Skip to main content
Log in

American, European, and Chinese practice guidelines or consensuses of polycystic ovary syndrome: a comparative analysis

关于美国、欧洲和中国的多囊卵巢综合征临床指 南或共识的比较分析

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common metabolic and endocrine disorder in women. However, there is no agreement concerning how to diagnose and treat PCOS worldwide. Three practice guidelines or consensuses, including consensus from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) in Rotterdam, diagnosis criteria and consensus in China, and clinical practice guideline from the Endocrine Society (ES) in the United States are widely recognized. The present paper may provide some guidance for clinical practice based on a comparative analysis of the above three practice guidelines or consensuses.

中文概要

通过比较欧洲人类生殖和胚胎学会和美国生殖医 学协会联合发表的鹿特丹共识、中国的多囊卵巢 综合征诊治标准专家共识和美国内分泌学会的临 床实践指南,分析了不同指南对育龄期、青春期 和围绝经期多囊卵巢综合症诊断标准的差异,概 括了多囊卵巢综合征临床治疗的主要方面,同时 提出了一些诊治方面的新进展及今后需要进一步 关注的问题。在多囊卵巢综合征的诊断上,对育 龄期女性的标准三大指南略有不同,而对青春期 和围绝经期女性的标准尚待完善。多囊卵巢综合 征的治疗主要围绕肥胖、月经失调、高雄激素血症、 胰岛素抵抗、不孕、青春期、心理干预等来进行, 各大指南各有侧重。由于不同种族的多囊卵巢综 合征的临床表现差异较大,需要尽早建立具有种 族特异性的指南来改善诊疗过度或不足的情况。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fan Qu.

Additional information

Project supported by the Zhejiang Province Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. LR16H040001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81401167), the Medical and Health General Project of Zhejiang Province, China (No. 2015KYA122), and the Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Foundation (Nos. 2017ZQ020 and 2017ZA091), China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Ff., Pan, Jx., Wu, Y. et al. American, European, and Chinese practice guidelines or consensuses of polycystic ovary syndrome: a comparative analysis. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 19, 354–363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1700074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1700074

Key words

CLC number

关键词

Navigation