 1996. Estimation of the primary productivity ofSpartina alterniflora using a canopy model. Ecography 19: 410–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fletcher, D., D. Mackenzie, and E. Villouta. 2005. Modelling skewed data with many zeros: a simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 12: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giurgevich, J. R. and E. L. Dunn. 1982. Seasonal patterns of dialy net photosynthesis, transpiration and net primary productivity ofJuncus roemerianus andSpartina alterniflora in a Georgia salt marsh. Oecologia 52: 404–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gustafson, D., J. Kilheffer, and B. Silliman. 2006. Relative effects ofLittoraria irrorata onProkelisia marginata onSpartina alterniflora. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 639–44.Google Scholar
  7. Howes, B. L., J. W. H. Dacey, and D. D. Goehringer. 1986. Factors controlling the growth forms ofSpartina alterniflora: feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen and salinity. Journal of Ecology 74: 881–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Long, M. E. 2006. Quantifying blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) predation on periwinkle (Littoraria irrorata) abundance. M.S. Thesis. University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Mendelssohn, I. A., K. L. McKee, and M. T. Postek. 1982. Sublethal stresses controllingSpartina alterniflora productivity. p. 223–242.In B. Gopal, R. E. Turner, R. G. Wetzel, and D. F. Whigham (eds.) Wetlands: Ecology and Management. International Scientific Publications & National Institute of Ecology, Jaipur, India.Google Scholar
  10. Mendelssohn, I. A. and J. T. Morris. 2000. Eco-physiological controls on the productivity ofSpartina alterniflora Loisel. p. 59–80.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger (eds.) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Mendelssohn, I. A. and E. D. Seneca. 1980. The influence of soil drainage on the growth of salt marsh cordgrassSpartina alterniflora in North Carolina. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 2: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Morris, J. 2000. Effects of sea level anomalies on estuarine processes. p. 107–27.In J. Hobbie (ed.) Estuarine Science: A Synthetic Approach to Research and Practice. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Morris, J., P. V. Sundareshwar, C. T. Nietch, B. Kjerfve, and D. R. Cahoon. 2002. Response of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83: 2869–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris, J. T. and J. W. H. Dacey. 1984. Effects of O2 on ammonium uptake and root respiration bySpartina alterniflora. American Journal of Botany 71: 979–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, J. T. and B. Haskin. 1990. A 5-yr record of aerial primary production and stand characteristics ofSpartina alterniflora. Ecology 71: 2209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Silliman, B. R. and M. D. Bertness. 2002. A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 10500–05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silliman, B. R., J. V. D. Koppel, M. D. Bertness, L. E. Stanton, and I. A. Mendelssohn. 2005. Drought, snails, and large-scale die-off of southern U.S. salt marshes. Science 310: 1803–06.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Silliman, B. R. and S. Y. Newell. 2003. Fungal farming in a snail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 15643–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silliman, B. R. and J. C. Zieman. 2001. Top-down control ofSpartina alterniflora production by periwinkle grazing in a Virginia salt marsh. Ecology 82: 2830–05.Google Scholar
  21. Smalley, A. E. 1958. The role of two invertebrate populations,Littorina irrorata andOrchelimum fidicinium, in the energy flow of a salt marsh ecosystem. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Sullivan, M. J. and F. C. Daiber. 1974. Response in production of cord grass,Spartina alterniflora, to inorganic nitrogen and phosphorous fertilization. Chesapeake Science 15: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Valiela, I. and J. M. Teal. 1974. Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation. p. 547–563.In R. J. Reimold and W. H. Queen (eds.) Ecology of Halophytes. New York Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Sciences Program and Belle W. Baruch InstituteUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biology and Belle W. Baruch InstituteUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations