Wetlands

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 313–322 | Cite as

Use of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape

Article

Abstract

We examined larval anuran assemblages at 12 temporary wetlands occurring on the MacArthur Agro-Ecology Research center (MAERC) in southcentral Florida. MAERC is an active cattle ranch, and the wetlands on the site are heavily influenced by an extensive series of ditches that drain the landscape. Ditching has resulted in a change from a historically extensive marsh system to a series of isolated wetlands surrounded by upland habitats. Because a majority of anurans in Florida breed exclusively or facultatively in wetlands whose drying regime excludes fish, we were interested in determining the value of these modified wetlands as breeding sites. We examined the effect of wetland size and hydrology on anuran use, and compared breeding activity across three summers that varied greatly in rainfall pattern. We sampled tadpoles from May 93 to August 93 and from May 94 to September 95. A total of 3678 tadpoles from 11 species was collected. Rana utricularia was the most abundant species and the only species found in every wetland Species richness was related positively to wetland size (r=0.65, p=0.023) but not hydroperiod (r=0.03, p=0.93). Tadpole abundance was not related to wetland size (r=0.35, p=0.29) nor hydroperiod (r=0.40, p=0.22). Annual variation in rainfall resulted in significant changes in species composition. A drought during 1993 resulted in no breeding. A high water table in the spring of 1995 resulted in localized flooding in early summer on part of the ranch. Wetlands in these areas were exposed to spillover of water from ditches containing fishes. Wetlands so impacted showed significant changes in species composition from the previous year (x2=1008, p < 0.0001), whereas wetlands that were not impacted did not differ in composition. The wetlands at MAERC provide dynamic habitats that offer varying breeding opportunities that are highly dependent on meteorological conditions.

Key Words

amphibians cattle ranch disturbance ditched wetlands frog hydrology tadpoles temporary wetlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Altig, R. 1970. A key to the tadpoles of the continental United States and Canada. Herpetologica 26:180–207.Google Scholar
  2. Ashton, R. E., Jr. and P. S. Ashton. Handbook of Amphibians and Reptiles. Part Three: the Amphibians. Windward Press, Inc., Miami, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Babbitt, K. J. 1996. Tadpoles and predators: patterns in space and time and the influence of habitat complexity on their interactions. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Caldwell, J. P., J. H. Thorpe, and T. O. Jervey. 1980. Predator-prey relations among larval dragonflies, salamander, and frogs. Oecologia 46:285–289.Google Scholar
  5. Calef, G. W. 1973. Natural mortality of tadpoles in a population of Rana aurora. Ecology 54:741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chick, J. H., F. Jordan, J. P. Smith, and C. C. Mclvor, 1992. A comparison of four enclosure traps and methods used to sample fishes in aquatic macrophytes. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 7: 353–361.Google Scholar
  7. Carr, A. F., Jr. 1940. A contribution to the herpetology of Florida. University of Florida Publication of the Biological Science Series 3:1–118.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, J. H. (1943). The natural features of southern Florida. Florida Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL, USA. Geological Bulletin No. 25.Google Scholar
  9. Duellman, W. E. and A. Shwartz. 1958. Amphibians and reptiles of southern Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 3:181–323.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalrymple, G. H. 1988. The herpetofauna of Long Pine Key. Everglades National Park, in relation to vegetation and hydrology. p. 72–86. In R. C. Szaro, K. E. Severson, and D. R. Patton (eds) Management of amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals in North America. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Fort Collins, CO, USA. General Technical Report RM-166.Google Scholar
  12. Diaz-Paniagua, C. 1990. Temporary ponds as breeding sites of amphibians at a locality in southwestern Spain. Herpetological Journal 1:447–453.Google Scholar
  13. Dodd, K. C., Jr. 1992. Biological diversity of a temporary pond herpetofauna in north Florida sandhills. Biodiversity and Conservation 1:125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodd, K. C. Jr. 1995. The ecology of a sandhills population of the eastern narrow-mouth toad, Gastrophryne carolinensis. during a drought. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History. Biological Science 38:11–41.Google Scholar
  15. Enge, K. E. and W. R. Marion. 1986. Effects of elearculting and site preparation on herpetofauna of a north Florida flatwoods. Forest Ecology and Management 14:177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, B. J., H. S. Greening, and J. D. Oliver. 1984. Comparison of three methods for sampling fishes and macroinvertebrates in a vegetated freshwater wetland. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 2: 603–610.Google Scholar
  17. Heyer, W. R., R. W. McDiarmid, and D. L. Weigmann. 1975. Tadpoles, predation, and pond habitats in the tropics. Biotropica 7: 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopey, M. E. and J. W. Petranka 1994. Restriction of wood frogs to fish-free habitats: how important is adult choice? Copeia 1994: 1023–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kats, L. B., J. W. Petranka, and A. Sih. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larva with fishes. Ecology 69: 1865–1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kushlan, J. A. 1981. Sampling characteristics of enclosure traps. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kutka, F. J. and M. D. Bachmann. 1990. Acid sensitivity and water chemistry correlates of amphibian breeding ponds in northern Wisconsin, USA. Hydrobiologia 208:153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lann, R., and B. Verboom. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54:251–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LaClair, L. V. and R. Franz. 1990. Importance of isolated wetlands in upland landscapes. p. 9–15. In M. Kelly (ed.) Florida Lake Management Society, Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting, Winter Haven, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Ligas, F. J. (1960). The Everglades Bullfrog: Life History and Management. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Meshaka, W. 1997. The herpetofauna of Buck Island Ranch: an altered wetland in south-central Florida. Florida Scientist 60:1–7Google Scholar
  26. Moler, P. E. and R. Franz 1987. Wildlife values of small isolated wetlands in the southeastern Coastal Plain. p. 234–241. In R. R. Odum, K. A. Riddleberger, and J. C. Ozier (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Southest Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Symposium. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  27. O’Neill, L. D. 1995. Amphibian and reptile communities of temporary ponds in a managed pine flatwoods. M.S. Thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, J. W. Gibbons, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pfenning, D. W. 1990. The adaptive significance of an enviromentally-cued developmental switch in an anuran tadpole. Oecologia 85:101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Resetarits, W. J. and H. M. Wilbur. 1991. Calting site choice by Hyla chrysoscelis: effects of predators, competitors, and oviposition sites. Ecology 72:778–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowe, C. L. and W. A. Dunson. 1995. Impacts of hydroperiod on growth and survival of larval amphibians in temporary ponds in central Pennsylvania, USA. Oecologia 102:397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richter, K. O. and A. L. Azous. 1995. Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound basin. Wetlands 5:305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Semlitsch, R. D. 1987. Relationship of pond drying to the reproductive success of the salamander Ambystoma talpoideum. Copeia 1987:61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Skelly, D. K. 1995. A behavioral trade-off and its consequences for the distribution of Pseudacris treefrog larvae. Ecology 76:150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Travis, J. 1981. A key to the tadpoles of North Carolina. Brimleyana 6:119–127.Google Scholar
  36. Vickers, C. R., L. D. Harris, and B. F. Swindel. 1985. Changes in herpetofauna resulting from ditching of cypress ponds in Coastal Plains flatwoods. Forest Ecology and Management 11:17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Werner, E. E. and M. A. McPeek. 1994. Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species along an environmental gradient. Ecology 75:1368–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilbur, H. M. 1984. Complex life cycles and community organization in amphibians. p. 195–224. In P. W. Price, C. N. Slobodchikoff, and W. S. Gaed (eds.) A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Wilbur, H. M. 1987. Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology 68:1437–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodward, B. D. 1983. Predator-prey interactions and breeding-pond use of temporary-pond species in a desert anuran community. Ecology 64:1549–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Wildlife Ecology and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife Ecology and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations