Model predictive control for adaptive cruise control with multi-objectives: comfort, fuel-economy, safety and car-following
For automated vehicles, comfortable driving will improve passengers’ satisfaction. Reducing fuel consumption brings economic profits for car owners, decreases the impact on the environment and increases energy sustainability. In addition to comfort and fuel-economy, automated vehicles also have the basic requirements of safety and car-following. For this purpose, an adaptive cruise control (ACC) algorithm with multi-objectives is proposed based on a model predictive control (MPC) framework. In the proposed ACC algorithm, safety is guaranteed by constraining the inter-distance within a safe range; the requirements of comfort and car-following are considered to be the performance criteria and some optimal reference trajectories are introduced to increase fuel-economy. The performances of the proposed ACC algorithm are simulated and analyzed in five representative traffic scenarios and multiple experiments. The results show that not only are safety and car-following objectives satisfied, but also driving comfort and fuel-economy are improved significantly.
Key wordsAdaptive cruise control (ACC) Multi-objectives Comfort Fuel-economy Model predictive control (MPC)
CLC numberU463 TP273
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bose, A., Ioannou, P., 2001. Analysis of Traffic Flow with Mixed Manual and Intelligent Cruise Control (ICC) Vehicles: Theory and Experiments. California PATH Report, UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-13.Google Scholar
- Crew, H., 2008. The Principles of Mechanics. BiblioBazaar, p.43.Google Scholar
- Hiraoka, T., Kunimatsu, T., Nishihara, O., Kumamoto, H., 2005. Modeling of Driver Following Behavior Based on Minimum-jerk Theory. 12th World Congress on ITS, San Francisco, p.3416–3427.Google Scholar
- Ioannou, P.A., Xu, Z., Eckert, S., Clemons, D., Sieja, T., 1993. Intelligent Cruise Control: Theory and Experiment. Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, p.1885–1890. [doi:10.1109/CDC.1993.325521]Google Scholar
- James, W.J., Neil, D.L., Steve, M., Scott, O., Brain, C.T., 2008. Use of Advanced In-vehicle Technology by Young and Older Early Adopters, Survey Results on Adaptive Cruise Control Systems. Report No. DOT HS 810 917. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
- Naus, G., van den Bleek, R., Ploeg, J., Scheepers, B., van de Molengraft, R., Steinbuch, M., 2008. Explicit MPC Design and Performance Evaluation of an ACC Stop&Go. American Control Conference, p.224–229. [doi:10.1109/ACC.2008.4586495]Google Scholar
- Scora, G., Barth, M., 2006. User’s Guide: Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model (CMEM), Version 3.01. Available from http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/cmem/docs/CMEM_User_Guide_v3.01d.pdf [Accessed on June 20, 2009]