Mesoscopic analysis of the utilization of hardening model for a description of softening behavior based on disturbed state concept theory
- 44 Downloads
Mesoscopic characteristics of a clayey soil specimen subjected to macroscopic loading are examined using a medical-use computerized tomography (CT) instrument. Disturbed state concept (DSC) theory is based on the utilization of the hardening model. DSC indirectly describes material behavior by claiming that the actual response of the material is expressed in terms of the relative intact (RI) response and the fully adjusted (FA) response. The occurrence of mesoscopic structural changes of material has similarities with the occurrence of a macroscopic response of the material under loadings. In general, the relative changing value of a softening material is three to five times more than that of a hardening material. Whether special zones exist or not in a specimen cross section does not affect the following conclusion: hardening material and softening material show mechanical differences with CT statistical indices values prominently changing, and the change is related to the superposing of a disturbance factor. A new disturbance factor evolution function is proposed. Thus, mesoscopic statistical indices are introduced to describe macroscopic behavior through the new evolution function. An application of the new evolution function proves the effectiveness of the amalgamation of a macroscopic and a mesoscopic experimental phenomenon measurement methods.
Key wordsConstitutive model Disturbed state concept (DSC) Computerized tomography (CT) Softening
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Desai, C.S., 2001. Mechanics of Materials and Interfaces—Disturbed State Concept. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Desai, C.S., Sharma, K.G., Wathugala, G.W., Rigby, D.B., 1991. Implementation of hierarchical single surface δ 0 and δ 1 model in finite element procedure. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 15(9):649–680. [doi:10.1002/nag.1610150904]CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Erkens, S., 2002. Asphalt Concrete Response. Delft University Press, Netherlands, p. 70–79.Google Scholar
- Michael, S.K., 2001. A Novel Approach to Predict Current Stress-strain Response of Cement Based Materials in Infrastructure. Ph.D. Thesis, the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, p.44–53.Google Scholar
- Sun, H., 2002. Damage Development Experimental and Theoretical Meso-scopic-macro-scopic Analysis of Shanghai Clay. Postdoctoral Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, p.23–35 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Wang, D.L., Ge, X.R., 2004. Discussion of some problems about HISS model. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 25(7):1059–1062 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Wang, G.X., Xiao, S.F., Huang, H.W., Wu, C.Y., 2004. Study of constitutive model of structural clay based on the disturbed state concept. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 25(2):191–197 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y.J., Wang, C.M., Wang, F., Zeng, H.B., 2005. Stress-strain relationship and analysis of compressive deformation of cohesive soil based on DSC. Global Geology, 24(2):200–202 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- Zhou, C., Shen, Z.J., Chen, S.S., Chen, T.L., 2004. A hypoplasticity disturbed state model for structured soils. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 26(4):435–439 (in Chinese).Google Scholar