Mapping of quantitative trait loci using the skew-normal distribution
- 36 Downloads
In standard interval mapping (IM) of quantitative trait loci (QTL), the QTL effect is described by a normal mixture model. When this assumption of normality is violated, the most commonly adopted strategy is to use the previous model after data transformation. However, an appropriate transformation may not exist or may be difficult to find. Also this approach can raise interpretation issues. An interesting alternative is to consider a skew-normal mixture model in standard IM, and the resulting method is here denoted as skew-normal IM. This flexible model that includes the usual symmetric normal distribution as a special case is important, allowing continuous variation from normality to non-normality. In this paper we briefly introduce the main peculiarities of the skew-normal distribution. The maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of the skew-normal distribution are obtained by the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. The proposed model is illustrated with real data from an intercross experiment that shows a significant departure from the normality assumption. The performance of the skew-normal IM is assessed via stochastic simulation. The results indicate that the skew-normal IM has higher power for QTL detection and better precision of QTL location as compared to standard IM and nonparametric IM.
Key wordsInterval mapping (IM) Quantitative trait loci (QTL) Skew-normal distribution Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm
CLC numberQ78 TP31
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Azzalini, A., 1985. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 12(2): 171–178.Google Scholar
- Azzalini, A., 1986. Further results on a class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Statistica, 46(2):199–208.Google Scholar
- Dalla Valle, A., 2004. The Skew-Normal Distribution. In: Genton, M.G. (Ed.), Skew-Elliptical Distributions and Their Applications: A Journey Beyond Normality. Chapman & Hall CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
- Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B., 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1–38.Google Scholar
- Draper, N.R., Smith, H., 1998. Applied Regression Analysis, 3th Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
- Henze, N., 1986. A probabilistic representation of the skew-normal distribution. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 13(4):271–275.Google Scholar
- Lynch, M., Walsh, B., 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
- Morton, N.E., 1984. Trials of Segregation Analysis by Deterministic and Macro Simulation. In: Chakravarti, A. (Ed.), Human Population Genetics: The Pittsburgh Symposium. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p.83–107.Google Scholar
- Rodo, J., Gonçalves, L.A., Demengeot, J., Coutinho, A., Penha-Gonçalves, C., 2006. MHC class II molecules control murine B cell responsiveness to lipopolysaccharide stimulation. The Journal of Immunology, 77(7):4620–4626.Google Scholar