Wetlands

, 27:399 | Cite as

Enzymatic evaluation of decomposition in mosaic landscapes of a tidal flat ecosystem

  • Mikiya Hiroki
  • Seiichi Nohara
  • Kana Hanabishi
  • Hirokatsu Utagawa
  • Tohru Yabe
  • Kiyoshi Satake
Note

Abstract

Organic matter decomposition is an important ecological function in tidal flat ecosystems, and extracellular hydrolytic enzyme activities can be used as indices of this process. In this study, the spatial and temporal variations of enzyme activities were determined to establish easily measured variables that could be used to assess wetland functions. Seven sampling sites belonging to the hydrogeomorphic subclasses estuary, foreshore, and lagoon were selected in the intertidal zone of the Obitsu River Delta and the Banzu Tidal Flat in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Ten field surveys were conducted between June 2001 and April 2003. In each survey triplicate sediment samples were collected from each sampling site. For each sample, fluoresceindiacetate hydrolysis (FDH), β-glucosidase (GLU), and β-acetylglucosaminidase (AGA) activities were measured. Among the 210 samples, the means and standard deviations were 0.018 ± 0.011 unit g−1 h−1 for FDH, 0.074 ± 0.043 mmol kg−1 h−1 for GLU, and 0.043 ± 0.041 mmol kg−1 h−1 for AGA. According to analysis of variance, sampling time, site location, and their interaction significantly influenced FDH activity. Both the sampling time and sampling location affected GLU and AGA activities, although no significant interaction was found. GLU and AGA activities were higher in the estuary sites than in the foreshore sites and the lagoon site. GLU and AGA activities differed among the estuary sites, although there were no significant differences in GLU and AGA activities among the foreshore beach sites. We recorded significant temporal changes of GLU and AGA activities, and seasonal changes differed across the three years of the study.

Key Words

β-acetylglucosaminidase β-glucosidase hydrogeomorphic approach sediment 

Literature Cited

  1. Ainslie, W. B. 1994. Rapid wetland functional assessment: its role and utility in the regulatory arena. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 77: 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnosti, C. 1995. Measurement of depth and site related differences in polysaccharide hydrolysis rates in marine sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 59: 4247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boschker, H. T. S. and T. E. Cappenberg. 1994. A sensitive method using 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-cellobiose as a substrate to measure (l,4)-β-glucanase activity in sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60: 3592–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical report WRP-DE-4.Google Scholar
  5. Chiba Prefecture. 2002. http://www.pref.chiba.jp/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Environment Agency. 1980. The Report of Marine Environment Survey in the 2nd National Survey on the Natural Environment. Environment Agency, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. Environment Agency and Marine Parks Center of Japan. 1994. The Report of Marine Biotic Environment Survey in the 4th National Survey on the Natural Environment. Vol. 1, Tidal Flats. Nature Conservation Bureau, Environment Agency, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. Hadas, O. and R. Pinkas. 1997. Arylsulfatase and alkaline phosphatase (APase) activity in sediments of Lake Kinneret, Israel. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99: 671–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hiroki, M., T. Yabe, S. Nohara, H. Utagawa, K. Satake, T. Koga, R. Ueno, M. Kawachi, and M. M. Watanabe. 2003a. Evaluation of an organic matter decomposing function from hydrolytic enzyme activities of tidal flat sediments in Japan. Japanese Journal of Limnology 64: 113–20.Google Scholar
  10. Hiroki, M., K. Hanabishi, H. Utagawa, T. Yabe, K. Satake, and S. Nohara. 2003b. Variations in enzyme activities in tidal flat sediments; considerations for evaluating their decomposing function in the ecosystem. Japanese Journal of Limnology 64: 185–93.Google Scholar
  11. Hoppe, H. G., H. C. Giesenhagen, and K. Gocke. 1998. Changing patterns of bacterial substrate decomposition in a eutrophication gradient. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 15: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanazawa, S. and Y. Takai. 1976. Determination method for β-acetylglucosaminidase in soil. Journal of the Science of Soil and Manure, Japan 47: 329–32.Google Scholar
  13. Kang, H. J., C. Freeman, D. Lee, and W. J. Mitsch. 1998a. Enzyme activities in constructed wetlands: implication for water quality amelioration. Hydrobiologia 368: 231–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang, H. J., C. Freeman, and M. A. Lock. 1998b. Trace gas emissions from a north Wales fen: role of hydrochemistry and soil enzyme activity. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 105: 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, G. M. 1986. Characterization of β-glucosidase activity in intertidal marine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 51: 373–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer-Reil, L. A. 1987. Seasonal and spatial distribution of extracellular enzymatic activities and microbial incorporation of dissolved organic substrates in marine sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 1748–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Savil, N., A. Cherqui, D. Tagliapietra, and M. A. Coletti-Previero. 1994. Immobilized enzymatic activity in the Venice lagoon sediment. Water Research 28: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schnurer, J. and T. Rosswall. 1982. Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 43: 1256–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shafer, D. J., B. Herczeg, D. W. Moulton, A. Sipocz, K. Jaynes, L. P. Rozas, C. P. Onuf, and W. Miller. 2002. Regional guidebook for applying the hydrogeomorphic approach to assessing wetland functions of northwest Gulf of Mexico tidal fringe wetlands. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, USA. ERDC/EL TR-02-5.Google Scholar
  20. Shafer, D. J. and D. J. Yozzo. 1998. National guidebook for application of hydrogeomorphic assessment to tidal fringe wetlands. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical report WRP-DE-16.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, R. D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M. M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Technical report WRP-DE-9.Google Scholar
  22. Tabatabai, M. A. 1982. Soil enzymes. p. 903–47. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Van Duyl, F. C., B. D. Winder, A. J. Kop, and U. Wollenzien. 1999. Tidal coupling between carbohydrate concentrations and bacterial activities in diatom-inhabited intertidal mudflats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 191: 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yabe, T., S. Nohara, H. Utagawa, K. Satake, M. Hiroki, R. Ueno, M. Kawachi, K. Kohata, M. M. Watanabe, and T. Koga. 2002. Functional assessment for restoration of intertidal sandy and muddy flat ecosystems. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture 65: 286–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikiya Hiroki
    • 1
  • Seiichi Nohara
    • 1
  • Kana Hanabishi
    • 2
  • Hirokatsu Utagawa
    • 1
  • Tohru Yabe
    • 1
  • Kiyoshi Satake
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukuba IbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Teikyo University School of Science and EngineeringUtsunomiya TochigiJapan

Personalised recommendations