On the vein-stiffening membrane structure of a dragonfly hind wing
- 166 Downloads
Aiming at exploring the excellent structural performance of the vein-stiffening membrane structure of dragonfly hind wings, we analyzed two planar computational models and three 3D computational models with cambered corrugation based on the finite element method. It is shown that the vein size in different zones is proportional to the magnitude of the vein internal force when the wing structure is subjected to uniform out-of-plane transverse loading. The membrane contributes little to the flexural stiffness of the planar wing models, while exerting an immense impact upon the stiffness of the 3D wing models with cambered corrugation. If a lumped mass of 10% of the wing is fixed on the leading edge close to the wing tip, the wing fundamental frequency decreases by 10.7%∼13.2%; if a lumped mass is connected to the wing via multiple springs, the wing fundamental frequency decreases by 16.0%∼18.0%. Such decrease in fundamental frequency explains the special function of the wing pterostigma in alleviating the wing quivering effect. These particular features of dragonfly wings can be mimicked in the design of new-style reticulately stiffening thin-walled roof systems and flapping wings in novel intelligent aerial vehicles.
Key wordsDragonfly wing Venation pattern Wing membrane Pterostigma Bionics Quivering effect
CLC numberTH113 TH161
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dudley, R., 2000. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Ellington, C.P., 1999. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202(23):3439–3448.Google Scholar
- Li, Z.X., Zheng, Y., 2005. Studies on the Flexible Wings of an Intelligent Aerocraft. In: Zhang, G.T., Xing, Q.H. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 1st Annual Academic Conference of Chinese Society of Astronautics. Astronautic Publishing House, Beihai, China, p.730–733 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Okamoto, M., Yasuda, K., Azuma, A., 1996. Aerodynamic characteristics of the wings and body of a dragonfly. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199(2):281–294.Google Scholar
- Schlaich, J., Bergermann, R., Sobek, W., 1994. Air-inflated roof over the Roman amphitheatre at Nimes. Structural Engineering Review, 6(3–4):203–214.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, J., 1955. Principles of Helicopter Engineering. Temple Press, London, p.365.Google Scholar
- Shen, W., 2006. Studies on New-style Reticulately Stiffening Thin-walled Cantilever by Bionic Modeling of Dragonfly Wings. MS Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, p.53–76 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Somervill, B.A., 2005. The History of the Airplane. The Child’s World Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Zhang, G., 2007. Studies on New-style Spatial Cantilever Structures by Bionic Modeling of Dragonfly Wings. MS Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, p.63–69 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Zhang, Q.L., Zhang, L., 2000. Three kinds of shape finding problems and their solutions for membrane structures. Journal of Building Structures, 21(5):33–40 (in Chinese).Google Scholar