Embedding ensemble tracking in a stochastic framework for robust object tracking
- 58 Downloads
We propose an algorithm of embedding ensemble tracking in a stochastic framework to achieve robust tracking performance under partial occlusion, illumination changes, and abrupt motion. It operates on likelihood images generated by the ensemble method, and combines mean shift and particle filtering in a principled way, where a better proposal distribution is designed by first propagating particles via a motion model, and then running mean shift to move towards their local peaks in the likelihood image. An observation model in the particle filter incorporates global and local information within a region, and an adaptive motion model is adopted to depict the evolution of the object state. The algorithm needs fewer particles to manage the tracking task compared with the general particle filter, and recaptures the object quickly after occlusion occurs. Experiments on two image sequences demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed algorithm.
Key wordsEnsemble tracking Particle filter Mean shift Likelihood mean
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bradski, G.R., 1998. Real Time Face and Object Tracking as a Component of a Perceptual User Interface. Proc. 4th IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, p.214–219.Google Scholar
- Dalai, N., Triggs, B., 2005. Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection. Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1:886–893. [doi:10.1109/CVPR.2005.177]Google Scholar
- Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E., 1996. Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, p.148–156.Google Scholar
- Isard, M., Blake, A., 1998b. ICONDENSATION: Unifying Low-level and High-level Tracking in a Stochastic Framework. Proc. 5th European Conf. on Computer Vision, 1406:893–908.Google Scholar
- Maggio, E., Cavallaro, A., 2005. Hybrid Particle Filter and Mean Shift Tracker with Adaptive Transition Model. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2:221–224.Google Scholar