Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 8–17 | Cite as

Genetic diversity of Chile (Capsicum annuum var. annuum L.) landraces from Northern New mexico, Colorado, and Mexico

  • Eric J. Votava
  • Jit B. Baral
  • Paul W. Bosland
Article

Abstract

Four hundred years of chile(Capsicum annuum var.annuum) cultivation, together with concerns about losing genetic resources in their native agrohabitats, provide the pretext for collecting and preserving landraces of this species in New Mexico. The molecular analysis of these accessions provided a powerful means by which their genetic structures were characterized. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) molecular markers were used to compare the relative genetic diversity of native chile landraces to the genetic diversity found in commercially available cultivars in the United States as well as landraces from Mexico.

Key Words

Landraces Capsicum annuum var.annuum RAPD genetic similarity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Andrews, J. 1984. Peppers: The domesticated Capsicums. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  2. Baral, J., andP. W. Bosland. 2002. Genetic diversity of aCapsicum germplasm collection from Nepal as determined by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA markers. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 127:316–324.Google Scholar
  3. Betancourt, J.L., W. S. Shuster, J. B. Mitton, andR. S. Anderson. 1991. Fossil and genetic history of a pinyon pine(Pinus edulis) isolate. Ecology 72: 1685–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosland, P. W., andE. J. Votava. 1997. The chile cultivars of New Mexico State University released from 1913 to 1993. Research Report 719. Agricultural Experiment Station. College of Agriculture and Home Economics. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM.Google Scholar
  5. —, and —. 2000. Peppers: Vegetable and spice capsicums. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  6. Chile Pepper Institute. 2003. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.www. chilepepperinstitute. org. Google Scholar
  7. Cotter, D.J. 1980. A review of studies on chili. Bulletin of New Mexico Agriculture Experiment Station 29(673).Google Scholar
  8. Dudley, J. W. 1994. Comparison of genetic distance estimators using molecular marker data. Analysis of molecular marker data. Pages 3-7 in Joint Plant Breeding Symposia Series. American Society of Horticultural Science and Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar
  9. Ebling, W. 1986. Handbook of Indian foods and fibers of arid America. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  10. Garcia, F. 1921. Improved variety No. 9 of native chile. Bulletin 124. New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts.Google Scholar
  11. Ledig, F.T., M. T. Conkle, B. Bermejo-Velazquez, T. Eguiluz-Piedra, P. D. Hodgkiss, D. R. Johnson, andW. S. Dvorak. 1999. Evidence for an extreme bottleneck in a rare Mexican pinyon: Genetic diversity, disequilibrium, and the mating system inPinus maximartinezii. Evolution 53:91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lesica, P., andF. W. Allendorf. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology 9:753–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lieu, J. 1989. New Mexico chiles singe the competition. New Mexico Resources. College of Agriculture and Home Economics. New Mexico State University 2:16–19.Google Scholar
  14. Long-Solis, J. 1986. Capsicum y cultura. La historia del chilli. Fando de Cultura Economico, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  15. Native Seed/SEARCH. 2003. Seed listing 2003. Tucson, p. 21.Google Scholar
  16. Nei, M., andW. H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 76:5269–5273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paran, I., E. Aftergoot, andC. Shifriss. 1998. Variation inCapsicum annuum revealed by RAPD and AFLP markers. Euphytica 99:167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pickersgill, B. 1997. Genetic resources and breeding ofCapsicum spp. Euphytica 96:129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quist, D., andI. Chapela. 2001. Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414:541–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richter, H. E., N. N. Sandal, K. A. Marker, andC. Sengupta-Gopalan. 1991. Characterization and genomic organization of a highly expressed late nodulin gene subfamily in soybean. Molecular and General Genetics 229:445–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodriguez, J. M., T Berke, L. Engle, andJ. Nienhuls. 1999. Variation among and withinCapsicum species revealed by RAPD markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99:147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rohlf, F. J. 1992. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Setauket, NY.Google Scholar
  23. Simmons, M. 1991. Coronado’s land: Essays on daily life in colonial New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  24. Tanksley, S. D. 1984. High rates of cross-pollination in chile pepper. HortScience 19:580–582.Google Scholar
  25. Votava, E., G. P. Nabhan, andP. W. Bosland. 2002. Genetic diversity and similarity revealed via molecular analysis among and within anin situ population andex situ accessions of chiltepín(Capsicum annuum var.glabriusculum). Conservation Genetics 3:123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. —, andP. W. Bosland. 2002. A cultivar by any other name: Genetic variability in an heirloom bell pepper-Capsicum annuum L.var. annuum‘California Wonder.’ HortScience 37:1100–1102.Google Scholar
  27. —, and —. 2001. Genetic diversity inCapsicum pubescens revealed via RAPD analysis. Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter 20:60–63.Google Scholar
  28. Zedan, H. 1995. Loss of plant diversity: A call for action. Pages 9–14 in L. Guarino, V. Ramanatha Rao, and R. Reid, eds., Collecting plant genetic diversity: Technical guidelines. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  29. Zevin, A. C. 1998. Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104:127–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric J. Votava
    • 1
  • Jit B. Baral
    • 1
  • Paul W. Bosland
    • 1
  1. 1.Agronomy and Horticulture DepartmentNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations