Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic histological analysis of palm fruits VII. The Cyrtostachydinae (Arecaceae)

  • Articles
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fruit specimens representing five taxa of the genusCyrtostachys were examined histologically in order to characterize the pericarp anatomy of the monogeneric subtribe Cyrtostachydinae (tribe Areceae, subfamily Arecoideae), as part of an ongoing survey of the family. The pericarp in this genus can be characterized by a combination of papillate epidermis, heavy layer of tanniniferous/pigmented cells below the epidermis, a system of vascular bundles with thick fibrous sheaths with purely fibrous bundles frequently above and below, absence of brachysclereids, and a very thin sclerified locular epidermis. On the basis of pericarp structure alone, the genus might be most closely related to theGronophyllum alliance of the subtribe Arecinae. This diverges somewhat from the hypothesis of relationship with theAreca group of the Arecinae resulting from two DNA-based phylogenetic studies, and even further from the hypothesis of relationship withIguanura suggested by another DNA-based phylogenetic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Asmussen, C. &M. Chase. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1103–1117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1977. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. I. ThePtychosperma alliance. Syst. Bot. 2: 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. Trends of specialization in the palm pericarp. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 83: 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2002. A systematic histological study of palm fruits VI. Subtribe Linospadicinae (Arecaceae) Brittonia 54: 196–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &N. Hernandez. 2002. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. V. Subtribe Archontophoenicinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 54: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &B. Young. 1979. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. II. The Areca alliance. Syst. Bot. 4: 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,T. Manka &L. Bussard. 1999. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. III. Subtribe Iguanurinae. Brittonia 51: 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,L. Bussard &N. Hernandez. 2001. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. IV. Subtribe Oncospermatinae. Brittonia 53: 466–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, W. J. 2002. A molecular phylogenetic study of the Palmae (Arecaceae) based onatpB,rbcL, and 18SnrDNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 51: 92–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. E. &J. J. Doyle. 2002. A phylogenetic study of tribe Areceae (Arecaceae) using two lowcopy nuclear genes. Pl. Syst. Evol. 236: 1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, N. W. &J. Dransfield. 1987. Genera Palmarum: a classification of palms based on the work of Harold E. Moore, Jr. L. H. Bailey Hortorium and the International Palm Society, Ithaca, NY: Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick B. Essig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Essig, F.B., Litten, L. A systematic histological analysis of palm fruits VII. The Cyrtostachydinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 56, 375–379 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2004)056[0375:ASHAOP]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2004)056[0375:ASHAOP]2.0.CO;2

Key words

Navigation