Wetlands

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 744–755 | Cite as

Valuing urban wetlands: A review of non-market valuation studies

Article

Abstract

Wetlands provide a range of valuable ecosystem services from water purification and nutrient retention to recreation and aesthetics. The value of these services is often difficult to quantify and document to policy makers and the general public. Economists have developed non-market approaches to address difficult issues related to valuation of the environment. This paper reviews recent literature on non-market valuation as applied to wetlands, with a particular focus on the value of urban wetlands. Wetland valuation studies have generated a wide range of values, in part due to differences in what is valued and in part due to differences in methodology. Several studies have shown that property owners value proximity to wetlands in urban areas. In addition, studies have found positive values for recreation (fishing and hunting), commercial fishing, water purification, and other ecosystem services provided by wetlands, although little of this work has been done on urban wetlands. Valuation studies can provide useful information about relative rankings of value, showing, for example, that certain types of wetlands or certain services are more highly valued than others. Whether the absolute magnitude of valuation estimates is correct is less clear.

Key Words

wetlands urban wetlands non-market valuation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Acharya, G. 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics 35:63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, G. and E. B. Barbier. 2000. Valuing groundwater recharge through agricultural production in the Hadejia’ Jama’ are wetlands in Northern Nigeria. Agricultural Economics 22:247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acharya, G. and E. B. Barbier. 2002. Using domestic water analysis to value groundwater recharge in the Hadejia’ Jama’ are Floodplain in northern Nigeria. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84:415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. and A. C. Fisher. 1974. Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 88: 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo, C. D., J. A. Herriges, and C. L. Kling. 2000. Ask a hypothetical question, get a valuable answer? Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. Working Paper 000-WP 260.Google Scholar
  6. Azous, A. L. and R. M. Horner. 2000. Wetlands and Urbanization: Implications for the Future. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Barbier, E. B. 2000. Valuing the environment as an input: review of mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecological Economics 35:47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barbier, E. B., M. Acreman, and D. Knowler. 1997. Economic Valuation of Wetlands: a Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  9. Barbier, E. B. and I. Strand. 1998. Valuing mangrove-fishery linkages: a case study of Campeche, Mexico. Environmental and Resource Economics 12:51–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbier, E. B., I. Strand, and S. Sathirathai. 2002. Do open access conditions affect the valuation of an externality? Estimating the welfare effects of mangrove-fishery linkages in Thailand. Environmental and Resource Economics 21:343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Batie, S. S. and J. R. Wilson. 1978. Economic values attributable to Virginia’s coastal wetlands as inputs in oyster production. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 10:111–118.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, M., K. L. Heck, K. W. Able, D. L. Childers, D. B. Eggleston, B. M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C. G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T. J. Minello, R. J. Orth, P. F. Sheridan, and M. P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fishes and invertebrates. BioScience 51:633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell, F. W. 1989. Application of wetland valuation theory to Florida fisheries. Florida Sea Grant Program, Tallahassee, FL, USA. Report No. 95.Google Scholar
  14. Bell, F. W. 1997. The economic value of saltwater marsh supporting marine recreational fishing the Southeastern United States. Ecological Economics 21:243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bin, O. and S. Polasky. 2004. Evidence on the amenity value of wetlands in a rural setting. Department of Economics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Boesch, D. F. and R. E. Turner. 1984. Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7:460–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Booth, D. B. 1991. Urbanization and the natural drainage system— impacts, solutions, and prognoses. Northwest Environmental Journal. 7:93–118.Google Scholar
  18. Breaux, A. M., S. Farber, and J. Day. 1995. Using Natural coastal wetlands systems for wastewater treatment and economic benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 44:285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brinson, M. 1993. Changes in functioning along environmental gradients. Wetlands 13:65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brinson, M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications 6:69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carson, R. T. 2004. Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Central and Southern Florida Project. 1999. Comprehensive Review Study: Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Chichilnisky, G. and G. Heal. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391:629–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooper, J. and J. Loomis. 1991. Economic value of wildlife resources in the San Joaquin Valley: hunting and viewing values. p. 447–463. In A. Dinar and D. Zilberman (eds.) The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  25. Cooper, J. C. 2000. Nonparametric and semi-nonparametric recreational demand analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82:451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dahl, T. E. 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Daily, G. (ed.) 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA and Covelo, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Diamond, P. A. and J. A. Hausman. 1994. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:45–64.Google Scholar
  29. Doss, C. R. and S. J. Taff. 1996. The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21:120–129.Google Scholar
  30. Earnhart, D. 2001. Combining revealed and stated preferences methods to value environmental amenities at residential locations. Land Economics 77:12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellis, G. M. and A. C. Fisher. 1987. Valuing the environment as input. Journal of Environmental Management 25:149–156.Google Scholar
  32. Farber, S. and R. Costanza. 1987. The economic value of wetlands systems. Journal of Environmental Management 24:41–51.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, A. M. 1991. Valuing environmental resources under alternative management regimes. Ecological Economics 3:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman, A. M. 1993. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Gan, C. and E. J. Luzar. 1993. A Conjoint Analysis of Waterfowl Hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25:36–45.Google Scholar
  36. Hammack, J. and G. M. Brown, Jr. 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Resources for the Future/The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA and London, UK.Google Scholar
  37. Hammitt, J. K., J.-T. Liu, and J.-L. Liu. 2001. Contingent valuation of Taiwanese wetlands. Environmental and Development Economics 6:259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hanemann, W. M. 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:19–43.Google Scholar
  39. Heimlich, R. E., K. D. Weibe, R. Claassen, R. Gadsy, and R. M. House. 1998. Wetlands and agriculture: private interests and public benefits. U.S.D.A. Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Hey, D. L. and N. S. Phillippi. 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the upper Mississippi as a case study. Restoration Ecology 3:4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hoehn, J. P., F. Lupi, and M. D. Kaplowitz. 2002. The economic equivalency of drained and restored wetlands in Michigan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84:1355–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnston, R. J., G. Magnusson, M. J. Mazotta, and J. J. Opaluch. 2002. Combining economic and ecological indicators to prioritize salt marsh restoration actions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84:1362–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kazmierczak, R. Jr. 2001. Economic linkages between coastal wetlands and water quality: a review of the value estimates reported in the published literature. Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  44. King, D. 1998. The dollar value of wetlands: trap set, bait taken, don’t swallow. National Wetlands Newsletter 20:7–11.Google Scholar
  45. Knutson, M., J. R. Sauer, D. A. Olsen, M. J. Mossman, L. M. Hemesath, and M. J. Lannoo. 1999. Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conservation Biology 13:1437–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lant, C. L. and R. S. Roberts. 1990. Greenbelts in the cornbelt: riparian wetlands, intrinsic values and market failure. Environment and Planning 22:1375–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lehtinen, R. M., S. M. Galatowitsch, and J. R. Tester. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12.Google Scholar
  48. Lupi, F. Jr., T. Graham-Thomasi, and S. Taff. 1991. A hedonic approach to urban wetland valuation. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. Staff paper P91–8.Google Scholar
  49. Lynne, G. D., P. Conroy, and F. Prochaska. 1981. Economic valuation of marsh areas for marine protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mahan, B. L., S. Polasky, and R. Adams. 2000. Valuing urban wetlands: a property price approach. Land Economics 76:100–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands, second edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  52. Morrison, M., J. Bennett, and R. Blamey. 1999. Valuing improved wetland quality using choice modeling. Water Resources Research 35:2805–2814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mullarkey, D. J. and R. C. Bishop. 1999. Sensitivity to scope: evidence from a CVM study of wetlands. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:1313.Google Scholar
  54. NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Understanding Marine Diversity: a Research Agenda for the Nation. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  55. Odum, H. T. 1996. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Accounting. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  56. Pate, J. and J. Loomis. 1997. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics 20:199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reynolds, J. E. and A. Regalado. 2002. The effects of wetlands and other factors on rural land values. Appraisal Journal 72:182–190.Google Scholar
  58. Sagoff, M. 1988. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  59. Shultz, S. and S. J. Taff. 2004. Implicit prices of wetland easements in areas of production agriculture. Land Economics 80. In press.Google Scholar
  60. Spash, C. L. 2000. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. Ecological Economics 34:195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevens, T. H., S. Benin, and J. S. Larson. 1995. Public attitudes and economic values for wetland preservation in New England. Wetlands 15:226–231.Google Scholar
  62. Stevens, T. H., J. Echeverria, R. J. Glass, T. Hager, and T. A. More. 1991. Measuring the existence value of wildlife: what do CVM estimates really show? Land Economics 67:390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swallow, S. K. 1994. Renewable and non-renewable resource theory applied to coastal agriculture, forest, wetland and fishery linkages. Marine Resource Economics 9:291–310.Google Scholar
  64. van Vuuren, W. and P. Roy. 1993. Private and social returns from wetland preservation versus those from agriculture. Ecological Economics 8:289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vileisis, A. 1997. Discovering the Unknown Landscape: a History of America’s Wetlands. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA and Covelo, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  66. Von Haefen, R. H. and D. J. Phaneuf. 2003. Estimating preferences for outdoor recreation: a comparison of continuous and count data demand system framework. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45:612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Woodward, R. T. and Y.-S. Wui. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 37:257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zedler, J. B. 2000. Progress in wetland restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:402–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Applied EconomicsUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations